|
|
What's with all the girl blogs on TL?
|
Russian Federation3631 Posts
On October 07 2013 18:44 Omigawa wrote:What's with all the girl blogs on TL?
that's one serious trainwreck
|
I miss Mani/Chill coming into girl blogs and destroying people... Def basically said what Mani would have said but nobody would talk shit/blatantly ignore an admin, unlike they can do with Def
*sigh*
edit: been lurking for ~3 years, the more things change the more they stay the same I guess
|
Girlblogs are unfortunatly not a thing in sweden so I do not really know how to write one. Or else I would just flood tl blogs with the most ridicilous girlblogs guaranteed not fake.
RHML lyfe
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=284479
edit:
Any bonuses to damage projection or application will NOT be applied (such as Raven missile velocity or Typhoon explosion velocity).
NVM DISREGARD WORST MODULES
|
Please keep in mind that they are still in an early development state in some ways. They still have yet to receive their new icon, there's definitely still some bugs with the firing animation and the stats themselves haven't undergone as much review as some other balance features.
there is still hope
|
http://i.imgur.com/ypyNpOW.png left linked, right unlinked by a skirmish loki. Target is standard 2x lse, 3x shield rig mwd caracal. Phoons are shooting cn mjolnirs and cerb is shooting scourge fury
|
On October 07 2013 03:14 DefMatrixUltra wrote:
A woman adds you to Facebook. That is a thing that happens on Facebook occasionally because people add "Friends" i.e. people they know. That is the design of Facebook. I know this and do not have a Facebook account.
A woman adds you to Facebook. You assume, for no real reason, she is interested romantically. If she was interested romantically, she would meet up with you the first time you ask. What's happening here is you are bombarding someone with requests to meet up, and they don't know how to let you down. They may have even just added you because Facebook has algorithms that can work out the possible relationship networks of people and make suggestions.
It bears repeating that if she was romantically interested, you don't have to ask more than once. This seems to be the crucial piece of information you skip over. All that "pain" and "torture" you endured was brought on entirely by yourself. Your advice to other people to go with someone who responds to you vs. those who don't respond to you is sound, but the situation is still warped heavily in your mind. The reason you go with people who respond to you vs. those who don't is not to be like "LOL DAT TRAIN DUN LEFT" - it's because people who don't respond to you are not interested. She has no responsibility in all this.
Based on the responses I've seen from you so far (very hostile), I can tell you're not good with criticism. So I'll just give it to you as straight and short as it comes. This is a sad, pathetic, and somewhat scary blog. Try to consider this situation from her point of view.
+ Show Spoiler [His Reply] +Okay i am getting sick of this fucking type of reply. The thing is I have known her for three fucking years. That is the main issue. If I did not know her for that long, I would agree with you. The thing is that with the situation that presented itself and the circumstances involved it was worse than usually it would be. If a random fucking chick added me to facebook, I wouldn't think twice about it. Even in the beginning i didn't think she was interested necessarily which is why i wanted to meet up. The background information is only background information. It gives you a picture of how the situation started and not necessarily reasons into it being started.
okay circumstances: 1. She wanted to stay single. 2. She was scared that I would either get with her or of turning me down. 3. I never assumed shit about her liking me. 4. I texted her for two months. It isn't like I made my advance "subtle" and it isn't like im some dumbass who cries when a girl says shes not interested in me. 5. Leading can be a few things, she accepts advances in some form or another which she did, but even than I wouldn't label it as just "leading on". 6. In the situation I was in which was there were cool as fuck chicks who are not sluts,whores,bitches, or anything like that. Each of them are high quality chicks. That is why it was torture. Eventually, one of these high quality chicks got me. 7. She never said she didn't want to hang out and only made an excuse of she wasn't free. After two months of that you do get annoyed and pissed off. Thus i vented a bit in MY BLOG on teamliquid, yeah white knights making me more frustrated and angry. Fuck you guys.
Now I have to have a conversation about how if she didn't want to hang out, all she had to do was tell me instead of giving me false hope.
STOP white knighting my fucking blog up. It is not needed and really unnecessary. I made this thread for two reasons 1. to vent a bit since it made me annoyed and pissed. Second, to tell guys to go for the girls that give you the time of day. That is it i am tired of this shit and please keep the white knighting off of my fucking blogs it is unneeded. instead im more pissed cause you fuckers have never had this happen to you apparently and literally you have no idea what you are talking about. Scary the hell you talking about? I am not stalking her at all. I have no intention of hurting her in anyway shape or form. This is literally me telling you that it was torture to me, which it fucking was. Torture is fucking subjective since you have no clue what the other person experienced.
Background information is like a setting almost.
The title, was more for interest sake than it actually being that way. So do not read into the title all that much.
Oh god, his response is worse than the original blog post, he’s hit every point here, self-delusion, lack of capital letters and general syntax in many locations, and even actually saying “stop white knighting”, I’ve never actually seen this in the wild. It’s beautiful.
Excellent work Def, just fantastic
+ Show Spoiler +
|
Johnny, use precision cruise with 2 rigors and a bit or crash, you should be gettig way better numbers than CN. CN is for BC and up m8.
|
precision totally destroys the range though and then the cerb is still better and a cruise phoon with that is also better them rhmls so why fit rhmls. rhml precision range is like ham range on some ships but less dps.
|
Lalalaland34491 Posts
|
|
|
Rofl Def, that definitely made my morning.. his response is priceless... Thank god I haven't made a TL girlblog.. maybe its time!
|
|
|
Lalalaland34491 Posts
Wow, is that limited to just inties, or can heavy interdictors etc also use that?
|
|
|
Lalalaland34491 Posts
Is it just me or does that fuck over small roaming ganks running away from big angry beehives
|
well you gotta make sure their entire fleet isnt in warp range because a ceptor + a prober will catch a kiteing oracle.
Or just bring defensive bubbles
|
On October 07 2013 18:44 Omigawa wrote:What's with all the girl blogs on TL?
Girl blogs are the EVE of TL blogs. Fools openly reveal their shortcomings and incompetence. When the criticism and backlash starts to fly, they counter by trying to argue that they are the wise ones. If only these people had space money to be stolen.
|
Cerberus and Ishtars m8, Cerberus and Ishtar. Training for Rapid light missiles and Sentries was the right decision, god bless Michael Harari for teaching me about caracals and sentrys back when I was a scrub.
|
thats amazing. imagine how much faster doing factionwarfare missions would be with that.
Shuttle getting no bonus?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i692.photobucket.com/albums/vv286/Body_Shield/New%20Album%202/New%20Album%202007/QMwX24n_zps7c22df24.gif)
![[image loading]](http://i692.photobucket.com/albums/vv286/Body_Shield/New%20Album%202/New%20Album%202007/x2obkfS_zpsdc62b0f5.gif)
