EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 7852
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
Logo
United States7542 Posts
| ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
| ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21952 Posts
On June 14 2017 05:28 Logo wrote: Is Sessions saying he's never talked with the president about the Russian hacking attempts of the election while being the Attorney General? That seems troubling given that there seems to be at least a credible prospect of such a thing occurring, if the National Security Council isn't talking about that then... like what the hell? This surprises you? The head of the government actively denied it happening, ofc they are doing nothing about it. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21952 Posts
On June 14 2017 05:30 crms wrote: Yeah it's complete and total bullshit to say you cant answer because of the POTUS constitutional right to executive privilege when the POTUS himself has NOT invoked this privilege. How he is getting away with this tactic is pretty gross. The committee has no actual power to make him answer questions right? He can bullshit all he wants, they cant stop him from getting away from it. | ||
ZeromuS
Canada13389 Posts
wow is right :O | ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
| ||
|
brian
United States9629 Posts
to be arrogantly dramatic in the question only makes it worse. | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On June 14 2017 05:34 crms wrote: So now we're using spy fiction as a basis for reality? Yep. The year after an election season with more twists and turns than House of Cards while we have a President who signs fake executive orders. | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
| ||
|
brian
United States9629 Posts
On June 14 2017 05:34 ZeromuS wrote: https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/874723683406839809 wow is right :O he recused himself? why would he ever receive such a briefing? | ||
|
Logo
United States7542 Posts
On June 14 2017 05:36 brian wrote: he recused himself? why would he ever receive such a briefing? He's on the National Security Council. This would strongly imply that council has not discussed the matter since Sessions joined it. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21952 Posts
On June 14 2017 05:36 brian wrote: he recused himself? why would he ever receive such a briefing? he recused himself from an investigation into the Trump campaign and Russia, not from the report on how Russia interfered that was compiled under Obama. But remember there is a secret link between Sessions and Russia as per Comey's testimony. Who knows, maybe the intelligence community cut him from access for a reason? | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On June 14 2017 05:35 brian wrote: lol at senator cotton pretending either one of them can recognize trade craft well enough to say it didn't happen at a reception. to be arrogantly dramatic in the question only makes it worse. He might as well say: I’m a senator and I don’t think anyone in the CIA could take advantage of me. | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On June 14 2017 05:02 TheTenthDoc wrote: I don't think the Rosenstein memo can hold up as the actual reason for Comey's firing. Rosenstein himself disputes that, and Trump was recorded disputing that, and there are mountains of evidence suggesting the administration praised how Comey handled the emails. That said, it's not a matter of whether it's true, it's whether Republicans can spin it to their base. Which is sadly not a problem. For Session's part, he simply says his opinion was requested, he gave it, then asked for in writing, he provided it. The rest is on Trump. I've caught most of it, and what I've heard has been good. Oh man that Wyden exchange was hilarious. | ||
|
CorsairHero
Canada9491 Posts
| ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32743 Posts
On June 14 2017 05:40 CorsairHero wrote: whose this lady thats asking questions right now Kamala Harris I believe. | ||
|
Diavlo
Belgium2915 Posts
On June 14 2017 05:40 CorsairHero wrote: whose this lady thats asking questions right now She sounds like a prosecutor. You can obviously tell who has a legal background. Edit: still can't believe their argument to fire Comey is that he was unfair to Hillary. Bold doesn't even begin to describe that claim. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On June 14 2017 05:42 Diavlo wrote: She sounds like a prosecutor. You can obviously tell who has a legal background Her question was important, because Sessions seems to be leaning on the argument that working for the president prevents him from answering any question he feels the president would disapprove of. But he is leaning on some “long standing” justice department policy he can’t cite or name and has not read to back that up. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
Logo
United States7542 Posts
| ||
| ||
