EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 6032
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
On November 09 2016 11:56 zlefin wrote: actually, it's more like 85-90% of the us population is stupid. trump just got a higher proportion of the stupid vote this time. I guess stupid is all relative. | ||
|
Clonester
Germany2808 Posts
On November 09 2016 11:56 plasmidghost wrote: Okay, NYTimes just flipped over But NYTimes is also at 62% Trump overall. NYTimes saw Virginia at 95% Clinton all along. | ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
| ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4333 Posts
Seriously Wisconsin wasn't meant to be in play guys! | ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On November 09 2016 11:57 Xialos wrote: Ye but is it not going to swing back in favor of Clinton once california's results comes in? Not how it works. | ||
|
ggrrg
Bulgaria2716 Posts
On November 09 2016 11:49 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Dems you should probably blame the DNC and their shady primary tactics for this loss and not Trump. Sanders would have demolished Trump, it wouldn't have been close. Agree. User was warned for this post | ||
|
wuhan_clan
United States5609 Posts
On November 09 2016 11:55 TheYango wrote: Except that's not going to happen because the "protest" vote is 3rd party. The Brexit referendum only had 2 options so the only protest option was Leave. Presidential elections have more than 2 options so someone protesting Hillary Clinton doesn't have to vote Trump. I don't think applying the typical protest vote explanation works here. It's definitely a "who do i hate more" / lesser of 2 evils vote. In this kind of mindset, you have to vote for the person you think will have the most chance to upset the candidate you hate. People who might have voted 3rd party or not at all are showing up to vote against the candidate they hate by casting a vote for the other candidate who actually has a shot to win. But who knows. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
Clonester
Germany2808 Posts
Will Donald win the popular vote? | ||
|
Ben...
Canada3485 Posts
| ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On November 09 2016 11:57 Xialos wrote: Ye but is it not going to swing back in favor of Clinton once california's results comes in? California's a given for Clinton. It probably will swing the popular vote, but that doesn't matter. | ||
|
Wolfstan
Canada605 Posts
On November 09 2016 11:57 Xialos wrote: Ye but is it not going to swing back in favor of Clinton once california's results comes in? California's numbers are baked in. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23238 Posts
| ||
|
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
Saying Sanders would have demolished Trump just says to me that Trump is actually a truly horrible candidate who only had a chance because Clinton has a huge optics problem. | ||
|
wuhan_clan
United States5609 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44362 Posts
On November 09 2016 11:57 FiWiFaKi wrote: Hillary takes lead in VI with 92% (by 6k votes). What is VI? You mean VA? | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
partially relative, partially absolute. even on an absolute scale one can make a decent case for it. on a relative it's of course very easy to make the case for it. this election just makes it all the easier to prove the point of course, given how well documentedly unfit trump is. | ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
Opps | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44362 Posts
No worries, I just wasn't sure  | ||
| ||
