• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:14
CEST 06:14
KST 13:14
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL60Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event19Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Korean Starcraft League Week 77 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL ASL20 Preliminary Maps SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Mineral Boosts Tutorial Video
Tourneys
[BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 516 users

[Poll] MBS implementation (or not)

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 23 24 25 Next All
Prose
Profile Joined June 2004
Canada314 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-10-11 17:24:38
October 09 2007 01:01 GMT
#1
[image loading]

Poll: How to implement MBS?
(Vote): Hotkey,unit: to mass-build unit.
(Vote): Hotkey,unit1,tab,unit2,tab,unit3... Hotkeyx3,unit: to mass-build unit.
(Vote): Hotkey,unit1,unit2,unit3... Hotkeyx3,unit: to mass-build unit w/ delay.
(Vote): Hotkey,unit1,unit2,unit3... Hotkeyx3,unit: to mass-build unit w/o delay.
(Vote): Toggle options: e.g., MBS off for ladder.
(Vote): No MBS.
(Vote): MBS only possible with mouse selection; no hotkey binding.
(Vote): MBS w/ arbitrary low limit: e.g. buildings powered by shared pylon, barracks lined up.
(Vote): Other.



Multiple Building Selection (MBS)

The following are options for MBS, as poll-arized above. Note that in all options, the scenario is six barracks bound to hotkey 8:

1. Can bind multiple buildings into one hotkey: one press of button will make all buildings make that unit. ie.

8,m. to make 6 marines.

This blanket 8,m mass-build won't allow you to diversify your unit production, which is bad.

2. Can bind multiple buildings into one hotkey: one press to select one unit. Press tab (or some other arbitrary button) to cycle to next building. Make unit. Press tab to cycle to next building, and so on. Not pressing tab will queue up one building, which is undesirable.

8,m,tab,m,tab,m,tab,m,tab,c,tab,c. to make 4 marines, 2 medics (c).

8,8,8,m. to center on barracks and mass-build 6 marines.

This is close to Brood War, with the same number of button presses. Only now, players will be able to bind more buildings to hotkeys, instead of one per hotkey. For mass-build, press hotkey three times (See explanation below).

3 and 4. Can bind multiple buildings into one hotkey: press to make a unit. Selection automatically cycles to next building that is idle or has the least queue.

8,m,m,m,m,c,c. to make 4 marines, 2 medics.

8,8,m,m,m,m,c,c. to center on 6 barracks, making 4 marines and 2 medics.

8,8,8,m. to center on 6 barracks, activating mass build, to make 6 marines.

Pressing 8 twice switches your view to centre of buildings; you can bind buildings from all over the map; pressing 8 twice may thus center your view to middle of nowhere. A good idea, then, to bind buildings in one base.

Pressing 8 thrice, centres view, and allows you to command all buildings to make units with one press. ie. This option has a logical delay: each building is selected (highlighted) for .10 seconds. Therefore, for ten buildings, the selection highlight cycle will amount a full second, which is not critical for casual games, but crucial for professional games. Note: .10 seconds is very generous. I don't think even Nada can order to make 10 marines from 10 barracks in one second?

With Terran, you can still bind buildings regardless of whether there's an add-on; however, the option to mass build add-on units like medics, tanks, and battlecruisers is only possible if all buildings have add-ons. (If you can mass-produce these special units, then they wouldn't be that special now, would they? If you wish to mass-produce them, bind only buildings with add-ons, then.)

For Zerg, this .10 second delay should be non-existent because Zerg is the prolific, mass unit race. Besides, in SC, you can mass-produce anyways by shift-clicking on larvae to produce 12 units at a time.

So don't use this hotkeyx3 (mass build) option when in middle of micro battle or if you don’t want a one-unit army or if you don't want the screen to move or if you just don't want to feel noobish. Side note: I've thought of other buttons to activate this mass-build option such Tab, but for now, pressing the hotkey once more (for a total of three times) seems the most convenient. I've also thought of activating this mass-build after only two presses of hotkey, but players might want to use only the centering function and not the mass-build.

5. Toggle options. MBS turned off for ladder games, for example.

6. No MBS.

7. MBS only possible with mouse selection; no hotkey binding.

8. Allow MBS but with an arbitrary low number of buildings (except for Zerg) that can be bound to a hotkey: for example, only buildings powered by same pylon or only barracks that are lined up together or only hatcheries visible on screen can be bound.

The pro-MBS camp has a point with modernizing User Interface (UI) to incorporate MBS. For example, in RPG, I love the first Final Fantasy but I cannot tolerate its now archaic interface. It is annoying that I need 300 button presses (buy, select item, confirm) just to max out on 100 potions.

When playing SC2 one-player, MBS would be fine.

