• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:41
CEST 18:41
KST 01:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202560RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings What tournaments are world championships? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Post Pic of your Favorite Food! The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 917 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5770

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5768 5769 5770 5771 5772 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Buckyman
Profile Joined May 2014
1364 Posts
October 26 2016 03:45 GMT
#115381
@MLL
I think in the 10% scenario, my vote for a third party candidate this election will matter more than 10x as much as a vote for a first party candidate in the 90% scenario.

The Green and Libertarian parties have both been around for at least 30 years. They're likely to continue to exist for the next 4, particularly if they get a bump in popular support this election.


@zlefin
The highlights of the emails (leaked and disclosed) related to the integrity of the Democratic party are:
1) Donors directly buying appointed positions
2) The Democratic National Committee (and several members thereof) violating its neutrality rule during the primary at Bernie Sanders' expense
3) Hints that the executive branch suppressed the FBI investigation of Clinton's email server and was complicit in destroying evidence related to it

If any of these are confirmed by a thorough investigation, it reflects poorly on the Democratic party to such an extent that it could fission over the scandal.
plasmidghost
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Belgium16168 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-26 03:48:39
October 26 2016 03:46 GMT
#115382
Regarding all the polls are rigged allegations, should the source code of electronic voting machines be made available to the public?
Actually now that I think about this, it's an awful idea that would lead to manipulation by nefarious people
Yugoslavia will always live on in my heart
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-26 04:00:29
October 26 2016 03:49 GMT
#115383
Fission isn't a result of scandal; scandal results in people getting fired and cleaning house, and some people kicked out. It doesn't cause fission of the party; fission is a result of irreconcilable differences in policy goals. (or disputes between leadership)

There have been numerous FAR worse TRUE scandals in the history of america, and in the parties at both national and state level. I mean, this stuff isn't even getting to indictments, let alone convictions.

They didn't show the DNC violating neutrality in a serious way; they showed that some of them had opinions that weren't neutral, and it may've colored a few things. But the DNC didn't act super non-neutral. It's also somewhat odd for them to even be neutral when dealing with someone like Sanders who's a sort-of newcomer to the party, seems odd to me at least.
Hints of investigation suppression could be nothing; there's been a lot of stuff that's made out to be bigger than it actually is. And comey's republican. I think Comey did a thorough job on the investigation, and his testimony before congress covers stuff well.


PS have you watched much cspan? watched the debates on the floor of the house or senate? committee hearings? I'm curious how many of those who talk here do.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-26 03:57:09
October 26 2016 03:56 GMT
#115384
On October 26 2016 12:46 plasmidghost wrote:
Regarding all the polls are rigged allegations, should the source code of electronic voting machines be made available to the public?
Actually now that I think about this, it's an awful idea that would lead to manipulation by nefarious people


Knowledge of the internal workings of the electronic voting machines shouldn't result in vulnerabilities. Any system that relies on secrecy is flawed. Estonia has released how their internet voting servers work without problems for example (https://github.com/vvk-ehk/evalimine).

However people would just say that the code on the machines is different or w/e, so it wouldn't get rid of the rigging allegations.
Buckyman
Profile Joined May 2014
1364 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-26 04:07:22
October 26 2016 04:01 GMT
#115385
On October 26 2016 12:46 plasmidghost wrote:
Regarding all the polls are rigged allegations, should the source code of electronic voting machines be made available to the public?
Actually now that I think about this, it's an awful idea that would lead to manipulation by nefarious people


Austin, Texas is attempting to do just that, develop an open source electronic ballot. (source)

And it seems like an improvement over existing voting machines which have been reported vulnerable to both direct tampering and manipulation at the aggregation stage.
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9118 Posts
October 26 2016 04:05 GMT
#115386
On October 26 2016 12:26 Nevuk wrote:
That Gingrich-Kelly interview was really bad for Newt. If it were any other campaign I would expect him to apologize before morning, but I'm half expecting them to double down on accusing Megyn Kelly of being a slut.

There's a thread from r/the_donald at the top of reddit about that video titled "Watch MEGYN KELLY get DESTROYED by based patriot NEWT GINGRICH!!! Absolutely destroyed."

