|
On April 05 2010 01:13 YouMake wrote:
Can i run SC2 if not what do i need to upgrade??
Operating system: Windows 2.6.0.6001 (SP 1) CPU type: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz CPU Speed (GHz): 2.356 System memory (GB): 2.998 Graphics card model: ATI Radeon HD 4350 Graphics card driver: atiumdag.dll Desktop resolution: 1366x768 Hard disk size (GB): 683.949 Hard disk free space (GB): 575.022
probably on medium settings
|
this is my laptop:
core 2 duo 2.26 ghz
4 gb ram
geforce 9400m
does anyone know how the 9400m's perform? i know they are pretty weak but specifically i'm wondering if it can handle the game @ 1280 x 800 on medium settings?
|
Do u have a macbook? because if you don't you just happened to have everything they do.
And if so i heard they are coming out with a mac client soon so at that point we should know how they perform. :D
|
On April 05 2010 01:32 Vin{MBL} wrote:
this is my laptop:
core 2 duo 2.26 ghz
4 gb ram
geforce 9400m
does anyone know how the 9400m's perform? i know they are pretty weak but specifically i'm wondering if it can handle the game @ 1280 x 800 on medium settings?
http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-9400M-G.11949.0.html
low-medium settings is my bet
|
Asus P6T
Intel i7950@stock
Ati Sapphire 5850
6GB corsairs triple channel kit
Intel SSD 80GB (34nm)
Windows 7x64 Ultimate
All that and get ......... 10-12 fps at max all, latest drivers and all! ^_^
So whats wrong with this picture?
|
On April 05 2010 03:05 koubaros wrote:
Asus P6T
Intel i7950@stock
Ati Sapphire 5850
6GB corsairs triple channel kit
Intel SSD 80GB (34nm)
Windows 7x64 Ultimate
All that and get ......... 10-12 fps at max all, latest drivers and all! ^_^
So whats wrong with this picture?
There is definitely something wrong there - you should be getting 60+ fps at max settings.
|
|
|
On April 05 2010 03:09 StayFrosty wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2010 03:05 koubaros wrote:
Asus P6T
Intel i7950@stock
Ati Sapphire 5850
6GB corsairs triple channel kit
Intel SSD 80GB (34nm)
Windows 7x64 Ultimate
All that and get ......... 10-12 fps at max all, latest drivers and all! ^_^
So whats wrong with this picture?
There is definitely something wrong there - you should be getting 60+ fps at max settings.
Cant find what ...... crysis did max out, so did mass effect 2, so did dirt2 but noooooo SC2 just have a mind of its own!
|
|
|
wow thats bad, i have c2duo 2gbram and 9800 and i play at 1080p maxed without problem (dual monitors)
somethings is very very wrong i wish i had ur rig! 
|
On April 05 2010 03:05 koubaros wrote:
Intel i7950@stock
Ati Sapphire 5850
6GB corsairs triple channel kit
Intel SSD 80GB (34nm)
Windows 7x64 Ultimate
Same here, but with Win7 64bit Professional
|
On April 05 2010 03:31 gEzUS wrote:wow thats bad, i have c2duo 2gbram and 9800 and i play at 1080p maxed without problem (dual monitors) somethings is very very wrong i wish i had ur rig!
it looks like you r doing gr8 with ur rig also ... you r way over me in fps 
|
On April 05 2010 03:39 Kyouya wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2010 03:05 koubaros wrote:
Intel i7950@stock
Ati Sapphire 5850
6GB corsairs triple channel kit
Intel SSD 80GB (34nm)
Windows 7x64 Ultimate
Same here, but with Win7 64bit Professional
lol .... same composition? I thought I was the only one .... sry m8 that makes two of us!
|
On April 05 2010 05:43 koubaros wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2010 03:39 Kyouya wrote:On April 05 2010 03:05 koubaros wrote:
Intel i7950@stock
Ati Sapphire 5850
6GB corsairs triple channel kit
Intel SSD 80GB (34nm)
Windows 7x64 Ultimate
Same here, but with Win7 64bit Professional lol .... same composition? I thought I was the only one .... sry m8 that makes two of us!
Sry I forgot to ask .... how is your fps? Same?
|
On April 05 2010 01:38 Ursad0n wrote:
Do u have a macbook? because if you don't you just happened to have everything they do.
And if so i heard they are coming out with a mac client soon so at that point we should know how they perform. :D
yep, it is the macbook pro 13"
|
On April 05 2010 09:13 Vin{MBL} wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2010 01:38 Ursad0n wrote:
Do u have a macbook? because if you don't you just happened to have everything they do.
And if so i heard they are coming out with a mac client soon so at that point we should know how they perform. :D yep, it is the macbook pro 13"
Yeah that's what i have, from streams and these threads i don't think it should be a problem on Low, Maybe medium but im not sure. I am really not having much trouble with streams, only the higher quality streams when they go over Zerg creep. but thats it.
|
Processor: Core 2 Quad 2.4GHz
Hard Drive: 500GB
RAM: 4GB DDR2
Connection: 5MB up 5MB down
Graphics: Geforce 9800 GT 512MB
Runs the game seamlessly, provided that there isn't somebody with a fisher price modem on the other end. Default graphics are ultra high.
|
On April 05 2010 12:22 RoosterSamurai wrote:
Connection: 5MB up 5MB down
You sure thats not 5Mb/5Mb? either way thats a nice up-speed you have there, most I can get by me is 2Mb up, 15Mb down. Anyway:
OS: Windows 7 64bit
CPU: Intel Q6600 quad-core 2.4, OC to 3.84
Mobo: Nvidia 790i FTW
Ram: 8Gb 1600 Mhz DDR3 (4x 2GB)
Graphics: Currently on an 8800gt, planning to upgrade to a gtx480 in june/july
Hard drives: 1x500Gb OS/Apps, 2x250gb in RAID 0 for games, separate 2TB NAS for storage
PSU: Tagan ITZ series 1100watt
|
flying_moose I would grab a GTX 480 as soon as it comes out
god knows how much trouble Nvidia will have with supply. :/
|
RAM ?? 6 vs 12
im gonna buy a new desktop for SC2 in a few months...and unlike many ppl...im not gonna buy something that can barely run it on low to mid settings....im gonna buy a fuckin monster that could run SC2 ten times at once. im looking at maybe...1300-1400ish USD's...without the monitor and other peripherals.... ..so just the tower. im probably gonna go with the i7-920 or 930 (LGA 1366) with some nice graphics card...so sure which one yet...but my main question is for the RAM.
im sitting here with my 2006 P4 3.0GHz with 1GB ram...and im reading posts from some nerds writing that they now have 6Gigs of ram...which of course seems a lot from my perspective... but ive seen that other nerds have 12GB of RAM....now thats really gangsta. thats what im talking about....but is it useful? can any technical dude here give me an example of a situation where 6 GB might not be enough? im talking mostly from a gamer's perspective but could this help me return searches faster from my 530GB music collection?
thx
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
