Let's put it this way: Your average 6 foot male is approx 160-170 pounds.
Yao is twice that.
His knees, joints, and bones have a LOT of weight to support... BUT Yao is running from hoop to hoop at least 50 times a game, 82 games a season (plus playoffs) in a period of six short months. Often he plays three or four times a week, many times back-to-back.
Plus every summer he was recalled for Chinese National Team duty.
Notice how his injuries are mostly in his legs, feet, knees.... the basic support pillars of that massive body jogging up and down the court.
On November 10 2009 15:35 city42 wrote: I made multiple attempts at writing out how I feel about AI, but the man and his career are just too damn complex. There is so much good and so much bad that you'd need a book to cover it all.
Agreed. A while ago Bill Simmons linked this about him, and if you don't know much about AI (ie. only know about what people have said about him through the media) then it'll change your perception of him:
Watched PHX vs. PHI last night. This is nothing new, but daaamn PHX cannot play any defense. It makes it so inexcusable for all these teams to keep losing to them. Weird night in general I guess: GS scoring 146 points, SA going for 131...
On November 10 2009 15:35 city42 wrote: I made multiple attempts at writing out how I feel about AI, but the man and his career are just too damn complex. There is so much good and so much bad that you'd need a book to cover it all.
Agreed. A while ago Bill Simmons linked this about him, and if you don't know much about AI (ie. only know about what people have said about him through the media) then it'll change your perception of him:
On November 10 2009 10:28 igotmyown wrote: .425 is not a good percentage for a guard, consider most teams get over 100 points over 100 possessions. Also his 3 point shooting usually hovered around .300. Luckily, iverson offset it by getting 10+ free throws per game in most of his good seasons, otherwise he'd be scoring a 2008 thunder-esque sub 90 points per 100 possessions. However, he's old now and can't finish as well as he used to.
Do you have to shoot well to get 27 points per game? In his good years in philly he attempted from 22 to 28 shots per game, on top of his 10+ free throws.
Exactly. Those numbers are not efficient.
AI is only a good player for his time, but all-time, there's a lot of guards you would choose ahead of him.
@HonestTea: My point about Rondo is that if I were building a team, I'd take Chris Paul, D. Williams, Tony Parker and Rondo ahead of a young AI, and these guys are in the league now. All of the players named average below 3 turnovers a game, whereas Iverson has averaged 3.6 TO's over his career. All of the players named shoot a much higher career percentage than Iverson's career average. Iverson's not a PG but he's sized like a PG and if I'm going to have a player that small on the court, I sure as hell don't want him taking 20+ shots per game at 42% with his 3.6 TO's etc. He should be passing the ball. That year he had with Denver is good statistically, but they didn't win anything. AI's overrated.
you are out of your mind. The others you could argue about even though they have yet to prove themselves over a long period of time. Do you know how bad those sixer teams were? Iverson was just a liability on defense because of his size. He had to play passing lanes because of it. Philly was horrible. Id argue that McKie was their 2nd best player for a few years......how sad is that. They were clippers bad those years save Iverson.
He was at his best when surrounded by good defensive players though so he could play the passing lanes. He needed a 2nd fiddle though who could score on his own occasionally and play good defense. Someone like an Artest would have worked perfect for Iverson.
AI was best as a SG, not a PG. During his top years he had Eric Snow at PG, and McKie as the 6th man of the year. He later tried hard to remake himself as a PG and had some success, but passing never came as naturally to him as slashing and scoring.
On November 11 2009 09:17 tonight wrote: Well, I have Chris Paul and they pretty much both do the same things. Only CP does it better at this point. Except Nash shoots the three better.
At this point, the 3pt shooting may end up being a wash if things continue as they have...
On November 11 2009 09:17 tonight wrote: Well, I have Chris Paul and they pretty much both do the same things. Only CP does it better at this point. Except Nash shoots the three better.
At this point, the 3pt shooting may end up being a wash if things continue as they have...
CP: 1.9 3/g @68.2% SN: 2.1 3/g @48.6%
Well, I meant it more in terms of, "I'd rather have Nash taking the 3 at the buzzer"