• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:52
CEST 02:52
KST 09:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow2[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy21ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy5GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding7Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage5Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
MaNa leaves Team Liquid Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Quebec Clan still alive ? BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow JD's Ro24 review The Korean Terminology Thread so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. ASL21 General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [ASL21] Ro24 Group F [BSL22] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CEST
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates Muta micro map competition What's the deal with APM & what's its true value
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The China Politics Thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
How Streamers Inspire Gamers…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2919 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 999

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 997 998 999 1000 1001 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11486 Posts
April 18 2014 01:30 GMT
#19961
On April 18 2014 09:42 rod409 wrote:
I'm curious, is food at Walmart stores that you guys have been to cheaper than other places? I only go to Walmart/Target a few times a year but the food seemed the same price as the big chain supermarkets and neither are cheaper than Costco or local supermarkets.

Dunno about in the States. But in Canada, one of my uncles used to own a grocery store and he couldn't buy in bulk from his suppliers what Superstores was selling to customers (I think particularly in produce?) There were cases when it was worth it to buy from Superstore, break apart the packages and sell separately in his own store rather than buy from his suppliers. The big box stores buy in such large quantities, they can leverage the prices down way more than smaller stores.

He thought there ought to be a scaled minimum wage where stores with X number of employees had to pay a higher minimum wage than small businesses. Particularly because it's the big stores that drive down the wages for the most part, but are the ones that are most able to pay higher wages while still out-competing small businesses. Interesting idea, I'd be interested to see if it could work.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mar a Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 01:36:39
April 18 2014 01:31 GMT
#19962
On April 18 2014 10:11 SnipedSoul wrote:
“Our business operations are subject to numerous risks, factors and uncertainties, domestically and internationally, which are outside our control . . . These factors include . . . changes in the amount of payments made under the Supplement[al] Nutrition Assistance Plan and other public assistance plans, changes in the eligibility requirements of public assistance plans, . . .”

Walmart fiscal year report, 2013

It isn't just their employees, but their entire business since a large portion of their customer base is on government assistance. They need SNAP and other public assistance to support their operations (profit). Remember that Walmart profits fell close to 20% in the quarter after SNAP was cut last year.