Doubling down sounds about right.
Doraemon
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Australia14949 Posts
October 26 2016 04:15 GMT
#115387
On October 26 2016 13:05 Dan HH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2016 12:26 Nevuk wrote:
That Gingrich-Kelly interview was really bad for Newt. If it were any other campaign I would expect him to apologize before morning, but I'm half expecting them to double down on accusing Megyn Kelly of being a slut.

There's a thread from r/the_donald at the top of reddit about that video titled "Watch MEGYN KELLY get DESTROYED by based patriot NEWT GINGRICH!!! Absolutely destroyed."

Doubling down sounds about right.


that subreddit is one of the most disgusting places on the net
Do yourself a favour and just STFU
plasmidghost
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Belgium16168 Posts
October 26 2016 04:16 GMT
#115388
On October 26 2016 12:56 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2016 12:46 plasmidghost wrote:
Regarding all the polls are rigged allegations, should the source code of electronic voting machines be made available to the public?
Actually now that I think about this, it's an awful idea that would lead to manipulation by nefarious people


Knowledge of the internal workings of the electronic voting machines shouldn't result in vulnerabilities. Any system that relies on secrecy is flawed. Estonia has released how their internet voting servers work without problems for example (https://github.com/vvk-ehk/evalimine).

However people would just say that the code on the machines is different or w/e, so it wouldn't get rid of the rigging allegations.

Yeah, that's true, but I think it would make vote rigging allegations a lot harder to take seriously. If an open-source ballot was considered, I wonder what standards it would have to undergo to be adopted nationwide
Yugoslavia will always live on in my heart
MyLovelyLurker
Profile Joined April 2007
France756 Posts
October 26 2016 04:34 GMT
#115389
On October 26 2016 12:45 Buckyman wrote:
@MLL
I think in the 10% scenario, my vote for a third party candidate this election will matter more than 10x as much as a vote for a first party candidate in the 90% scenario.

The Green and Libertarian parties have both been around for at least 30 years. They're likely to continue to exist for the next 4, particularly if they get a bump in popular support this election.


@zlefin
The highlights of the emails (leaked and disclosed) related to the integrity of the Democratic party are:
1) Donors directly buying appointed positions
2) The Democratic National Committee (and several members thereof) violating its neutrality rule during the primary at Bernie Sanders' expense
3) Hints that the executive branch suppressed the FBI investigation of Clinton's email server and was complicit in destroying evidence related to it

If any of these are confirmed by a thorough investigation, it reflects poorly on the Democratic party to such an extent that it could fission over the scandal.


This is where I respectfully disagree with your math, because this election is different. In the 90% scenario, there is a fundamental danger both to libertarian and green values alike, and to freedom of speech in general, in electing Trump. So your vote in the central scenario - or lack thereof - matters 2x to 5x more. Let me make my case in a clearer, but hopefully relatively neutral, fashion :

- The guy's foreign policy credentials are notoriously abysmal, as evident from the debates ( his only substantial claims on the timing of US attacks on foreign soil, so the 'when', not 'what' or 'why'). You know the country has effed-up when just his strong poll numbers encourage more whackos like Zhirinovsky to threaten the US with WW3 if he doesn't go through.
- A well-documented lack of self-discipline ( tweeting about Alicia Machado's sex tape at 3AM ? Presidential ? Really ? ).
- Mediocre to poor business ability. The son of a real estate mogul himself, and expelled from school in his youth, you'll find that compounding a conservative estimate of his father's wealth at the long-term risk premium of the stock market, 7%, yields $2.5bn, roughly his net worth in today's dollars. In other words, he'd have been a billionaire just the same, had he bought some SPX and sat on it. If he were in the same league as business titans such as Buffett or Dalio, he'd be worth a hundred times more. Has noone in their right mind questioned how someone who can lose a billion on a litteral cash machine will run the country's finances ?
- A constitutional crisis in waiting, due to sex scandals-induced impeachment procedures should he get elected.
- Repeated attacks on fundamentals of American democracy and patriotism, starting with peaceful transition of power
- An unwillingness to prepare files and show bait-proof temperament that make him an outright threat to national security ( you can't stand up to Billy Bush, have fun playing with Putin ).
- A lack of basic dignity ( making fun of a disabled reporter, insulting the family of a Gold Star veteran ) incompatible with the sober function of Commander-in-Chief

I'm sure you've heard those before. This is even before I get into the 11+ women who are accusing him of sexual misconduct. If you say all of them independently are a coin toss for truth, since he's denied them all, you work out an upper bound probability of him lying of 99.95%.

