• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 09:08
CET 15:08
KST 23:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book3Clem wins HomeStory Cup 287HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info4herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 26-Feb 1): herO, Clem, ByuN, Classic win2RSL Season 4 announced for March-April7Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win3Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8
StarCraft 2
General
Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Clem wins HomeStory Cup 28 How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000 WardiTV Winter Championship 2026 $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) HomeStory Cup 28 RSL Season 4 announced for March-April
Strategy
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 510 Safety Violation Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report
Brood War
General
StarCraft player reflex TE scores [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates Can someone share very abbreviated BW cliffnotes? Gypsy to Korea 2024 BoxeR's birthday message
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Diablo 2 thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread EVE Corporation Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Play, Watch, Drink: Esports …
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1454 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 999

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 997 998 999 1000 1001 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11412 Posts
April 18 2014 01:30 GMT
#19961
On April 18 2014 09:42 rod409 wrote:
I'm curious, is food at Walmart stores that you guys have been to cheaper than other places? I only go to Walmart/Target a few times a year but the food seemed the same price as the big chain supermarkets and neither are cheaper than Costco or local supermarkets.

Dunno about in the States. But in Canada, one of my uncles used to own a grocery store and he couldn't buy in bulk from his suppliers what Superstores was selling to customers (I think particularly in produce?) There were cases when it was worth it to buy from Superstore, break apart the packages and sell separately in his own store rather than buy from his suppliers. The big box stores buy in such large quantities, they can leverage the prices down way more than smaller stores.

He thought there ought to be a scaled minimum wage where stores with X number of employees had to pay a higher minimum wage than small businesses. Particularly because it's the big stores that drive down the wages for the most part, but are the ones that are most able to pay higher wages while still out-competing small businesses. Interesting idea, I'd be interested to see if it could work.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 01:36:39
April 18 2014 01:31 GMT
#19962
On April 18 2014 10:11 SnipedSoul wrote:
“Our business operations are subject to numerous risks, factors and uncertainties, domestically and internationally, which are outside our control . . . These factors include . . . changes in the amount of payments made under the Supplement[al] Nutrition Assistance Plan and other public assistance plans, changes in the eligibility requirements of public assistance plans, . . .”

Walmart fiscal year report, 2013

It isn't just their employees, but their entire business since a large portion of their customer base is on government assistance. They need SNAP and other public assistance to support their operations (profit). Remember that Walmart profits fell close to 20% in the quarter after SNAP was cut last year.

