D2 Ladder Reset the 14th - Interest in a TL effort - Page 2

On May 15 2013 02:08 MagmaPunch wrote:
I will probably play some too. Question is: should i playe in USeast or Europe ( i am in europe but i do not know in which area there are more players xd )

On May 15 2013 07:13 HornyHerring wrote:

socially competitive aspects or d2? how so? no ladder? there was no ladder untill 3(?) years into d2 too. ruined economy? by the fact that there's AH that allows people to do what they did in D2 only easier? Or by the fact that gold actually has a use?

edit:

I mean, don't get me wrong I enjoyed d2 for a few years, since classic release till 1.10, but it's like playing BW now.

On May 15 2013 02:11 Barrin wrote:
East is the largest has always been and will always be (especially this time I bet), but some have estimated it to be not much larger than EU.

On May 15 2013 08:42 HornyHerring wrote:
D2 had as shitty storyline, and nobody and I mean nobody played this game for the storyline after first finish. Don't tell me you read every dialogue everytime you played, d2 didnt have interesting quest rewards either(unless you mean naming your weapon whooowhooooo superfucking sweet), community or socialisation isnt any better in d2, unless you think bigger chat makes a better game social-wise, there is pvp, what the hell are you talking about, you can customise your character in shitload of ways, there are many viable builds and its not like most poeple play hammerdins on d2 , rmah is just what d2 had but integrated into the game, there was more bot messages about gold/items shops than regular chatter on your FAR SUPERIOR CHATS, there was no ladder the first few years of D2 too, theres maybe hundreds of people having 100 paragon, no need for a ladder now, no public games? srs? the only thing missing is naming your own games, the fact that you didnt get any good drops doesnt mean drops are bad, how was d2 different? blues were pretty common in the first weeks after release, its not like people roll with anything else than uniques in d2. d2 was good for its time and now its bad. stop being an elitist jerk, we got shitton of those in here already


go double the list, those arguments are pretty bad. the only reason you think d3 is bad because youve set up a superhigh expectations before the d3 release and you wouldnt be satisfied with anything

On May 15 2013 08:42 HornyHerring wrote:
D2 had as shitty storyline, and nobody and I mean nobody played this game for the storyline after first finish. Don't tell me you read every dialogue everytime you played, d2 didnt have interesting quest rewards either(unless you mean naming your weapon whooowhooooo superfucking sweet), community or socialisation isnt any better in d2, unless you think bigger chat makes a better game social-wise, there is pvp, what the hell are you talking about, you can customise your character in shitload of ways, there are many viable builds and its not like most poeple play hammerdins on d2 , rmah is just what d2 had but integrated into the game, there was more bot messages about gold/items shops than regular chatter on your FAR SUPERIOR CHATS, there was no ladder the first few years of D2 too, theres maybe hundreds of people having 100 paragon, no need for a ladder now, no public games? srs? the only thing missing is naming your own games, the fact that you didnt get any good drops doesnt mean drops are bad, how was d2 different? blues were pretty common in the first weeks after release, its not like people roll with anything else than uniques in d2. d2 was good for its time and now its bad. stop being an elitist jerk, we got shitton of those in here already


go double the list, those arguments are pretty bad. the only reason you think d3 is bad because youve set up a superhigh expectations before the d3 release and you wouldnt be satisfied with anything