|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
United States42985 Posts
On July 23 2016 04:41 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2016 04:40 zlefin wrote:On July 23 2016 04:39 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:35 ticklishmusic wrote:On July 23 2016 04:33 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:26 WhiteDog wrote:
Libertarian party is the last retarded child of the right. Beautiful. My favorite part about a lot of Libertarians is they love of personal rights above all other things, except when someone else’s personal rights interfere with what they want to do. And the government is bad for sticking up for that other person’s rights. It is truly the "I do what I want!" party. i mean peter thiel is chairman of palantir. its basically a branch of the cia. He also thinks death is a problem that science can and should solve so it is available for those who can afford it. I feel like his master plan is to be a cyberpunk villain. I rather like the idea of solving death. that sounds like a nice problem to solve. It’s a cool problem to solve, as long as it’s free for everyone. If not, shit gets real dark real fast. All of our concepts on how to deal with wealth and power are rooted in the idea that we all die.
We're a very, very long way from solving death and every conceivable solution involves either making a copy and letting the original die, which doesn't solve death at all but simply creates a replacement for the deceased, or requires a Ship of Theseus approach which still has the same issue but smooths out the transition.
|
On July 23 2016 04:43 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2016 04:41 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:40 zlefin wrote:On July 23 2016 04:39 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:35 ticklishmusic wrote:On July 23 2016 04:33 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:26 WhiteDog wrote:
Libertarian party is the last retarded child of the right. Beautiful. My favorite part about a lot of Libertarians is they love of personal rights above all other things, except when someone else’s personal rights interfere with what they want to do. And the government is bad for sticking up for that other person’s rights. It is truly the "I do what I want!" party. i mean peter thiel is chairman of palantir. its basically a branch of the cia. He also thinks death is a problem that science can and should solve so it is available for those who can afford it. I feel like his master plan is to be a cyberpunk villain. I rather like the idea of solving death. that sounds like a nice problem to solve. It’s a cool problem to solve, as long as it’s free for everyone. If not, shit gets real dark real fast. All of our concepts on how to deal with wealth and power are rooted in the idea that we all die. We're a very, very long way from solving death and every conceivable solution involves either making a copy and letting the original die, which doesn't solve death at all but simply creates a replacement for the deceased, or requires a Ship of Theseus approach which still has the same issue but smooths out the transition.
Yeah, the Altered Carbon future is a terrifying future I really don’t want to exist.
|
On July 23 2016 04:41 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2016 04:40 zlefin wrote:On July 23 2016 04:39 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:35 ticklishmusic wrote:On July 23 2016 04:33 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:26 WhiteDog wrote:
Libertarian party is the last retarded child of the right. Beautiful. My favorite part about a lot of Libertarians is they love of personal rights above all other things, except when someone else’s personal rights interfere with what they want to do. And the government is bad for sticking up for that other person’s rights. It is truly the "I do what I want!" party. i mean peter thiel is chairman of palantir. its basically a branch of the cia. He also thinks death is a problem that science can and should solve so it is available for those who can afford it. I feel like his master plan is to be a cyberpunk villain. I rather like the idea of solving death. that sounds like a nice problem to solve. It’s a cool problem to solve, as long as it’s free for everyone. If not, shit gets real dark real fast. All of our concepts on how to deal with wealth and power are rooted in the idea that we all die.
well; i'ts undoubtedly the case that we're going to have to address some of those issues anyways. and free for everyone? things cost money; it'll take time for it to become that affordable. i'd rather have it i the pipeline and going down in cost.
|
Jeb endorsing Johnson would be amazing. Imagine if the whole Bush family backed Johnson and actively pushed for him.
|
On July 23 2016 04:45 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2016 04:41 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:40 zlefin wrote:On July 23 2016 04:39 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:35 ticklishmusic wrote:On July 23 2016 04:33 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:26 WhiteDog wrote:
Libertarian party is the last retarded child of the right. Beautiful. My favorite part about a lot of Libertarians is they love of personal rights above all other things, except when someone else’s personal rights interfere with what they want to do. And the government is bad for sticking up for that other person’s rights. It is truly the "I do what I want!" party. i mean peter thiel is chairman of palantir. its basically a branch of the cia. He also thinks death is a problem that science can and should solve so it is available for those who can afford it. I feel like his master plan is to be a cyberpunk villain. I rather like the idea of solving death. that sounds like a nice problem to solve. It’s a cool problem to solve, as long as it’s free for everyone. If not, shit gets real dark real fast. All of our concepts on how to deal with wealth and power are rooted in the idea that we all die. well; i'ts undoubtedly the case that we're going to have to address some of those issues anyways. and free for everyone? things cost money; it'll take time for it to become that affordable. i'd rather have it i the pipeline and going down in cost.
It is another subject, but you are talking about extending someone’s live indefinitely and doing so in a free market system. The tech will be available to the wealthy first and allow them to sustain their wealth indefinitely. And their children’s wealth. And so on. It’s a dark, dystopian future if the government doesn’t have a hard lock on that shit.