Lol they list everything under the sun in that section

+ Show Spoiler +
Our business operations are subject to numerous risks, factors and uncertainties, domestically and internationally, which are outside our control. Any one, or a combination, of these risks, factors and uncertainties could materially affect our financial performance, our results of operations, including our sales, earnings per share or comparable store sales or comparable club sales and effective tax rate for any period, our business operations, business strategy, plans, goals or objectives. These factors include, but are not limited to: general economic conditions, including changes in the economy of the United States or other specific markets in which we operate, economic instability, changes in the monetary policies of the United States, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, other governments or central banks, economic crises and disruptions in the financial markets, including as a result of sovereign debt crises, governmental budget deficits, unemployment and partial employment levels, employment conditions within our markets, credit availability to consumers and businesses, levels of consumer disposable income, consumer confidence, consumer credit availability, consumer spending patterns, consumer debt levels, consumer preferences, including consumer demand for the merchandise we offer for sale, the timing of consumers' receipt of tax refund checks, changes in the amount of payments made under the Supplement Nutrition Assistance Plan and other public assistance plans, changes in the eligibility requirements of public assistance plans, inflation, deflation, commodity prices, the cost of the goods we sell, competitive pressures, the seasonality of our business, seasonal buying patterns in the United States and our other markets, anticipated store or club closures, labor costs, transportation costs, the cost of diesel fuel, gasoline, natural gas and electricity, the selling prices of fuel, the cost of healthcare and other benefits, accident costs, our casualty and other insurance costs, information security costs, the cost of construction materials, availability and the cost of acceptable building sites for new stores, clubs and other units, availability of qualified labor pools in the specific markets in which we operate, including the availability of persons with the skills and abilities necessary to meet Walmart's needs for managing and staffing its new units and conducting their operations, real estate, zoning, land use and other laws, ordinances, legal restrictions and initiatives that may prevent Walmart from building, or that impose limitations on Walmart's ability to build, new units in certain locations or relocate or expand existing units, availability of necessary utilities for new units, availability of skilled labor and labor, material and other construction costs in areas in which new or relocated units are proposed to be constructed or existing units are proposed to be expanded or remodeled, competitive pressures and the initiatives of our competitors, accident-related costs, weather conditions patterns and events, climate change, catastrophic events and natural disasters, as well as storm and other damage to our stores, clubs, distribution centers and other facilities and store closings and other limitations on our customers' access to our stores and clubs resulting from such events and disasters, disruption in the availability of our online shopping sites on the internet, cyberattacks on our information systems, disruption in our supply chain, including availability and transport of goods from domestic and foreign suppliers, trade restrictions, changes in tariff and freight rates, adoption of or changes in tax, labor and other laws and regulations that affect our business, including changes in corporate and personal tax rates and the imposition of new taxes and surcharges, costs of compliance with laws and regulations, the mix of our earnings from our United States and foreign operations, changes in our assessment of certain tax contingencies, increases or decreases in valuation allowances, outcome of administrative audits, the impact of discrete items on our effective tax rate, the resolution of other tax matters, developments in and the outcome of legal and regulatory proceedings to which we are a party or are subject and the expenses associated therewith, the requirements for expenditures in connection with the FCPA-related matters, including enhancements to Walmart's compliance program and ongoing investigations; changes in the rating of any of our indebtedness; currency exchange rate fluctuations and volatility, fluctuations in market rates of interest, and other conditions and events affecting domestic and global financial and capital markets, public health emergencies, economic and geo-political conditions and events, including civil unrest and disturbances and terrorist attacks, unanticipated changes in generally accepted accounting principles or in the interpretations or applicability thereof, unanticipated changes in accounting estimates and judgments, and unanticipated restructurings and the related expenses. Moreover, we typically earn a disproportionate part of our annual operating income in the fourth quarter as a result of the seasonal buying patterns. Those buying patterns are difficult to forecast with certainty and can be affected by many factors. The accuracy of the forecast of the range of our effective tax rate for any year can be affected by other factors, including changes in assessments of certain tax contingencies, increases or decreases in valuation allowances, outcome of administrative audits, the impact of discrete items and the mix of earnings among the Company's United States and international operations.


They made the reference to customers rather than employees too.

Edit: Poor people shop at Walmart. Complaining that they spend more there because of the subsidies doesn't make the subsidies useless - it means that the poor have increased their purchasing power. That's a good thing, if you want to help the poor.

On April 18 2014 10:15 Mindcrime wrote:
That just means that Walmart relies on their customers getting government assistance.

And that's totally okay, right Jonny?


Yes, of course it's okay.

Edit: The unemployed buy stuff at Walmart. Better get rid of UI too... lol...
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 01:46:31
April 18 2014 01:35 GMT
#19963
This was the first time they mentioned SNAP cuts in that huge list.

By the way, nearly a fifth of all foodstamp dollars are spent at Walmart. That's $13.5 billion of your tax dollars that go directly into Walmart's pocket.
rod409
Profile Joined September 2011
United States36 Posts
April 18 2014 01:45 GMT
#19964
On April 18 2014 10:30 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 09:42 rod409 wrote:
I'm curious, is food at Walmart stores that you guys have been to cheaper than other places? I only go to Walmart/Target a few times a year but the food seemed the same price as the big chain supermarkets and neither are cheaper than Costco or local supermarkets.

Dunno about in the States. But in Canada, one of my uncles used to own a grocery store and he couldn't buy in bulk from his suppliers what Superstores was selling to customers (I think particularly in produce?) There were cases when it was worth it to buy from Superstore, break apart the packages and sell separately in his own store rather than buy from his suppliers. The big box stores buy in such large quantities, they can leverage the prices down way more than smaller stores.

He thought there ought to be a scaled minimum wage where stores with X number of employees had to pay a higher minimum wage than small businesses. Particularly because it's the big stores that drive down the wages for the most part, but are the ones that are most able to pay higher wages while still out-competing small businesses. Interesting idea, I'd be interested to see if it could work.

