| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Omigawa
United States1556 Posts
On March 31 2013 09:24 sashkata wrote: Isn't the current WW team the ex Anexis team? Yeah, WW was Anexis as short as a month ago I believe. Current Anexis used to be mouz.uk. They played CS:S during the CGS for Birmingham Salvo (a.k.a. Dignitas). | ||
|
Gogo1
Norway43 Posts
On March 31 2013 09:34 Omigawa wrote: Yeah, WW was Anexis as short as a month ago I believe. Current Anexis used to be mouz.uk. They played CS:S during the CGS for Birmingham Salvo (a.k.a. Dignitas). Also, current Anexis were also played under the banner overrated individuals and sometimes still do I think. Edit: Also, for god's sake when is this final game starting? I wanna go to bed ;_; | ||
|
okum
France5778 Posts
| ||
|
sashkata
Bulgaria3241 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
85-0 on LAN so far. Ninjas hwaiting! | ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On March 31 2013 10:54 Holgerius wrote: 85-0 on LAN so far. That map score is just ridiculous. | ||
|
meanmarine24
37 Posts
It seemed to run at alternating 15-25fps, and bitrate wasn't the highest either. | ||
|
Maedi
United States477 Posts
 | ||
|
TheRabidDeer
United States3806 Posts
On March 31 2013 10:54 Holgerius wrote: 16-2 in the grand final. 85-0 on LAN so far. Ninjas hwaiting! How is that even possible? Any idea on the total number of rounds won/lost? Wonder if that is equally staggering. | ||
|
yrt123
Singapore1246 Posts
On March 31 2013 15:26 TheRabidDeer wrote: How is that even possible? Any idea on the total number of rounds won/lost? Wonder if that is equally staggering. Got me intrigued so I went to check HLTV stats. http://www.hltv.org/?pageid=192&teamid=4411&eventid=0&gameid=2 Adding up the 5 maps stats; Total Rounds Played : 3001 Rounds won: 2083 Rounds lost: 918 This includes online matches however. Don't know where to find LAN only stats. | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19200 Posts
| ||
|
kuruptt
Canada168 Posts
What resolution and graphic settings do you guys play at? I am currently playing in a 4:3 resolution at the lowest settings to see people clearer, is there any advantage in graphic settings you guys noticed? Also is it me or is cs:go hard to tell when your bullets are landing? I mean in 1.6 you can hear some sounds and clearly see if you hit him or not. | ||
|
Maedi
United States477 Posts
http://play.esea.net/users/442077 Resolution is highly personal preference, while there is irrefutable evidence that 16  vs 16:10 vs 4:3, you see the most on 16.... yet I'd say 95% of professional players are using 4:3 resolutions (Ranging from 1024x768 to 1280x)If you're not really playing competitively, playing on your native resolution will probably yield the best results. http://pantheones.com.au/content/uploads/2012/03/csgo_16-10.jpg The bullets and registry is just different from 1.6, a lot of CS veterans have a hard time adjusting because they're so trained to one version of the game. I have friends who have never played CS before pick up the shooting much quicker than I did. Just need to be very patient and open-minded about it.  | ||
|
kuruptt
Canada168 Posts
On April 01 2013 09:59 Maedi wrote: I have my autoconfig on my ESEA profile, if you want to see what commands are relevant to you in there. http://play.esea.net/users/442077 Resolution is highly personal preference, while there is irrefutable evidence that 16 vs 16:10 vs 4:3, you see the most on 16.... yet I'd say 95% of professional players are using 4:3 resolutions (Ranging from 1024x768 to 1280x)If you're not really playing competitively, playing on your native resolution will probably yield the best results. http://pantheones.com.au/content/uploads/2012/03/csgo_16-10.jpg The bullets and registry is just different from 1.6, a lot of CS veterans have a hard time adjusting because they're so trained to one version of the game. I have friends who have never played CS before pick up the shooting much quicker than I did. Just need to be very patient and open-minded about it. There is also evidence though that lower resolution makes the model a tad bigger because its more zoomed in. Would you recommend any graphic settings that should be toned down or up for more clarity? | ||
|
Maedi
United States477 Posts
| ||
|
jaj22
United Kingdom1376 Posts
On April 01 2013 09:39 kuruptt wrote: Also is it me or is cs:go hard to tell when your bullets are landing? I mean in 1.6 you can hear some sounds and clearly see if you hit him or not. I'd say that the effect of hitting a wall is a lot less visible in CSGO, at least at the low/medium graphics settings I play on. 1.6 has these big puffs of dust that you can see a mile off. For hits, the blood splatter is quite visible in GO but the flinch animation seems to be extremely unreliable. You do get a nice "doink" noise from headshots though, which you can use as a cue to switch aim to the body. | ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9036 Posts
| ||
|
chesshaha
United States1117 Posts
On April 05 2013 01:13 Garnet wrote: Navi is out? Double elim Bo3, grand finals Bo5. So no. | ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
| ||
|
ReignSupreme.
Australia4123 Posts
Pretty close so far but map and Tside was VP's pick... | ||
| ||
|
|
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
PiGosaur Cup
Replay Cast
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Team League
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
