EPTLets Play Crack the Case - Page 16
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Stratos.FEAR
Canada706 Posts
| ||
|
Neon_Monkey
United States270 Posts
Did someone who worked for the owner visit the house during the 3 days? If so, did they enter the house? Was the owner involved in any illegal activities? Was the owner blackmailing the intruder? | ||
|
Terranlisk
Singapore1404 Posts
Is the item a living thing? Is anyone else besides the Intruder, owner and police involved? | ||
|
ZERG_RUSSIAN
10417 Posts
Would the intruder have been accused of something that was not murder had he not visited the house three times? Did the intruder have to visit the house on all three days? Did the intrusion involve mail or post of any sort? | ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
Eh, yes and no. Elaboration: Pretty much yes, but just saying yes seems a bit wrong to me. Was the victim a cop or detective of some sort? No not a cop, for detective of some sort: yes and no. Would the item prove that the intruder was the murderer? or that he had a motive to do so? No, yes to the 2nd part. Did someone who worked for the owner visit the house during the 3 days? If so, did they enter the house? Yes, Yes Was the owner involved in any illegal activities? No Was the owner blackmailing the intruder? No Was the owner carrying the item when he was murdered? No Is the item a living thing? No Is anyone else besides the Intruder, owner and police involved? I'm not sure what constitutes involved. They are not the only three parties mentioned in the story I use to answer your questions. Would the intruder have been accused of murder if he had not visited the house three times? Yes Would the intruder have been accused of something that was not murder had he not visited the house three times? I'm not positive, but most likely yes. Did the intruder have to visit the house on all three days? You already know that he is looking for something that didn't arrive until the third day. Other than not knowing that it wouldn't arrive until the third day, no he didn't. Did the intrusion involve mail or post of any sort? Yes | ||
|
dogabutila
United States1438 Posts
| ||
|
Neon_Monkey
United States270 Posts
| ||
|
arbiter_md
Moldova1219 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
On July 13 2010 17:40 dogabutila wrote: To clarify: The intruder / murderer was not the housekeeper / gardener etc person right? Nope. Did the owner have any incriminating information about the intruder before the death? Yes. | ||
|
Terranlisk
Singapore1404 Posts
Was there a key of some sorts involved? Were there any witness to the murder? | ||
|
tissue
Malaysia441 Posts
Would it make any difference if the intruder broke in, say, from 1:00 to 1:30pm? Was the intruder in a uniform or dressed in a professional capacity? Was the item a letter, photographs, data or similar communication? Was it a thing in a parcel? | ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
No Was there a key of some sorts involved? No Were there any witness to the murder? I'm not sure, I don't think so. The story doesn't give details about the place or method of the murder. Was the victim an insurance investigator? Would the item have uncovered a fraud? No Would it make any difference if the intruder broke in, say, from 1:00 to 1:30pm? It's possible. As soon after delivery that he broke in, the better. Was the intruder in a uniform or dressed in a professional capacity? I don't think so (not specified) Was the item a letter, photographs, data or similar communication? Yes Was it a thing in a parcel? No edit: deleted some extra information, if you saw it and want to share, go ahead. A note: the game card I'm reading off of has a section called "the solution", which tells me what information investigators must provide to consider the case solved. You guys are very close to that but missing one little point. However just "the solution" is a very incoherent story, and would seem quite random to you (regarding the cause of the little point happening), so I'm making it a little harder by demanding a bit more of the story in order to make it feel more solved and make more sense. ("The story" is the other secret section of the game card, which tells the more complete version of events and is what I use to answer questions.) | ||
|
Terranlisk
Singapore1404 Posts
| ||
|
DM20
Canada544 Posts
Was the item pictures of the intruder? | ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
Irrelevant. edit, because it could provide a smidge of useful information: Unlikely but possible. Was the item pictures of the intruder? Yes and no. | ||
|
dogabutila
United States1438 Posts
| ||
|
stet_tcl
Greece319 Posts
Was the item incriminating the intruder for the owner's murder? For a previous crime? | ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
See above. Is the killer a member of the opposite gender of the killee? Irrelevant. Was the item sent to the victim by the intruder? No. Was the item incriminating the intruder for the owner's murder? For a previous crime? Not directly incriminating. A previous question I answered that yes, it gave a motive though. Yes, it was incriminating for a previous crime. You guys are very close now, and I believe the pieces are in place to find the answer. And I'm tired, so I'm going to go to sleep and check in the morning to see if the solution has been posted. | ||
|
DM20
Canada544 Posts
| ||
|
stet_tcl
Greece319 Posts
| ||
| ||
