• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:28
CEST 13:28
KST 20:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202568RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced3BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Server Blocker Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Simple editing of Brood War save files? (.mlx) BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 671 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3715

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 3713 3714 3715 3716 3717 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
May 02 2016 14:16 GMT
#74281
On May 02 2016 11:01 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2016 10:20 kwizach wrote:
On May 02 2016 10:12 oBlade wrote:
This is apparently your discovery of hindsight. It's "unmistakably" the Nazi salute because it happened in the past and we now have the photo's context. And you're not listening. I'm asking you what you expect me to say to you right now. As in what was your goal here?

...except everyone but you recognized it for what it was before she confirmed it was the Nazi salute and before we had context, because it looks like the Nazi salute and not like anything else -- no need for hindsight. I'm not expecting you to say anything. You're the one who started replying to me for no reason except to say "nuh-uh!", and you've declined repeatedly my invitations to either stop replying or take it to PM. What are you trying to achieve here?

I'm having a discussion - don't you share that goal? Surely you didn't copy/paste to me a dozen times just to restate that you thought it was 100% certain that the woman was doing a Nazi salute? Did you think I wasn't aware of your opinion?

What's so different about the picture of the man I showed you, besides the angle of the shot, that makes the gesture totally different than the woman's?

What discussion are you having? You didn't seem to be aware of my point given you kept ignoring it and going on tangents instead. Perhaps if you stopped attributing to me positions you imagined in your head, it'd be easier to have an actual discussion. You're the one asking me what you should be responding to me, so you don't even seem to know what point you want to argue -- again, you're the one who replied to me.

The gestures are not "totally different", since both obviously have their arms up and extended, but they're sufficiently different to know for sure that the woman was doing the Nazi salute looking at how she deliberately kept her hand straight, while the guy could be doing any kind of of salute given his hand muscles are relaxed and not keeping the hand straight. Again, this was obvious to everyone in the thread, without context of hindsight (contrary to what you falsely claimed).
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
Thieving Magpie
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
United States6752 Posts
May 02 2016 14:32 GMT
#74282
On May 02 2016 14:09 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2016 13:55 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On May 02 2016 13:21 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 02 2016 13:10 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On May 02 2016 13:00 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 02 2016 12:46 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 02 2016 12:38 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
He's saying after 4 years and Citizens United is still active will you be pissed or glad that the Democrats who are in power are using it.

I don't think either Clinton or Bernie would have the ability to somehow get rid of money in politics in 4 years. I also think 4 years in the future is plainly silly to speculate about. Did we see this election coming 4 years ago? 4 years in politics is like a different era.


So four years is an "era", but not enough time to get something done that 2 out of the 3 viable presidential candidates are already doing and the other claims she supports, done? Don't think that quite adds up.

I'm curious who you think would stop it and how?


High attendance in local elections is the only way to get it overturned. Get the house and senate Blue, get a Blue president, and then have the congressmen pressure the executive branch to push for the overturning of citizens united.

You know, actual politics and not danke memes.



Why is it so absurd to ask Hillary to join the other two viable candidates in not having superPAC's and not coordinating with them, and not using her Victory Fund like she has?

I shouldn't have to convince the Democrat nominee to only exploit Citizens United as little as her Republican opponent (which, to date, is not at all).

Right now if I was a Trump supporter I could be making the argument that Trump needs to get a superPAC, otherwise he's unilaterally disarming against a Democratic nominee that embraces their corrupting influence. If that doesn't raise a flag for Democrats I don't know what could on the topic of campaign finance.


So you're saying that Hilary is more beholden to corporations than the guy who's corporation literally has his name on it?


I'm saying she's exploiting CU more than any other candidate ever and that makes her a bad champion for campaign finance reform. Trump and his supporters are going to point that out frequently. That should raise some flags for Democrats imo.


So the resourceful politician accused of getting stuff done will use all options at her disposal to get stuff done?

