|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On November 09 2016 12:04 GGTeMpLaR wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 12:02 zlefin wrote:On November 09 2016 12:01 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On November 09 2016 12:00 zlefin wrote:On November 09 2016 11:57 FiWiFaKi wrote:On November 09 2016 11:56 zlefin wrote:On November 09 2016 11:52 FiWiFaKi wrote:On November 09 2016 11:51 Dismay wrote:On November 09 2016 11:46 hunts wrote:On November 09 2016 11:36 Clonester wrote:
Trump is doing it. He is changing the game.
Against all the odds. No all trump is doing is showing that there are many uneducated bigoted idiots out there who are allowed to vote, and that republicans did a good job of voter suppression in key states. It's important to understand why Trump is doing well, and it's not just uneducated racism. There's a pretty big rural vs urban dynamic at play here. The standard Hillary lost because 50% of the US population is stupid argument, standard. =/ actually, it's more like 85-90% of the us population is stupid. trump just got a higher proportion of the stupid vote this time. I guess stupid is all relative. partially relative, partially absolute. even on an absolute scale one can make a decent case for it. on a relative it's of course very easy to make the case for it. this election just makes it all the easier to prove the point of course, given how well documentedly unfit clinton is. Fixed that for you man ;D don't be an idiot. the two are not equivalent, and your claims to the contrary merely demonstrate your inability to tell the difference. and replacing one with the other doens't make you right, nor me wrong. it just means you're unable to actually look at issues in a decent fashion. I'm not the one being an idiot here lol There is a huge difference between the two and unless you're a criminal, a briber with millions at stake, or an illegal immigrant, one is objectively better than the other
As if there was the slightest objectivity involved in this election.
|
|
|
On November 09 2016 12:04 GGTeMpLaR wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 12:02 zlefin wrote:On November 09 2016 12:01 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On November 09 2016 12:00 zlefin wrote:On November 09 2016 11:57 FiWiFaKi wrote:On November 09 2016 11:56 zlefin wrote:On November 09 2016 11:52 FiWiFaKi wrote:On November 09 2016 11:51 Dismay wrote:On November 09 2016 11:46 hunts wrote:On November 09 2016 11:36 Clonester wrote:
Trump is doing it. He is changing the game.
Against all the odds. No all trump is doing is showing that there are many uneducated bigoted idiots out there who are allowed to vote, and that republicans did a good job of voter suppression in key states. It's important to understand why Trump is doing well, and it's not just uneducated racism. There's a pretty big rural vs urban dynamic at play here. The standard Hillary lost because 50% of the US population is stupid argument, standard. =/ actually, it's more like 85-90% of the us population is stupid. trump just got a higher proportion of the stupid vote this time. I guess stupid is all relative. partially relative, partially absolute. even on an absolute scale one can make a decent case for it. on a relative it's of course very easy to make the case for it. this election just makes it all the easier to prove the point of course, given how well documentedly unfit clinton is. Fixed that for you man ;D don't be an idiot. the two are not equivalent, and your claims to the contrary merely demonstrate your inability to tell the difference. and replacing one with the other doens't make you right, nor me wrong. it just means you're unable to actually look at issues in a decent fashion. I'm not the one being an idiot here lol There is a huge difference between the two and unless you're a criminal, a briber with millions at stake, or an illegal immigrant, one is objectively better than the other
yes, you are. but you are not capable of recognizing it. at any rate, all your false claims have been proven false int he past repeatedly, so there's little to be done. too much bubble.
|
On November 09 2016 12:03 Clonester wrote:
Virgina is Clintoland, thats save now.
N.C. is extremly likely to be won by Trump.
Now it is Michigan, whoever wins here... and freaking Wisconson.
