EPTTester fails to advance in GSL2 qualifiers - Page 10
| Forum Index > Community News and Headlines |
|
pinkranger15
Philippines1597 Posts
| ||
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
On October 12 2010 10:27 gozima wrote: Actually, there is a phonetic distinction between the consonants in those sounds. ㄱ = g ㅋ = k looooooool | ||
|
G3nXsiS
United States656 Posts
| ||
|
ProtisRobit
United States21 Posts
 <3 tester. hope you or huk wins the next one. | ||
GTR
51677 Posts
On October 12 2010 14:04 G3nXsiS wrote: Wow they should make the qualifiers a little more solid, perhaps make it a round robin group like OSL. good luck doing round robin with 2500 players. | ||
|
TheGiftedApe
United States1243 Posts
| ||
|
Frankon
3054 Posts
On October 11 2010 16:49 JWD wrote: GSL needs seeds so freaking bad. Whole point of GSL 1 - 3 is to get a list of seeded players for GSL 2011... | ||
|
Agh
United States1095 Posts
On October 12 2010 07:30 parkin wrote: I think FlinthZenith is a pretty cool guy, eh goes banshess against protoss and doesnt afraid to take calculated risks. There is absolutely no 'risk' involved in getting banshees against toss. Banshees do 19 dps Stalkers do under 6 dps You must have 2 stalkers to deal with a banshee, thats 250/100 4 supply vs 150/100 3 supply If you already have a robo then chances are you're inbetween an expansion and hurting extremely bad for gas. The correct 'response'/best option is to go gateway units with phoenix. But you will still be unable to deal with the number of marines+sprinkled in marauders with banshees and ravens. At a certain point gateway units (obv non-templar) cannot do anything against bio, factor in banshees and raven for PDD and its auto good game. Basically you have to hope that your opponents micro is terrible, which at the top level it won't be. Phoenix will be in range of marines if banshees are controlled correctly, and then they will just push into your base. | ||
|
lastreason
Romania250 Posts
p.s after the qualifications i whant to see the ratio that every race has in the 64 | ||
|
AdelSC123
France362 Posts
| ||
|
BlackWhole
United States40 Posts
because of tester. hmm. don't think i'll get it now....will have to look to see if there are any other notable toss players who are legit enough to beat the terran beasts that are gonna be in this tourney.... | ||
|
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
| ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
There were nearly zero upset, all big names qualified, except tester. Shit happens. And when you look at the bracket, you clearly see they have done some seeding (that or randomness was very favorable for known players) | ||
|
imperator-xy
Germany1377 Posts
kkkkkk | ||
|
cArn-
Korea (South)824 Posts
| ||
|
Moody
United States750 Posts
| ||
|
CriticalLine
United States13 Posts
On October 12 2010 10:27 gozima wrote: Actually, there is a phonetic distinction between the consonants in those sounds. ㄱ = g ㅋ = k No, the phonetic distinction is that one is aspirated and the other is not. | ||
|
Wargizmo
1237 Posts
On October 12 2010 11:51 AmiPolizeiFunk wrote: The fact that his own nick is his initials, I think Seo Ki-Soo or Seo Ki-Su is best, as they match with sSKS. But what's the little "s" for? the extra s is for 'sidelined'  | ||
|
SichuanPanda
Canada1542 Posts
| ||
|
dellesh1ruH
Denmark509 Posts
Who is that Flint guy? | ||
| ||
