|
|
Lalalaland34483 Posts
Apparently the mega had a heavy neut, faction long point and mwd.
Trolololo
|
United States41962 Posts
T2 missiles have lost all penalties.
|
As awesome as that is, I am going to now need more cargo space in my drake if I actually am going to want to carry around different variants of precision in addition to everything else...zzz.
|
The winter expansion is lookin sexy if CCP goes through with it.
|
I haven't played eve in a while I'm a bit confused as to what Tier 3 refers to IE for the Gallente the Talos and the Proteus, I'm a bit confused or does it just require BC 3 to fly?
|
On October 26 2011 06:08 Dacendoran wrote: I haven't played eve in a while I'm a bit confused as to what Tier 3 refers to IE for the Gallente the Talos and the Proteus, I'm a bit confused or does it just require BC 3 to fly?
You're right on. Tier 3 just needs BC3 and racial cruiser to fly. Tech 3 refers to wormhole tech, right now just the strategic cruisers. Terrible naming convention...
|
are the costs going to be in like with Faction BS? Or like the cost of 2 drakes or so? If it's the latter it seems a bit overpowered
|
Russian Federation3631 Posts
On October 26 2011 03:17 JJoNeEightY wrote: Did you guys really fly 2 drakes and a billion isk loki into a maelstrom and all die?
Nice. I'm not sure two nanodrakes and a zero-damage mod covops configured loki could have gotten enough damage to break a properly fit brick mael, even if the loki went into brawling range.
|
Lalalaland34483 Posts
On October 26 2011 06:21 419 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2011 03:17 JJoNeEightY wrote: Did you guys really fly 2 drakes and a billion isk loki into a maelstrom and all die?
Nice. I'm not sure two nanodrakes and a zero-damage mod covops configured loki could have gotten enough damage to break a properly fit brick mael, even if the loki went into brawling range. It did go into brawling range yo.
|
On October 26 2011 06:18 Dacendoran wrote: are the costs going to be in like with Faction BS? Or like the cost of 2 drakes or so? If it's the latter it seems a bit overpowered
When the initial explosion settles expect it to cost about 50% more than a drake. Before mods of course
|
Russian Federation3631 Posts
On October 26 2011 06:24 Firebolt145 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2011 06:21 419 wrote:On October 26 2011 03:17 JJoNeEightY wrote: Did you guys really fly 2 drakes and a billion isk loki into a maelstrom and all die?
Nice. I'm not sure two nanodrakes and a zero-damage mod covops configured loki could have gotten enough damage to break a properly fit brick mael, even if the loki went into brawling range. It did go into brawling range yo. I can't be surprised at the outcome then.
|
How do you guys project these are going to be for PvE purposes O.O?
|
On October 26 2011 06:34 Dacendoran wrote: How do you guys project these are going to be for PvE purposes O.O?
Useless. They have no advantage over a battleship for PvE.
maybe the caldari one will be useful in missions, with bonused torps.
|
On October 26 2011 04:45 Body_Shield wrote:
With that pastebin data, the Oracle has 3 mids. Not very promising for nano fleet use. Unless you just want to fit an LSE/Invuln/MWD and forget about the point because LOL GLASS CANNON.
Am sad.
Zealot 3 mid slots problem?
|
On October 26 2011 06:49 Johnny Business wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2011 04:45 Body_Shield wrote:
With that pastebin data, the Oracle has 3 mids. Not very promising for nano fleet use. Unless you just want to fit an LSE/Invuln/MWD and forget about the point because LOL GLASS CANNON.
Am sad. Zealot 3 mid slots problem? Kwark has solved that by not fitting a point, which allows him to rage at people for not pointing something, which we all know is a favorite pastime of his.
|
On October 26 2011 06:59 Mandini wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2011 06:49 Johnny Business wrote:On October 26 2011 04:45 Body_Shield wrote:
With that pastebin data, the Oracle has 3 mids. Not very promising for nano fleet use. Unless you just want to fit an LSE/Invuln/MWD and forget about the point because LOL GLASS CANNON.
Am sad. Zealot 3 mid slots problem? Kwark has solved that by not fitting a point, which allows him to rage at people for not pointing something, which we all know is a favorite pastime of his.
I heard double small shield extenders on a zealot is highly advocated and secret technology. Can I get a confirm/deny?
|
Hyrule18969 Posts
On October 26 2011 05:08 Firebolt145 wrote:Apparently the mega had a heavy neut, faction long point and mwd. Trolololo Maelstrom, and if we go by his losses he's got 2 heavy neuts and MWD.
|
Hyrule18969 Posts
On October 26 2011 06:24 Firebolt145 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 26 2011 06:21 419 wrote:On October 26 2011 03:17 JJoNeEightY wrote: Did you guys really fly 2 drakes and a billion isk loki into a maelstrom and all die?
Nice. I'm not sure two nanodrakes and a zero-damage mod covops configured loki could have gotten enough damage to break a properly fit brick mael, even if the loki went into brawling range. It did go into brawling range yo. Once again you prove you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. I had kept out at 26k (although apparently i ended up in neut range). Gate guns did all the work. Azro and Happyft are just terrible and tried to brawl the Mael and OH YEAH FORGOT TO MENTION THE NEUTS.
|
lol not sure how i feel about that fit tofu
|
Hyrule18969 Posts
ffs i know the fit is stupid
|
|
|
|