Your uncle's store sounds small? I am comparing food at big chains to Costco and local supermarkets (they are very big but only have a few stores if more than one). I can buy things at the local supermarkets like 20 lb (9 kg) of rice for 10$ and at times 7 lbs (3.2 kg) of onion for 1$ if there is a sale. I never see stuff like this at the big chains but I guess they only need to be competitive for packaged things like chips, cereals etc. And these are a few stores I have personally been to so they might be a total anomaly.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
April 18 2014 01:46 GMT
#19965
On April 18 2014 10:35 SnipedSoul wrote:
This was the first time they mentioned SNAP cuts in that huge list.

By the way, nearly a fifth of all foodstamp dollars are spent at Walmart. That's $13.5 billion of your tax dollars that go directly into Walmart's pocket.

Wow, it's so important to their business model they never mentioned it before...

You'd rather people go hungry? That's quite cruel.
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 01:52:40
April 18 2014 01:50 GMT
#19966
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11486 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 01:53:19
April 18 2014 01:50 GMT
#19967
On April 18 2014 10:45 rod409 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 10:30 Falling wrote:
On April 18 2014 09:42 rod409 wrote:
I'm curious, is food at Walmart stores that you guys have been to cheaper than other places? I only go to Walmart/Target a few times a year but the food seemed the same price as the big chain supermarkets and neither are cheaper than Costco or local supermarkets.

Dunno about in the States. But in Canada, one of my uncles used to own a grocery store and he couldn't buy in bulk from his suppliers what Superstores was selling to customers (I think particularly in produce?) There were cases when it was worth it to buy from Superstore, break apart the packages and sell separately in his own store rather than buy from his suppliers. The big box stores buy in such large quantities, they can leverage the prices down way more than smaller stores.

He thought there ought to be a scaled minimum wage where stores with X number of employees had to pay a higher minimum wage than small businesses. Particularly because it's the big stores that drive down the wages for the most part, but are the ones that are most able to pay higher wages while still out-competing small businesses. Interesting idea, I'd be interested to see if it could work.

Your uncle's store sounds small? I am comparing food at big chains to Costco and local supermarkets (they are very big but only have a few stores if more than one). I can buy things at the local supermarkets like 20 lb (9 kg) of rice for 10$ and at times 7 lbs (3.2 kg) of onion for 1$ if there is a sale. I never see stuff like this at the big chains but I guess they only need to be competitive for packaged things like chips, cereals etc. And these are a few stores I have personally been to so they might be a total anomaly.

It was one grocery store locally owned and operated and employed several people. There are a few chains that compete with Superstore and he wound up selling the business and working for Quality Foods as a manager (which is a regional chain). But even QF prices are more expensive than Superstore or Walmart.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mar a Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
April 18 2014 01:57 GMT
#19968
On April 18 2014 10:50 SnipedSoul wrote:
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.

They added it to that huge list that no one reads to justify why their profits fell? Seems a bit odd, but OK.

So what would you propose as a better public policy alternative? Raising the min wage isn't flawless and some of those workers will spend money at Walmart, which you don't like, apparently.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23848 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 02:00:20
April 18 2014 02:00 GMT
#19969
On April 18 2014 10:50 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 10:45 rod409 wrote:
On April 18 2014 10:30 Falling wrote:
On April 18 2014 09:42 rod409 wrote:
I'm curious, is food at Walmart stores that you guys have been to cheaper than other places? I only go to Walmart/Target a few times a year but the food seemed the same price as the big chain supermarkets and neither are cheaper than Costco or local supermarkets.

Dunno about in the States. But in Canada, one of my uncles used to own a grocery store and he couldn't buy in bulk from his suppliers what Superstores was selling to customers (I think particularly in produce?) There were cases when it was worth it to buy from Superstore, break apart the packages and sell separately in his own store rather than buy from his suppliers. The big box stores buy in such large quantities, they can leverage the prices down way more than smaller stores.

