EPTis BW 1.07 patch more balanced than current patch?
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
NotJumperer
United States1371 Posts
| ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
"WAAAH REVERSE BACK TO 1.08 WAAAH" | ||
|
writer22816
United States5775 Posts
| ||
|
Cambium
United States16368 Posts
For example, I'm fairly certain we wouldn't even have FE in PvZ if pool remained 150, because there's is just no way to effectively counter a 4/5/6-pool as Protoss with today's set of maps. Then you might argue we could have a bigger map to alleviate this problem, which leads to the first statement of this response. | ||
|
TurboDreams
United States427 Posts
| ||
|
Marti
552 Posts
On February 05 2013 10:40 writer22816 wrote: What makes you think that Flash completely broke the matchup right before PL ended? I'm not saying I disagree with you but I'd love to hear your reasoning on this backed up with concrete examples. Has flash solved TvZ ? 80 macro 200 micro edit : 280, that's a DOUBLE VLADIMIR PUTIN APM ! | ||
|
TelecoM
United States10682 Posts
I think they should release a patch that updates the UI and an auto matchmaking system built in like the SC2GG BW server, and hopefully that would solve the Game hosting issues as well. | ||
FlaShFTW
United States10227 Posts
| ||
|
da_head
Canada3350 Posts
| ||
|
bduddy
United States1326 Posts
| ||
|
GhostOwl
766 Posts
I dont agree with 150 mineral pool however. PvZ's main problem was P's inability to scout early game, and Z's muta control picking off HT's, TvP problems were (slightly) carriers on (some)maps, and TvZ's problems were just about everything. Too bad Blizz will not revert. Wont happen. BW wasnt so balanced because back in the old beta days /patch days of BW, Blizzard didnt have a big active community of fans giving feedback about balance and neither did they have a strong tournament scene in early days so it just happened to be balanced like that. | ||
|
SpaNiarD
Spain351 Posts
| ||
|
xxpack09
United States2160 Posts
On February 05 2013 11:55 GhostOwl wrote: I totally agree with OP. There was a reason why BW was very T dominated and the last best BW player was Terran. I didn't know Jangbi played terran | ||
|
GhostOwl
766 Posts
Winning one last tournament doesnt mean much, especially when people were switching over to SC2 and neglecting BW practice. Korean fans and foreign fans both agree Flash was the last bonjwa | ||
|
ArvickHero
10387 Posts
| ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
On February 05 2013 11:55 GhostOwl wrote: I totally agree with OP. There was a reason why BW was very T dominated and the last best BW player was Terran. I think more drastic changes are needed, such as raising supply of Tanks to 3 to make 200/200 metal deathball less deadly, and medics cost more gas with vulture coming with 1 free mine so TvZ isnt so T favored. I dont agree with 150 mineral pool however. PvZ's main problem was P's inability to scout early game, and Z's muta control picking off HT's, TvP problems were (slightly) carriers on (some)maps, and TvZ's problems were just about everything. Too bad Blizz will not revert. Wont happen. BW wasnt so balanced because back in the old beta days /patch days of BW, Blizzard didnt have a big active community of fans giving feedback about balance and neither did they have a strong tournament scene in early days so it just happened to be balanced like that. my soul.. 3 supply tanks means terran will never win tvp rofl. | ||
|
GhostOwl
766 Posts
On February 05 2013 12:43 arb wrote: my soul.. 3 supply tanks means terran will never win tvp rofl. No it doesn't. It just means that Terran can't get a massive mech army, siege up, and completely melt the entire Protoss army in a few seconds while laughing at the futile P attempts to bring it down by storm, stasis, zealot bomb, etc. Now you actually have to actively EMP and take more caution spreading tanks. 3 supply tanks should have been implemented(same supply as vulture/zealot? what was Blizzard thinking) | ||
|
shizaep
Canada2920 Posts
The 1.07 patch makes it a protoss favored matchup. more storm damage and quicker goon seals the deal. Although zealots do die quicker and less carriers do help terran just a little bit. Turrets at 100 makes dt and reaver drop more effective. ... ... REVERSE BACK TO 1.07 BLIZZARD. Thinking really smart there. I wonder what race you play? | ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
On February 05 2013 10:10 Jumperer wrote: REVERSE BACK TO 1.07 BLIZZARD. We'll get right on that. | ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
On February 05 2013 12:49 GhostOwl wrote: No it doesn't. It just means that Terran can't get a massive mech army, siege up, and completely melt the entire Protoss army in a few seconds while laughing at the futile P attempts to bring it down by storm, stasis, zealot bomb, etc. Now you actually have to actively EMP and take more caution spreading tanks. 3 supply tanks should have been implemented(same supply as vulture/zealot? what was Blizzard thinking) No i'd almost 100% say Terran would never win another TvP with 3 supply tanks. barring some cheesy all in or something | ||
| ||
