• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:24
CEST 19:24
KST 02:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double2Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple3BSL Season 2313Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon111
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double Recent Patches and the Future Stellar Fest 1 Replay Pack Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)
Tourneys
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) 2026 GSTL Grand Finals SC2 INu's Battles#21 [ 3-Days tournament ] ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder Where can I find Flash replays that work? a Announcement on the JEDI Ringing Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 4 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 3 [ASL22] Ro8 Day 2
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread All you football fans (soccer)! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Violent-Cooperative Play and…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9458 users

Prop 8 upheld - Page 7

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 24 Next All
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:05 GMT
#121
On May 30 2009 09:57 JWD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:51 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:48 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:41 micronesia wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.

I think any major issue has tons of this shit and you are just cherry picking anyway.


Wrong. Prop 8 supporters never did any of this.


http://vimeo.com/2053489

lol


I stand corrected, do you have any more incidents? No one should condone any of this behavior.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/10/29/state/n064853D35.DTL
http://vodpod.com/watch/1218422-skinhead-ordered-to-stand-trial-for-anti-gay-yes-on-8-hate-crime-span-classsourcetowleroadspan
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/dec/18/anti-gay-graffiti-scrawled-clearview-home/
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/syracuse_police_identify_shoot.html

Come to think of it, because all anti-gay hate crime perpetrators would probably vote Yes on 8, I think your position that Proposition 8's opponents are more "like the Gestapo" looks even sillier.

And wait, you're saying that a majority of Prop 8 opponents used violent tactics? Um...please don't generalize anecdotal evidence.


That's the best you have? The first two are the same story, the fourth has no merit because the police have no idea why it happened, so because the mother said it was because he was gay then it was? So, you gave me two. Of course that behavior is horrendous, and one is a skin-head.

I think i'll link you some in a bit. Runs the gamut from pro gay marching into churches and disrupting services to harassing and threatening businesses and persons.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
May 30 2009 01:05 GMT
#122
There is no way to debate with someone who chooses what to respond to.
koOl
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Canada254 Posts
May 30 2009 01:05 GMT
#123
On May 30 2009 10:05 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:57 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:51 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:48 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:41 micronesia wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.

I think any major issue has tons of this shit and you are just cherry picking anyway.


Wrong. Prop 8 supporters never did any of this.


http://vimeo.com/2053489

lol


I stand corrected, do you have any more incidents? No one should condone any of this behavior.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/10/29/state/n064853D35.DTL
http://vodpod.com/watch/1218422-skinhead-ordered-to-stand-trial-for-anti-gay-yes-on-8-hate-crime-span-classsourcetowleroadspan
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/dec/18/anti-gay-graffiti-scrawled-clearview-home/
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/syracuse_police_identify_shoot.html

Come to think of it, because all anti-gay hate crime perpetrators would probably vote Yes on 8, I think your position that Proposition 8's opponents are more "like the Gestapo" looks even sillier.

And wait, you're saying that a majority of Prop 8 opponents used violent tactics? Um...please don't generalize anecdotal evidence.


That's the best you have? The first two are the same story, the fourth has no merit because the police have no idea why it happened, so because the mother said it was because he was gay then it was? So, you gave me two. Of course that behavior is horrendous, and one is a skin-head.

I think i'll link you some in a bit. Runs the gamut from pro gay marching into churches and disrupting services to harassing and threatening businesses and persons.


let me post thisf or u again cuz it seems you have missed it:

+ Show Spoiler +
In January 2009, the American Psychological Association (APA) released three separate studies that described the psychological distress associated with anti same-sex marriage amendments. One study using national survey responses of LGBTI individuals found that those who live in states that have passed marriage amendments experienced increased psychological stress not due to other pre-existing conditions but as “a direct result of the negative images and messages associated with the ballot campaign and the passage of the amendment.” Furthermore, participants reported feeling “alienated from their community, fearful they would lose their children, and concerned they would become victims of anti-gay violence.” These studies also reported that this harm extends to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) family members and straight allies who experience a form of “secondary minority stress.” Finally, “although many participants displayed resiliency and effective coping with this stress, some experienced strong negative consequences to their mental and physical health.”