He thought there ought to be a scaled minimum wage where stores with X number of employees had to pay a higher minimum wage than small businesses. Particularly because it's the big stores that drive down the wages for the most part, but are the ones that are most able to pay higher wages while still out-competing small businesses. Interesting idea, I'd be interested to see if it could work.

Your uncle's store sounds small? I am comparing food at big chains to Costco and local supermarkets (they are very big but only have a few stores if more than one). I can buy things at the local supermarkets like 20 lb (9 kg) of rice for 10$ and at times 7 lbs (3.2 kg) of onion for 1$ if there is a sale. I never see stuff like this at the big chains but I guess they only need to be competitive for packaged things like chips, cereals etc. And these are a few stores I have personally been to so they might be a total anomaly.

It was one grocery store locally owned and operated and employed several people. There are a few chains that compete with Superstore and he wound up selling the business and working for Quality Foods as a manager (which is a regional chain). But even QF prices are more expensive than Superstore or Walmart.


Walmart prices on the whole are generally cheaper by weight if you purchase in bulk than smaller supermarkets. The difference between Walmart and Costco is less noticeable.

Smaller stores can usually list a few particular items at a sale price comparable or below Walmart but they have to raise the prices on the other items they expect you to get while you are shopping for the sale item/s to make up for the probable loss.At least that's my friends and my combined anecdotal experience.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 02:07:24
April 18 2014 02:05 GMT
#19970
On April 18 2014 10:57 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 10:50 SnipedSoul wrote:
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.

They added it to that huge list that no one reads to justify why their profits fell? Seems a bit odd, but OK.

So what would you propose as a better public policy alternative? Raising the min wage isn't flawless and some of those workers will spend money at Walmart, which you don't like, apparently.


I would tie the minimum wage to inflation. The minimum wage in 1970 was $1.45 which is $9.47 in 2013 dollars. The current minimum wage is almost 25% lower than it was in 1970.

I don't give a crap if people shop at Walmart. What I don't like is taxpayers supporting a business that would fail without subsidies. Walmart isn't some startup that could benefit from subsidies like solar power or electric cars. It's one of the biggest companies in the world.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
April 18 2014 02:05 GMT
#19971
re: snipedsoul

I don't think one job is supposed to support a family of four; more like 2 jobs. One job should be enough to support one person, (with one optional child).


As to cost of living, i'd need to run some numbers to figure it all out; but costs aren't always so bad if you're frugal.
Let me see what I can come up with. Also note that costs of living vary substantially in different places.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
April 18 2014 02:10 GMT
#19972
On April 18 2014 11:05 SnipedSoul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 10:57 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 18 2014 10:50 SnipedSoul wrote:
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.

They added it to that huge list that no one reads to justify why their profits fell? Seems a bit odd, but OK.

So what would you propose as a better public policy alternative? Raising the min wage isn't flawless and some of those workers will spend money at Walmart, which you don't like, apparently.


I would tie the minimum wage to inflation. The minimum wage in 1970 was $1.45 which is $9.47 in 2013 dollars. The current minimum wage is almost 25% lower than it was in 1970.

I don't give a crap if people shop at Walmart. What I don't like is taxpayers supporting a business that would fail without subsidies. Walmart isn't some startup that could benefit from subsidies like solar power or electric cars. It's one of the biggest companies in the world.

Yeah and we've used things like the EITC to boost the min wage for the poor to a higher level than it was in 1970.

Taxpayers don't support Walmart anymore than your higher min wage scenario.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43876 Posts
April 18 2014 02:12 GMT
#19973
On April 18 2014 11:05 zlefin wrote:
re: snipedsoul

I don't think one job is supposed to support a family of four; more like 2 jobs. One job should be enough to support one person, (with one optional child).


As to cost of living, i'd need to run some numbers to figure it all out; but costs aren't always so bad if you're frugal.
Let me see what I can come up with. Also note that costs of living vary substantially in different places.

