|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On July 23 2016 07:39 CorsairHero wrote:but all the people in the media used ONE word to describe trumps speech! dark. I'm not seeing what that guy said ("75% people say that Trumps speech was positive & uplifting") in any of those images. None of the questions were about whether it was positive or uplifting.
|
|
On July 23 2016 07:30 LegalLord wrote:How does it compare to the other speeches? Interesting thing is that Trump and his speakers had policies that were strongly in conflict with each other at times. Not sure about that, but what I'll be looking for is how the response compares to Hillary's speech next week. I thought it was interesting to see people's own impressions, before the media has nudged them towards how they're supposed to think.
The Republicans in general disagree among themselves more so they have to be a "big tent." The DNC will probably be more like a single voice.
|
Expected but nonetheless disappointing that the Dems resort to having celebs speak.
|
Silva is a "Dreamer" from Nevada who will talk about her personal immigration story and her activism.
Tuesday: Former President Bill Clinton will be joined by Mothers of the Movement, mothers of black men and women who have been killed by gun violence or in police custody, including the mothers of Eric Garner, Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown. Oh.... oh no...
Oh no, no, no.
Trump is trying to generate massive uneducated white turnout... and the DNC is doing everything they can to help him.
|
LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Nielsen company says an estimated 32.2 million people watched Donald Trump deliver his GOP nomination acceptance speech.
Thursday's audience topped the 30.3 million who watched nominee Mitt Romney's 2012 speech but fell well short of John McCain's audience of 38.9 million at the 2008 Republican convention.
This year's tally reflects viewership across 10 commercial networks, Nielsen said Friday, topped by Fox News Channel with 9.4 million viewers.
The channel's triumph came the same day that its founder and chief, Roger Ailes, resigned amid a former anchorwoman's claims of workplace misconduct.
For the closing hour of the four-day convention, CNN drew 5.5 million viewers; NBC 4.6 million; ABC 3.9 million; CBS 3.8 million and MSNBC 3 million.
apnews.com
|
On July 23 2016 07:50 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2016 07:41 Mohdoo wrote:On July 23 2016 07:40 LegalLord wrote:On July 23 2016 07:34 GGTeMpLaR wrote: mothers of black men and women who have been killed by gun violence or in police custody, including the mothers of Eric Garner, Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown. Wow. Not a fan. lmao do we really need THREE of them? They better be eloquent, well spoken people. What a mess. Hopefully they give them terrible times so that we technically patted them on the head and gave our condolences, but not to where people are seeing that shit when they're off work. Law enforcement is speaking as well. From the reports, the Democrats want to give equal time to both sides and promote discussion. Nothing gets better if everyone stays in their corner. Do you think each of the mothers will be contributing something unique?
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
All they are going to do is give a speech that appeals to the converted and comes off as partisan and one-sided to those who are undecided or more pro-police than others.
|
On July 23 2016 08:14 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Nielsen company says an estimated 32.2 million people watched Donald Trump deliver his GOP nomination acceptance speech.
Thursday's audience topped the 30.3 million who watched nominee Mitt Romney's 2012 speech but fell well short of John McCain's audience of 38.9 million at the 2008 Republican convention.
This year's tally reflects viewership across 10 commercial networks, Nielsen said Friday, topped by Fox News Channel with 9.4 million viewers.
The channel's triumph came the same day that its founder and chief, Roger Ailes, resigned amid a former anchorwoman's claims of workplace misconduct.
For the closing hour of the four-day convention, CNN drew 5.5 million viewers; NBC 4.6 million; ABC 3.9 million; CBS 3.8 million and MSNBC 3 million. apnews.com
be interesting to see online numbers. there were at least 100k on the youtube stream.
|
Wait is the immigrant speaker an illegal immigrant?
edit: I guess they use the phrase 'undocumented immigrant' instead.
|
With all the leaks from the DNC, it really just show how much of a farce the US election system is, far more oligarchy than democracy
|
On July 23 2016 03:56 biology]major wrote: Europe is pretty much screwed, they have let this virus infiltrate their countries and now there is no way for them to get rid of it. These pockets of isolated radical muslim neighborhoods will just continue to thrive while harboring/inspiring these continued attacks. I hope to god the US can restrict immigration from these high risk countries and just overall completely for a while.
The sad part is the more european countries resist islam at this point after letting in massive amounts of immigrants, they will inspire violence from the inside out so they are in a lose/lose situation. The culture of Germany will be permanently altered in a few generations from the reckless free immigration policy it has going on. Sad to see this. You have to try to stay level headed. Dont buy all the propagandistic fear mongering. Most, if not all european countries are way safer than the us and here in sweden we have given asylum to more refugees per capita than any other western country and our society is fine. Crime is down, lower than it was a couple of years ago for example. Sure, immigration is a big burden, especially in the short run, but is it really better to let hundreds of thousands of people, men, women and children, starve, drown, get locked up in torture camps, sold into slavery?
|
On July 23 2016 08:20 ticklishmusic wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2016 08:14 Dan HH wrote:LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Nielsen company says an estimated 32.2 million people watched Donald Trump deliver his GOP nomination acceptance speech.
