• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:03
CEST 06:03
KST 13:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
GSTL Returns in 2026!38Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out7RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-2212Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-611
StarCraft 2
General
GSTL Returns in 2026! Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) SC4ALL: II Talent Announcement! Protoss AoE skill expression Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Announcement Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) 2026 KungFu Cup Announcement
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 538 Media Blackout The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch
Brood War
General
Best Games Kespa era BCA KCU TANGERANG Telp:08218200233 Your past clans BW General Discussion ASL22 General Discussion
Tourneys
CSLAN 4 is Coming! Small VOD Thread 2.0 Escore Tournament - Season 3 BSL LAN Party - Kraków 29-30 August - OPEN SIGNUPS
Strategy
Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates Any training maps people recommend? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Anyone here play Quakeworld back in the day? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread The Letting Off Steam Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Chinese Gen Z: Between Dream…
TrAiDoS
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Hello guys!
LIN1s
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9567 users

Prop 8 upheld - Page 7

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 24 Next All
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:05 GMT
#121
On May 30 2009 09:57 JWD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:51 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:48 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:41 micronesia wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.

I think any major issue has tons of this shit and you are just cherry picking anyway.


Wrong. Prop 8 supporters never did any of this.


http://vimeo.com/2053489

lol


I stand corrected, do you have any more incidents? No one should condone any of this behavior.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/10/29/state/n064853D35.DTL
http://vodpod.com/watch/1218422-skinhead-ordered-to-stand-trial-for-anti-gay-yes-on-8-hate-crime-span-classsourcetowleroadspan
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/dec/18/anti-gay-graffiti-scrawled-clearview-home/
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/syracuse_police_identify_shoot.html

Come to think of it, because all anti-gay hate crime perpetrators would probably vote Yes on 8, I think your position that Proposition 8's opponents are more "like the Gestapo" looks even sillier.

And wait, you're saying that a majority of Prop 8 opponents used violent tactics? Um...please don't generalize anecdotal evidence.


That's the best you have? The first two are the same story, the fourth has no merit because the police have no idea why it happened, so because the mother said it was because he was gay then it was? So, you gave me two. Of course that behavior is horrendous, and one is a skin-head.

I think i'll link you some in a bit. Runs the gamut from pro gay marching into churches and disrupting services to harassing and threatening businesses and persons.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
May 30 2009 01:05 GMT
#122
There is no way to debate with someone who chooses what to respond to.
koOl
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Canada254 Posts
May 30 2009 01:05 GMT
#123
On May 30 2009 10:05 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:57 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:51 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:48 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:41 micronesia wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.

I think any major issue has tons of this shit and you are just cherry picking anyway.


Wrong. Prop 8 supporters never did any of this.


http://vimeo.com/2053489

lol


I stand corrected, do you have any more incidents? No one should condone any of this behavior.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/10/29/state/n064853D35.DTL
http://vodpod.com/watch/1218422-skinhead-ordered-to-stand-trial-for-anti-gay-yes-on-8-hate-crime-span-classsourcetowleroadspan
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/dec/18/anti-gay-graffiti-scrawled-clearview-home/
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/syracuse_police_identify_shoot.html

Come to think of it, because all anti-gay hate crime perpetrators would probably vote Yes on 8, I think your position that Proposition 8's opponents are more "like the Gestapo" looks even sillier.

And wait, you're saying that a majority of Prop 8 opponents used violent tactics? Um...please don't generalize anecdotal evidence.


That's the best you have? The first two are the same story, the fourth has no merit because the police have no idea why it happened, so because the mother said it was because he was gay then it was? So, you gave me two. Of course that behavior is horrendous, and one is a skin-head.