In a country where a single income used to be sufficient to feed a family of four, in a world where the mechanisation of labour and increased efficiency mean that a single individual's labour is far more effective than at any point in the past and the labour required to provide for yourself has never been lower you're saying Americans need to work harder. The rest of the western world is trying to work fewer hours and to spread the jobs that still need doing between more people through 3 day weekends and part time work but in America a third child is now a luxury beyond your means.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
April 18 2014 02:12 GMT
#19974
Both parents working minimum wage jobs is actually worse than one parent staying at home because daycare costs far more than $7.25 an hour. Remember that I was talking about no government help, so daycare is going to be whatever the true cost is without subsidy.

Fun fact, Australia has a minimum wage of $16.88 and they haven't had a recession in 20 years.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43876 Posts
April 18 2014 02:14 GMT
#19975
On April 18 2014 11:12 SnipedSoul wrote:
Both parents working minimum wage jobs is actually worse than one parent staying at home because daycare costs far more than $7.25 an hour. Remember that I was talking about no government help, so daycare is going to be whatever the true cost is without subsidy.

Fun fact, Australia has a minimum wage of $16.88 and they haven't had a recession in 20 years.

Australia has a low population sitting on a layer of coal beneath which is found a layer of valuable ores.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 02:26:36
April 18 2014 02:15 GMT
#19976
On April 18 2014 11:10 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 11:05 SnipedSoul wrote:
On April 18 2014 10:57 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 18 2014 10:50 SnipedSoul wrote:
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.

They added it to that huge list that no one reads to justify why their profits fell? Seems a bit odd, but OK.

So what would you propose as a better public policy alternative? Raising the min wage isn't flawless and some of those workers will spend money at Walmart, which you don't like, apparently.


I would tie the minimum wage to inflation. The minimum wage in 1970 was $1.45 which is $9.47 in 2013 dollars. The current minimum wage is almost 25% lower than it was in 1970.

I don't give a crap if people shop at Walmart. What I don't like is taxpayers supporting a business that would fail without subsidies. Walmart isn't some startup that could benefit from subsidies like solar power or electric cars. It's one of the biggest companies in the world.

Yeah and we've used things like the EITC to boost the min wage for the poor to a higher level than it was in 1970.

Taxpayers don't support Walmart anymore than your higher min wage scenario.


You implied in a previous post that cutting foodstamps would cause poor people to starve to death. Many of Walmart's employees are on foodstamps. If taxpayers did not provide foodstamps to Walmart employees, then those employees would starve.

Therefore, taxpayers are subsidizing Walmart through foodstamps because without foodstamps Walmart would be forced to pay higher wages or their employees would starve.

On April 18 2014 11:14 KwarK wrote:

Australia has a low population sitting on a layer of coal beneath which is found a layer of valuable ores.


Australia also has next to no infrastructure once you move away from the coast. Brand new railways, roads, and shipping terminals are really expensive if you have to build them today.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
April 18 2014 02:21 GMT
#19977
On April 18 2014 11:15 SnipedSoul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 11:10 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 18 2014 11:05 SnipedSoul wrote:
On April 18 2014 10:57 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 18 2014 10:50 SnipedSoul wrote:
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.

They added it to that huge list that no one reads to justify why their profits fell? Seems a bit odd, but OK.

So what would you propose as a better public policy alternative? Raising the min wage isn't flawless and some of those workers will spend money at Walmart, which you don't like, apparently.


I would tie the minimum wage to inflation. The minimum wage in 1970 was $1.45 which is $9.47 in 2013 dollars. The current minimum wage is almost 25% lower than it was in 1970.

I don't give a crap if people shop at Walmart. What I don't like is taxpayers supporting a business that would fail without subsidies. Walmart isn't some startup that could benefit from subsidies like solar power or electric cars. It's one of the biggest companies in the world.

Yeah and we've used things like the EITC to boost the min wage for the poor to a higher level than it was in 1970.

Taxpayers don't support Walmart anymore than your higher min wage scenario.


You implied in a previous post that cutting foodstamps would cause poor people to starve to death. Many of Walmart's employees are on foodstamps. If taxpayers did not provide foodstamps to Walmart employees, then those employees would starve.