What's trump going to do, "Oh, I don't believe in corporations using money doing politics, which is why the Trump Corporation is using its money to run a politician for president"

You're being really weird right now, like, more than usual. Cool off bro.
Hark, what baseball through yonder window breaks?
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15686 Posts
May 02 2016 15:20 GMT
#74283
Anyone else think Cruz concedes tomorrow? I know he has maintained his commitment, but I also don't take him as the type to beat a dead horse. I do think he has a chance if he wins IN, but that is looking extremely unlikely. If he loses IN, he even more certainly loses CA. I think he'll cash in his book deal and be done with all this, tbh.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21667 Posts
May 02 2016 15:22 GMT
#74284
On May 03 2016 00:20 Mohdoo wrote:
Anyone else think Cruz concedes tomorrow? I know he has maintained his commitment, but I also don't take him as the type to beat a dead horse. I do think he has a chance if he wins IN, but that is looking extremely unlikely. If he loses IN, he even more certainly loses CA. I think he'll cash in his book deal and be done with all this, tbh.

If the plan is still a brokered convention then he will stay in. If he drops Trump clinches.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
May 02 2016 15:29 GMT
#74285
It's been pretty obv that Trump is going to convention with most delegates, Kasich and Cruz look to be sticking out this race to its sorry conclusion
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15686 Posts
May 02 2016 15:31 GMT
#74286
Yeah, I suppose I was under the impression that the convention is only contested if Trump can't hit 1237. But with an IN win, doesn't 1237 become pretty likely? As soon as Trump is guaranteed, doesn't the party want to suddenly unite?
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-02 16:08:58
May 02 2016 16:07 GMT
#74287
I think Cruz will stay in; there's still a not-insignificant chance of Trump imploding before California votes in June, and Trump cannot reach 1237 before California unless I missed some math.

Plus it's not like Cruz actually cares about the party uniting or the party itself. The only person who cares less about the party than Cruz is Trump.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
May 02 2016 16:14 GMT
#74288
On May 03 2016 01:07 TheTenthDoc wrote:
I think Cruz will stay in; there's still a not-insignificant chance of Trump imploding before California votes in June, and Trump cannot reach 1237 before California unless I missed some math.

Plus it's not like Cruz actually cares about the party uniting or the party itself. The only person who cares less about the party than Cruz is Trump.

Trump will probably wrap up the nomination with California. Both California and Indiana are winner-take-all states. Wins in those two states alone (which seem probable at this point) would push him up to 1,225 delegates.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
May 02 2016 16:17 GMT
#74289
If Trump clinches the nomination then loses to Hillary, how do you think that Cruz and Kasich will be considered in the next primary? Will people think of them as undermining the R party, or as brave heroes who stood up to the evil Trump, or will they simply just forget or not care?
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
May 02 2016 16:18 GMT
#74290
On May 03 2016 01:14 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2016 01:07 TheTenthDoc wrote:
I think Cruz will stay in; there's still a not-insignificant chance of Trump imploding before California votes in June, and Trump cannot reach 1237 before California unless I missed some math.

Plus it's not like Cruz actually cares about the party uniting or the party itself. The only person who cares less about the party than Cruz is Trump.

Trump will probably wrap up the nomination with California. Both California and Indiana are winner-take-all states. Wins in those two states alone (which seem probable at this point) would push him up to 1,225 delegates.

No, their winner-take-all systems are mixed. Delegates are distributed depending on both who wins the states and who wins individual districts.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-02 16:49:45
May 02 2016 16:48 GMT
#74291
On May 02 2016 23:32 Thieving Magpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2016 14:09 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 02 2016 13:55 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On May 02 2016 13:21 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 02 2016 13:10 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On May 02 2016 13:00 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 02 2016 12:46 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 02 2016 12:38 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
He's saying after 4 years and Citizens United is still active will you be pissed or glad that the Democrats who are in power are using it.

I don't think either Clinton or Bernie would have the ability to somehow get rid of money in politics in 4 years. I also think 4 years in the future is plainly silly to speculate about. Did we see this election coming 4 years ago? 4 years in politics is like a different era.


So four years is an "era", but not enough time to get something done that 2 out of the 3 viable presidential candidates are already doing and the other claims she supports, done? Don't think that quite adds up.

I'm curious who you think would stop it and how?


High attendance in local elections is the only way to get it overturned. Get the house and senate Blue, get a Blue president, and then have the congressmen pressure the executive branch to push for the overturning of citizens united.

You know, actual politics and not danke memes.



Why is it so absurd to ask Hillary to join the other two viable candidates in not having superPAC's and not coordinating with them, and not using her Victory Fund like she has?