Lol they list everything under the sun in that section

+ Show Spoiler +
Our business operations are subject to numerous risks, factors and uncertainties, domestically and internationally, which are outside our control. Any one, or a combination, of these risks, factors and uncertainties could materially affect our financial performance, our results of operations, including our sales, earnings per share or comparable store sales or comparable club sales and effective tax rate for any period, our business operations, business strategy, plans, goals or objectives. These factors include, but are not limited to: general economic conditions, including changes in the economy of the United States or other specific markets in which we operate, economic instability, changes in the monetary policies of the United States, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, other governments or central banks, economic crises and disruptions in the financial markets, including as a result of sovereign debt crises, governmental budget deficits, unemployment and partial employment levels, employment conditions within our markets, credit availability to consumers and businesses, levels of consumer disposable income, consumer confidence, consumer credit availability, consumer spending patterns, consumer debt levels, consumer preferences, including consumer demand for the merchandise we offer for sale, the timing of consumers' receipt of tax refund checks, changes in the amount of payments made under the Supplement Nutrition Assistance Plan and other public assistance plans, changes in the eligibility requirements of public assistance plans, inflation, deflation, commodity prices, the cost of the goods we sell, competitive pressures, the seasonality of our business, seasonal buying patterns in the United States and our other markets, anticipated store or club closures, labor costs, transportation costs, the cost of diesel fuel, gasoline, natural gas and electricity, the selling prices of fuel, the cost of healthcare and other benefits, accident costs, our casualty and other insurance costs, information security costs, the cost of construction materials, availability and the cost of acceptable building sites for new stores, clubs and other units, availability of qualified labor pools in the specific markets in which we operate, including the availability of persons with the skills and abilities necessary to meet Walmart's needs for managing and staffing its new units and conducting their operations, real estate, zoning, land use and other laws, ordinances, legal restrictions and initiatives that may prevent Walmart from building, or that impose limitations on Walmart's ability to build, new units in certain locations or relocate or expand existing units, availability of necessary utilities for new units, availability of skilled labor and labor, material and other construction costs in areas in which new or relocated units are proposed to be constructed or existing units are proposed to be expanded or remodeled, competitive pressures and the initiatives of our competitors, accident-related costs, weather conditions patterns and events, climate change, catastrophic events and natural disasters, as well as storm and other damage to our stores, clubs, distribution centers and other facilities and store closings and other limitations on our customers' access to our stores and clubs resulting from such events and disasters, disruption in the availability of our online shopping sites on the internet, cyberattacks on our information systems, disruption in our supply chain, including availability and transport of goods from domestic and foreign suppliers, trade restrictions, changes in tariff and freight rates, adoption of or changes in tax, labor and other laws and regulations that affect our business, including changes in corporate and personal tax rates and the imposition of new taxes and surcharges, costs of compliance with laws and regulations, the mix of our earnings from our United States and foreign operations, changes in our assessment of certain tax contingencies, increases or decreases in valuation allowances, outcome of administrative audits, the impact of discrete items on our effective tax rate, the resolution of other tax matters, developments in and the outcome of legal and regulatory proceedings to which we are a party or are subject and the expenses associated therewith, the requirements for expenditures in connection with the FCPA-related matters, including enhancements to Walmart's compliance program and ongoing investigations; changes in the rating of any of our indebtedness; currency exchange rate fluctuations and volatility, fluctuations in market rates of interest, and other conditions and events affecting domestic and global financial and capital markets, public health emergencies, economic and geo-political conditions and events, including civil unrest and disturbances and terrorist attacks, unanticipated changes in generally accepted accounting principles or in the interpretations or applicability thereof, unanticipated changes in accounting estimates and judgments, and unanticipated restructurings and the related expenses. Moreover, we typically earn a disproportionate part of our annual operating income in the fourth quarter as a result of the seasonal buying patterns. Those buying patterns are difficult to forecast with certainty and can be affected by many factors. The accuracy of the forecast of the range of our effective tax rate for any year can be affected by other factors, including changes in assessments of certain tax contingencies, increases or decreases in valuation allowances, outcome of administrative audits, the impact of discrete items and the mix of earnings among the Company's United States and international operations.


They made the reference to customers rather than employees too.

Edit: Poor people shop at Walmart. Complaining that they spend more there because of the subsidies doesn't make the subsidies useless - it means that the poor have increased their purchasing power. That's a good thing, if you want to help the poor.

On April 18 2014 10:15 Mindcrime wrote:
That just means that Walmart relies on their customers getting government assistance.

And that's totally okay, right Jonny?


Yes, of course it's okay.

Edit: The unemployed buy stuff at Walmart. Better get rid of UI too... lol...
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 01:46:31
April 18 2014 01:35 GMT
#19963
This was the first time they mentioned SNAP cuts in that huge list.

By the way, nearly a fifth of all foodstamp dollars are spent at Walmart. That's $13.5 billion of your tax dollars that go directly into Walmart's pocket.
rod409
Profile Joined September 2011
United States36 Posts
April 18 2014 01:45 GMT
#19964
On April 18 2014 10:30 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 09:42 rod409 wrote:
I'm curious, is food at Walmart stores that you guys have been to cheaper than other places? I only go to Walmart/Target a few times a year but the food seemed the same price as the big chain supermarkets and neither are cheaper than Costco or local supermarkets.

Dunno about in the States. But in Canada, one of my uncles used to own a grocery store and he couldn't buy in bulk from his suppliers what Superstores was selling to customers (I think particularly in produce?) There were cases when it was worth it to buy from Superstore, break apart the packages and sell separately in his own store rather than buy from his suppliers. The big box stores buy in such large quantities, they can leverage the prices down way more than smaller stores.

