|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
Whos gonna moderate the thread after Kwark gets banned?
|
On November 09 2016 12:19 Sermokala wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 12:18 Toadesstern wrote:If clinton gets back WI+MI, loses NH, loses NV, wins all of Maine: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/XFAjMmw.png) höhöhö NV and AZ should be going blue that would push it back the other way.
I'm worried about WI and MI though. I think Trump wins at least one of those, and then it's lights out
|
On November 09 2016 12:20 TheYango wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 12:19 FiWiFaKi wrote:On November 09 2016 12:17 biology]major wrote: To all the trump supporters in this thread, we were outnumbered from the get go in this thread, but we are about to pull off something historic. Agreed. Lets not start gloating just yet though, Hillary has a very large probability to win if she hold Wisconsin, Michigan, and Colorado. I expect all of these to end within 1-2%. It's not clear to me what you "pulled off" if you don't even live in the US and were an observer from the beginning.
I have many friends in the US and it's mostly the philosophical battle.
Not something I want people to get salty about. It's like if the candidate you've been fighting/arguing for wins, you kind of say, "hey we did it", you know. Don't read too deep into it.
|
Man, a 90 day ban bet. that took balls. Props man.
|
On November 09 2016 12:18 Nevuk wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 12:17 Sermokala wrote:On November 09 2016 12:15 BeMannerDuPenner wrote: im up at 4am watching this insane process coming to an end and i absolutely have lost all faith in humanity.
i knew things were going down in the US in the last 2 decades. But even if she wins in the end this is the clearest proof that the good years are over for this world. The supposdely most powerful leading democracy on the planet is in huge parts going for a braindamaged insane racist that represents evrything bad in this world.
With other countries leaning right in the eu, brexit and all that crap ... im scared. im truly scared for the future of the world as we know it and humankind as a whole. we learned nothing. Jesus calm down. things are the best they've ever been full stop. if trump is as bad as everyone is thinking then he won't get more then 4 years let alone 2 strong ones with a house on his side. The fear is that he attempts to maintain his power through means other people would find beyond the pale. He won't be able to. He has a fractional advantage in the electorate and no establishment patience for long term damage he could do to the party.
|
On November 09 2016 12:18 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: At least Wolf brings us the good info
Clearly distress signaling that he actually thinks Bernie should have been the nominee ;P
|
On November 09 2016 12:22 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:Man, a 90 day ban bet. that took balls. Props man.
But does Kwark have the balls.
|
On November 09 2016 12:21 Sent. wrote:Whos gonna moderate the thread after Kwark gets banned? kwark never moderated the thread it wouldn't matter.
|
On November 09 2016 12:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 12:18 SoSexy wrote: If Trump wins, this election will be a really big kick to political correctness and laxism. Can't wait. Because being politically incorrect is the same as being an outright racist and sexist?
You should not pile on salt, price is going down as it becomes super available :D
|
Clinton will not win Michigan. A place where Obama won with oer 9% against Romney...
|
I think Bernie would have the same problem in rural areas that Clinton does, possibly to an even larger extent.
|
On November 09 2016 12:21 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 12:19 Sermokala wrote:On November 09 2016 12:18 Toadesstern wrote:If clinton gets back WI+MI, loses NH, loses NV, wins all of Maine: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/XFAjMmw.png) höhöhö NV and AZ should be going blue that would push it back the other way. I'm worried about WI and MI though. I think Trump wins at least one of those, and then it's lights out
if he gets nevada and NH, he ties it up 269-269 assuming he gets the others he needs to anyway.
|
On November 09 2016 12:19 Doraemon wrote: what is the actual appeal of trump? he keeps saying MAGA but i've never seen once how he will do it Part of it is a way to "stick it" to those who dislike him. This is why the negative coverage by the media is actually backfiring in some parts - "Oh, you hate this guy? I hate you, that must mean he's awesome"
Part of it is simply just loving tyrants. A good portion of it is also hating Hillary Clinton.
Looks like we're about to be in for Trump taking credit for all of the coat-tails of Obama's decent work on the economy.
|
On November 09 2016 12:19 Birdie wrote:Show nested quote +You can think whatever you want about his ideas, but the fact remains that he has been the most authentic and well-meaning presidential candidate the US has had in a very long time. Forgetting Ron Paul?
Trump = well-meaning? Is that a joke?
|
On November 09 2016 12:22 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:Man, a 90 day ban bet. that took balls. Props man.
Hardly dude. I've taken a month over whether French players would make it to the Ro8 of a Dreamhack.
|
On November 09 2016 12:21 Sent. wrote:Whos gonna moderate the thread after Kwark gets banned? Oh wow. Kwark with a 90 day ban. Crazy stuff.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
I leave for an hour to finish up my work, and I'm back to the tune of chaos in the ballot count.
I still see a Hillary win. But at this point it could go either way.
|
|
On November 09 2016 12:23 SoSexy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 12:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On November 09 2016 12:18 SoSexy wrote: If Trump wins, this election will be a really big kick to political correctness and laxism. Can't wait. Because being politically incorrect is the same as being an outright racist and sexist? You should not pile on salt, price is going down as it becomes super available :D
Because correcting you is me being salty...
|
On November 09 2016 12:23 Buckyman wrote: I think Bernie would have the same problem in rural areas that Clinton does, possibly to an even larger extent. This is where I question the idea that Bernie would have done a lot better. Trump's mostly overperforming in rural areas, which isn't where Bernie would have outperformed Clinton.
|
|
|
|