• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:21
CEST 02:21
KST 09:21
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy16ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Behind the scenes footage of ASL21 Group E ASL21 General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group E Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM [ASL21] Ro24 Group F 🌍 Weekly Foreign Showmatches
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10151 users

Prop 8 upheld - Page 7

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 24 Next All
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:05 GMT
#121
On May 30 2009 09:57 JWD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:51 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:48 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:41 micronesia wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.

I think any major issue has tons of this shit and you are just cherry picking anyway.


Wrong. Prop 8 supporters never did any of this.


http://vimeo.com/2053489

lol


I stand corrected, do you have any more incidents? No one should condone any of this behavior.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/10/29/state/n064853D35.DTL
http://vodpod.com/watch/1218422-skinhead-ordered-to-stand-trial-for-anti-gay-yes-on-8-hate-crime-span-classsourcetowleroadspan
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/dec/18/anti-gay-graffiti-scrawled-clearview-home/
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/syracuse_police_identify_shoot.html

Come to think of it, because all anti-gay hate crime perpetrators would probably vote Yes on 8, I think your position that Proposition 8's opponents are more "like the Gestapo" looks even sillier.

And wait, you're saying that a majority of Prop 8 opponents used violent tactics? Um...please don't generalize anecdotal evidence.


That's the best you have? The first two are the same story, the fourth has no merit because the police have no idea why it happened, so because the mother said it was because he was gay then it was? So, you gave me two. Of course that behavior is horrendous, and one is a skin-head.

I think i'll link you some in a bit. Runs the gamut from pro gay marching into churches and disrupting services to harassing and threatening businesses and persons.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
May 30 2009 01:05 GMT
#122
There is no way to debate with someone who chooses what to respond to.
koOl
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Canada254 Posts
May 30 2009 01:05 GMT
#123
On May 30 2009 10:05 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:57 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:51 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:48 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:41 micronesia wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.

I think any major issue has tons of this shit and you are just cherry picking anyway.


Wrong. Prop 8 supporters never did any of this.


http://vimeo.com/2053489

lol


I stand corrected, do you have any more incidents? No one should condone any of this behavior.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/10/29/state/n064853D35.DTL
http://vodpod.com/watch/1218422-skinhead-ordered-to-stand-trial-for-anti-gay-yes-on-8-hate-crime-span-classsourcetowleroadspan
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/dec/18/anti-gay-graffiti-scrawled-clearview-home/
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/syracuse_police_identify_shoot.html

Come to think of it, because all anti-gay hate crime perpetrators would probably vote Yes on 8, I think your position that Proposition 8's opponents are more "like the Gestapo" looks even sillier.

And wait, you're saying that a majority of Prop 8 opponents used violent tactics? Um...please don't generalize anecdotal evidence.


That's the best you have? The first two are the same story, the fourth has no merit because the police have no idea why it happened, so because the mother said it was because he was gay then it was? So, you gave me two. Of course that behavior is horrendous, and one is a skin-head.

I think i'll link you some in a bit. Runs the gamut from pro gay marching into churches and disrupting services to harassing and threatening businesses and persons.


let me post thisf or u again cuz it seems you have missed it:

+ Show Spoiler +
In January 2009, the American Psychological Association (APA) released three separate studies that described the psychological distress associated with anti same-sex marriage amendments. One study using national survey responses of LGBTI individuals found that those who live in states that have passed marriage amendments experienced increased psychological stress not due to other pre-existing conditions but as “a direct result of the negative images and messages associated with the ballot campaign and the passage of the amendment.” Furthermore, participants reported feeling “alienated from their community, fearful they would lose their children, and concerned they would become victims of anti-gay violence.” These studies also reported that this harm extends to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) family members and straight allies who experience a form of “secondary minority stress.” Finally, “although many participants displayed resiliency and effective coping with this stress, some experienced strong negative consequences to their mental and physical health.”

Marriage Equality USA, through a series of town halls held across California and a national on-line survey of over 3,100 respondents, collected community input regarding the homophobia and other harm experienced through initiative campaigns, like Proposition 8, and received personal stories that mirror these APA findings. In our report “Prop 8 Hurt My Family – Ask Me How,” we collected almost 1,200 individual experiences which illustrate how:

