EPTOn April 07 2017 10:41 Doodsmack wrote:
Don't fuck with the USA
Don't fuck with the USA
Or we will fire low yield warheads that could maybe destroy a cement truck in your general direction. Like 60 of them and then call it a day.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7287
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
Or we will fire low yield warheads that could maybe destroy a cement truck in your general direction. Like 60 of them and then call it a day. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24505 Posts
On April 07 2017 10:36 Ayaz2810 wrote: Russian ambassador warned of "negative consequences" if the US used military force in Syria. Great. Number updated to 60 and they flew low over Russian radar and antiaircraft sites. So they were seen and reported instantly obviously. There's this... 50 cruise missiles targeting air bases won't permenently knock them offline but they are going to suffer significant damage unless they all got jammed and missed completely/were duds. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
Good tomahawks or evil tomahawks? | ||
|
Introvert
United States5082 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Ayaz2810
United States2763 Posts
On April 07 2017 10:43 eviltomahawk wrote: 60 Tomahawk missiles Good tomahawks or evil tomahawks? Took me a second. Well played. | ||
|
Ayaz2810
United States2763 Posts
On April 07 2017 10:43 GreenHorizons wrote: There's this... https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/850160552324333568 50 cruise missiles targeting air bases won't permenently knock them offline but they are going to suffer significant damage unless they all got jammed and missed completely/were duds. I'm kind of high right now after a hard day so I'm dumb. Is the Russian airbase in the link the same one we hit? Or am I misunderstanding? | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
I've waited 7 years to post this | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On April 07 2017 10:46 Ayaz2810 wrote: I'm kind of high right now after a hard day so I'm dumb. Is the Russian airbase in the link the same one we hit? Or am I misunderstanding? Syria can't build an air-force. But it can totally be given one by Russia for a low low price over a decade or so. | ||
|
Eridanus
United States75 Posts
I doubt Trump made a deal with Putin. The Russians must be pissed. So was Trump really suddenly swayed by pictures of dead children? There is this concept that Trump's opinion is the opinion of the last person he talked to. This seems likely in this case. I buy that reasoning a lot more than Trump being worried he is made to look like an actual Siberian Candidate, and needs to give a counter-example. This sudden move and unpredictability is sure to have shaken up and scared some national leaders. The US superpower war machine being controlled by an unpredictable person is not a nice thing when you are a country that may one day find itself in the crosshair. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Ayaz2810
United States2763 Posts
You've earned your moment of glory here then lol | ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
On April 07 2017 10:48 Eridanus wrote: Well, that escalated quickly. So I wonder what happened in Trump's mind. He was on Assad's and Putin's side all this time, at least in rhetoric. And now suddenly he is doing more than Obama ever did. I doubt Trump made a deal with Putin. The Russians must be pissed. So was Trump really suddenly swayed by pictures of dead children? There is this concept that Trump's opinion is the opinion of the last person he talked to. But this seems likely in this case. I buy that reasoning a lot more than Trump being worried he is made to look like an actual Siberian Candidate, and needs to give a counter-example. This sudden move and unpredictability is sure to have shaken up and scared some national leaders. The US superpower war machine being controlled by an unpredictable person is not a nice thing when you are a country that may one day find itself in the crosshair. The answer to your question is mattis | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
America first into the breach. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
Also avoiding the whole congressional approval thing by not asking. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Ayaz2810
United States2763 Posts
On April 07 2017 10:51 Plansix wrote: Get excited people. Trump has now seen the merit of NATO and the way he can prove himself as a strong leader. America first into the breach. Well, if nothing else, a potential WWIII is a good distraction from Russia.... sort of. | ||
|
Nyxisto
Germany6287 Posts
| ||
|
Ayaz2810
United States2763 Posts
| ||
| ||