Marriage Equality USA, through a series of town halls held across California and a national on-line survey of over 3,100 respondents, collected community input regarding the homophobia and other harm experienced through initiative campaigns, like Proposition 8, and received personal stories that mirror these APA findings. In our report “Prop 8 Hurt My Family – Ask Me How,” we collected almost 1,200 individual experiences which illustrate how:

LGBTI people experience increased verbal abuse, homophobia, physical harm and other discrimination associated with or resulting from the Prop 8 campaign;
Children of same-sex couples express fear due to direct exposure to homophobia and hate and concerns that the passage of Prop 8 means they could be taken from their families and targeted for further violence;
LGBTI youth and their supporters experience increased bullying at schools as Prop 8’s passage fosters a supportive environment for homophobic acts of physical and emotional violence;
Straight allies experience the impact of homophobia firsthand and express shock and fear for their LGBTI family members and friends and the danger they may experience if they were perceived as gay or an ally;
Families are torn apart as relatives divide on Prop 8; and
Communities are destroyed from the aftermath of abusive behavior towards them during local street demonstrations, neighborhood divisions, and the impact of “knowing your neighbor” voted against your family.
hihi
s_side
Profile Joined May 2009
United States700 Posts
May 30 2009 01:09 GMT
#124
The court did the responsible thing (which is amazing considering the California judiciary). That being said, I'm quite conflicted. The will of the people and the rule of law were upheld. I happen to think, however, that in this case, their will is pretty retarded.
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:09 GMT
#125
On May 30 2009 10:00 koOl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:58 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:56 koOl wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:55 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:50 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:47 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:


Marriage as always been only between a man and a woman throughout all of history.


If I can provide you an example will you admit your definition is wrong?




On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Remember when those black people were being oppressive and doing all those things. Good thing we didnt cave and give them equal rights. Otherwise everyone would want them.


I addressed this, gay couples have the same benefits as married couples.

...except being able to marry.


So you want to force the churches to do something that is a sin in their religion? What happened to freedom of religion?


churches would NOT be forced to perform same sex marriages...that is purely propaganda


What do you think marriage is? Do you know who marries couples? I'm sorry, but going to the local judicial services and getting your 'paper' is not marriage. Sure, you get your state derived benefits, that is associated with marriage and civil unions, but then you just want that called marriage, and not a civil union?



your point being?? that has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that churches wouldnt be forced to perform same sex marriages, ones that choose to do it could


My point being is the arguement for gay marriage isn't one of 'rights' or 'benefits' anymore, because those who are gay have the same 'rights' and 'benefits' as straight couples. Now, they want to impose their views of marriage onto religion and the churches. It's quite obvious. Stop obfuscating the real issue at hand. 80% of this country are christians. You want to force these 80% to essentially change the definition of marriage for what purpose? Of course the purpose is to make this behavior 'socially' recognized as normal and acceptable even though it goes against nature.

I have no problem with gays having the same state derived benefits. I do have problems when you force others to adapt your views through governmental action, when there is no rights being infringed upon. I'd recommend looking up the Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, and the US Constitution, and show me where, marriage is a right.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Frits
Profile Joined March 2003
11782 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-05-30 01:24:10
May 30 2009 01:09 GMT
#126
On May 30 2009 09:57 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:54 Diomedes wrote:
Wait, Aegraen is calling those who want to lift bans on gay marriage oppressive like the gestapo? WTF? I thought he meant the other way around?


WTF

Ban me if he isn't a troll.


Nope, not at all. I'm calling those who employ coercive, violent, and strongarm tactics as comparable to exactly what the Gestapo did. The majority of anti prop 8, supported these, and employed these tactics once they lost, and even beforehand.



What a retarded analogy, the contexts are so different it's not even funny. People against prop 8 who act in outrage do so because they want equal rights, not because they think they are the master race.

You're one to talk by the way, this is probably the most manipulative argument I have ever seen:

On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Ad hominem, stereotyping, hasty generalization, scare tactics, in the current context I'd call your methods as detestable as the prop 8 supporters who resort to violent acts.

Not to mention you openly support torture, you comparing someone with the gestapo is incredibly ironic.

