Strategy Forum Highlighting - Page 11
Forum Index > Community News and Headlines |
Blurb
Denmark55 Posts
| ||
Eviltoast
Australia166 Posts
| ||
Mofisto
United Kingdom585 Posts
| ||
Tschis
Brazil1511 Posts
Ofc you could make us choose between 3 or something, but at least that would give the users some kind of choice. //tx | ||
DisaFear
Australia4074 Posts
![]() | ||
Argoth.
Germany1961 Posts
| ||
clickrush
Switzerland3257 Posts
I was a bit suprised that iEchoic isnt on the list. But I trust you as allways to keep on doing the right decisions. | ||
![]()
Chill
Calgary25962 Posts
On February 18 2011 21:05 Argoth. wrote: How about an icon to the thread, so you can identify discussions where those "trusted" users contributed? Very similiar to the battle.net forums where you can see on the spot in which thread a blizz employee has posted. Been discussed many times. | ||
Rakanishu2
United States475 Posts
Actually, this is better. I like hilarious threads. | ||
Knickknack
United States1187 Posts
So highlighted users are more likely to know what they are talking about, and this generality is pointed out to others. Does not make me want to post more. Lets see if any top players start posting/more eh. The op mentions not alienating new members and strong players being ignored or attacked. Well I'll show you an instance of this. Take this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=192658¤tpage=7 Markwerf points out that 2gate production is preferred and more efficient. CecilSunkre says no, and types "People like you posting make me hate this entire forum." Unfortunately, Merkwerf responds with some hate, and is temp banned. Lastly, CecilSunkre gives up addressing the point directly and ends "you're just flaming me and being a troll without actually contributing anything to it." Guess who was more correct on this point of strategy? Merkwerf. Guess who the highlighted user is? Cecilsunkre. Surely anyone can see how responding to hate, yet also being more right on the point, then being banned seems not quite justice and is alienating from the community. | ||
CecilSunkure
United States2829 Posts
On February 19 2011 06:28 Knickknack wrote: I guess the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages, but that is about all I can say. So highlighted users are more likely to know what they are talking about, and this generality is pointed out to others. Does not make me want to post more. Lets see if any top players start posting/more eh. The op mentions not alienating new members and strong players being ignored or attacked. Well I'll show you an instance of this. Take this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=192658¤tpage=7 Markwerf points out that 2gate production is preferred and more efficient. CecilSunkre says no, and types "People like you posting make me hate this entire forum." Unfortunately, Merkwerf responds with some hate, and is temp banned. Lastly, CecilSunkre gives up addressing the point directly and ends "you're just flaming me and being a troll without actually contributing anything to it." Guess who was more correct on this point of strategy? Merkwerf. Guess who the highlighted user is? Cecilsunkre. Surely anyone can see how responding to hate, yet also being more right on the point, then being banned seems not quite justice and is alienating from the community. That actually happened before the highlighting happened, so him on I were both non-highlighted. Also, I kept telling that dude to provide some evidence to his claims like I was, and he just flamed me. If you want to also claim he was more right, you'd need evidence just like Markwerf did. | ||
fishjie
United States1519 Posts
On February 19 2011 06:28 Knickknack wrote: I guess the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages, but that is about all I can say. So highlighted users are more likely to know what they are talking about, and this generality is pointed out to others. Does not make me want to post more. Lets see if any top players start posting/more eh. The op mentions not alienating new members and strong players being ignored or attacked. Well I'll show you an instance of this. Take this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=192658¤tpage=7 Markwerf points out that 2gate production is preferred and more efficient. CecilSunkre says no, and types "People like you posting make me hate this entire forum." Unfortunately, Merkwerf responds with some hate, and is temp banned. Lastly, CecilSunkre gives up addressing the point directly and ends "you're just flaming me and being a troll without actually contributing anything to it." Guess who was more correct on this point of strategy? Merkwerf. Guess who the highlighted user is? Cecilsunkre. Surely anyone can see how responding to hate, yet also being more right on the point, then being banned seems not quite justice and is alienating from the community. Markwerf was trolling, and he does that in a lot of threads. This highlighting system lets people know that he is not worth listening to, and that thread doesn't really show any indication that this is an untrue statement. I dunno about you, but I'd rather read strategy posts from people who are good at the game. | ||
