• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:22
CEST 16:22
KST 23:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO4 & Finals Preview5[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course12Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview7[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors8Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13
Community News
Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results2Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !15Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple0RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event12
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO4 & Finals Preview Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results MaNa leaves Team Liquid
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament KSL Week 89 2026 GSL Season 2 Qualifiers
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 526 Rubber and Glue Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes
Brood War
General
25 Years Since Brood War Patch 1.08 vespene.gg — BW replays in browser BW General Discussion Data needed BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL21] Semifinals B [BSL22] RO8 Bracket Stage + Another TieBreaker [ASL21] Ro8 Day 4 Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne ZeroSpace Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread War of Dots, 2026 minimalst RTS Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread YouTube Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
How EEG Data Can Predict Gam…
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2010 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 749

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 747 748 749 750 751 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-28 21:09:00
December 28 2013 21:04 GMT
#14961
you acknowledge the theoretical possibility, but you'd never actually admit that it applied to some concrete situation

as long as there's costs to be externalized, you'll be damned if you aint gonna externalize em

also it's hilarious that you think the pipeline is opposed by special interests, but clearly the people pushing it are not special interests, nossir, no powerful special interests in the energy sector. Idiot
shikata ga nai
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
December 28 2013 21:05 GMT
#14962
On December 29 2013 05:55 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2013 04:13 hypercube wrote:
On December 29 2013 03:54 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On December 29 2013 03:50 hypercube wrote:
On December 29 2013 03:41 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On December 29 2013 03:08 hypercube wrote:
On December 29 2013 01:04 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Oil Company Looks To Great Lakes As Shipping Demand Booms

North Dakota and western Canada are producing crude oil faster than it can be shipped to refineries.

Rail car manufacturers can't make new tank cars fast enough, and new pipeline proposals face long delays over environmental concerns. So energy companies are looking for new ways to get the heavy crude to market.

One proposed solution is to ship the oil by barge over the Great Lakes — but it's a controversial one.

Crews are working around the clock in North Dakota, where there's a lot of oil under the Bakken Shale formation, and in the Alberta tar sands area in western Canada, where there's tens of billions of gallons more. ...

Shipping the oil by barge brings potential economic benefits and jobs. But there are special risks with heavy crude, says Lyman Welch, water quality program director of the conservation group Alliance for the Great Lakes.

"A spill in the open waters of Lake Superior would be very difficult if not impossible to clean up," Welch says. "Tar sands crude oil is heavier than water, so much of it sinks to the bottom of a river or lake water body if there is a spill." ...

Link

Seems riskier than a certain pipeline...


Sounds like an argument for banning the current practice, not for building the pipeline.

Shipping by tanker is being proposed as an alternative to pipelines. So if we ban both, what's the new alternative?


You don't need to ban tankers just force them to take out insurance up to the possible damage an accident would cause.

Why not just have the pipeline do that?


I don't know, I was under the impression that most of the damage from a pipeline is 'guaranteed'. E.g loss of habitat during the construction phase. If that kind of damage can be estimated and someone is willing to pay for it, sure build the pipeline. But ultimately it's up to the local governments to set the price (with active consent from their voters). If that price is too high, that just means that project isn't economically viable.

If none of the options work, then the product costs more to produce than it's worth and the logical solution is to stop producing it.

Those are fine concerns but is that the issue here? The opposition to the keystone pipeline comes from national special interest groups who have extra lobbying power due to the pipeline crossing the US boarder.


My understanding was that most of the opposition was environmental, but I don't know enough about the issue to care to debate it.
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
December 28 2013 21:13 GMT
#14963
On December 29 2013 06:05 hypercube wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2013 05:55 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On December 29 2013 04:13 hypercube wrote:
On December 29 2013 03:54 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On December 29 2013 03:50 hypercube wrote:
On December 29 2013 03:41 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On December 29 2013 03:08 hypercube wrote:
On December 29 2013 01:04 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Oil Company Looks To Great Lakes As Shipping Demand Booms

North Dakota and western Canada are producing crude oil faster than it can be shipped to refineries.

