• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:53
CEST 22:53
KST 05:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Rollback Netcode in Brood War845.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202622Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)78
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 ESL Pro Tour for SC2 discontinued [Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR?
Tourneys
ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups $3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! GG Lan Fest Sofia, Bulgaria [this November] Sagi.gg Launcher Released ASL FINALS HYPE VIDEO 2X
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Semifinal A [ASL22] Semifinal B [ASL22] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Link Between Gaming and …
TrAiDoS
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 14140 users

is BW 1.07 patch more balanced than current patch? - Page 3

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
UPro-BW
Profile Joined September 2012
81 Posts
February 05 2013 08:49 GMT
#41
On February 05 2013 10:41 Musiq wrote:
I would actually want a patch that would make scouts cheaper, make ghosts an actual academy unit (covert ops for nuke only) and make queens more useful.

THIS(almost). In addition to that, how about removing the research constraint for lockdown and ensnare,
and buffing the dark archon someway to compensate for that changes might be good.

TvZ: better queens might provide better late game for zerg against mech
TvT: possible bio TvT fork?
ZvP: something must be done about zerg allins and scout isn't the answer imo
TvP: ghosts with earlier availability and lockdown might be useful for soft countering protoss allins and carriers/arbiters supremacy.
ZvZ : how about giving queens a spell that soft counter mutas?

"3t4t5t6v7v8v9v" - iloveoov
iFU.pauline
Profile Joined September 2009
France1776 Posts
February 05 2013 08:59 GMT
#42
On February 05 2013 17:40 Sayle wrote:
I can't believe so many people are taking a Jumper thread seriously. I do like the sound of 128 damage storm though ^_^


Yes it has been nerf because it would kill lurker in one time.
No coward soul is mine, No trembler in the world's storm-troubled sphere, I see Heaven's glories shine, And Faith shines equal arming me from Fear
Fuchsteufelswild
Profile Joined October 2009
Australia2028 Posts
February 05 2013 09:02 GMT
#43
I think when you look at it at a glance, it's not too much worse. Key points for me are:
1 - You have listed that patch as having: zealots: Shields decreased to 60 and hit points increased to 100.
That's what they are now, you meant to list what they were before, right?
2 - Storm would have been too strong by one shotting lurkers and mutalisks, I think
3 - Queen was already unpopular (bless ZerO for making my dreams come true) so them being even less useful is of course bad for variety of gameplay
4 onwards (ㅋㅋㅋ never mind the numbers) - Sunken colony, Hydra/lurker and spawning pool changes were good ones, I think.

Other than that, not too bad, but it's not going to happen and those specific changes would probably ruin the balance. Whatever good the other changes could make (and that's supposing they actually would be good), it would not compensate for the key changes that would break the game (in my opinion).
ZerO - FantaSy - Calm - Nal_rA - Jaedong - NaDa - EffOrt - Bisu - by.hero - StarDust - Welmu - Nerchio - Supernova - Solar - Squirtle - LosirA - Grubby - IntoTheRainbow - Golden... ~~~ Incredible Miracle and Woongjin Stars 화이팅!
ninazerg
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States7291 Posts
February 05 2013 09:20 GMT
#44
On February 05 2013 17:40 Sayle wrote:
I can't believe so many people are taking a Jumper thread seriously. I do like the sound of 128 damage storm though ^_^


Yeah, this is weird. Why are people arguing like "OMG NO WE SHOULDN'T DO THIS".

+ Show Spoiler +


Especially when it's obvious that we should.[image loading]

"If two pregnant women get into a fist fight, it's like a mecha-battle between two unborn babies." - Fyodor Dostoevsky
NotJumperer
Profile Blog Joined July 2005
United States1371 Posts
February 05 2013 09:48 GMT
#45
--- Nuked ---
thezanursic
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
5504 Posts
February 05 2013 10:03 GMT
#46
On February 05 2013 16:18 thezanursic wrote:
The answer is NO.

BW in my opinion only warrants a couple of changes

Ghosts being cheaper, having slightly more health and 25 more starting energy

Dark archons having 1 more range on MC and Feedback or making maelstorm more powerful + 50 more shields or 1+ armor

Queens having 25 to 50 more starting energy (To reduce the waiting time for broodlings)

+ Show Spoiler +

Ohh and being totally biased reducing the build time of cannons or increasing the build time of bunkers because its just BS as it is, haha

Adding on top of this I got another idea.