He thought there ought to be a scaled minimum wage where stores with X number of employees had to pay a higher minimum wage than small businesses. Particularly because it's the big stores that drive down the wages for the most part, but are the ones that are most able to pay higher wages while still out-competing small businesses. Interesting idea, I'd be interested to see if it could work.

Your uncle's store sounds small? I am comparing food at big chains to Costco and local supermarkets (they are very big but only have a few stores if more than one). I can buy things at the local supermarkets like 20 lb (9 kg) of rice for 10$ and at times 7 lbs (3.2 kg) of onion for 1$ if there is a sale. I never see stuff like this at the big chains but I guess they only need to be competitive for packaged things like chips, cereals etc. And these are a few stores I have personally been to so they might be a total anomaly.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
April 18 2014 01:46 GMT
#19965
On April 18 2014 10:35 SnipedSoul wrote:
This was the first time they mentioned SNAP cuts in that huge list.

By the way, nearly a fifth of all foodstamp dollars are spent at Walmart. That's $13.5 billion of your tax dollars that go directly into Walmart's pocket.

Wow, it's so important to their business model they never mentioned it before...

You'd rather people go hungry? That's quite cruel.
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 01:52:40
April 18 2014 01:50 GMT
#19966
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11412 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 01:53:19
April 18 2014 01:50 GMT
#19967
On April 18 2014 10:45 rod409 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 10:30 Falling wrote:
On April 18 2014 09:42 rod409 wrote:
I'm curious, is food at Walmart stores that you guys have been to cheaper than other places? I only go to Walmart/Target a few times a year but the food seemed the same price as the big chain supermarkets and neither are cheaper than Costco or local supermarkets.

Dunno about in the States. But in Canada, one of my uncles used to own a grocery store and he couldn't buy in bulk from his suppliers what Superstores was selling to customers (I think particularly in produce?) There were cases when it was worth it to buy from Superstore, break apart the packages and sell separately in his own store rather than buy from his suppliers. The big box stores buy in such large quantities, they can leverage the prices down way more than smaller stores.

He thought there ought to be a scaled minimum wage where stores with X number of employees had to pay a higher minimum wage than small businesses. Particularly because it's the big stores that drive down the wages for the most part, but are the ones that are most able to pay higher wages while still out-competing small businesses. Interesting idea, I'd be interested to see if it could work.

Your uncle's store sounds small? I am comparing food at big chains to Costco and local supermarkets (they are very big but only have a few stores if more than one). I can buy things at the local supermarkets like 20 lb (9 kg) of rice for 10$ and at times 7 lbs (3.2 kg) of onion for 1$ if there is a sale. I never see stuff like this at the big chains but I guess they only need to be competitive for packaged things like chips, cereals etc. And these are a few stores I have personally been to so they might be a total anomaly.

It was one grocery store locally owned and operated and employed several people. There are a few chains that compete with Superstore and he wound up selling the business and working for Quality Foods as a manager (which is a regional chain). But even QF prices are more expensive than Superstore or Walmart.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
April 18 2014 01:57 GMT
#19968
On April 18 2014 10:50 SnipedSoul wrote:
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.

They added it to that huge list that no one reads to justify why their profits fell? Seems a bit odd, but OK.

So what would you propose as a better public policy alternative? Raising the min wage isn't flawless and some of those workers will spend money at Walmart, which you don't like, apparently.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23631 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 02:00:20
April 18 2014 02:00 GMT
#19969
On April 18 2014 10:50 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 10:45 rod409 wrote:
On April 18 2014 10:30 Falling wrote:
On April 18 2014 09:42 rod409 wrote:
I'm curious, is food at Walmart stores that you guys have been to cheaper than other places? I only go to Walmart/Target a few times a year but the food seemed the same price as the big chain supermarkets and neither are cheaper than Costco or local supermarkets.

Dunno about in the States. But in Canada, one of my uncles used to own a grocery store and he couldn't buy in bulk from his suppliers what Superstores was selling to customers (I think particularly in produce?) There were cases when it was worth it to buy from Superstore, break apart the packages and sell separately in his own store rather than buy from his suppliers. The big box stores buy in such large quantities, they can leverage the prices down way more than smaller stores.