Rail car manufacturers can't make new tank cars fast enough, and new pipeline proposals face long delays over environmental concerns. So energy companies are looking for new ways to get the heavy crude to market.

One proposed solution is to ship the oil by barge over the Great Lakes — but it's a controversial one.

Crews are working around the clock in North Dakota, where there's a lot of oil under the Bakken Shale formation, and in the Alberta tar sands area in western Canada, where there's tens of billions of gallons more. ...

Shipping the oil by barge brings potential economic benefits and jobs. But there are special risks with heavy crude, says Lyman Welch, water quality program director of the conservation group Alliance for the Great Lakes.

"A spill in the open waters of Lake Superior would be very difficult if not impossible to clean up," Welch says. "Tar sands crude oil is heavier than water, so much of it sinks to the bottom of a river or lake water body if there is a spill." ...

Link

Seems riskier than a certain pipeline...


Sounds like an argument for banning the current practice, not for building the pipeline.

Shipping by tanker is being proposed as an alternative to pipelines. So if we ban both, what's the new alternative?


You don't need to ban tankers just force them to take out insurance up to the possible damage an accident would cause.

Why not just have the pipeline do that?


I don't know, I was under the impression that most of the damage from a pipeline is 'guaranteed'. E.g loss of habitat during the construction phase. If that kind of damage can be estimated and someone is willing to pay for it, sure build the pipeline. But ultimately it's up to the local governments to set the price (with active consent from their voters). If that price is too high, that just means that project isn't economically viable.

If none of the options work, then the product costs more to produce than it's worth and the logical solution is to stop producing it.

Those are fine concerns but is that the issue here? The opposition to the keystone pipeline comes from national special interest groups who have extra lobbying power due to the pipeline crossing the US boarder.


My understanding was that most of the opposition was environmental, but I don't know enough about the issue to care to debate it.

It's mainly opposition to tar sand / fracking production. Opposition to the pipeline is being used as a proxy.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
December 28 2013 21:15 GMT
#14964
On December 29 2013 06:04 sam!zdat wrote:
you acknowledge the theoretical possibility, but you'd never actually admit that it applied to some concrete situation

as long as there's costs to be externalized, you'll be damned if you aint gonna externalize em

also it's hilarious that you think the pipeline is opposed by special interests, but clearly the people pushing it are not special interests, nossir, no powerful special interests in the energy sector. Idiot

Opposing the pipeline will not stop the production. Instead it's pushing the production to use riskier transportation methods. So, congratulations for doing only harm.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18857 Posts
December 28 2013 21:22 GMT
#14965
On December 29 2013 06:15 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2013 06:04 sam!zdat wrote:
you acknowledge the theoretical possibility, but you'd never actually admit that it applied to some concrete situation

as long as there's costs to be externalized, you'll be damned if you aint gonna externalize em

also it's hilarious that you think the pipeline is opposed by special interests, but clearly the people pushing it are not special interests, nossir, no powerful special interests in the energy sector. Idiot

Opposing the pipeline will not stop the production. Instead it's pushing the production to use riskier transportation methods. So, congratulations for doing only harm.

That's nonsense, transportation and refinery access are an integral cost concern when it comes to tar sand production budgetary analysis. They most certainly have a dramatic impact on production scale decisions.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
December 28 2013 21:24 GMT
#14966
no no jonny you don't get the drug war argument here

it's precisely the idea that the production is inevitable that we oppose, because that is game over for global climatic disruption. Which I know you don't care about the future of the planet, but that's why I hate your idiot guts
shikata ga nai
Paljas
Profile Joined October 2011
Germany6926 Posts
December 28 2013 21:24 GMT
#14967
hey guys, if you oppose the pipeline, we are gonna use even more dangerous transportation methods.
hey guys, if you oppose factory farming, we are gonna use even more cruel methods.