I think i'll link you some in a bit. Runs the gamut from pro gay marching into churches and disrupting services to harassing and threatening businesses and persons.


let me post thisf or u again cuz it seems you have missed it:

+ Show Spoiler +
In January 2009, the American Psychological Association (APA) released three separate studies that described the psychological distress associated with anti same-sex marriage amendments. One study using national survey responses of LGBTI individuals found that those who live in states that have passed marriage amendments experienced increased psychological stress not due to other pre-existing conditions but as “a direct result of the negative images and messages associated with the ballot campaign and the passage of the amendment.” Furthermore, participants reported feeling “alienated from their community, fearful they would lose their children, and concerned they would become victims of anti-gay violence.” These studies also reported that this harm extends to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) family members and straight allies who experience a form of “secondary minority stress.” Finally, “although many participants displayed resiliency and effective coping with this stress, some experienced strong negative consequences to their mental and physical health.”

Marriage Equality USA, through a series of town halls held across California and a national on-line survey of over 3,100 respondents, collected community input regarding the homophobia and other harm experienced through initiative campaigns, like Proposition 8, and received personal stories that mirror these APA findings. In our report “Prop 8 Hurt My Family – Ask Me How,” we collected almost 1,200 individual experiences which illustrate how:

LGBTI people experience increased verbal abuse, homophobia, physical harm and other discrimination associated with or resulting from the Prop 8 campaign;
Children of same-sex couples express fear due to direct exposure to homophobia and hate and concerns that the passage of Prop 8 means they could be taken from their families and targeted for further violence;
LGBTI youth and their supporters experience increased bullying at schools as Prop 8’s passage fosters a supportive environment for homophobic acts of physical and emotional violence;
Straight allies experience the impact of homophobia firsthand and express shock and fear for their LGBTI family members and friends and the danger they may experience if they were perceived as gay or an ally;
Families are torn apart as relatives divide on Prop 8; and
Communities are destroyed from the aftermath of abusive behavior towards them during local street demonstrations, neighborhood divisions, and the impact of “knowing your neighbor” voted against your family.
hihi
s_side
Profile Joined May 2009
United States700 Posts
May 30 2009 01:09 GMT
#124
The court did the responsible thing (which is amazing considering the California judiciary). That being said, I'm quite conflicted. The will of the people and the rule of law were upheld. I happen to think, however, that in this case, their will is pretty retarded.
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:09 GMT
#125
On May 30 2009 10:00 koOl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:58 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:56 koOl wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:55 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:50 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:47 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:


Marriage as always been only between a man and a woman throughout all of history.


If I can provide you an example will you admit your definition is wrong?




On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Remember when those black people were being oppressive and doing all those things. Good thing we didnt cave and give them equal rights. Otherwise everyone would want them.


I addressed this, gay couples have the same benefits as married couples.

...except being able to marry.


So you want to force the churches to do something that is a sin in their religion? What happened to freedom of religion?


churches would NOT be forced to perform same sex marriages...that is purely propaganda


What do you think marriage is? Do you know who marries couples? I'm sorry, but going to the local judicial services and getting your 'paper' is not marriage. Sure, you get your state derived benefits, that is associated with marriage and civil unions, but then you just want that called marriage, and not a civil union?



your point being?? that has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that churches wouldnt be forced to perform same sex marriages, ones that choose to do it could


My point being is the arguement for gay marriage isn't one of 'rights' or 'benefits' anymore, because those who are gay have the same 'rights' and 'benefits' as straight couples. Now, they want to impose their views of marriage onto religion and the churches. It's quite obvious. Stop obfuscating the real issue at hand. 80% of this country are christians. You want to force these 80% to essentially change the definition of marriage for what purpose? Of course the purpose is to make this behavior 'socially' recognized as normal and acceptable even though it goes against nature.

I have no problem with gays having the same state derived benefits. I do have problems when you force others to adapt your views through governmental action, when there is no rights being infringed upon. I'd recommend looking up the Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, and the US Constitution, and show me where, marriage is a right.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Frits
Profile Joined March 2003
11782 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-05-30 01:24:10
May 30 2009 01:09 GMT
#126
On May 30 2009 09:57 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:54 Diomedes wrote:
Wait, Aegraen is calling those who want to lift bans on gay marriage oppressive like the gestapo? WTF? I thought he meant the other way around?