He thought there ought to be a scaled minimum wage where stores with X number of employees had to pay a higher minimum wage than small businesses. Particularly because it's the big stores that drive down the wages for the most part, but are the ones that are most able to pay higher wages while still out-competing small businesses. Interesting idea, I'd be interested to see if it could work.

Your uncle's store sounds small? I am comparing food at big chains to Costco and local supermarkets (they are very big but only have a few stores if more than one). I can buy things at the local supermarkets like 20 lb (9 kg) of rice for 10$ and at times 7 lbs (3.2 kg) of onion for 1$ if there is a sale. I never see stuff like this at the big chains but I guess they only need to be competitive for packaged things like chips, cereals etc. And these are a few stores I have personally been to so they might be a total anomaly.

It was one grocery store locally owned and operated and employed several people. There are a few chains that compete with Superstore and he wound up selling the business and working for Quality Foods as a manager (which is a regional chain). But even QF prices are more expensive than Superstore or Walmart.


Walmart prices on the whole are generally cheaper by weight if you purchase in bulk than smaller supermarkets. The difference between Walmart and Costco is less noticeable.

Smaller stores can usually list a few particular items at a sale price comparable or below Walmart but they have to raise the prices on the other items they expect you to get while you are shopping for the sale item/s to make up for the probable loss.At least that's my friends and my combined anecdotal experience.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 02:07:24
April 18 2014 02:05 GMT
#19970
On April 18 2014 10:57 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 10:50 SnipedSoul wrote:
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.

They added it to that huge list that no one reads to justify why their profits fell? Seems a bit odd, but OK.

So what would you propose as a better public policy alternative? Raising the min wage isn't flawless and some of those workers will spend money at Walmart, which you don't like, apparently.


I would tie the minimum wage to inflation. The minimum wage in 1970 was $1.45 which is $9.47 in 2013 dollars. The current minimum wage is almost 25% lower than it was in 1970.

I don't give a crap if people shop at Walmart. What I don't like is taxpayers supporting a business that would fail without subsidies. Walmart isn't some startup that could benefit from subsidies like solar power or electric cars. It's one of the biggest companies in the world.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
April 18 2014 02:05 GMT
#19971
re: snipedsoul

I don't think one job is supposed to support a family of four; more like 2 jobs. One job should be enough to support one person, (with one optional child).


As to cost of living, i'd need to run some numbers to figure it all out; but costs aren't always so bad if you're frugal.
Let me see what I can come up with. Also note that costs of living vary substantially in different places.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
April 18 2014 02:10 GMT
#19972
On April 18 2014 11:05 SnipedSoul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 10:57 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 18 2014 10:50 SnipedSoul wrote:
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.

They added it to that huge list that no one reads to justify why their profits fell? Seems a bit odd, but OK.

So what would you propose as a better public policy alternative? Raising the min wage isn't flawless and some of those workers will spend money at Walmart, which you don't like, apparently.


I would tie the minimum wage to inflation. The minimum wage in 1970 was $1.45 which is $9.47 in 2013 dollars. The current minimum wage is almost 25% lower than it was in 1970.

I don't give a crap if people shop at Walmart. What I don't like is taxpayers supporting a business that would fail without subsidies. Walmart isn't some startup that could benefit from subsidies like solar power or electric cars. It's one of the biggest companies in the world.

Yeah and we've used things like the EITC to boost the min wage for the poor to a higher level than it was in 1970.

Taxpayers don't support Walmart anymore than your higher min wage scenario.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43554 Posts
April 18 2014 02:12 GMT
#19973
On April 18 2014 11:05 zlefin wrote:
re: snipedsoul

I don't think one job is supposed to support a family of four; more like 2 jobs. One job should be enough to support one person, (with one optional child).


As to cost of living, i'd need to run some numbers to figure it all out; but costs aren't always so bad if you're frugal.
Let me see what I can come up with. Also note that costs of living vary substantially in different places.

In a country where a single income used to be sufficient to feed a family of four, in a world where the mechanisation of labour and increased efficiency mean that a single individual's labour is far more effective than at any point in the past and the labour required to provide for yourself has never been lower you're saying Americans need to work harder. The rest of the western world is trying to work fewer hours and to spread the jobs that still need doing between more people through 3 day weekends and part time work but in America a third child is now a luxury beyond your means.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
April 18 2014 02:12 GMT
#19974
Both parents working minimum wage jobs is actually worse than one parent staying at home because daycare costs far more than $7.25 an hour. Remember that I was talking about no government help, so daycare is going to be whatever the true cost is without subsidy.