But it's not so simple when it comes to competitive SC. The game is fun because of the delicate balance between macro and micro. How important is macro? If you can gain an economic advantage, get better unit production, while denying the opponent both, then you will most likely win. (But if your micro is inferior, you might still lose).

SC has these elements:
Macromanagement - economy, rate of unit production, upgrades, supply, tech
Micromanagement - unit control, focus-fire, flanking, aiming spells
Strategy - scouting, counters, timing, when and where to hit, retreat, build orders, feint

MBS affects rate of unit production, while auto-mining, the economy. But rate of unit production is a huge chunk of macro, and if MBS is to be implemented, what element of macro should replace it? This is the big conundrum.

Which RPG game is more diverse? Obviously B.
A. strength, intelligence
B. strength, intelligence, speed, stamina

I've read a lot of people's comments on MBS, and I've tried to include all the suggestions in this poll. I'm leaning towards Choice 3, of course, which a lot of people have suggested, but it also includes the option of mass-building. For the pro-MBS out there, mass-build pressing 8,8,8,m, is only two more button presses than 8,m. So it's not too much of a hardship. As for the buildings cycling every .10 seconds, can you do better than building ten marines in one second from ten barracks?

Update: Oct 9, 2007 Added to first choice: "This blanket 8,m mass-build won't allow you to diversify your unit production, which is bad."

Update: October 10, 2007

Thanks for all your input.

Conclusions from this poll about MBS implementation:

- Hotkeyx3 is disliked.
- Tab preferred in cycling through hotkeyed buildings.
- Mass producing preferred with no delay.
- Two camps are divided.

If a clearcut side, simplest solution is take majority. Case in point: Soul Hunter got surf.. serf.. um, served.

It's not worth repeating the pros and cons to MBS. You can read them in MBS threads by orangedude and artosis3.

orangedude: "We should be instead focusing on ways to make up for the addition of MBS/automining with additional macro ideas rather than opposing its inclusion into SC2, because we might actually profoundly improve the game as a result of our ideas."

However, what other macrotasks (not microtasks) are offered to counterbalance automation of unit production? 1. Warpgates. 2. Upkeep?? 3. ?? It's hard to think up ideas...

The solution I propose to appease both camps is not in coming up with other macrotasks, but pertains to the MBS sytem itself: how it should be implemented.

Proposed MBS solution:

* Hotkey,unit1,tab,unit2,tab,unit3... to build unit one at a time, cycling through hotkeyed buildings with tab.
* Hotkey2x,hold,unit to mass-produce unit at a rate of 4 per second with bonus special effects.
* If mouse only, cntrl+click on building to select all similar buildings onscreen, click "mass-build", a new option in command window (bottom right corner of screen), click unit.

Note: Currently in BW, Tab toggles mini-map colours. This function can be switched, let's say, to F5.

Note: I think hotkey2x,hold,unit (hotkey,hotkey+unit or hotkey,holdhotkey,unit) is better than the unpopular hotkey3x,unit. So please substitute this notation to my original post above.

Explanation:

* Brood War macro is preserved; number of button presses stays the same.
* Can now bind more buildings to hotkeys, freeing up other hotkeys for units.
* Slight improvement to queueing: the first building highlighted is idle or has the least queue.
* With two buttons, you can mass-produce one unit at an expert rate: four per second. In other words, the task of clicking on your buildings, one by one, to produce one unit, has been automated. Does this require you to leave your units, your attention turned elsewhere? Yes. Does this take time? Yes.
* Hotkey2x forces centering on hotkeyed buildings, away from the battlefield.
* Hotkey2x,hold,unit allows mass-building of unit.
* Cursor/selection/highlight cycles (the screen transitions smoothly, not abruptly) from building to building with subtle special effects (maybe a grotesque root-like adrenaline vein that branches from one hatchery to the next... or a phasing out/cloaking effect of one gateway to the next... or a Terran battle cry that varies according to the number of buildings bound to a hotkey: "Move it out, move it out, move it out! One, two, three, four, five, six, seven! Aaarrrrr, absolutely badassess! Let's pack 'em in! Get in there!" Apone, Aliens.)
* Naturally, the more buildings bound, the longer the cycle.
* You can queue in other commands while this cycle is happening, including pressing another hotkey to mass-build another unit from a different set of buildings.

** Why the special effects? To appease the fashionable? Maybe. But also to let opponent know (who has vision, of course) that your attention is away from your units for a second or two--a perfect time for them to unleash hold lurkers on your army, for example.

** Why not just hotkey,hold,unit? To prevent a player from accidentally mass-building (pressing hotkey and unit so fast, virtually at the same time).