WTF

Ban me if he isn't a troll.


Nope, not at all. I'm calling those who employ coercive, violent, and strongarm tactics as comparable to exactly what the Gestapo did. The majority of anti prop 8, supported these, and employed these tactics once they lost, and even beforehand.



What a retarded analogy, the contexts are so different it's not even funny. People against prop 8 who act in outrage do so because they want equal rights, not because they think they are the master race.

You're one to talk by the way, this is probably the most manipulative argument I have ever seen:

On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Ad hominem, stereotyping, hasty generalization, scare tactics, in the current context I'd call your methods as detestable as the prop 8 supporters who resort to violent acts.

Not to mention you openly support torture, you comparing someone with the gestapo is incredibly ironic.

-

About the equal rights which you seem to think are already in place: Why are people protesting? Please explain how this is possible when according to you there is no issue apparently. My take on this is that not allowing gays to marry is a discrimination based on sexuality. You can come up with a compromis that gives the same benefits, but it's like having to wear the star of david (you started these lame ww2 analogies), you're still reminded painfully every day for being different. If it's the same why call it different? It's painfully obvious that the reason for this is to maintain some kind of gap to support your feelings of superiority. Either allow gays to marry or don't, but don't make up some bullshit compromis and pretend it isn't discrimination, I'm pretty sure that's not simply for the majority to decide.

Since you seem to love branding people: If this debate was years ago I'm you'd be arguing for racial segregation. As usual I'd like to suggest to you that maybe there is such a thing called human progress.
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
May 30 2009 01:09 GMT
#127
On May 30 2009 10:05 travis wrote:
There is no way to debate with someone who chooses what to respond to.



Who isnt addressing your point? If you want put (respond please) at the end of points you want addressed.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
May 30 2009 01:11 GMT
#128
On May 30 2009 10:09 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:05 travis wrote:
There is no way to debate with someone who chooses what to respond to.



Who isnt addressing your point? If you want put (respond please) at the end of points you want addressed.

I think he has to be referring to Aegraen, the guy is completely ignoring all the posts where we tell him he has his facts totally wrong.
✌
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
May 30 2009 01:12 GMT
#129
Yah he does that in like every thread.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:12 GMT
#130
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Idle
Profile Joined May 2009
Korea (South)124 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-05-30 01:13:37
May 30 2009 01:12 GMT
#131
On May 30 2009 10:09 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:00 koOl wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:58 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:56 koOl wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:55 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:50 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:47 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:


Marriage as always been only between a man and a woman throughout all of history.


If I can provide you an example will you admit your definition is wrong?




On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Remember when those black people were being oppressive and doing all those things. Good thing we didnt cave and give them equal rights. Otherwise everyone would want them.


I addressed this, gay couples have the same benefits as married couples.

...except being able to marry.


So you want to force the churches to do something that is a sin in their religion? What happened to freedom of religion?


churches would NOT be forced to perform same sex marriages...that is purely propaganda


What do you think marriage is? Do you know who marries couples? I'm sorry, but going to the local judicial services and getting your 'paper' is not marriage. Sure, you get your state derived benefits, that is associated with marriage and civil unions, but then you just want that called marriage, and not a civil union?



your point being?? that has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that churches wouldnt be forced to perform same sex marriages, ones that choose to do it could


My point being is the arguement for gay marriage isn't one of 'rights' or 'benefits' anymore, because those who are gay have the same 'rights' and 'benefits' as straight couples.


You really need to stop with that argument because it is entirely false and has been shown to be such multiple times.
I'd turn gay for Baby.... wait, that came out wrong.
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
May 30 2009 01:16 GMT
#132
On May 30 2009 10:05 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:57 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:51 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:48 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:41 micronesia wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.

I think any major issue has tons of this shit and you are just cherry picking anyway.