LGBTI people experience increased verbal abuse, homophobia, physical harm and other discrimination associated with or resulting from the Prop 8 campaign;
Children of same-sex couples express fear due to direct exposure to homophobia and hate and concerns that the passage of Prop 8 means they could be taken from their families and targeted for further violence;
LGBTI youth and their supporters experience increased bullying at schools as Prop 8’s passage fosters a supportive environment for homophobic acts of physical and emotional violence;
Straight allies experience the impact of homophobia firsthand and express shock and fear for their LGBTI family members and friends and the danger they may experience if they were perceived as gay or an ally;
Families are torn apart as relatives divide on Prop 8; and
Communities are destroyed from the aftermath of abusive behavior towards them during local street demonstrations, neighborhood divisions, and the impact of “knowing your neighbor” voted against your family.
hihi
s_side
Profile Joined May 2009
United States700 Posts
May 30 2009 01:09 GMT
#124
The court did the responsible thing (which is amazing considering the California judiciary). That being said, I'm quite conflicted. The will of the people and the rule of law were upheld. I happen to think, however, that in this case, their will is pretty retarded.
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:09 GMT
#125
On May 30 2009 10:00 koOl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:58 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:56 koOl wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:55 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:50 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:47 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:


Marriage as always been only between a man and a woman throughout all of history.


If I can provide you an example will you admit your definition is wrong?




On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Remember when those black people were being oppressive and doing all those things. Good thing we didnt cave and give them equal rights. Otherwise everyone would want them.


I addressed this, gay couples have the same benefits as married couples.

...except being able to marry.


So you want to force the churches to do something that is a sin in their religion? What happened to freedom of religion?


churches would NOT be forced to perform same sex marriages...that is purely propaganda


What do you think marriage is? Do you know who marries couples? I'm sorry, but going to the local judicial services and getting your 'paper' is not marriage. Sure, you get your state derived benefits, that is associated with marriage and civil unions, but then you just want that called marriage, and not a civil union?



your point being?? that has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that churches wouldnt be forced to perform same sex marriages, ones that choose to do it could


My point being is the arguement for gay marriage isn't one of 'rights' or 'benefits' anymore, because those who are gay have the same 'rights' and 'benefits' as straight couples. Now, they want to impose their views of marriage onto religion and the churches. It's quite obvious. Stop obfuscating the real issue at hand. 80% of this country are christians. You want to force these 80% to essentially change the definition of marriage for what purpose? Of course the purpose is to make this behavior 'socially' recognized as normal and acceptable even though it goes against nature.

I have no problem with gays having the same state derived benefits. I do have problems when you force others to adapt your views through governmental action, when there is no rights being infringed upon. I'd recommend looking up the Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, and the US Constitution, and show me where, marriage is a right.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Frits
Profile Joined March 2003
11782 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-05-30 01:24:10
May 30 2009 01:09 GMT
#126
On May 30 2009 09:57 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:54 Diomedes wrote:
Wait, Aegraen is calling those who want to lift bans on gay marriage oppressive like the gestapo? WTF? I thought he meant the other way around?


WTF

Ban me if he isn't a troll.


Nope, not at all. I'm calling those who employ coercive, violent, and strongarm tactics as comparable to exactly what the Gestapo did. The majority of anti prop 8, supported these, and employed these tactics once they lost, and even beforehand.



What a retarded analogy, the contexts are so different it's not even funny. People against prop 8 who act in outrage do so because they want equal rights, not because they think they are the master race.

You're one to talk by the way, this is probably the most manipulative argument I have ever seen:

On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Ad hominem, stereotyping, hasty generalization, scare tactics, in the current context I'd call your methods as detestable as the prop 8 supporters who resort to violent acts.

Not to mention you openly support torture, you comparing someone with the gestapo is incredibly ironic.

-

About the equal rights which you seem to think are already in place: Why are people protesting? Please explain how this is possible when according to you there is no issue apparently. My take on this is that not allowing gays to marry is a discrimination based on sexuality. You can come up with a compromis that gives the same benefits, but it's like having to wear the star of david (you started these lame ww2 analogies), you're still reminded painfully every day for being different. If it's the same why call it different? It's painfully obvious that the reason for this is to maintain some kind of gap to support your feelings of superiority. Either allow gays to marry or don't, but don't make up some bullshit compromis and pretend it isn't discrimination, I'm pretty sure that's not simply for the majority to decide.

Since you seem to love branding people: If this debate was years ago I'm you'd be arguing for racial segregation. As usual I'd like to suggest to you that maybe there is such a thing called human progress.
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
May 30 2009 01:09 GMT
#127
On May 30 2009 10:05 travis wrote:
There is no way to debate with someone who chooses what to respond to.



Who isnt addressing your point? If you want put (respond please) at the end of points you want addressed.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
May 30 2009 01:11 GMT
#128
On May 30 2009 10:09 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:05 travis wrote:
There is no way to debate with someone who chooses what to respond to.



Who isnt addressing your point? If you want put (respond please) at the end of points you want addressed.