Repercussions:

* This is better than pure MBS (blanket hotkey,unit) as it allows unit diversity, by tabbing or clicking at each building in selection window.
* This is better than pure no MBS.
* This is better than toggle, which may segregate communities further. As it is, we have differing tastes: progaming scene, UMS Bound UMS RPG, UMS micro, BGH, Fastest, NoRush, compstomp, novice, experts. Not necessarily a bad thing, but now novice players may feel more confident playing against experts knowing they can keep up with this aspect of unit production. However, they should realize that maintaining supply, expanding, timing expansion, making workers, transferring workers, ensuring economy to support mass production, and keeping minerals low instead of waiting for 1000 minerals to build ten zealots, are not automated for them by MBS. In fact, if their skills are poor in these areas, against an expert, they will likely not even live long enough to build ten gateways...
* A pro-gamer will likely not use the MBS feature because it'll take attention away from the battlefield and limit diversity in unit mix. The special effects may also reveal to a scouting opponent a momentary nonattention to the battlefield--a bad thing. But only on high levels of gaming can this be exploited.
* Pro-gramers will not use the MBS feature because they can produce faster than 4 units per second.
* In professional gaming, even one second away from battlefield is an eternity. In novice play, a second is not as crucial.
* Pro-gamers may even avoid using the MBS feature for psychological reasons--it may make them lazy or less alert. Hence, that's why they 'spam' at beginning of a game.
* There are times experts may want to use MBS, such as to check which buildings are bound to a hotkey, or if they want to see the special effects.
** The rate of production can be beta-tested. It can even be tweaked to favour Zerg (faster rate) if Blizzard is really differentiating the races, with Zerg being the "swarming", en-masse species, and the Protoss now seeming to be even more the every-single-unit-counts race.
** MBS should apply to unit-producing buildings only, and not to static defense structures like cannons and sunkens to encourage aggression and thwart turtling. Who loves turtlers? Do we need a poll for that...

Please, my brethrens. Whether for or against MBS, we share a common interest: this awesome game. Let us find a way to unite and keep the StarCraft franchise the best ever. Shoot. I sound like an arbiter. For Aiu... StarCraft! ;P
April showers bring May flowers bring June bugs bring JulyZerg.
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
October 09 2007 01:03 GMT
#2
I'm so sick of these MBS threads. So much so that even though you put a lot of time and effort into your post I'm going to completely ignore it and hope this gets closed.
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
iamke55
Profile Blog Joined April 2004
United States2806 Posts
October 09 2007 01:24 GMT
#3
Yeah there seriously has to be something better to discuss than MBS War 30 or whatever number we're on.
During practice session, I discovered very good build against zerg. -Bisu[Shield]
Dark.Carnival
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States5095 Posts
October 09 2007 01:35 GMT
#4
I agree that there's been far to many MBS discussions, but at least this isn't exactly a 'yay mbs' or 'nay mbs' thread. there are some interesting ideas but it doesn't really solve anything.
@QxGDarkCell ._.
InRaged
Profile Joined February 2007
1047 Posts
October 09 2007 01:43 GMT
#5
On October 09 2007 10:03 CharlieMurphy wrote:
I'm so sick of these MBS threads. So much so that even though you put a lot of time and effort into your post I'm going to completely ignore it and hope this gets closed.

ahaha So true

Prose, I might vote wouldn't you place in only option I like that "Hotkeyx3" thing, which makes no sense for me.
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25979 Posts
October 09 2007 01:45 GMT
#6
You know, I think if you really wanted to know the results you could read the current MBS thread. This is just cluttering things up.

I'm going to leave it open, just because I don't know what other mods think. But I really think it should be closed.
Moderator
Prose
Profile Joined June 2004
Canada314 Posts
October 09 2007 01:55 GMT
#7
On October 09 2007 10:45 Chill wrote:
You know, I think if you really wanted to know the results you could read the current MBS thread. This is just cluttering things up.

I'm going to leave it open, just because I don't know what other mods think. But I really think it should be closed.


The current MBS thread was cluttered. I tried to narrow down the options to a poll, the easiest gauge.

Yes, that Hotkeyx3 thing was confusing. It's a basically a nerfed version of true MBS. I don't know if I can scrap it from the choices.
Maybe just 8,m,m,m,m,c,c. as a choice.
April showers bring May flowers bring June bugs bring JulyZerg.
Wizard
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Poland5055 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-10-09 02:03:56
October 09 2007 02:03 GMT
#8
another MBS thread....
sAviOr[gm] ~ want to watch good replays? read my blog: http://www.teamliquid.net/blog/wizard
ToKoreaWithLove
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Norway10161 Posts
October 09 2007 02:12 GMT
#9
I also think this is a well made thread. I don't care myself so I won't vote.
ModeratorFather of bunnies
LosingID8
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
CA10827 Posts
October 09 2007 02:50 GMT
#10
no mbs
ModeratorResident K-POP Elitist
KoveN-
Profile Joined October 2004
Australia503 Posts
October 09 2007 03:31 GMT
#11
On October 09 2007 11:50 LosingID8 wrote:
no mbs
DTDominion
Profile Joined November 2005
United States2148 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-10-09 03:39:26
October 09 2007 03:38 GMT
#12
I picked other. I think some kind of mass rallying should be implemented, but otherwise MBS shouldn't be in the game.