-

About the equal rights which you seem to think are already in place: Why are people protesting? Please explain how this is possible when according to you there is no issue apparently. My take on this is that not allowing gays to marry is a discrimination based on sexuality. You can come up with a compromis that gives the same benefits, but it's like having to wear the star of david (you started these lame ww2 analogies), you're still reminded painfully every day for being different. If it's the same why call it different? It's painfully obvious that the reason for this is to maintain some kind of gap to support your feelings of superiority. Either allow gays to marry or don't, but don't make up some bullshit compromis and pretend it isn't discrimination, I'm pretty sure that's not simply for the majority to decide.

Since you seem to love branding people: If this debate was years ago I'm you'd be arguing for racial segregation. As usual I'd like to suggest to you that maybe there is such a thing called human progress.
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
May 30 2009 01:09 GMT
#127
On May 30 2009 10:05 travis wrote:
There is no way to debate with someone who chooses what to respond to.



Who isnt addressing your point? If you want put (respond please) at the end of points you want addressed.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
May 30 2009 01:11 GMT
#128
On May 30 2009 10:09 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:05 travis wrote:
There is no way to debate with someone who chooses what to respond to.



Who isnt addressing your point? If you want put (respond please) at the end of points you want addressed.

I think he has to be referring to Aegraen, the guy is completely ignoring all the posts where we tell him he has his facts totally wrong.
✌
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
May 30 2009 01:12 GMT
#129
Yah he does that in like every thread.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:12 GMT
#130
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Idle
Profile Joined May 2009
Korea (South)124 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-05-30 01:13:37
May 30 2009 01:12 GMT
#131
On May 30 2009 10:09 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:00 koOl wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:58 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:56 koOl wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:55 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:50 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:47 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:


Marriage as always been only between a man and a woman throughout all of history.


If I can provide you an example will you admit your definition is wrong?




On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Remember when those black people were being oppressive and doing all those things. Good thing we didnt cave and give them equal rights. Otherwise everyone would want them.


I addressed this, gay couples have the same benefits as married couples.

...except being able to marry.


So you want to force the churches to do something that is a sin in their religion? What happened to freedom of religion?


churches would NOT be forced to perform same sex marriages...that is purely propaganda


What do you think marriage is? Do you know who marries couples? I'm sorry, but going to the local judicial services and getting your 'paper' is not marriage. Sure, you get your state derived benefits, that is associated with marriage and civil unions, but then you just want that called marriage, and not a civil union?



your point being?? that has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that churches wouldnt be forced to perform same sex marriages, ones that choose to do it could


My point being is the arguement for gay marriage isn't one of 'rights' or 'benefits' anymore, because those who are gay have the same 'rights' and 'benefits' as straight couples.


You really need to stop with that argument because it is entirely false and has been shown to be such multiple times.
I'd turn gay for Baby.... wait, that came out wrong.
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
May 30 2009 01:16 GMT
#132
On May 30 2009 10:05 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:57 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:51 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:48 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:41 micronesia wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.

I think any major issue has tons of this shit and you are just cherry picking anyway.


Wrong. Prop 8 supporters never did any of this.


http://vimeo.com/2053489

lol


I stand corrected, do you have any more incidents? No one should condone any of this behavior.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/10/29/state/n064853D35.DTL
http://vodpod.com/watch/1218422-skinhead-ordered-to-stand-trial-for-anti-gay-yes-on-8-hate-crime-span-classsourcetowleroadspan
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/dec/18/anti-gay-graffiti-scrawled-clearview-home/
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/syracuse_police_identify_shoot.html

Come to think of it, because all anti-gay hate crime perpetrators would probably vote Yes on 8, I think your position that Proposition 8's opponents are more "like the Gestapo" looks even sillier.

And wait, you're saying that a majority of Prop 8 opponents used violent tactics? Um...please don't generalize anecdotal evidence.


That's the best you have? The first two are the same story, the fourth has no merit because the police have no idea why it happened, so because the mother said it was because he was gay then it was? So, you gave me two. Of course that behavior is horrendous, and one is a skin-head.

I spent two minutes on this (literally googling "proposition 8 supporter violence") because I don't think it's really relevant to the core issue here (gay marriage). I merely wanted to address your request for more incidents.

