EPTImagine you gave away a unique BPO to an in-game corporation. The corporation then used the profits from owning that BPO to enrich its players. Would that be OK?
EVE Corporation - Page 1673
| Forum Index > General Games |
Antoine
United States7481 Posts
Imagine you gave away a unique BPO to an in-game corporation. The corporation then used the profits from owning that BPO to enrich its players. Would that be OK? | ||
KwarK
United States44288 Posts
| ||
|
Jones Hawkwood
Belgium54 Posts
| ||
|
Antoine
United States7481 Posts
| ||
|
Jones Hawkwood
Belgium54 Posts
My first response was: 'don't react, you'll regret it. But if you do want to buy something just order BPCs to invent'. CAN I PUT ON MY SMUG FACE NOW? | ||
|
Skilledblob
Germany3392 Posts
| ||
|
Cheesedawg
United States182 Posts
| ||
|
ain
Germany786 Posts
1) I don't think letting a third party profit from this is a good decision. 2) Somer Blink is pretty sketchy to begin with, regardless of how trustworthy theyve been with isk. edit: and of course I missed the stream D: | ||
|
Body_Shield
Canada3373 Posts
Control Your Destiny Guerilla-style Warfare Support - Tactics to chip away at the behemoths have surfaced, allowing small fleets of mercenaries, saboteurs and troublemakers to become cause for concern for even the most reinforced of alliance strongholds. Yeah this won't be either massively broken or just completely useless at all | ||
|
Galdo
United States338 Posts
On September 27 2013 07:25 Body_Shield wrote: Yeah this won't be either massively broken or just completely useless at all Since when was anything in eve not either completely useless or horrendously broken? | ||
|
Impervious
Canada4222 Posts
On September 27 2013 07:49 Galdo wrote: Since when was anything in Brood War not either completely useless or horrendously broken? I feel like I've had this conversation when relating to another game..... Hmmm..... But which one? | ||
|
DefMatrixUltra
Canada1992 Posts
On September 27 2013 07:23 ain wrote: I'm on Antoine's side here. I only took minor offense on the reuse of the golden Magnate and fed Vexor, but 1) I don't think letting a third party profit from this is a good decision. 2) Somer Blink is pretty sketchy to begin with, regardless of how trustworthy theyve been with isk. edit: and of course I missed the stream D: CCP has a long history of extremely questionable and/or head-scratching decisions. If they stopped now, it would be weird. Hiring Michael Bolton III. Antagonizing Garmon. Makes me laugh through my tears. | ||
|
419
Russian Federation3631 Posts
| ||
|
DefMatrixUltra
Canada1992 Posts
| ||
|
Body_Shield
Canada3373 Posts
On September 27 2013 09:21 DefMatrixUltra wrote: If you don't think it's fair, just ask Ueber. It's fair as fuck. Extra fair specifically to Ueber | ||
|
Cheesedawg
United States182 Posts
| ||
|
KwarK
United States44288 Posts
On September 27 2013 11:09 Cheesedawg wrote: Isn't there some rule were no matter how much ccp wants to help the little guy or something, it always is horribly abused by the larger/wealthier? No matter how much CCP tries to help people who refuse help they always end up helping the people who accept help. If you're still poor in eve now it's because you choose to be. | ||
|
Viceorvirtue
United States273 Posts
| ||
|
DiracMonopole
United States1555 Posts
| ||
|
Body_Shield
Canada3373 Posts
On September 27 2013 11:16 Viceorvirtue wrote: No, it's "Anything designed to help the newer player will always help the older players more" in terms of game mechanics. There are a number of ways to screw over large groups, esp sov holding entities such as forcing them to actually rat/mine in systems they own to maintain control in addition to sov bills. Doubt ccp would ever implement anything like that though. On September 27 2013 11:16 Viceorvirtue wrote: Doubt ccp would ever implement anything like that though. Shhh Vov, shh, no more talking only dreams | ||
| ||