Thursday's audience topped the 30.3 million who watched nominee Mitt Romney's 2012 speech but fell well short of John McCain's audience of 38.9 million at the 2008 Republican convention.
This year's tally reflects viewership across 10 commercial networks, Nielsen said Friday, topped by Fox News Channel with 9.4 million viewers.
The channel's triumph came the same day that its founder and chief, Roger Ailes, resigned amid a former anchorwoman's claims of workplace misconduct.
For the closing hour of the four-day convention, CNN drew 5.5 million viewers; NBC 4.6 million; ABC 3.9 million; CBS 3.8 million and MSNBC 3 million. apnews.com be interesting to see online numbers. there were at least 100k on the youtube stream. I actually looked that night because I was curious how Twitch was faring vs Youtube. There were 217k on Youtube and 22k on Twitch about 1/3 through his speech when I checked. I assume that on top of that there's another chunk of people that watched it on the websites of TV channels.
|
Part of the cache of emails from top DNC officials reveals that DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz took issue with the negative coverage coming from MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski, going so far as to email NBC’s Chuck Todd to tell the anchor that it “must stop.”
The email was sent on May 18 to Todd with the subject “Chuck, this must stop.” In the email, Wasserman Schultz forwards Todd an article from Breitbart‘s Ian Hanchett glossing the criticism Wasserman Schultz had received from the Morning Joe co-host. Brzenzinski is quoted as saying that Wasserman Schultz “should step down” over her poor handling of the Democratic primary.
“Chuck, see below. I would like to discuss this with you today. Can you reach out to Luis to schedule a call? Thanks,” Wasserman Schultz writes.
Just before contacting Todd, in an email to DNC Communications Director Luis Miranda, Wasserman Schultz was more forceful, writing, “This is the LAST straw. […] This is outrageous. She needs to apologize.”
Todd replied to Wasserman Schultz with the hours that day he was available to speak, and she agrees to have Miranda set up a call.
Todd told Mediaite that the email was not remarkable. “I think it’s clear what it was. Someone complaining about coverage,” he said. “Something that happens daily from every campaign we interact with.”
In a later email the same day, Miranda wrote Todd: “Hey Chuck, per our conversation earlier today, I’d appreciate it if you passed along the following to the Morning Joe team.”
The email notes that Wasserman Schultz has “talked in very positive terms about both of our candidates.” Miranda writes that “No one wrote or rewrote any rules to help or hurt any specific candidate, these are the Party rules.” Miranda argues that the importance of superdelegates has been overstated and that there was no DNC chicanery in Iowa or Nevada.
Other emails indicate that DNC officials were arranging to get Brzezinski and Wasserman Schultz to speak to each other on the phone “to clear up some misperceptions of the DNC and DWS that she [Brzezinski] has expressed on the air,” DNC communications consultant Ryan Banfill wrote on May 18.
Todd asked Miranda, “Between us, You think the call is a good idea?”
Miranda responded, “Not necessarily. If Mika just doesn’t like her, I’m not sure it’s worth either of their time. I’ve lowered her expectations, but don’t know. If you think Mika is set in stone I’m happy to kill it.”
“I don’t know. She can do 180s after these calls. It can’t get worse,” Todd said.
Miranda told Wasserman Schultz on May 19 that Brzezinski was agreeable to a phone chat, writing, “Mika is willing to do a call with you, so we need to know if you want to make that happen too. We figure it can’t get worse, so worth having a call.”
“At this point, why would I do that?” Wasserman Schultz replied.
“She’s already served as a judge and jury without even bothering to talk to me. Not sure why I should trust having a conversation with her would make any difference. Or that she even matters, to be frank,” she added in a separate email.
The missives are just part of a pile of over 19,000 emails and some 8,000 attachments from top DNC officials that were released onto Wikileaks Friday morning. The emails cover the time period between Jan. 2015 and May 25 of this year. Other emails include DNC officials floating a plan to push a conversation about Bernie Sanders‘ religion in order to “make several points difference” in Kentucky and West Virginia. http://www.mediaite.com/online/leaked-emails-shows-dnc-chair-told-chuck-todd-negative-coverage-must-stop/
|
Well I always said Chuck Todd was the Bologna Sandwich of news reporters.
|
On July 23 2016 08:52 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Well I always said Chuck Todd was the Bologna Sandwich of news reporters. I really don't get why DWS was complaining about MSNBC to Chuck Todd, an NBC reporter.
|
Because Chuck Todd is a plant who doesn't really do any reporting just reads from a script.
|
In my wild fantasy, it's taking longer to announce vp because she decided against Kaine. Please just no. Kaine is the antithesis of the populist movement.
|
|
|
|
|
|