I think he has to be referring to Aegraen, the guy is completely ignoring all the posts where we tell him he has his facts totally wrong.
✌
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
May 30 2009 01:12 GMT
#129
Yah he does that in like every thread.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:12 GMT
#130
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Idle
Profile Joined May 2009
Korea (South)124 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-05-30 01:13:37
May 30 2009 01:12 GMT
#131
On May 30 2009 10:09 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:00 koOl wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:58 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:56 koOl wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:55 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:50 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:47 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:


Marriage as always been only between a man and a woman throughout all of history.


If I can provide you an example will you admit your definition is wrong?




On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Remember when those black people were being oppressive and doing all those things. Good thing we didnt cave and give them equal rights. Otherwise everyone would want them.


I addressed this, gay couples have the same benefits as married couples.

...except being able to marry.


So you want to force the churches to do something that is a sin in their religion? What happened to freedom of religion?


churches would NOT be forced to perform same sex marriages...that is purely propaganda


What do you think marriage is? Do you know who marries couples? I'm sorry, but going to the local judicial services and getting your 'paper' is not marriage. Sure, you get your state derived benefits, that is associated with marriage and civil unions, but then you just want that called marriage, and not a civil union?



your point being?? that has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that churches wouldnt be forced to perform same sex marriages, ones that choose to do it could


My point being is the arguement for gay marriage isn't one of 'rights' or 'benefits' anymore, because those who are gay have the same 'rights' and 'benefits' as straight couples.


You really need to stop with that argument because it is entirely false and has been shown to be such multiple times.
I'd turn gay for Baby.... wait, that came out wrong.
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
May 30 2009 01:16 GMT
#132
On May 30 2009 10:05 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:57 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:51 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:48 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:41 micronesia wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.

I think any major issue has tons of this shit and you are just cherry picking anyway.


Wrong. Prop 8 supporters never did any of this.


http://vimeo.com/2053489

lol


I stand corrected, do you have any more incidents? No one should condone any of this behavior.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/10/29/state/n064853D35.DTL
http://vodpod.com/watch/1218422-skinhead-ordered-to-stand-trial-for-anti-gay-yes-on-8-hate-crime-span-classsourcetowleroadspan
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/dec/18/anti-gay-graffiti-scrawled-clearview-home/
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/syracuse_police_identify_shoot.html

Come to think of it, because all anti-gay hate crime perpetrators would probably vote Yes on 8, I think your position that Proposition 8's opponents are more "like the Gestapo" looks even sillier.

And wait, you're saying that a majority of Prop 8 opponents used violent tactics? Um...please don't generalize anecdotal evidence.


That's the best you have? The first two are the same story, the fourth has no merit because the police have no idea why it happened, so because the mother said it was because he was gay then it was? So, you gave me two. Of course that behavior is horrendous, and one is a skin-head.

I spent two minutes on this (literally googling "proposition 8 supporter violence") because I don't think it's really relevant to the core issue here (gay marriage). I merely wanted to address your request for more incidents.

Let's get off this nonsense about which camp is more violent - you can stop threatening to pull out your links to examples of anti-Prop 8 violence like it's some sort of game-ending ultimate weapon in this debate. Instead, I'd like to see you address some of the more obvious faults in your reasoning which have been pointed out on earlier pages.
✌
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:16 GMT
#133
On May 30 2009 10:09 Frits wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:57 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:54 Diomedes wrote:
Wait, Aegraen is calling those who want to lift bans on gay marriage oppressive like the gestapo? WTF? I thought he meant the other way around?


WTF

Ban me if he isn't a troll.


Nope, not at all. I'm calling those who employ coercive, violent, and strongarm tactics as comparable to exactly what the Gestapo did. The majority of anti prop 8, supported these, and employed these tactics once they lost, and even beforehand.



What a retarded analogy, the contexts are so different it's not even funny. People against prop 8 who act in outrage do so because they want equal rights, not because they think they are the master race.

You're one to talk by the way, this is probably the most manipulative argument I have ever seen:

Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Ad hominem, stereotyping, hasty generalization, scare tactics, in the current context I'd call your methods as detestable as the prop 8 supporters who resort to violent acts.

Not to mention you openly support torture, you comparing someone with the gestapo is incredibly ironic.



http://michellemalkin.com/?s=proposition 8 mob

There are at least 20+ incidents, across a variety of spectrum. Read at your behest.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
May 30 2009 01:17 GMT
#134
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.

hmmm...a libertarian who thinks it's the government's business to prevent certain citizens from getting married? Really?
✌
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-05-30 01:18:41
May 30 2009 01:18 GMT
#135
Aegraen there were hundred of incidents of black violence during the civil rights movements. Your trying to place the sin of the individual upon the issue. Im sorry but you cant do that. Its a tactic people use when they dont have any better points to make.