what kind of argumentation is this?
TL+ Member
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
December 28 2013 21:39 GMT
#14968
On December 29 2013 06:22 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2013 06:15 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On December 29 2013 06:04 sam!zdat wrote:
you acknowledge the theoretical possibility, but you'd never actually admit that it applied to some concrete situation

as long as there's costs to be externalized, you'll be damned if you aint gonna externalize em

also it's hilarious that you think the pipeline is opposed by special interests, but clearly the people pushing it are not special interests, nossir, no powerful special interests in the energy sector. Idiot

Opposing the pipeline will not stop the production. Instead it's pushing the production to use riskier transportation methods. So, congratulations for doing only harm.

That's nonsense, transportation and refinery access are an integral cost concern when it comes to tar sand production budgetary analysis. They most certainly have a dramatic impact on production scale decisions.

Hasn't had a dramatic impact yet. Oil is expensive, a couple extra bucks per barrel isn't a tipping point.
On December 29 2013 06:24 sam!zdat wrote:
no no jonny you don't get the drug war argument here

it's precisely the idea that the production is inevitable that we oppose, because that is game over for global climatic disruption. Which I know you don't care about the future of the planet, but that's why I hate your idiot guts

And this is why I hate your idiot guts. Using the pipeline as a proxy for tar sand / fracking opposition is at best ineffective, and at worst counter productive. Why don't you care about that? Ignorance? Indifference?
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
December 28 2013 21:42 GMT
#14969
On December 29 2013 06:24 Paljas wrote:
hey guys, if you oppose the pipeline, we are gonna use even more dangerous transportation methods.
hey guys, if you oppose factory farming, we are gonna use even more cruel methods.

what kind of argumentation is this?


It's called argument by blackmail. Maybe samizdat knows the latin expression.
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18857 Posts
December 28 2013 21:43 GMT
#14970
If it hasn't had a dramatic impact yet, then why are oil interests slobbering all over themselves via pushing the pipeline? This "oh they are going to use riskier methods, better give in" is nothing more than a ploy.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
December 28 2013 21:49 GMT
#14971
On December 29 2013 06:43 farvacola wrote:
If it hasn't had a dramatic impact yet, then why are oil interests slobbering all over themselves via pushing the pipeline? This "oh they are going to use riskier methods, better give in" is nothing more than a ploy.

They want the pipeline because it's a cheap and stable transportation method. If they don't build it through the US to Cushing they're considering building it to the west coast of Canada and exporting to Asia.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
December 28 2013 21:52 GMT
#14972
the tar sands are a bad idea. The pipeline is a bad idea. Shipping across the lake is a bad idea. You know what's a good idea? Ecology and renewable energy. Smash the false idols of consumption and the false god of limitless growth without consequences. In other words, go to hell bourgeois scum
shikata ga nai
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
December 28 2013 21:58 GMT
#14973
On December 29 2013 06:52 sam!zdat wrote:
the tar sands are a bad idea. The pipeline is a bad idea. Shipping across the lake is a bad idea. You know what's a good idea? Ecology and renewable energy. Smash the false idols of consumption and the false god of limitless growth without consequences. In other words, go to hell bourgeois scum

So impose worse economic conditions so you don't feel so guilty.

Life's not just about you, sam.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
December 28 2013 22:01 GMT
#14974
about ME? About ME??

god you are an insufferable twat
shikata ga nai
Roe
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada6002 Posts
December 28 2013 22:20 GMT
#14975
On December 29 2013 06:24 Paljas wrote:
hey guys, if you oppose the pipeline, we are gonna use even more dangerous transportation methods.
hey guys, if you oppose factory farming, we are gonna use even more cruel methods.

what kind of argumentation is this?

it's the argument from conservative bullies; don't change anything, or else we'll make things worse!
Paljas
Profile Joined October 2011
Germany6926 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-28 22:29:47
December 28 2013 22:20 GMT
#14976
life's isnt just about the oil lobby either
or about good economic conditions for that matter
TL+ Member
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-28 22:38:03
December 28 2013 22:29 GMT
#14977
On December 29 2013 07:01 sam!zdat wrote:
about ME? About ME??

god you are an insufferable twat


Chances are very high you are not typing this on some kind of fair trade computer, so It's hypocritical to complain about the "god of growth" and corporate America while typing that on the internet using hardware that is build out of resources that are sold by some African warlord.