Would giving spores 2x or 3x damage versus bio air (Essentially only zerg units) make anything other than muta ling viable and how would this change affect ZvZ?
http://i45.tinypic.com/9j2cdc.jpg Let it be so!
corumjhaelen
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
France6884 Posts
February 05 2013 10:20 GMT
#47
On February 05 2013 19:03 thezanursic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2013 16:18 thezanursic wrote:
The answer is NO.

BW in my opinion only warrants a couple of changes

Ghosts being cheaper, having slightly more health and 25 more starting energy

Dark archons having 1 more range on MC and Feedback or making maelstorm more powerful + 50 more shields or 1+ armor

Queens having 25 to 50 more starting energy (To reduce the waiting time for broodlings)

+ Show Spoiler +

Ohh and being totally biased reducing the build time of cannons or increasing the build time of bunkers because its just BS as it is, haha

Adding on top of this I got another idea.

Would giving spores 2x or 3x damage versus bio air (Essentially only zerg units) make anything other than muta ling viable and how would this change affect ZvZ?

Stop wanting to change ZvZ, it's a fine match up... -_-
‎numquam se plus agere quam nihil cum ageret, numquam minus solum esse quam cum solus esset
CoL_DarkstaR
Profile Joined January 2009
Germany649 Posts
February 05 2013 10:28 GMT
#48
Yeah right, complain about BW's balance. LOL, what is this?

People stop talking and play the actual game. It's the most well balanced game ever. And it is that for a reason. I couldn't imagine modern starcraft with 1.07. :D Protoss would just be hilarious...
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19393 Posts
February 05 2013 11:04 GMT
#49
On February 05 2013 18:48 Jumperer wrote:
For those who wants to know why KESPA stopped BW and went to SC2. It wasn't because of savior and matchfixing, it also wasn't because of SC2. It was because patch 1.08+ caused so much imbalance within the game that the OGN mapcreators couldn't come up with another balance map for this broken game. So they figured that it was simply easier to just switch to sc2.

If blizzard stays with 1.07. Starcraft would still be alive today. Bisu would also have 90% PvZ winnrate and 3 more OSL titles. Bisu only having 70%ish winrate further shows how imbalance the matchup is. You think that fool of a took named shine would beat bisu when storm do the damage it's supposed to do?

this game demonstrated my point.
. Look at this, if it was played under patch 1.07. Bisu would've won because dragoons would come out quicker and it would kill all the hydras.

even stork said in an interview that zerg is imba against protoss. he suggests quicker archon build time and 128 storm to compensate. IN CONCLUSION, STORK SUPPORTS THE PATCH 1.07 MOVEMENT.

anyone who disagrees with this post and thread is killing esports and is a esport terrorist.

This is border line offensive. But jumperer did raise some valid points wink wink
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
Berceno
Profile Joined May 2012
Spain401 Posts
February 05 2013 12:09 GMT
#50
I would kill for a 128 damage storm, I hate lurkers!! I'm with jumperer its a shame that bisu only had 70% winrate pvz , he never was a bonjwa because he played protoss. come on even stork said it, the veteran.

protoss living in da ghetto
fazek42
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Hungary438 Posts
February 05 2013 12:47 GMT
#51
This thread is not even worth commenting... Wait, what did I just do? Seriously though, what was the OP even thinking? This is bad trolling.
sabas123
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands3122 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-05 13:21:55
February 05 2013 13:16 GMT
#52
On February 05 2013 18:48 Jumperer wrote:
For those who wants to know why KESPA stopped BW and went to SC2. It wasn't because of savior and matchfixing, it also wasn't because of SC2. It was because patch 1.08+ caused so much imbalance within the game that the OGN mapcreators couldn't come up with another balance map for this broken game. So they figured that it was simply easier to just switch to sc2.

If blizzard stays with 1.07. Starcraft would still be alive today. Bisu would also have 90% PvZ winnrate and 3 more OSL titles. Bisu only having 70%ish winrate further shows how imbalance the matchup is. You think that fool of a took named shine would beat bisu when storm do the damage it's supposed to do?

this game demonstrated my point. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JJ9w9zcozjU. Look at this, if it was played under patch 1.07. Bisu would've won because dragoons would come out quicker and it would kill all the hydras.

even stork said in an interview that zerg is imba against protoss. he suggests quicker archon build time and 128 storm to compensate. IN CONCLUSION, STORK SUPPORTS THE PATCH 1.07 MOVEMENT.

anyone who disagrees with this post and thread is killing esports and is a esport terrorist.

never really thought of it that way,

its a strange thought that bw needs a patch, but i am curius how this would effect the gameplay of bw.