s031720
Sweden383 Posts
| ||
Neo.NEt
United States785 Posts
| ||
CookieMaker
Canada880 Posts
| ||
idonthinksobro
3138 Posts
| ||
zenyu
United States74 Posts
On February 17 2011 21:32 Chill wrote: <font size='3'><b><center>Strategy Forum Changes - Highlighted Users</b></center></font> TL has been aware of the issues with the Starcraft 2 Strategy Forum. Users' frustrations can easily be found with a simple search http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=strategy forum The goal of the TL Starcraft 2 Strategy Forum has always been to elevate the level of discussion without alienating newer or weaker members. Strong players feel helpless when posting advice because their advice is easily ignored or immediately attacked, while creating a pros-only forum has the possibility of becoming an inactive waste. To maintain the level of activity in the Strategy Forum, while placing emphasis on the opinions of strong players, TL has created Highlighted Users: Whenever a Highlighted Poster makes any post in the Starcraft 2 Strategy Forum, it becomes highlighted. A Highlighted Poster is a poster who can be counted upon to provide accurate comments. Highlighted Posters are those who show the highest level of understanding of the game. Highlighted Posters will not always be right, and highlighting should not be seen as a substitute of lively debate in the strategy forum. But we believe that posters who contribute to the strategy forum should be rewarded and given the respect that their diligence deserves! The criteria for becoming a Highlighted User is quite subjective. Some combination of tournament results, high-level play, and Starcraft 2 Strategy Forum activity will earn you Highlighted User status. Requesting status will never be approved. Below are the list of pre-approved Highlighted Users. Current List of Highlighted Users: + Show Spoiler + Anihc Antimage Artosis Catz.root CecilSunkure DarKFoRcE drewbie.root IdrA iNcontroL kcdc LaLuSh Liquid`Tyler Liquid`Ret Liquid`Haypro Liquid`HuK Liquid`TLO Liquid`Jinro merz Minigun MorroW qxc RyanRushia Saracen Sheth sleepingdog whiplash Zelniq Zerg~Legend This list is by no means final. We will continually be adding users as we see them posting in the strategy forum. Obviously a lot of top level players are missing from this list, and there is very good reason for that. Up until now top level players have tended to avoid the strategy forum and refrained from posting in it. Without any prior posts in the strategy forum it is impossible for us to assess whether the information the top level player is providing is helpful or not. If top level players choose to participate in the strategy forum and contribute good advice they will be added to the list. The same goes for anyone - people contributing consistent accurate top quality advice will always be added to the list. Also please keep in mind that just because you are on the list, doesn't mean you're going to stay there. If we notice that your advice and posts start to become unhelpful in the strategy forum your highlighting will be revoked, simple as that. We have also implemented strategy forum temp bans for users who are being unhelpful and annoying in the strategy forum. If you would like to nominate someone for post highlighting please use this thread. Congratulations to our foundation highlighted posters! And we look forward to welcoming many more over the years to come. How do we search for highlighted posts? | ||
![]()
bkrow
Australia8532 Posts
![]() ![]() | ||
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
The wise speak only of what they know -Gandalf I think that highlighted posters should be held to a higher standard especially in regards to civility. You can tell someone they are wrong and explain why but no amount of being right justifies calling someone an idiot or similar misconduct. Behavior such as that does not contribute in any way to the discussion or the Starcraft community. | ||
Shiv.
3534 Posts
On February 17 2011 21:50 Mr.Brightside wrote: I think the people TL have specifically selected do not have a reputation for this kind of abuse of power. Chill stated that if you want to be a highlighted user then you can't demand it so I'm sure they will only select more suitable people that aren't going to deter others from posting. The forums are highly moderated so I think if someone abuses this power they will probably have it revoked. Yeah. That's why IdrA is on that list. On a more serious note: I really think this is a great idea that will help distinguishing useful posts from the lesser useful ones. | ||
| ||