EPT
[TV] Suits - Page 69
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
NOTE: This thread contains spoilers. Do not read the thread if you are not caught up. If a new episode has already officially aired, you are allowed to discuss what happened without posting in spoilers. | ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9109 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45727 Posts
 | ||
|
FlawlessFeeL
Canada88 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45727 Posts
On August 21 2013 10:38 FlawlessFeeL wrote: I'm not sure if I understood properly...Is this a full 10 years before episode the whole time? I'm not sure if it's the whole episode or not... the other flashback episode (when Harvey found out about his father's death) switched between present (him taking the day off to have a drink at his father's grave) and past quite a few times. I wouldn't be surprised if they switched again back and forth, relating present events with flashbacks of past experiences that will influence their decisions and actions. | ||
|
FlawlessFeeL
Canada88 Posts
On August 21 2013 10:40 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: I'm not sure if it's the whole episode or not... the other flashback episode (when Harvey found out about his father's death) switched between present (him taking the day off to have a drink at his father's grave) and past quite a few times. I don't even remember this episode? :o | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45727 Posts
On August 21 2013 10:45 FlawlessFeeL wrote: Oh I see...But I don't even remember this episode? :o http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2305044/synopsis http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2012/08/09/suits-season-2-episode-8-‘rewind’-tv-recap/ | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45727 Posts
On August 21 2013 10:38 FlawlessFeeL wrote: I'm not sure if I understood properly...Is this a full 10 years before episode the whole time? Now that it's on, I can tell you for sure that it's going back and forth between the present and the past, like before. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45727 Posts
And I can't wait for the next one already x.x | ||
micronesia
United States24770 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45727 Posts
On August 21 2013 12:09 micronesia wrote: What is up with that lawyer from the London office? For a while he was doing an excellent job, and now suddenly he always is doing the worst possible thing for the firm. It doesn't make sense. Yeah especially the last line of the episode. + Show Spoiler + When Cameron Dennis had bluffed about having a key witness, got caught with having no evidence, and was just about to give up the whole lawsuit against Ava Hessington... but now apparently Stephen gave Dennis the witness? Wtf. | ||
|
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On August 21 2013 12:18 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Yeah especially the last line of the episode. + Show Spoiler + When Cameron Dennis had bluffed about having a key witness, got caught with having no evidence, and was just about to give up the whole lawsuit against Ava Hessington... but now apparently Stephen gave Dennis the witness? Wtf. I am starting to wonder if Darby now really wants Jessica out so he told Stephan that if Harvey wins Harvey is managing partner but if he loses Stephen is. | ||
|
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On August 21 2013 10:45 FlawlessFeeL wrote: Oh I see...But I don't even remember this episode? :o It was the one where Mike tried get Monica to sue the firm for sexual harassment at Harvey's direction (which was really at Jessica's) and which got her the votes she needed to be ahead at the time. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45727 Posts
On August 21 2013 12:29 Adreme wrote: I am starting to wonder if Darby now really wants Jessica out so he told Stephan that if Harvey wins Harvey is managing partner but if he loses Stephen is. That's pretty interesting. I feel that despite Stephen's new relationship with Donna, Stephen hasn't really done much case-wise to make him seem as established as Harvey or any managing partner. We know he's supposed to be the British Harvey and is Darby's fixer, but I feel like he hasn't really shown much of his lawyer skills to the audience yet. | ||
|
feanor1
United States1899 Posts
| ||
|
publicenemies
458 Posts
On August 21 2013 12:29 Adreme wrote: I am starting to wonder if Darby now really wants Jessica out so he told Stephan that if Harvey wins Harvey is managing partner but if he loses Stephen is. I don't think this will be the case since Darby wants to win the case as much as Harvey, why would he let Stephen be managing partner if the case was a complete lost? However, Stephen does seem to have some kind of secret agenda that we don't know about. | ||
|
Dreamer.T
United States3584 Posts
On August 21 2013 12:09 micronesia wrote: What is up with that lawyer from the London office? For a while he was doing an excellent job, and now suddenly he always is doing the worst possible thing for the firm. It doesn't make sense. I'm not sure, but I think Darby wanted Stephen to make a move after finding out Harvey got his name on the door. He probably fears that Jessica and Harvey will team up on him or something... | ||
|
nayumi
Australia6499 Posts
I was watching the latest episode during my lunch break, worth it :D | ||
|
GeneticToss
Canada188 Posts
| ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
| ||
|
Tachion
Canada8573 Posts
On August 21 2013 16:28 NarutO wrote: Did someone also watch new episodes preview? Please don't let the "sorry Harvey" from Donna mean that she's going to London with Stephen. I would hate it I took that to mean that she was sorry she got involved with a douche like Steven, cause he back-stabbed harvey pretty hard it looks like. | ||
| ||