but don't impliment some rediculse stuff like 150 pool
The harder it becomes, the more you should focus on the basics.
IceCube
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Croatia1403 Posts
February 05 2013 13:33 GMT
#53
Taking serious this is like eating a piece of troll right off the live troll

Just saying
Forever Vulture.. :(
PassiveAce
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States18076 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-05 13:56:55
February 05 2013 13:55 GMT
#54
Im not a broodwar player but wouldnt the 150 mineral spawning pool more or less break the game? I mean... yea.
o, I get it now haha
Call me Marge Simpson cuz I love you homie
PiPaPoh
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
121 Posts
February 05 2013 14:06 GMT
#55
Such a legendary topic Folks
figq
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
12519 Posts
February 05 2013 14:18 GMT
#56
With all the kinds of weird community semi-serious semi-epic events that we've seen, I have no doubt in my mind that an organized 1.07 BW tournament would fare very well.
If you stand next to my head, you can hear the ocean. - Day[9]
intotheheart
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada33091 Posts
February 05 2013 14:38 GMT
#57
On February 05 2013 21:09 Berceno wrote:
I would kill for a 128 damage storm, I hate lurkers!! I'm with jumperer its a shame that bisu only had 70% winrate pvz , he never was a bonjwa because he played protoss. come on even stork said it, the veteran.



128 damage Storm would just murder Lurkers but then balancing that unit would be ridiculous.
kiss kiss fall in love
Sum41
Profile Joined November 2011
Chile345 Posts
February 05 2013 17:00 GMT
#58
i say that you know nothing
Hydralisk so fasts and dangerous :D
arb
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Noobville17922 Posts
February 05 2013 17:32 GMT
#59
On February 05 2013 17:49 UPro-BW wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2013 10:41 Musiq wrote:
I would actually want a patch that would make scouts cheaper, make ghosts an actual academy unit (covert ops for nuke only) and make queens more useful.

THIS(almost). In addition to that, how about removing the research constraint for lockdown and ensnare,
and buffing the dark archon someway to compensate for that changes might be good.

TvZ: better queens might provide better late game for zerg against mech
TvT: possible bio TvT fork?
ZvP: something must be done about zerg allins and scout isn't the answer imo
TvP: ghosts with earlier availability and lockdown might be useful for soft countering protoss allins and carriers/arbiters supremacy.
ZvZ : how about giving queens a spell that soft counter mutas?


you mean ensnare?
Artillery spawned from the forges of Hell
Marti
Profile Joined August 2011
552 Posts
February 05 2013 17:57 GMT
#60
On February 05 2013 18:48 Jumperer wrote:
For those who wants to know why KESPA stopped BW and went to SC2. It wasn't because of savior and matchfixing, it also wasn't because of SC2. It was because patch 1.08+ caused so much imbalance within the game that the OGN mapcreators couldn't come up with another balance map for this broken game. So they figured that it was simply easier to just switch to sc2.

If blizzard stays with 1.07. Starcraft would still be alive today. Bisu would also have 90% PvZ winnrate and 3 more OSL titles. Bisu only having 70%ish winrate further shows how imbalance the matchup is. You think that fool of a took named shine would beat bisu when storm do the damage it's supposed to do?

this game demonstrated my point. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JJ9w9zcozjU. Look at this, if it was played under patch 1.07. Bisu would've won because dragoons would come out quicker and it would kill all the hydras.

even stork said in an interview that zerg is imba against protoss. he suggests quicker archon build time and 128 storm to compensate. IN CONCLUSION, STORK SUPPORTS THE PATCH 1.07 MOVEMENT.

anyone who disagrees with this post and thread is killing esports and is a esport terrorist.

I am offended by your post and will put an esport jihad on you if you don't apologize
#adun giveafuck - - - "Did this guy just randomly finger me?" - Sayle
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 14h 7m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech167
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2189
Shuttle 387
Mini 123
Aegong 19
Dota 2
qojqva2900
monkeys_forever206
Counter-Strike
fl0m1570
pashabiceps1295
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby4918
Other Games
Liquid`RaSZi2545
FrodaN1083
Liquid`Hasu420
C9.Mang0204
ZombieGrub173
Pyrionflax171
UpATreeSC79
Mew2King53
ToD13
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 25
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta18
• niya90s 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Eskiya23 41
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV336
Other Games
• imaqtpie1452
• Scarra340
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Weekly
14h 7m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 3h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 14h
The PondCast
2 days
Online Event
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
BSL Open Qualifier
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
IPSL
5 days
BSL Open Qualifier
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
HCC Season 3
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.