|
On July 12 2010 10:34 Nik0 wrote:
Was the Black man hired to kill the Gray man?
The "something" had anything to do with the reason the gray man was killed?
Yes.
"anything to do" is unclear.
On July 12 2010 10:34 agarfin wrote:
Was there any common ground shared between them in regards to the item passed?
"common ground" is unclear also.
On July 12 2010 10:44 Brazen[six] wrote:
Are the colours being worn by both of the subjects relevant?
Is the item handed to the man in black something living?
On the colours: only relevant in as far as a hired killer is generally associated with black, so now not needed since that is discovered.
Not living.
On July 12 2010 10:47 dogabutila wrote:
Is this some insurance scam?
No.
On July 12 2010 10:58 sixghost wrote:
Was it always the Black man's plan to kill the grey man after the exchange?
Was the blackman aware there would be an exchange? If so, did he know what the item would be?
You said the greyman did not know the blackman, but the meeting was set up. Was the blackman not who the greyman was expecting?I'll try to explain this question better. For example, the greyman was told he would be meeting a blackman (whom he had never met nor knew what he looked like) on a train, the killer was aware of this somehow and pretended to be the man greyman was supposed to be meeting.
If the greyman had still boarded the train and sat next to the blackman but did not have the item with him, would he still have been killed on the train?
1. Has an iffy assumption but I'll say mostly yes.
2. Ditto. Yes he knew what the item would be.
3. The setup was a yes and no answer, you are interpreting that answer wrong.
|
The "something" was some way for the black man to identify the gray man? Was part of the reason the gray man was killed?
|
On July 12 2010 11:20 Nik0 wrote:
The "something" was some way for the black man to identify the gray man? Was part of the reason the gray man was killed?
Yes. I don't understand the second part of your question.
On July 12 2010 10:58 sixghost wrote:
If the greyman had still boarded the train and sat next to the blackman but did not have the item with him, would he still have been killed on the train?
No.
On July 12 2010 11:04 Buckeye Bob wrote:
Is the grey man a courier or delivery man?
Is the black man a hit-man/assassin?
No for man in grey. Yes that is the man in black's profession.
|
Was the exchanged item a handkerchief?
|
On July 12 2010 11:27 Monkeyz_Rule wrote:
Was the exchanged item a handkerchief?
Nope.
Just a note, the full answer to why is not "because he was hired to", why he was hired is part of the answer.
|
Did the grey man give the black man something that told the black man to kill a family member of the black man?
I know I'm reaching here but it's late and I'm getting drunk.
|
On July 12 2010 11:32 Buckeye Bob wrote:
Did the grey man give the black man something that told the black man to kill a family member of the black man?
No.
|
Was the meeting set up by a person other then Mr. Grey and Mr. Black?
If yes, was the person that set up the meeting the same person as the one who hired Mr. Black to kill Mr. Grey?
Maybe the dude who set up the meeting was a business partner of grey. And found out Mr.Grey was banging his wife and wanted revenge (or perhaps just wants to off his business partner for a complete holding in the company or whatever). So he sets up the meeting under the cover of an exchange or business proposition but separately hires Mr. Black to kill the dude.
Was the item exchanged a letter?
|
The item exchanged was not a photo, picture, or piece of paper. Nor was it of monetary or personal value to either men. This was asked before I think. Right now it seems like the item was simply something for the black man to easily identify that the gray man was the guy that he needed to kill.
Did the men talk before the exchange occurred? If so, did the black man initiate the conversation? Was their conversation polite? Was it threatening?
Does the gray man ride the train regularly? - Maybe he is a regular commuter or maybe he is the train conductor/driver.
Was the black man's mission/objective fully complete upon killing? Or more towards what I'm getting at, did the black man need to kill AND obtain/keep the object (instead of throwing the object away or leaving it on the train) for the mission/objective to be fully successful?
|
If it wasn't the gray man giving the package and was actually someother dude doing it would the black man have shot him dead anyway?
|
zeks: I would think no because of this ... but we'll see Zap's answer.
"On July 12 2010 10:58 sixghost wrote:
If the greyman had still boarded the train and sat next to the blackman but did not have the item with him, would he still have been killed on the train?
No."
|
Going back to this question by Seth_
Did the two men know each other before they got on the train?
The man in gray did not know the man in black. Define "know" for the other way.
Did the man in black know the man in grey personally before boarding the train?
Did the man in black know of the man in grey before boarding the train?
|
Was there any reason for the gray man to suspect he might be murdered?
Was the gray man a witness to a crime?
Did the gray man knew he was going to meet a men? Did he knew he was going to be wearing a black suit?
Did the black man pretended to be someone hes not?
|
(btw, where might i purchase this game?)
|
Sorry if these have been posted: I've honestly read all the previous posts as best as I can.
If the item has no value...does the black man benefit from having the gray man dead?
If so, is he the sole beneficiary?
|
Fail  i missed that you had already said the man in black was a hitman.
This might have been asked im not sure.
Was the man in black hired by a criminal organization (i.e the mob)?
Was he hired by a woman?
|
On July 12 2010 12:01 agarfin wrote:
having said black is the most common color for his profession, is a priest? Is he a Ninja?
We already know he is a hit-man/assassin from a previous question.
|
edit:lac29 beated me to it
|
On July 12 2010 11:48 dogabutila wrote:
Was the meeting set up by a person other then Mr. Grey and Mr. Black?
If yes, was the person that set up the meeting the same person as the one who hired Mr. Black to kill Mr. Grey?
Was the item exchanged a letter?
No to all. The meeting was not set-up in a traditional sense, that is misleading, and why I said yes and no. Think about how a hitman does his job.
On July 12 2010 11:49 lac29 wrote:
Did the men talk before the exchange occurred? If so, did the black man initiate the conversation? Was their conversation polite? Was it threatening?
Does the gray man ride the train regularly? - Maybe he is a regular commuter or maybe he is the train conductor/driver.
Was the black man's mission/objective fully complete upon killing? Or more towards what I'm getting at, did the black man need to kill AND obtain/keep the object (instead of throwing the object away or leaving it on the train) for the mission/objective to be fully successful?
Yes they talked. Yes the black man initiated it. Yes it was polite.
Yes he does.
Yes it was complete. No he did not need to have the object.
On July 12 2010 11:50 zeks wrote:
If it wasn't the gray man giving the package and was actually someother dude doing it would the black man have shot him dead anyway?
Nope.
On July 12 2010 11:52 Buckeye Bob wrote:Going back to this question by Seth_ Show nested quote +Did the two men know each other before they got on the train?
The man in gray did not know the man in black. Define "know" for the other way.
Did the man in black know the man in grey personally before boarding the train?
Did the man in black know of the man in grey before boarding the train?
No not personally. Yes knew of. Hitmen have to do research right?
On July 12 2010 11:56 Nik0 wrote:
Was there any reason for the gray man to suspect he might be murdered?
Was the gray man a witness to a crime?
Did the gray man knew he was going to meet a men? Did he knew he was going to be wearing a black suit?
Did the black man pretended to be someone hes not?
Yes it's possible.
No.
No he didn't know.
I suppose he pretended to be a commuter? Beyond that, no.
|
Was it because the man in gray wouldn't let the man in black leave the island?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
