EPT
Tester fails to advance in GSL2 qualifiers - Page 2
| Forum Index > Community News and Headlines |
|
Quanticfograw
United States2053 Posts
| ||
Kinky
United States4126 Posts
| ||
|
FuRong
New Zealand3089 Posts
At least the guy he lost to wasn't called Gaybar =/ | ||
|
Highways
Australia6120 Posts
Top 8 of season 1 should've had auto entry into the ro64. | ||
|
Teton
France1656 Posts
My dream of tester vs boxer finals is dead | ||
|
Darklance
22 Posts
| ||
|
devolore
United States70 Posts
If nothing else, I'm very interested to see how the "unknown" fares going forward. EDIT: Note, I'm not particularly saying that the lack of seeding is a good thing, I'm just throwing it out there that maybe Kim Byung Jun is actually just good at Starcraft. | ||
|
Dadant
United Kingdom15 Posts
This is the guy that beat tester. | ||
|
KevinIX
United States2472 Posts
On October 11 2010 16:55 Highways wrote: Qualifying system fail. Top 8 of season 1 should've had auto entry into the ro64. As I understand it, the GSL will have seeds. The first 3 GSL seasons are actually to determine the seeds starting with GSL 4. The top players are given the rank "S" and are allowed to seed into the Ro64. | ||
|
Sfydjklm
United States9218 Posts
On October 11 2010 16:49 JWD wrote: GSL needs seeds so freaking bad. I highly doubt that this is about "the nature of SC2" or exposure of Tester's "trendy play". Probably just cheese or, as the ever-euphemistic Korean eSports media calls it, a "unique timing rush". or it might be simply a bo3 against another top notch player | ||
|
TheFinalWord
Australia790 Posts
| ||
|
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
On October 11 2010 16:49 JWD wrote: GSL needs seeds so freaking bad. I highly doubt that this is about "the nature of SC2" or exposure of Tester's "trendy play". Probably just cheese or, as the ever-euphemistic Korean eSports media calls it, a "unique timing rush". It was 2-0, and by the hundreds of posts on the other thread, didn't look like it was cheese, instead it was really smart play and smart studying. I'm pretty sad that nobody is going to give this guy any credit for taking out tester, instead they just blame it on cheese/luck. I'm with iNcontroL. The game is so new that nobody can ever be guaranteed to qualify, tester, cool, etc. included. Anyone can lose, and today, it was Testers day to lose. | ||
|
KillerPenguin
United States516 Posts
Would really like to see replays, I'm a bit confused why pro toss keep having problems with early t rushes, first jangminchul, then huk vs qxc who surprisingly likes to go zealot, stalker, stalker instead of a sentry, and now tester, is it really that necessary to play aggressive when t can have the advantage early and your widely regarded as the better player? | ||
|
Tef
Sweden443 Posts
| ||
|
TehRaZer
36 Posts
| ||
|
Irrational_Animal
Germany1059 Posts
| ||
|
Crushgroove
United States793 Posts
On October 11 2010 16:43 acrimoneyius wrote: wow, unfortunate...I wonder if he had a chance to research his opponents Gonna be hard to do that since you have no idea who you'll get matched with in the prelims... | ||
|
Piy
Scotland3152 Posts
| ||
|
QuothTheRaven
United States5524 Posts
Here's his sc2ranks profile: http://sc2ranks.com/team/3362571 1,680 points  211 - 174, 54% | ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
On October 11 2010 17:00 KevinIX wrote: As I understand it, the GSL will have seeds. The first 3 GSL seasons are actually to determine the seeds starting with GSL 4. The top players are given the rank "S" and are allowed to seed into the Ro64. This sounds really really retarded. Why would you seed from 3 tournaments into one tournament? If they just seed the top 2 its only 6 players but that would be really limited, I think top 4 should be seeded into the next tournament and the rest of the top 8 seeded into the end of a qualifier. The way they are doing it if they try and seed a fair number 4-8 players they will fill basically 1/4th the bracket. Kind of ridiculous :/ Can you source this? | ||
| ||