|
|
|
On July 23 2016 04:51 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2016 04:45 zlefin wrote:On July 23 2016 04:41 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:40 zlefin wrote:On July 23 2016 04:39 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:35 ticklishmusic wrote:On July 23 2016 04:33 Plansix wrote:On July 23 2016 04:26 WhiteDog wrote:
Libertarian party is the last retarded child of the right. Beautiful. My favorite part about a lot of Libertarians is they love of personal rights above all other things, except when someone else’s personal rights interfere with what they want to do. And the government is bad for sticking up for that other person’s rights. It is truly the "I do what I want!" party. i mean peter thiel is chairman of palantir. its basically a branch of the cia. He also thinks death is a problem that science can and should solve so it is available for those who can afford it. I feel like his master plan is to be a cyberpunk villain. I rather like the idea of solving death. that sounds like a nice problem to solve. It’s a cool problem to solve, as long as it’s free for everyone. If not, shit gets real dark real fast. All of our concepts on how to deal with wealth and power are rooted in the idea that we all die. well; i'ts undoubtedly the case that we're going to have to address some of those issues anyways. and free for everyone? things cost money; it'll take time for it to become that affordable. i'd rather have it i the pipeline and going down in cost. It is another subject, but you are talking about extending someone’s live indefinitely and doing so in a free market system. The tech will be available to the wealthy first and allow them to sustain their wealth indefinitely. And their children’s wealth. And so on. It’s a dark, dystopian future if the government doesn’t have a hard lock on that shit.
yeah, it's ognna be a tricky issue to deal with. Of course it depends on the level of immortality involved. Law's always too slow to adapt to new tech too. Personally i'd like to try getting ahead of the curve.
|
Plot is a strong term for that email, wikilinks.
|
When someone's campaign's stated intent is to radically transform a party, it is a declaration against what the party currently is. This idea that there was no reason for people to fight Bernie is so stupid. He was trying to overthrow the party the same way Trump did. His language was never aimed at some kinda shift or change, he used the word revolution. The fight happened and he lost. But don't mistake just how wide a scope Bernie declared war on. He was an independent for a reason.
|
|
|
I wish I lived in a world where being an atheist wasn't even an issue in politics.
|
It won't be in 30-40 years
|
On July 23 2016 05:00 Mohdoo wrote:When someone's campaign's stated intent is to radically transform a party, it is a declaration against what the party currently is. This idea that there was no reason for people to fight Bernie is so stupid. He was trying to overthrow the party the same way Trump did. His language was never aimed at some kinda shift or change, he used the word revolution. The fight happened and he lost. But don't mistake just how wide a scope Bernie declared war on. He was an independent for a reason.
The party has charter/bylaws which say what they did is against the rules.
In the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National
Committee, particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of
the Presidential nominating process, the Chairperson shall exercise
impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates
and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the
national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee
maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party
Presidential nominating process .
Source
By any reasonable measure she failed to do that.
Definition of rig
rigged rigging
transitive verb
1
: to manipulate or control usually by deceptive or dishonest means
The primary was rigged period. You all knew it then, but it's undeniable now.
|
maybe they should have hired some lawyers and use keyword search which seems to be effective
+ Show Spoiler +
|
Gawker talking about respecting peoples privacy...
lel
|
The fact that the email in question is a reply of "AMEN" to a forwarding of that email with just the text "it's these Jesus thing" is pretty fuckin' weird.
|
On July 23 2016 06:10 zeo wrote:Gawker talking about respecting peoples privacy... lel
They are a public entity that can be sued in court and will show up. If they harm you, you have legal recourse against Gawker. Wikileaks doesn't care, won't show up and gives no fucked about if they hurt anyone.
|
On July 23 2016 04:16 FiWiFaKi wrote:
"It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist."
One of the few American friends I have on FB just announced they're voting for Gary Johnson because of this rofl
|
On July 23 2016 05:39 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2016 05:00 Mohdoo wrote:When someone's campaign's stated intent is to radically transform a party, it is a declaration against what the party currently is. This idea that there was no reason for people to fight Bernie is so stupid. He was trying to overthrow the party the same way Trump did. His language was never aimed at some kinda shift or change, he used the word revolution. The fight happened and he lost. But don't mistake just how wide a scope Bernie declared war on. He was an independent for a reason. The party has charter/bylaws which say what they did is against the rules. Show nested quote +In the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National
Committee, particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of
the Presidential nominating process, the Chairperson shall exercise
impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates
and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the
national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee
maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party
Presidential nominating process . SourceBy any reasonable measure she failed to do that. Show nested quote +Definition of rig
rigged rigging
transitive verb
1
: to manipulate or control usually by deceptive or dishonest means The primary was rigged period. You all knew it then, but it's undeniable now.
When you lead a revolt against a group of people, openly, do not expect people to sit around doing nothing. Bernie was openly declaring a lot of people would lose their jobs as a result of a revolution. The people who you are trying to throw out of their job will probably seek to limit your effectiveness.
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On July 23 2016 06:16 Mohdoo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2016 05:39 GreenHorizons wrote:On July 23 2016 05:00 Mohdoo wrote:When someone's campaign's stated intent is to radically transform a party, it is a declaration against what the party currently is. This idea that there was no reason for people to fight Bernie is so stupid. He was trying to overthrow the party the same way Trump did. His language was never aimed at some kinda shift or change, he used the word revolution. The fight happened and he lost. But don't mistake just how wide a scope Bernie declared war on. He was an independent for a reason. The party has charter/bylaws which say what they did is against the rules. In the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National
Committee, particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of
the Presidential nominating process, the Chairperson shall exercise
impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates
and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the
national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee
maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party
Presidential nominating process . SourceBy any reasonable measure she failed to do that. Definition of rig
rigged rigging
transitive verb
1
: to manipulate or control usually by deceptive or dishonest means The primary was rigged period. You all knew it then, but it's undeniable now. When you lead a revolt against a group of people, openly, do not expect people to sit around doing nothing. Bernie was openly declaring a lot of people would lose their jobs as a result of a revolution. The people who you are trying to throw out of their job will probably seek to limit your effectiveness.
Bernie made a mistake by labeling his campaign as a revolution rather than a movement. Ron Paul did similar labeling in 2012 and that got him in the end
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