Fun fact, Australia has a minimum wage of $16.88 and they haven't had a recession in 20 years.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43554 Posts
April 18 2014 02:14 GMT
#19975
On April 18 2014 11:12 SnipedSoul wrote:
Both parents working minimum wage jobs is actually worse than one parent staying at home because daycare costs far more than $7.25 an hour. Remember that I was talking about no government help, so daycare is going to be whatever the true cost is without subsidy.

Fun fact, Australia has a minimum wage of $16.88 and they haven't had a recession in 20 years.

Australia has a low population sitting on a layer of coal beneath which is found a layer of valuable ores.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 02:26:36
April 18 2014 02:15 GMT
#19976
On April 18 2014 11:10 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 11:05 SnipedSoul wrote:
On April 18 2014 10:57 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 18 2014 10:50 SnipedSoul wrote:
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.

They added it to that huge list that no one reads to justify why their profits fell? Seems a bit odd, but OK.

So what would you propose as a better public policy alternative? Raising the min wage isn't flawless and some of those workers will spend money at Walmart, which you don't like, apparently.


I would tie the minimum wage to inflation. The minimum wage in 1970 was $1.45 which is $9.47 in 2013 dollars. The current minimum wage is almost 25% lower than it was in 1970.

I don't give a crap if people shop at Walmart. What I don't like is taxpayers supporting a business that would fail without subsidies. Walmart isn't some startup that could benefit from subsidies like solar power or electric cars. It's one of the biggest companies in the world.

Yeah and we've used things like the EITC to boost the min wage for the poor to a higher level than it was in 1970.

Taxpayers don't support Walmart anymore than your higher min wage scenario.


You implied in a previous post that cutting foodstamps would cause poor people to starve to death. Many of Walmart's employees are on foodstamps. If taxpayers did not provide foodstamps to Walmart employees, then those employees would starve.

Therefore, taxpayers are subsidizing Walmart through foodstamps because without foodstamps Walmart would be forced to pay higher wages or their employees would starve.

On April 18 2014 11:14 KwarK wrote:

Australia has a low population sitting on a layer of coal beneath which is found a layer of valuable ores.


Australia also has next to no infrastructure once you move away from the coast. Brand new railways, roads, and shipping terminals are really expensive if you have to build them today.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
April 18 2014 02:21 GMT
#19977
On April 18 2014 11:15 SnipedSoul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 11:10 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 18 2014 11:05 SnipedSoul wrote:
On April 18 2014 10:57 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On April 18 2014 10:50 SnipedSoul wrote:
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.

They added it to that huge list that no one reads to justify why their profits fell? Seems a bit odd, but OK.

So what would you propose as a better public policy alternative? Raising the min wage isn't flawless and some of those workers will spend money at Walmart, which you don't like, apparently.


I would tie the minimum wage to inflation. The minimum wage in 1970 was $1.45 which is $9.47 in 2013 dollars. The current minimum wage is almost 25% lower than it was in 1970.

I don't give a crap if people shop at Walmart. What I don't like is taxpayers supporting a business that would fail without subsidies. Walmart isn't some startup that could benefit from subsidies like solar power or electric cars. It's one of the biggest companies in the world.

Yeah and we've used things like the EITC to boost the min wage for the poor to a higher level than it was in 1970.

Taxpayers don't support Walmart anymore than your higher min wage scenario.


You implied in a previous post that cutting foodstamps would cause poor people to starve to death. Many of Walmart's employees are on foodstamps. If taxpayers did not provide foodstamps to Walmart employees, then those employees would starve.

Therefore, taxpayers are subsidizing Walmart through foodstamps because without foodstamps Walmart would be forced to pay higher wages or their employees would starve.

EITC and other programs are among the most successful anti-poverty programs in the US.

You want to get rid of them because you have a belief, unsupported by evidence, that the subsides go to Walmart (among others) rather than the workers.