I shouldn't have to convince the Democrat nominee to only exploit Citizens United as little as her Republican opponent (which, to date, is not at all).

Right now if I was a Trump supporter I could be making the argument that Trump needs to get a superPAC, otherwise he's unilaterally disarming against a Democratic nominee that embraces their corrupting influence. If that doesn't raise a flag for Democrats I don't know what could on the topic of campaign finance.


So you're saying that Hilary is more beholden to corporations than the guy who's corporation literally has his name on it?


I'm saying she's exploiting CU more than any other candidate ever and that makes her a bad champion for campaign finance reform. Trump and his supporters are going to point that out frequently. That should raise some flags for Democrats imo.


So the resourceful politician accused of getting stuff done will use all options at her disposal to get stuff done?

What's trump going to do, "Oh, I don't believe in corporations using money doing politics, which is why the Trump Corporation is using its money to run a politician for president"

You're being really weird right now, like, more than usual. Cool off bro.


That's an interesting use of an "ends justify the means" argument. How much has Trump's corporation donated to his campaign?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
May 02 2016 16:48 GMT
#74292
On May 03 2016 01:17 LegalLord wrote:
If Trump clinches the nomination then loses to Hillary, how do you think that Cruz and Kasich will be considered in the next primary? Will people think of them as undermining the R party, or as brave heroes who stood up to the evil Trump, or will they simply just forget or not care?

I don't know enough Republicans to guess from personal experience.
My general guess would be that the primary efforts would largely be a wash. The establishment will like that they went against Trump, the Trump supporters will probably be annoyed some; but mostly I expect it to be a "that was a dismal time and we don't talk about it" situation.
Cruz will probably still be hated by the alot of the establishment because he'll probably continue doing things to annoy them in any case.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
May 02 2016 16:52 GMT
#74293
And it starts...

Donald Trump leads Hillary Clinton by 2 points in a head-to-head matchup, according to a new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey.

Trump gets 41 percent to Clinton's 39 percent in the new poll.

This poll differs from recent polling, which all show Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, holding a lead over her Republican counterpart. According to the RealClearPolitics average of polls, Clinton has a 7.3 point lead over Trump, 47.4 to 40.1 percent.

Just last week, Clinton and Trump tied in another Rasmussen poll in which each won 38 percent. In that survey, voters were also allowed to answer that they would stay home and not vote for either candidate.

According to the latest Rasmussen poll, 15 percent of respondents would prefer some other candidate and 5 percent were undecided.

The recent poll also found that Trump does twice as well among Democrats as Clinton does among Republicans in a matchup between the two candidates.

Trump takes 15 percent support of Democrats in a general election matchup between Trump and Clinton, but Clinton takes just 8 percent of GOP voters.

Trump has 73 percent support of Republicans, and Clinton has 77 percent support of Democrats in a matchup.

The survey was conducted from April 27 to 28 among 1,000 likely voters. The margin of error is 3 percentage points.


Source
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5583 Posts
May 02 2016 16:55 GMT
#74294
On May 02 2016 23:16 kwizach wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2016 11:01 oBlade wrote:
On May 02 2016 10:20 kwizach wrote:
On May 02 2016 10:12 oBlade wrote:
This is apparently your discovery of hindsight. It's "unmistakably" the Nazi salute because it happened in the past and we now have the photo's context. And you're not listening. I'm asking you what you expect me to say to you right now. As in what was your goal here?

...except everyone but you recognized it for what it was before she confirmed it was the Nazi salute and before we had context, because it looks like the Nazi salute and not like anything else -- no need for hindsight. I'm not expecting you to say anything. You're the one who started replying to me for no reason except to say "nuh-uh!", and you've declined repeatedly my invitations to either stop replying or take it to PM. What are you trying to achieve here?

I'm having a discussion - don't you share that goal? Surely you didn't copy/paste to me a dozen times just to restate that you thought it was 100% certain that the woman was doing a Nazi salute? Did you think I wasn't aware of your opinion?

What's so different about the picture of the man I showed you, besides the angle of the shot, that makes the gesture totally different than the woman's?

What discussion are you having? You didn't seem to be aware of my point given you kept ignoring it and going on tangents instead. Perhaps if you stopped attributing to me positions you imagined in your head, it'd be easier to have an actual discussion. You're the one asking me what you should be responding to me, so you don't even seem to know what point you want to argue -- again, you're the one who replied to me.