Something where like, if you select more than one Barracks all functions become unusable except for rallying.
Aphelion
Profile Blog Joined December 2005
United States2720 Posts
October 09 2007 05:09 GMT
#13
I wonder how many noobs are going to sign up just to vote in this.
But Garimto was always more than just a Protoss...
Hokay
Profile Joined May 2007
United States738 Posts
October 09 2007 05:56 GMT
#14
If there is no MBS, I will be disappointed at blizzards game designers for being lazy and incompetent because they couldn't implement another way for SC2's macro to be competitive/skillful as SC1's macro while having MBS.

Even Blizzard admitted having an enhanced UI leaves more room for them to design new stuff, so having no MBS doesn't leave much room for designers to flex what they are hired to do, design/implement new game concepts and gameplay.

They can cop out and be lazy and just make a rehash of their older game SC1/BW with 3d graphics, new units and cliff walking which to me seems the case atm. 10 year wait for rehash? What happened to SC re imagined?

The game Metroid Prime was totally re imagined in 3d and many metroid fans were scared of change from 2d, but the game was universally accepted by its fans and new players because it felt and played like metroid except it was a totally new and refreshing playing experience from start to end while retaining and feeling like it's roots.

I know there is a line that has to be drawn when implementing new concepts because the goal is to retain sc1's spirit, competitive nature and core gameplay but I think with careful and clever designing, the designers can and should pull something out of their brains that please all. I mean for christ sakes it's been 10+ years.

With that said, if Blizzard cannot deliver a good or better competitive game compared to SC1 while retaining MBS, than MBS has to go. I'm waiting for beta...
DTDominion
Profile Joined November 2005
United States2148 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-10-09 06:22:12
October 09 2007 06:21 GMT
#15
So basically, no matter how much evidence is presented to you that effective implementation of MBS is impossible, you still think that Blizzard's game designers should do it because it makes them lazy and stupid if they don't?

Fine logic there.
Hokay
Profile Joined May 2007
United States738 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-10-09 07:00:44
October 09 2007 06:54 GMT
#16
On October 09 2007 15:21 DTDominion wrote:
So basically, no matter how much evidence is presented to you that effective implementation of MBS is impossible, you still think that Blizzard's game designers should do it because it makes them lazy and stupid if they don't?

Fine logic there.


What evidence? SC2 is barely finished.

EDIT: Also I said if Blizzard cannot implement MBS while retaining a competitive level like SC1 it should not be in. Which is why I am waiting for beta. Fine reading comprehension there.
Fen
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Australia1848 Posts
October 09 2007 07:47 GMT
#17
Voted other, Meant to vote no MBS
ForAdun
Profile Joined August 2007
Germany986 Posts
October 09 2007 07:59 GMT
#18
On October 09 2007 16:47 Fen wrote:
Voted other, Meant to vote no MBS


Nevermind, the opposition of MBS is too big to be ignored anyway.
Gandalf
Profile Joined August 2004
Pakistan1905 Posts
October 09 2007 10:44 GMT
#19
I'd prefer to have no MBS, but at the same time I can understand why MBS might be added and admit that its possible SC2 could kick ass even with the feature implemented. This poll however, being on tl.net, is probably going to have biased results, since most of us are or were hardcore starcraft players. All it'll show is that of the tl.net members who ran across this thread and voted, more would like no MBS.
Gandalf
Profile Joined August 2004
Pakistan1905 Posts
October 09 2007 10:50 GMT
#20
I would've liked to vote on the option "I'm fine either way".
1 2 3 4 5 23 24 25 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 46m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 195
ROOTCatZ 80
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 856
Icarus 8
LuMiX 5
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm169
League of Legends
JimRising 826
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor158
Other Games
summit1g10805
tarik_tv4796
WinterStarcraft300
ViBE192
ProTech42
SortOf0
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV48
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH308
• Hupsaiya 89
• davetesta60
• practicex 33
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo932
• masondota2791
• Stunt386
Other Games
• Scarra3576
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
5h 46m
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
7h 46m
WardiTV European League
7h 46m
BSL: ProLeague
13h 46m
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
1d 19h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
FEL
6 days
FEL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.