EPTLets Play Crack the Case - Page 9
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Nik0
Uruguay460 Posts
| ||
|
ZidaneTribal
United States2800 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
On July 12 2010 12:50 Nik0 wrote: Does the gray man expect to get the object back? No. | ||
|
Neon_Monkey
United States270 Posts
On July 12 2010 12:51 ZidaneTribal wrote: wtf monkey i thought u gotta go why u still posting on TL lol I finished dinner. >.> | ||
|
ZidaneTribal
United States2800 Posts
edit: if so, was the item a picture of his family | ||
|
Stratos.FEAR
Canada706 Posts
was he killed for revenge? wondering about the motives the other person had for hiring a hitman | ||
|
Nik0
Uruguay460 Posts
(its really long) + Show Spoiler + On July 12 2010 11:15 ZapRoffo wrote: Yes. "anything to do" is unclear. "common ground" is unclear also. On the colours: only relevant in as far as a hired killer is generally associated with black, so now not needed since that is discovered. Not living. No. 1. Has an iffy assumption but I'll say mostly yes. 2. Ditto. Yes he knew what the item would be. 3. The setup was a yes and no answer, you are interpreting that answer wrong. On July 12 2010 11:24 ZapRoffo wrote: Yes. I don't understand the second part of your question. No. No for man in grey. Yes that is the man in black's profession. On July 12 2010 11:28 ZapRoffo wrote: Nope. Just a note, the full answer to why is not "because he was hired to", why he was hired is part of the answer. On July 12 2010 12:08 ZapRoffo wrote: No to all. The meeting was not set-up in a traditional sense, that is misleading, and why I said yes and no. Think about how a hitman does his job. Yes they talked. Yes the black man initiated it. Yes it was polite. Yes he does. Yes it was complete. No he did not need to have the object. Nope. No not personally. Yes knew of. Hitmen have to do research right? Yes it's possible. No. No he didn't know. I suppose he pretended to be a commuter? Beyond that, no. On July 12 2010 12:36 ZapRoffo wrote: Yes. It's not super relevant though. Yes. On July 12 2010 12:39 ZapRoffo wrote: No Apart from wanting to hire a hitman and doing so, not that I know of. No not a business card. On July 12 2010 12:46 ZapRoffo wrote: It is quite a normal thing to have in general. Nope Nope. On July 12 2010 12:49 ZapRoffo wrote: Yes. Yes it's related to the motive in some way. No he doesn't. On July 12 2010 10:28 ZapRoffo wrote: No, no, no. Correct, they are none of those. No, no. Was this a preset/scheduled meeting and exchange? - similar to Seth_'s question Yes and no. The yes aspect is atypical though. Is this meeting part of either man's job? Yes, the man in black, not the man in gray. Has the gray man ever done this in the past (exchanging this particular item in a train ... without getting killed obviously)? Possibly, I don't know. Is killing part of the black man's job? Yes Gray man's job? No Does the man in black normally carry a gun+silencer? Probably not all the time, but surely more than the amount a typical person would. Did the gray man carry the item on himself (maybe in a pocket)? - trying to get at what the item is and why the item is important Yes. Nope. On July 12 2010 09:06 ZapRoffo wrote: The man in gray did not know the man in black. Define "know" for the other way. Yes before, I don't know after for the 2nd. No. edit: I don't know for the man in gray. Were there any witnesses? Was the man in black caught by the police? I assume no one realized what happened before he got off/he was sneaky. It was not legal. Don't know if he got caught. Did the gray man carry a weapon? No Was the gray man surprised by being shot? Yes he would have been. Was the thing exchanged something of monetary value to the gray man? Black man? Was the thing exchanged something of personal value to the gray man? Black man? No, no particular value. Was the man in gray killed because the exchange occurred? Yes. Was the man in gray killed because the man in black was unsatisfied with the exchange? No. One thing I'm wondering is why this exchange is on a train ... and a commuter train at that. Also, is the location important? And why did the man in black wait a stop to shoot the man in gray instead of shooting him immediately? Why was a silencer used (I guess to avoid witnesses until after the killing was done)? Location is not very important. It's relevance is very outside and subtle. Yeah the silencer is to be able to do it in a public place without people realizing it. These details will not be very helpful in figuring it out. Yeah on the no real value, no on the rest. Nope. No not a piece of paper. Gray - irrelevant Black - Yes and no I guess. Tricky question. I'll say probably a lot more common than any other color. I don't know, nothing unusual in this regard. Not fake. No. No. | ||
|
lac29
United States1485 Posts
Was the reason why the gray man was killed because of the gray man's job? - getting at something like the gray man was the leader of a big labor union and a company wanted him dead because he would cause labor problems (go on strike or something) Was the reason why the gray man was killed because of the gray man's personal relationships? - getting at maybe the gray man had an affair with the black man's boss' wife Was the gray man killed for monetary reasons? Is the item in question visible if you are walking around on the train looking at people? | ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
On July 12 2010 12:55 ZidaneTribal wrote: Is the man in black hired by the man in gray's relative? edit: if so, was the item a picture of his family No. On July 12 2010 12:56 Stratos.FEAR wrote: was the grey man killed to be kept silent? was he killed for revenge? No to be kept silent. Yes for revenge. | ||
|
Nik0
Uruguay460 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
On July 12 2010 12:59 lac29 wrote: Was the reason why the gray man was killed because of the gray man's personal relationships? - getting at maybe the gray man had an affair with the black man's boss' wife Is the item in question visible if you are walking around on the train looking at people? Yes to that reason, no to the others. Yes and no (as in its visibility depends on something). lol I keep refreshing expecting someone to tell the answer at any moment. | ||
|
Nik0
Uruguay460 Posts
| ||
|
ZidaneTribal
United States2800 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
On July 12 2010 13:07 Nik0 wrote: is the object smokes? Yes. Just waiting for the final piece now. | ||
|
Stratos.FEAR
Canada706 Posts
Did the grey man kill anyone close to the hitman's boss? | ||
|
Nik0
Uruguay460 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
On July 12 2010 13:11 Nik0 wrote: Are the smokes a special kind, a weird that only mr gray will have? Yes. | ||
|
Nik0
Uruguay460 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
| ||
|
lac29
United States1485 Posts
Heh this was a little confusing then: "On July 12 2010 12:59 lac29 wrote: Was the reason why the gray man was killed because of the gray man's personal relationships? - getting at maybe the gray man had an affair with the black man's boss' wife Is the item in question visible if you are walking around on the train looking at people? Yes to that reason, no to the others. Yes and no (as in its visibility depends on something)." | ||
| ||
