| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
|
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
On January 26 2010 08:45 GGTeMpLaR wrote: IDK what yall are talking about I thought the music was amazing. I agree because I thought the songs used in the movie was beautiful. Yeah, Avatar 2 is gonna be hyped up just like Transformers 2, Spider-Man 3, etc. I am confident that it will deliver and be just as good as Avatar or better. | ||
|
d3_crescentia
United States4054 Posts
On January 26 2010 20:27 GTR wrote: I'm sorry Titanic, but Avatar is the highest grossing film of all time! ... and I haven't still seen the movie ;O highest gross doesn't mean anything when you think about inflation! (i.e. inflation calculator says that titanic would gross ~500 million more in 2007 dollars) | ||
|
BanZu
United States3329 Posts
On January 27 2010 08:12 d3_crescentia wrote: highest gross doesn't mean anything when you think about inflation! (i.e. inflation calculator says that titanic would gross ~500 million more in 2007 dollars) Wasn't there something about how fewer people go to the movies now? Hm, I wish I could find where I first heard that. | ||
|
Itachii
Poland12466 Posts
I'd thought that i won't see better film after LOTR, but Avatar was just outstanding. | ||
|
zeppelin
United States565 Posts
On January 27 2010 08:12 d3_crescentia wrote: highest gross doesn't mean anything when you think about inflation! (i.e. inflation calculator says that titanic would gross ~500 million more in 2007 dollars) It actually means quite a lot because older movies didn't make nearly as much from home version sales for obvious reasons. Instead of going to DVD players, popular movies stayed in theaters and continued to be popular for years and often had periodic re-releases (like most of the classic Disney films, Star Wars, etc.). Now there are so many movies and so many studios that films are rotated out after just a few months, but a big blockbuster will make hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars off of rentals and sales of DVD/blu-ray versions. So, the fact that a modern movie can make its way relatively high on an all time inflation-adjusted list in its historically limited theater time means it's a much, much bigger cash cow than just those numbers show and in fact probably competes with the all time biggest films once all the numbers are tallied. | ||
|
ShAsTa
Belgium2841 Posts
On January 27 2010 13:44 zeppelin wrote: It actually means quite a lot because older movies didn't make nearly as much from home version sales for obvious reasons. Instead of going to DVD players, popular movies stayed in theaters and continued to be popular for years and often had periodic re-releases (like most of the classic Disney films, Star Wars, etc.). Now there are so many movies and so many studios that films are rotated out after just a few months, but a big blockbuster will make hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars off of rentals and sales of DVD/blu-ray versions. So, the fact that a modern movie can make its way relatively high on an all time inflation-adjusted list in its historically limited theater time means it's a much, much bigger cash cow than just those numbers show and in fact probably competes with the all time biggest films once all the numbers are tallied. Not to mention it's only been out for 6 weeks. | ||
|
StorkHwaiting
United States3465 Posts
http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/news/2010-01-31-boxoffice01_N.htm | ||
|
zergpower123
United States197 Posts
link AVATAR HAS REACHED!!!! $2 BILLION WORLDWIDE!!!!!!!!!!!!! | ||
|
zergpower123
United States197 Posts
| ||
|
inReacH
Sweden1612 Posts
| ||
|
neVern
United States115 Posts
On January 27 2010 08:21 BanZu wrote: Wasn't there something about how fewer people go to the movies now? Hm, I wish I could find where I first heard that. You can just download them, however its a bit lower quality but that would still make sense. | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On February 01 2010 06:59 inReacH wrote: Might have been posted already.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJarz7BYnHA that was even better than the phantom menace one, shorter and more to the point | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On February 01 2010 06:59 inReacH wrote: Might have been posted already.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJarz7BYnHA that review's pretty awful I think there was a logical fallacy in that every 10 seconds | ||
|
LunarDestiny
United States4177 Posts
| ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On February 01 2010 08:36 GGTeMpLaR wrote: that review's pretty awful I think there was a logical fallacy in that every 10 seconds avatar supporters never use logical fallacies, also avatar is the best movie ever because it made the most money | ||
|
Railxp
Hong Kong1313 Posts
| ||
|
aTnClouD
Italy2428 Posts
On February 01 2010 11:48 Railxp wrote: It's just Pocahontas repackaged.... Does it make the film less awesome?  | ||
|
Biochemist
United States1008 Posts
On February 01 2010 08:57 jalstar wrote: avatar supporters never use logical fallacies, also avatar is the best movie ever because it made the most money And that is a good counter-argument how? | ||
|
Faronel
United States658 Posts
On February 01 2010 11:58 Biochemist wrote: And that is a good counter-argument how? He's being sarcastic. His statement is a logical fallacy: an incorrect causation relationship b/w money and quality. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On February 01 2010 08:57 jalstar wrote: avatar supporters never use logical fallacies, also avatar is the best movie ever because it made the most money avatar critics never use logical fallacies, also avatar is a terrible movie because it is the same as dances with wolves | ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
RongYI Cup
herO vs Maru
Replay Cast
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
Sparkling Tuna Cup
The PondCast
|
|
|
EPT