If you're not living in the woods without any kind of technology or product of modern civilisation you're basically just another profiteer of the system, so it's a little ridiculous to always complain about the "bourgeois scum" while being an integral part of what makes the system work in the first place.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
December 28 2013 22:51 GMT
#14978
On December 29 2013 06:52 sam!zdat wrote:
the tar sands are a bad idea. The pipeline is a bad idea. Shipping across the lake is a bad idea. You know what's a good idea? Ecology and renewable energy. Smash the false idols of consumption and the false god of limitless growth without consequences. In other words, go to hell bourgeois scum

The former is just an excuse to get to the latter. I like wallowing in "excess," thank you very much. I don't want to be relegated to drinking scotch that isn't old enough for me to sleep with.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
December 28 2013 22:59 GMT
#14979
On December 29 2013 07:20 Paljas wrote:
life's isnt just about the oil lobby either
or about good economic conditions for that matter

Lol, of course. Don't be silly.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14128 Posts
December 28 2013 23:26 GMT
#14980
The problem I have with it is that we all know that the oil is going to be drilled out and transported and burned somewhere. Even the people who are fighting it for some reason are doing it with the knowledge that they will fail and the oils going though anyway. The enviorment is going to get worse and there isn't anything we can do about it. The only thing we can do now is minimize the damage until the technology comes around to solve the problem.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Prev 1 747 748 749 750 751 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
11:00
#87
IntoTheiNu 1276
WardiTV1195
OGKoka 503
Rex132
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
TKL 782
OGKoka 503
Rex 132
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 10877
Bisu 2970
Horang2 1827
Jaedong 1424
EffOrt 629
BeSt 535
Mini 502
ggaemo 482
Soulkey 456
Light 339
[ Show more ]
Hyuk 300
firebathero 275
Snow 189
Rush 167
Pusan 125
Hyun 114
Mong 95
Sharp 73
hero 72
Zeus 70
Aegong 69
Backho 58
Sea.KH 58
Sexy 52
scan(afreeca) 51
ToSsGirL 51
[sc1f]eonzerg 48
sorry 41
Barracks 38
Movie 25
910 24
soO 18
GoRush 17
Rock 15
Sacsri 10
zelot 10
Noble 9
Terrorterran 8
Dota 2
syndereN404
Counter-Strike
zeus1082
byalli509
allub315
edward96
Other Games
singsing2814
B2W.Neo1361
hiko757
Lowko386
crisheroes281
Hui .256
Pyrionflax215
monkeys_forever101
ArmadaUGS33
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL1650
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 1484
lovetv 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 5
• HerbMon 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis5353
Other Games
• WagamamaTV363
• Shiphtur23
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
1h 39m
Replay Cast
9h 39m
The PondCast
19h 39m
Kung Fu Cup
20h 39m
GSL
1d 19h
Cure vs sOs
SHIN vs ByuN
Replay Cast
2 days
GSL
2 days
Classic vs Solar
GuMiho vs Zoun
WardiTV Spring Champion…
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Spring Champion…
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Classic vs SHIN
Rogue vs Bunny
BSL
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Flash vs Soma
RSL Revival
5 days
BSL
6 days
Patches Events
6 days
Universe Titan Cup
6 days
Rogue vs Percival
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W7
2026 GSL S1
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
YSL S3
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
Heroes Pulsing #1
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
Bounty Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.