The TLDR is : Trump's a glorified real estate agent, who spent most of his life in the intellectual abyss of pro-westlers, wannabe beauty queens, and Howard Stern. In a sense America doesn't elect its own leader, but the leader of the free world. Trump's not just unfit - he's plainly damaging and would make the US a laughing stock. The negative implications of the risk of electing someone who can't do without Kellyanne Conway's damage control a single day are much, much, larger than hedging for tail risks.

"I just say, it doesn't matter win or lose, I just love Starcraft 2, I love this game, I love this stage, just play like in practice" - TIME/Oliveira
Buckyman
Profile Joined May 2014
1364 Posts
October 26 2016 04:41 GMT
#115390
I acknowledge all those points but am not persuaded that Clinton would be a meaningful improvement over Trump, except regarding self-discipline. She would be impeached over obstruction of justice rather than sexual misconduct, however, which I consider more significant for a POTUS.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
October 26 2016 04:45 GMT
#115391
yeah clinton isnt getting impeached, even if the house is gonna make noises about it.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Madkipz
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Norway1643 Posts
October 26 2016 04:48 GMT
#115392
On October 26 2016 13:45 ticklishmusic wrote:
yeah clinton isnt getting impeached, even if the house is gonna make noises about it.


That's great. I'm sure the spitting image of inequality before the law is going to improve the perspective of a corrupt and biased system that doesn't work.
"Mudkip"
MyLovelyLurker
Profile Joined April 2007
France756 Posts
October 26 2016 04:58 GMT
#115393
On October 26 2016 13:41 Buckyman wrote:
I acknowledge all those points but am not persuaded that Clinton would be a meaningful improvement over Trump, except regarding self-discipline. She would be impeached over obstruction of justice rather than sexual misconduct, however, which I consider more significant for a POTUS.


This is fair, but I urge you to consider she has a track record as a former partner in a law firm and as a Secretary of State which, at the very least, indicate some degree of competence re my first two, and last two points.

As for impeachment this is speculative and you are right, but again, in her favour, this is one single case versus any of 11 ( and potentially more ) that would await Trump.

I would not necessarily argue for her versus a reasonable Rep such as Ryan or Rubio, but here, my key point is simply the campaign has been damaging to the perception of America, and its priority should be to send a message to the world saying 'we see through populism, and we're better than this'.
"I just say, it doesn't matter win or lose, I just love Starcraft 2, I love this game, I love this stage, just play like in practice" - TIME/Oliveira
Buckyman
Profile Joined May 2014
1364 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-26 05:22:46
October 26 2016 05:21 GMT
#115394
Trump has one foreign policy point in his favor: He has neither started any wars nor caused the US to become involved in any existing armed conflict. Thanks to Hillary's term as SoS, she can't claim as much.

Also, Hillary's FBI testimony casts doubt on how valuable her SoS experience actually is.
----
Regarding the 11 accusations, I find it quite suspicious that they all waited until a few weeks before the election and then all came forwards at once. I would have expected some of them to come out during the extended primaries if they weren't deliberately timing it to cause a Clinton presidency.

----
Finally, I'm not voting in a swing state. The only scenario in which the state is even contested (within, say, 5%) is if it's the victim of incompetently executed election fraud. On the other hand, my vote for a 3rd party would get pooled nationwide towards the 5% recognition threshold and is therefore far more likely to be relevant.
MyLovelyLurker
Profile Joined April 2007
France756 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-26 05:46:11
October 26 2016 05:45 GMT
#115395
On October 26 2016 14:21 Buckyman wrote:
Trump has one foreign policy point in his favor: He has neither started any wars nor caused the US to become involved in any existing armed conflict. Thanks to Hillary's term as SoS, she can't claim as much.