Let's get off this nonsense about which camp is more violent - you can stop threatening to pull out your links to examples of anti-Prop 8 violence like it's some sort of game-ending ultimate weapon in this debate. Instead, I'd like to see you address some of the more obvious faults in your reasoning which have been pointed out on earlier pages.
✌
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:16 GMT
#133
On May 30 2009 10:09 Frits wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:57 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:54 Diomedes wrote:
Wait, Aegraen is calling those who want to lift bans on gay marriage oppressive like the gestapo? WTF? I thought he meant the other way around?


WTF

Ban me if he isn't a troll.


Nope, not at all. I'm calling those who employ coercive, violent, and strongarm tactics as comparable to exactly what the Gestapo did. The majority of anti prop 8, supported these, and employed these tactics once they lost, and even beforehand.



What a retarded analogy, the contexts are so different it's not even funny. People against prop 8 who act in outrage do so because they want equal rights, not because they think they are the master race.

You're one to talk by the way, this is probably the most manipulative argument I have ever seen:

Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Ad hominem, stereotyping, hasty generalization, scare tactics, in the current context I'd call your methods as detestable as the prop 8 supporters who resort to violent acts.

Not to mention you openly support torture, you comparing someone with the gestapo is incredibly ironic.



http://michellemalkin.com/?s=proposition 8 mob

There are at least 20+ incidents, across a variety of spectrum. Read at your behest.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
May 30 2009 01:17 GMT
#134
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.

hmmm...a libertarian who thinks it's the government's business to prevent certain citizens from getting married? Really?
✌
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-05-30 01:18:41
May 30 2009 01:18 GMT
#135
Aegraen there were hundred of incidents of black violence during the civil rights movements. Your trying to place the sin of the individual upon the issue. Im sorry but you cant do that. Its a tactic people use when they dont have any better points to make.


On May 30 2009 10:17 JWD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.

hmmm...a libertarian who thinks it's the government's business to prevent certain citizens from getting married? Really?


Lol great point.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Idle
Profile Joined May 2009
Korea (South)124 Posts
May 30 2009 01:18 GMT
#136
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.


You call yourself that but your attitude and viewpoints are completely counter to libertarian/conservative ideals.
I'd turn gay for Baby.... wait, that came out wrong.
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
May 30 2009 01:19 GMT
#137
On May 30 2009 10:16 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:09 Frits wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:57 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:54 Diomedes wrote:
Wait, Aegraen is calling those who want to lift bans on gay marriage oppressive like the gestapo? WTF? I thought he meant the other way around?


WTF

Ban me if he isn't a troll.


Nope, not at all. I'm calling those who employ coercive, violent, and strongarm tactics as comparable to exactly what the Gestapo did. The majority of anti prop 8, supported these, and employed these tactics once they lost, and even beforehand.



What a retarded analogy, the contexts are so different it's not even funny. People against prop 8 who act in outrage do so because they want equal rights, not because they think they are the master race.

You're one to talk by the way, this is probably the most manipulative argument I have ever seen:

On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Ad hominem, stereotyping, hasty generalization, scare tactics, in the current context I'd call your methods as detestable as the prop 8 supporters who resort to violent acts.

Not to mention you openly support torture, you comparing someone with the gestapo is incredibly ironic.



http://michellemalkin.com/?s=proposition 8 mob

There are at least 20+ incidents, across a variety of spectrum. Read at your behest.

This is great, but it has nothing to do with whether gay marriage should be legalized. Get off it.
✌
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:19 GMT
#138
On May 30 2009 10:04 Idle wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 09:59 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:57 Idle wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:55 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:50 JWD wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:47 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:43 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:


Marriage as always been only between a man and a woman throughout all of history.


If I can provide you an example will you admit your definition is wrong?




On May 30 2009 09:39 Aegraen wrote:
Anyways, anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. Vandalizing property, threatening peoples lives, assault and battery, runs the gamut. Reminds me of the gestapo. Calling up businesses and threatening them with violence, etc. This is all documented immensely, and if you want me to link for you, I'll gladly do that.


Remember when those black people were being oppressive and doing all those things. Good thing we didnt cave and give them equal rights. Otherwise everyone would want them.


I addressed this, gay couples have the same benefits as married couples.

...except being able to marry.