That's absurd.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23631 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 02:26:22
April 18 2014 02:22 GMT
#19978
On April 18 2014 10:57 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 10:50 SnipedSoul wrote:
They mention it because they needed to justify why their profits fell 21% in one quarter. I would imagine that shareholders start asking questions after a drop like that.

I would rather Walmart pay a decent wage so that their employees can afford to feed themselves without government help.

They added it to that huge list that no one reads to justify why their profits fell? Seems a bit odd, but OK.

So what would you propose as a better public policy alternative? Raising the min wage isn't flawless and some of those workers will spend money at Walmart, which you don't like, apparently.


How about instead of saying Walmart isn't doing anything counterproductive we work together on solutions to what for many is an obvious problem?

So a raise to the minimum wage might not be the silver bullet.

Walmart's nefarious business practices don't stop in America either... What Walmart does in China is significantly worse and probably more important to their model than their stateside wages and government subsidies.

Are there benefits to businesses like Walmart... Of course there are. The question that opponents of Walmart practices pose is are they worth it? And what I presume puzzles many is why do people like you so staunchly defend Walmart profits being so heavily driven by the expenses they save and the income they derive from the government?

A public policy solution isn't even necessary. Walmart could go a long way to solve this problem itself. Here's one idea on how it could happen

"What that suggests is that even Wal-Mart's investors think the company should pay its employees more, or at least expects it will," says Lee.
How much more? Wal-Mart has a book value of $76.7 billion. Take 15.4% of that, and that means investors are looking to get paid $11.8 billion a year. That leaves $101 billion to pay employees.

Source
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-18 02:25:33
April 18 2014 02:22 GMT
#19979
Walmart gets $13.5 billion in foodstamp money every year. That amount would be far less if they paid their employees more.

I never said get rid of foodstamps. I am saying that without foodstamps, Walmart would be forced to pay higher wages and the burden of feeding Walmart employees would be taken away from the government and placed on Walmart which is where it belongs.

Force Walmart to pay higher wages and you will reduce the need for foodstamps.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14102 Posts
April 18 2014 02:25 GMT
#19980
On April 18 2014 11:22 SnipedSoul wrote:
Walmart gets $13.5 billion in foodstamp money every year. That amount would be far less if they paid their employees more.

It would be the same because their employees arn't the only ones buying food at their stores. Walmart doesn't employ THAT many people.

They sell things for cheaper so people looking for cheap (footstamp spenders) go to them. It has nothing to do with how much they pay their people.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Prev 1 997 998 999 1000 1001 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
SC Evo League
13:00
#18
SteadfastSC215
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
trigger 273
SteadfastSC 215
Rex 89
MindelVK 37
LamboSC2 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 44342
Horang2 17248
Flash 1430
Jaedong 1393
Stork 586
Hyuk 491
Soma 465
BeSt 364
Rush 341
Mini 197
[ Show more ]
ggaemo 193
Mong 149
Hyun 117
Last 107
Pusan 102
Soulkey 85
Bonyth 70
EffOrt 65
Sea.KH 60
Backho 58
Aegong 47
Mind 45
sorry 33
Shuttle 33
sSak 32
Shinee 32
ToSsGirL 29
Free 27
910 25
Nal_rA 25
Shine 24
IntoTheRainbow 20
zelot 18
Terrorterran 16
Rock 15
GoRush 13
SilentControl 11
Movie 10
Icarus 8
ivOry 8
Dota 2
qojqva2319
singsing2235
Dendi664
XcaliburYe222
febbydoto15
Counter-Strike
kRYSTAL_20
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King102
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor280
Other Games
B2W.Neo2241
Hui .56
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1087
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 17
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH169
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2123
League of Legends
• Jankos4631
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
9h 52m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
21h 52m
WardiTV Winter Champion…
1d
OSC
1d 9h
Replay Cast
1d 18h
Wardi Open
1d 21h
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
LiuLi Cup
2 days
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
[ Show More ]
LiuLi Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
KCM Race Survival
4 days
LiuLi Cup
4 days
Online Event
5 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS4
HSC XXVIII
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W8
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
WardiTV Winter 2026
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.