That's just because thank God he hasn't had a chance to. Just his comment about giving nuclear weapons to Japan would have China throw a fit ( and possibly a test missile or two ) over the Senkaku islands overnight.


Regarding the 11 accusations, I find it quite suspicious that they all waited until a few weeks before the election and then all came forwards at once. I would have expected some of them to come out during the extended primaries if they weren't deliberately timing it to cause a Clinton presidency.


This is very true, and slightly disturbing. Obviously some of them have been coordinated, and I would find very little credence in, say, the allegations of an adult film star. This is why I've used 'upper bound' for probability earlier. But say Salma Hayek, herself the wife of a billionaire, has come forward as well recently, and Trump has admitted to groping as his MO in the Access Hollywood tapes, so that really shouldn't come across as a surprise ; the timing doesn't make it less true. Trump hasn't denied the veracity of the tapes. Two wrongs don't make a right : simply because dem spin doctors are busy digging out dirt with cash doesn't mean there's no dirt in the first place.


Finally, I'm not voting in a swing state. The only scenario in which the state is even contested (within, say, 5%) is if it's the victim of incompetently executed election fraud. On the other hand, my vote for a 3rd party would get pooled nationwide towards the 5% recognition threshold and is therefore far more likely to be relevant.


You know where you are voting, obviously A swing state is a domestic concern. Where we ultimately disagree is on the value to yourself of America's international standing. I think it's an asset that translates directly into the safety of its citizen and their economic well-being. Where America is perceived as strong, trade deals go ever so slightly in its favour. Where America is perceived as friendly, terrorists have a harder time training recruits. Where it is seen as weak and angry, it stands to be exploited and meddled with. There is only one candidate in this election that improves how America is seen across the world. If they're 'all the same' to you, all I'm asking is for you to consider maximizing the global value of your vote.

"I just say, it doesn't matter win or lose, I just love Starcraft 2, I love this game, I love this stage, just play like in practice" - TIME/Oliveira
CobaltBlu
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States919 Posts
October 26 2016 06:29 GMT
#115396
On October 26 2016 14:21 Buckyman wrote:
Regarding the 11 accusations, I find it quite suspicious that they all waited until a few weeks before the election and then all came forwards at once. I would have expected some of them to come out during the extended primaries if they weren't deliberately timing it to cause a Clinton presidency..


Women did come out with allegations of Trump sexually assaulting them long before a few weeks before the end of the election. Why wouldn't they want to come out on their own? A lot of people would be afraid of coming out against a notoriously litigious billionaire that has gathered such a spirited following. Without some impetus, like the audio tape of Trump himself describing how he likes to sexually women, it shouldn't be hard to imagine how the personal cost of making accusations on their own would outweigh the benefits. That isn't to say that all claims of sexual assault/harassment are true but they should be taken seriously. You shouldn't be so willing to brush them off just because you can imagine some ulterior motive. Not everything is a conspiracy.
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-26 06:37:52
October 26 2016 06:30 GMT
#115397
On October 26 2016 14:21 Buckyman wrote:
Also, Hillary's FBI testimony casts doubt on how valuable her SoS experience actually is.

I've seen this argument made multiple times, and I honestly can't make any sense of it.

Did Clinton do a shitty job as SoS? Yes. Does that make experience worth less than someone with no experience? Of course not. That's the entire idea of experience being a good thing--you got to make some mistakes the first time, learned from them, and therefore will do better than someone who is doing it for the first time because you won't repeat the same mistakes while they're likely to make the same fuckups you did the first time around.

The only way you could make the "no experience is better than experience when she did a shitty job the first time" argument make any sense is if you're arguing that Trump is some kind of FP prodigy where even without any experience, he will avoid the pitfalls of a political novice. When all evidence is to the contrary--that Trump is woefully underinformed about how foreign policy works and will be unable to intelligently pursue his FP goals.