So you want to force the churches to do something that is a sin in their religion? What happened to freedom of religion?


Nobody wants the churches to do anything. The issue is that the government is the one refusing to grant marriages, and the government shouldn't get to exclude people.


The government grants the same benefits to gay couples as it does to straight couples. Try again.


No, actually it doesn't. You keep stating this but its completely false. Only 8 states grant civil unions or domestic partnerships which similar rights to marriage, and 5 more grant some of the same rights. Since this thread is specifically on prop 8 in california, domestic partnership differs in the following ways:

# Couples seeking domestic partnership must already share a residence, married couples may be married without living together.
# Couples seeking domestic partnership must be 18 or older, minors can be married before the age of 18 with the consent of their parents.
# California permits married couples the option of confidential marriage, there is no equivalent institution for domestic partnerships. In confidential marriages, no witnesses are required and the marriage license is not a matter of public record.
# Married partners of state employees are eligible for the CalPERS long-term care insurance plan, domestic partners are not.
# There is, at least according to one appellate ruling, no equivalent of the Putative Spouse Doctrine for domestic partnerships.



The only benefit there, that isn't the same is CalPERS. Fight for that, not to change the definition of marriage.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:19 GMT
#139
On May 30 2009 10:18 Idle wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.


You call yourself that but your attitude and viewpoints are completely counter to libertarian/conservative ideals.


No, they are not.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
May 30 2009 01:22 GMT
#140
On May 30 2009 10:17 JWD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2009 10:12 Aegraen wrote:
On May 30 2009 10:03 Diomedes wrote:
Aegraen is posting offensive stereotype nonsense, in the bluntest most unconvincing manners, in almost every thread.

So surely you are wrong. Main problem is his intentions. I suspect he is some enbittered far left wing 'liberal' trying to make 'his opponents' look bad.


Try again, I'm a libertarian/conservative.

hmmm...a libertarian who thinks it's the government's business to prevent certain citizens from getting married? Really?


Yes, I am opposed to them getting married. I am not opposed to civil unions and the granting of same benefits. How again, is that against libertarianism? Personally, I'm perfectly ok, with the abolishment of state derived benefits for all parties whether its marriage or civil unions.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 24 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Stellar Fest
13:00
Stellar Fest 2 The Moon: Qualifier Day 1
ComeBackTV 668
IntoTheiNu 619
SteadfastSC477
Rex98
CosmosSc2 63
EnkiAlexander 51
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 477
Rex 98
UpATreeSC 90
CosmosSc2 63
BRAT_OK 41
MindelVK 15
Codebar 15
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 42414
Jaedong 1427
Hyuk 822
Soma 734
Mini 463
BeSt 459
Larva 352
Rush 293
Soulkey 253
ZerO 234
[ Show more ]
Snow 167
hero 97
Dewaltoss 76
Liquid`Ret 53
Mind 45
sorry 31
yabsab 29
Killer 27
ToSsGirL 23
Terrorterran 21
Rock 21
Shine 19
Trap 16
Dota 2
qojqva1334
Dendi832
Counter-Strike
Fnx 738
x6flipin350
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King103
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby3327
crisheroes2358
Khaldor1777
Liquid`Hasu444
Other Games
singsing1769
ArmadaUGS1692
byalli470
ceh9377
B2W.Neo376
KnowMe120
QueenE93
Trikslyr35
Chillindude24
Railgan22
ZerO(Twitch)13
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream86
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 39
• Adnapsc2 6
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• IndyKCrew
• intothetv
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki14
• FirePhoenix11
• ZZZeroYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3473
League of Legends
• Nemesis2358
• TFBlade1111
Other Games
• imaqtpie643
• Shiphtur337
• WagamamaTV226
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
16h 36m
OSC
19h 36m
Stellar Fest
19h 36m
OSC
1d 6h
Stellar Fest
1d 19h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
Online Event
2 days
FEL
2 days
AI Arena Tournament
2 days
BSL: Ladder Tournament
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
INu's Battles
3 days
herO vs Classic
Percival vs Rogue
BSL Open Qualifier
4 days
BSL Open Qualifier
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
INu's Battles
5 days
SHIN vs Cure
ByuN vs Zoun
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-27
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Calamity Invitational

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.