Therefore, taxpayers are subsidizing Walmart through foodstamps because without foodstamps Walmart would be forced to pay higher wages or their employees would starve.

EITC and other programs are among the most successful anti-poverty programs in the US.

You want to get rid of them because you have a belief, unsupported by evidence, that the subsides go to Walmart (among others) rather than the workers.

That's absurd.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23848 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 02:26:22
April 18 2014 02:22 GMT
#19978
On April 18 2014 10:57 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 10:50 SnipedSoul wrote:
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.

They added it to that huge list that no one reads to justify why their profits fell? Seems a bit odd, but OK.

So what would you propose as a better public policy alternative? Raising the min wage isn't flawless and some of those workers will spend money at Walmart, which you don't like, apparently.


How about instead of saying Walmart isn't doing anything counterproductive we work together on solutions to what for many is an obvious problem?

So a raise to the minimum wage might not be the silver bullet.

Walmart's nefarious business practices don't stop in America either... What Walmart does in China is significantly worse and probably more important to their model than their stateside wages and government subsidies.

Are there benefits to businesses like Walmart... Of course there are. The question that opponents of Walmart practices pose is are they worth it? And what I presume puzzles many is why do people like you so staunchly defend Walmart profits being so heavily driven by the expenses they save and the income they derive from the government?

A public policy solution isn't even necessary. Walmart could go a long way to solve this problem itself. Here's one idea on how it could happen

"What that suggests is that even Wal-Mart's investors think the company should pay its employees more, or at least expects it will," says Lee.
How much more? Wal-Mart has a book value of $76.7 billion. Take 15.4% of that, and that means investors are looking to get paid $11.8 billion a year. That leaves $101 billion to pay employees.

Source
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 02:25:33
April 18 2014 02:22 GMT
#19979
Walmart gets $13.5 billion in foodstamp money every year. That amount would be far less if they paid their employees more.

I never said get rid of foodstamps. I am saying that without foodstamps, Walmart would be forced to pay higher wages and the burden of feeding Walmart employees would be taken away from the government and placed on Walmart which is where it belongs.

Force Walmart to pay higher wages and you will reduce the need for foodstamps.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14104 Posts
April 18 2014 02:25 GMT
#19980
On April 18 2014 11:22 SnipedSoul wrote:
Walmart gets $13.5 billion in foodstamp money every year. That amount would be far less if they paid their employees more.

It would be the same because their employees arn't the only ones buying food at their stores. Walmart doesn't employ THAT many people.

They sell things for cheaper so people looking for cheap (footstamp spenders) go to them. It has nothing to do with how much they pay their people.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Prev 1 997 998 999 1000 1001 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL
19:00
RO32 Group B
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
ZZZero.O179
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SpeCial 173
elazer 162
CosmosSc2 64
ROOTCatZ 45
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 5608
Artosis 790
ZZZero.O 179
Dota 2
monkeys_forever375
canceldota297
NeuroSwarm86
League of Legends
JimRising 560
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King42
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor138
Other Games
gofns24695
summit1g19175
tarik_tv9417
ViBE1252
Liquid`RaSZi1073
C9.Mang0291
Maynarde117
febbydoto13
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick747
Counter-Strike
PGL405
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 44
• davetesta37
• musti20045 27
• mYiSmile110
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie1677
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
8h 8m
Wardi Open
9h 8m
Afreeca Starleague
9h 8m
Soma vs YSC
Sharp vs sSak
Monday Night Weeklies
15h 8m
OSC
23h 8m
Afreeca Starleague
1d 9h
Snow vs PianO
hero vs Rain
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
1d 9h
GSL
1d 11h
Replay Cast
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
3 days
Escore
4 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
5 days
IPSL
5 days
WolFix vs nOmaD
dxtr13 vs Razz
BSL
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
6 days
Ladder Legends
6 days
BSL
6 days
IPSL
6 days
JDConan vs TBD
Aegong vs rasowy
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W2
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
WardiTV TLMC #16
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.