Wrong. Prop 8 supporters never did any of this.


http://vimeo.com/2053489

lol


I stand corrected, do you have any more incidents? No one should condone any of this behavior.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/10/29/state/n064853D35.DTL
http://vodpod.com/watch/1218422-skinhead-ordered-to-stand-trial-for-anti-gay-yes-on-8-hate-crime-span-classsourcetowleroadspan
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/dec/18/anti-gay-graffiti-scrawled-clearview-home/
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/syracuse_police_identify_shoot.html

Come to think of it, because all anti-gay hate crime perpetrators would probably vote Yes on 8, I think your position that Proposition 8's opponents are more "like the Gestapo" looks even sillier.

And wait, you're saying that a majority of Prop 8 opponents used violent tactics? Um...please don't generalize anecdotal evidence.


That's the best you have? The first two are the same story, the fourth has no merit because the police have no idea why it happened, so because the mother said it was because he was gay then it was? So, you gave me two. Of course that behavior is horrendous, and one is a skin-head.

I spent two minutes on this (literally googling "proposition 8 supporter violence") because I don't think it's really relevant to the core issue here (gay marriage). I merely wanted to address your request for more incidents.

Let's get off this nonsense about which camp is more violent - you can stop threatening to pull out your links to examples of anti-Prop 8 violence like it's some sort of game-ending ultimate weapon in this debate. Instead, I'd like to see you address some of the more obvious faults in your reasoning which have been pointed out on earlier pages.
✌
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:16 GMT
#133
On May 30 2009 10:09 Frits wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:57 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:54 Diomedes wrote:
Wait, Aegraen is calling those who want to lift bans on gay marriage oppressive like the gestapo? WTF? I thought he meant the other way around?


WTF

Ban me if he isn't a troll.


Nope, not at all. I'm calling those who employ coercive, violent, and strongarm tactics as comparable to exactly what the Gestapo did. The majority of anti prop 8, supported these, and employed these tactics once they lost, and even beforehand.



What a retarded analogy, the contexts are so different it's not even funny. People against prop 8 who act in outrage do so because they want equal rights, not because they think they are the master race.

You're one to talk by the way, this is probably the most manipulative argument I have ever seen:

Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Ad hominem, stereotyping, hasty generalization, scare tactics, in the current context I'd call your methods as detestable as the prop 8 supporters who resort to violent acts.

Not to mention you openly support torture, you comparing someone with the gestapo is incredibly ironic.



http://michellemalkin.com/?s=proposition 8 mob

There are at least 20+ incidents, across a variety of spectrum. Read at your behest.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
May 30 2009 01:17 GMT
#134
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.

hmmm...a libertarian who thinks it's the government's business to prevent certain citizens from getting married? Really?
✌
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-05-30 01:18:41
May 30 2009 01:18 GMT
#135
Aegraen there were hundred of incidents of black violence during the civil rights movements. Your trying to place the sin of the individual upon the issue. Im sorry but you cant do that. Its a tactic people use when they dont have any better points to make.


On May 30 2009 10:17 JWD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.

hmmm...a libertarian who thinks it's the government's business to prevent certain citizens from getting married? Really?


Lol great point.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Idle
Profile Joined May 2009
Korea (South)124 Posts
May 30 2009 01:18 GMT
#136
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.


You call yourself that but your attitude and viewpoints are completely counter to libertarian/conservative ideals.
I'd turn gay for Baby.... wait, that came out wrong.
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
May 30 2009 01:19 GMT
#137
On May 30 2009 10:16 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:09 Frits wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:57 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:54 Diomedes wrote:
Wait, Aegraen is calling those who want to lift bans on gay marriage oppressive like the gestapo? WTF? I thought he meant the other way around?


WTF

Ban me if he isn't a troll.


Nope, not at all. I'm calling those who employ coercive, violent, and strongarm tactics as comparable to exactly what the Gestapo did. The majority of anti prop 8, supported these, and employed these tactics once they lost, and even beforehand.



What a retarded analogy, the contexts are so different it's not even funny. People against prop 8 who act in outrage do so because they want equal rights, not because they think they are the master race.