The argument would hold more water if her opponent was a veteran politician with a similar resume, who could draw upon comparable experience less fraught with fuck-ups. But that's not what we got. We got an incompetent political novice, so yes, even experience where someone made a lot of mistakes is a distinct advantage over someone who has none.
Moderator
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-26 06:31:17
October 26 2016 06:30 GMT
#115398
On October 26 2016 03:32 zlefin wrote:
bio -> I couldn't fidn the article I was looking for.

Were you referring to this article, and to Clinton's "New College Compact" plan in particular (and how it got ignored by the press at the time)?
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
JW_DTLA
Profile Joined December 2015
242 Posts
October 26 2016 08:05 GMT
#115399
On October 26 2016 15:29 CobaltBlu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2016 14:21 Buckyman wrote:
Regarding the 11 accusations, I find it quite suspicious that they all waited until a few weeks before the election and then all came forwards at once. I would have expected some of them to come out during the extended primaries if they weren't deliberately timing it to cause a Clinton presidency..


Women did come out with allegations of Trump sexually assaulting them long before a few weeks before the end of the election. Why wouldn't they want to come out on their own? A lot of people would be afraid of coming out against a notoriously litigious billionaire that has gathered such a spirited following. Without some impetus, like the audio tape of Trump himself describing how he likes to sexually women, it shouldn't be hard to imagine how the personal cost of making accusations on their own would outweigh the benefits. That isn't to say that all claims of sexual assault/harassment are true but they should be taken seriously. You shouldn't be so willing to brush them off just because you can imagine some ulterior motive. Not everything is a conspiracy.


See also: Roger Ailes. Ailes abused women who worked for him for decades. But until a very famous woman with nothing to lose came out against him, the rest of the ones who really needed their jobs stayed silent. Also Cosby. Once the first three came out after the Burress sketch the rest flooded out into the open. One accuser begets another because no one wants to be the first one.
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4329 Posts
October 26 2016 08:10 GMT
#115400
On October 26 2016 15:30 TheYango wrote:
Did Clinton do a shitty job as SoS? Yes. Does that make experience worth less than someone with no experience? Of course not. That's the entire idea of experience being a good thing--you got to make some mistakes the first time, learned from them, and therefore will do better than someone who is doing it for the first time because you won't repeat the same mistakes while they're likely to make the same fuckups you did the first time around.

Plenty depends on the advisers too.Maybe we can give Clinton the benefit of the doubt with a few of her bad calls, It's possible they were due to bad advice from her advisers.More wikileaks stuff is coming out daily so thats a gold mine for this kind of info.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
Prev 1 5768 5769 5770 5771 5772 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
14:00
King of the Hill #219
davetesta15
Liquipedia
Esports World Cup
11:00
2025 - Final Day
Serral vs ClassicLIVE!
EWC_Arena20873
ComeBackTV 4907
TaKeTV 1031
JimRising 789
Hui .752
3DClanTV 517
Fuzer 336
EnkiAlexander 297
Rex266
CranKy Ducklings155
Reynor151
SpeCial78
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena20873
JimRising 789
Hui .752
Fuzer 336
Rex 266
Reynor 151
UpATreeSC 142
SpeCial 78
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 4429
Shuttle 2618
Larva 973
Mini 729
actioN 509
EffOrt 361
Soma 299
ggaemo 235
Rush 142
TY 126
[ Show more ]
sorry 92
Snow 90
JYJ85
Shine 66
Hyun 65
Aegong 26
Terrorterran 17
JulyZerg 16
zelot 16
Sacsri 9
sas.Sziky 9
soO 7
yabsab 5
NaDa 3
Dota 2
Gorgc7411
XaKoH 447
syndereN428
420jenkins395
XcaliburYe311
Counter-Strike
fl0m3570
sgares369
oskar224
Other Games
gofns6788
FrodaN1860
singsing1817
Beastyqt706
KnowMe135
ArmadaUGS116
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 4
• FirePhoenix1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV548
League of Legends
• Nemesis4176
Other Games
• Shiphtur362
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
17h 19m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
21h 19m
CSO Cup
23h 19m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 1h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 16h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 21h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.