I can see Michigan going back looking at what's still left out there... Wisconsin looking a bit more scary for me
Though most people, like posts on 538 livefeed, seem to suggest Michigan is the more critical one
|
On November 09 2016 12:05 plasmidghost wrote:
A ton of Wisconsin hasn't even reported yet, I wonder how that's gonna play out
Anyone who can guess Wisconsin or Michigan based on what I'm seeing on CNN's results is a fucking wizard
|
Talking head on TYT livestream still thinks Clinton will win
|
On November 09 2016 12:05 plasmidghost wrote:
A ton of Wisconsin hasn't even reported yet, I wonder how that's gonna play out
I think he has issues with the classic conservatives in Wisconsin due to his attacks on Ryan. His strength seems to be predicated on getting blue collar whites to the polls, so the map is gonna be wonky.
|
Interesting to see how the numbers do sometimes vary from district to district within a state
|
NYTimes just crushed the 70% mark for Trump, with 269 (thanks house) to over 280 electorials, but clinton being at +2 in popular.
I still think Trump can even out the popular vote.
|
On November 09 2016 12:02 FiWiFaKi wrote:
I might be stupid, so I dunno, but I've made my arguments here very clear many times about why I think Hillary is an awful person and why she shouldn't be president. So while you might think that Trump is unfit, I think than Hillary is unfit, so there we are.
I agree Hillary is an awful person. I think both are unfit to be president. I just think Trump's inexperience and a tendency for irrational outbursts is more disqualifying than Clinton being awful and corrupt.
But we've had this discussion before so I guess it's not really worth carrying forward. We're both aware of the candidates' flaws, we just disagree on how important they are, and that's really hard to argue definitively.
|
|
|
By land area, Trump wins like 95% of the US.
|
How much left to count in Florida?
|
On November 09 2016 12:05 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2016 12:04 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On November 09 2016 12:02 zlefin wrote:On November 09 2016 12:01 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On November 09 2016 12:00 zlefin wrote:On November 09 2016 11:57 FiWiFaKi wrote:On November 09 2016 11:56 zlefin wrote:On November 09 2016 11:52 FiWiFaKi wrote:On November 09 2016 11:51 Dismay wrote:On November 09 2016 11:46 hunts wrote:
[quote]
No all trump is doing is showing that there are many uneducated bigoted idiots out there who are allowed to vote, and that republicans did a good job of voter suppression in key states. It's important to understand why Trump is doing well, and it's not just uneducated racism. There's a pretty big rural vs urban dynamic at play here. The standard Hillary lost because 50% of the US population is stupid argument, standard. =/ actually, it's more like 85-90% of the us population is stupid. trump just got a higher proportion of the stupid vote this time. I guess stupid is all relative. partially relative, partially absolute. even on an absolute scale one can make a decent case for it. on a relative it's of course very easy to make the case for it. this election just makes it all the easier to prove the point of course, given how well documentedly unfit clinton is. Fixed that for you man ;D don't be an idiot. the two are not equivalent, and your claims to the contrary merely demonstrate your inability to tell the difference. and replacing one with the other doens't make you right, nor me wrong. it just means you're unable to actually look at issues in a decent fashion. I'm not the one being an idiot here lol There is a huge difference between the two and unless you're a criminal, a briber with millions at stake, or an illegal immigrant, one is objectively better than the other yes, you are. but you are not capable of recognizing it. at any rate, all your false claims have been proven false int he past repeatedly, so there's little to be done. too much bubble.
You should strongly consider you're the one incapable of recognizing it
I haven't made any false claims to be disproven so I don't know what fantasyland you're living in
Everything I've predicted months ago is coming true and everyone is waking up out of fantasyland now upset that reality doesn't match the coolaid they've been drinking this election
|
On November 09 2016 12:08 Grettin wrote:
How much left to count in Florida?
1%
|
On November 09 2016 12:06 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Talking head on TYT livestream still thinks Clinton will win
so everyone must think trump will win? why bother have a conversation then
|
Florida has gone to Trump it's over.
|
Lmao I hope the media is happy with trump winning because they are imo the biggest reason why he achieved what he has this election cycle
|
On November 09 2016 12:08 Grettin wrote:
How much left to count in Florida?
1% according to the guardian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