You're one to talk by the way, this is probably the most manipulative argument I have ever seen:

On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Ad hominem, stereotyping, hasty generalization, scare tactics, in the current context I'd call your methods as detestable as the prop 8 supporters who resort to violent acts.

Not to mention you openly support torture, you comparing someone with the gestapo is incredibly ironic.



http://michellemalkin.com/?s=proposition 8 mob

There are at least 20+ incidents, across a variety of spectrum. Read at your behest.

This is great, but it has nothing to do with whether gay marriage should be legalized. Get off it.
✌
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:19 GMT
#138
On May 30 2009 10:04 Idle wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:59 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:57 Idle wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:55 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:50 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:47 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:


Marriage as always been only between a man and a woman throughout all of history.


If I can provide you an example will you admit your definition is wrong?




On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Remember when those black people were being oppressive and doing all those things. Good thing we didnt cave and give them equal rights. Otherwise everyone would want them.


I addressed this, gay couples have the same benefits as married couples.

...except being able to marry.


So you want to force the churches to do something that is a sin in their religion? What happened to freedom of religion?


Nobody wants the churches to do anything. The issue is that the government is the one refusing to grant marriages, and the government shouldn't get to exclude people.


The government grants the same benefits to gay couples as it does to straight couples. Try again.


No, actually it doesn't. You keep stating this but its completely false. Only 8 states grant civil unions or domestic partnerships which similar rights to marriage, and 5 more grant some of the same rights. Since this thread is specifically on prop 8 in california, domestic partnership differs in the following ways:

# Couples seeking domestic partnership must already share a residence, married couples may be married without living together.
# Couples seeking domestic partnership must be 18 or older, minors can be married before the age of 18 with the consent of their parents.
# California permits married couples the option of confidential marriage, there is no equivalent institution for domestic partnerships. In confidential marriages, no witnesses are required and the marriage license is not a matter of public record.
# Married partners of state employees are eligible for the CalPERS long-term care insurance plan, domestic partners are not.
# There is, at least according to one appellate ruling, no equivalent of the Putative Spouse Doctrine for domestic partnerships.



The only benefit there, that isn't the same is CalPERS. Fight for that, not to change the definition of marriage.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:19 GMT
#139
On May 30 2009 10:18 Idle wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.


You call yourself that but your attitude and viewpoints are completely counter to libertarian/conservative ideals.


No, they are not.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:22 GMT
#140
On May 30 2009 10:17 JWD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.

hmmm...a libertarian who thinks it's the government's business to prevent certain citizens from getting married? Really?


Yes, I am opposed to them getting married. I am not opposed to civil unions and the granting of same benefits. How again, is that against libertarianism? Personally, I'm perfectly ok, with the abolishment of state derived benefits for all parties whether its marriage or civil unions.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 24 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
IPSL
16:00
CSLAN Day 1
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 89
StarCraft: Brood War
Noble 24
Bale 12
Icarus 9
Dota 2
The International47229
NeuroSwarm168
Fuzer 117
febbydoto9
LuMiX0
Counter-Strike
summit1g9143
minikerr49
Other Games
JimRising 449
WinterStarcraft384
ViBE256
ProTech68
Trikslyr44
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick778
BasetradeTV284
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki58
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1916
League of Legends
• Rush970
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5h 57m
PiG Sty Festival
7h 57m
Maru vs Shameless
Reynor vs TriGGeR
IPSL
11h 57m
OSC
19h 57m
Afreeca Starleague
1d 5h
Rush vs Hm
Bisu vs Shuttle
WardiTV Weekly
1d 6h
The Patches Monday
1d 11h
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Sharp vs Shinee
Action vs Shine
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
BeSt vs Paralyze
Jaedong vs Speed
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
KCM Race Survival
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
PiG Sty Festival
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
PiG Sty Festival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S3: W7
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
Acropolis #5
CSLAN 4
RSL Revival: Season 6
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
META DYMY #4
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026

Upcoming

ASL Season 22
CSL Season 22: Qualifier 1
Escore Tournament S3: W8
CSL Season 22: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.