On May 30 2009 10:17 JWD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.

hmmm...a libertarian who thinks it's the government's business to prevent certain citizens from getting married? Really?


Lol great point.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Idle
Profile Joined May 2009
Korea (South)124 Posts
May 30 2009 01:18 GMT
#136
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.


You call yourself that but your attitude and viewpoints are completely counter to libertarian/conservative ideals.
I'd turn gay for Baby.... wait, that came out wrong.
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
May 30 2009 01:19 GMT
#137
On May 30 2009 10:16 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:09 Frits wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:57 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:54 Diomedes wrote:
Wait, Aegraen is calling those who want to lift bans on gay marriage oppressive like the gestapo? WTF? I thought he meant the other way around?


WTF

Ban me if he isn't a troll.


Nope, not at all. I'm calling those who employ coercive, violent, and strongarm tactics as comparable to exactly what the Gestapo did. The majority of anti prop 8, supported these, and employed these tactics once they lost, and even beforehand.



What a retarded analogy, the contexts are so different it's not even funny. People against prop 8 who act in outrage do so because they want equal rights, not because they think they are the master race.

You're one to talk by the way, this is probably the most manipulative argument I have ever seen:

On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Ad hominem, stereotyping, hasty generalization, scare tactics, in the current context I'd call your methods as detestable as the prop 8 supporters who resort to violent acts.

Not to mention you openly support torture, you comparing someone with the gestapo is incredibly ironic.



http://michellemalkin.com/?s=proposition 8 mob

There are at least 20+ incidents, across a variety of spectrum. Read at your behest.

This is great, but it has nothing to do with whether gay marriage should be legalized. Get off it.
✌
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:19 GMT
#138
On May 30 2009 10:04 Idle wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:59 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:57 Idle wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:55 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:50 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:47 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:


Marriage as always been only between a man and a woman throughout all of history.


If I can provide you an example will you admit your definition is wrong?




On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Remember when those black people were being oppressive and doing all those things. Good thing we didnt cave and give them equal rights. Otherwise everyone would want them.


I addressed this, gay couples have the same benefits as married couples.

...except being able to marry.


So you want to force the churches to do something that is a sin in their religion? What happened to freedom of religion?


Nobody wants the churches to do anything. The issue is that the government is the one refusing to grant marriages, and the government shouldn't get to exclude people.


The government grants the same benefits to gay couples as it does to straight couples. Try again.


No, actually it doesn't. You keep stating this but its completely false. Only 8 states grant civil unions or domestic partnerships which similar rights to marriage, and 5 more grant some of the same rights. Since this thread is specifically on prop 8 in california, domestic partnership differs in the following ways:

# Couples seeking domestic partnership must already share a residence, married couples may be married without living together.
# Couples seeking domestic partnership must be 18 or older, minors can be married before the age of 18 with the consent of their parents.
# California permits married couples the option of confidential marriage, there is no equivalent institution for domestic partnerships. In confidential marriages, no witnesses are required and the marriage license is not a matter of public record.
# Married partners of state employees are eligible for the CalPERS long-term care insurance plan, domestic partners are not.
# There is, at least according to one appellate ruling, no equivalent of the Putative Spouse Doctrine for domestic partnerships.



The only benefit there, that isn't the same is CalPERS. Fight for that, not to change the definition of marriage.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:19 GMT
#139
On May 30 2009 10:18 Idle wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.


You call yourself that but your attitude and viewpoints are completely counter to libertarian/conservative ideals.


No, they are not.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:22 GMT
#140
On May 30 2009 10:17 JWD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.

hmmm...a libertarian who thinks it's the government's business to prevent certain citizens from getting married? Really?


Yes, I am opposed to them getting married. I am not opposed to civil unions and the granting of same benefits. How again, is that against libertarianism? Personally, I'm perfectly ok, with the abolishment of state derived benefits for all parties whether its marriage or civil unions.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 24 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #18
CranKy Ducklings28
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft312
ViBE177
SpeCial 124
JuggernautJason42
CosmosSc2 38
PattyMac 10
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 4800
Artosis 603
Shuttle 117
NaDa 16
LancerX 14
Dota 2
canceldota188
League of Legends
Cuddl3bear2
Super Smash Bros
PPMD74
Other Games
summit1g9922
tarik_tv5055
shahzam318
C9.Mang0291
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick999
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 79
• RyuSc2 66
• musti20045 34
• davetesta20
• Response 8
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP5
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 20
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21931
League of Legends
• Stunt116
Other Games
• imaqtpie637
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
9h 39m
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
Big Brain Bouts
15h 39m
Replay Cast
23h 39m
RSL Revival
1d 9h
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
1d 18h
RSL Revival
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
Escore Tournament S2: W1
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.