The gestures are not "totally different", since both obviously have their arms up and extended, but they're sufficiently different to know for sure that the woman was doing the Nazi salute looking at how she deliberately kept her hand straight, while the guy could be doing any kind of of salute given his hand muscles are relaxed and not keeping the hand straight. Again, this was obvious to everyone in the thread, without context of hindsight (contrary to what you falsely claimed).

So this is why it's going nowhere as usual: You think questions are strawmen and your idea of a discussion is repeating the same thing ad nauseam. Your opinion has been read, really. Even Rubio only repeats himself 3 times. People down in the Mafia forum now know what you think. We've all got it.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
May 02 2016 17:21 GMT
#74295
On May 03 2016 01:52 GreenHorizons wrote:
And it starts...

Show nested quote +
Donald Trump leads Hillary Clinton by 2 points in a head-to-head matchup, according to a new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey.

Trump gets 41 percent to Clinton's 39 percent in the new poll.

This poll differs from recent polling, which all show Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, holding a lead over her Republican counterpart. According to the RealClearPolitics average of polls, Clinton has a 7.3 point lead over Trump, 47.4 to 40.1 percent.

Just last week, Clinton and Trump tied in another Rasmussen poll in which each won 38 percent. In that survey, voters were also allowed to answer that they would stay home and not vote for either candidate.

According to the latest Rasmussen poll, 15 percent of respondents would prefer some other candidate and 5 percent were undecided.

The recent poll also found that Trump does twice as well among Democrats as Clinton does among Republicans in a matchup between the two candidates.

Trump takes 15 percent support of Democrats in a general election matchup between Trump and Clinton, but Clinton takes just 8 percent of GOP voters.

Trump has 73 percent support of Republicans, and Clinton has 77 percent support of Democrats in a matchup.

The survey was conducted from April 27 to 28 among 1,000 likely voters. The margin of error is 3 percentage points.


Source

Now the dueling head to head polls of questionable accuracy and relevance can be discussed on TV until the end of time, securing the salaries of those talking, while leaving the public vaguely more informed.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
May 02 2016 17:27 GMT
#74296
On May 03 2016 02:21 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2016 01:52 GreenHorizons wrote:
And it starts...

Donald Trump leads Hillary Clinton by 2 points in a head-to-head matchup, according to a new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey.

Trump gets 41 percent to Clinton's 39 percent in the new poll.

This poll differs from recent polling, which all show Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, holding a lead over her Republican counterpart. According to the RealClearPolitics average of polls, Clinton has a 7.3 point lead over Trump, 47.4 to 40.1 percent.

Just last week, Clinton and Trump tied in another Rasmussen poll in which each won 38 percent. In that survey, voters were also allowed to answer that they would stay home and not vote for either candidate.

According to the latest Rasmussen poll, 15 percent of respondents would prefer some other candidate and 5 percent were undecided.

The recent poll also found that Trump does twice as well among Democrats as Clinton does among Republicans in a matchup between the two candidates.

Trump takes 15 percent support of Democrats in a general election matchup between Trump and Clinton, but Clinton takes just 8 percent of GOP voters.

Trump has 73 percent support of Republicans, and Clinton has 77 percent support of Democrats in a matchup.

The survey was conducted from April 27 to 28 among 1,000 likely voters. The margin of error is 3 percentage points.


Source

Now the dueling head to head polls of questionable accuracy and relevance can be discussed on TV until the end of time, securing the salaries of those talking, while leaving the public vaguely more informed.


Now Trump wont be completely lying when he says he leads her in polls.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
ZeaL.
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States5955 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-02 17:31:09
May 02 2016 17:30 GMT
#74297
On May 03 2016 01:52 GreenHorizons wrote:
And it starts...

Show nested quote +
Donald Trump leads Hillary Clinton by 2 points in a head-to-head matchup, according to a new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey.

Trump gets 41 percent to Clinton's 39 percent in the new poll.

This poll differs from recent polling, which all show Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, holding a lead over her Republican counterpart. According to the RealClearPolitics average of polls, Clinton has a 7.3 point lead over Trump, 47.4 to 40.1 percent.

Just last week, Clinton and Trump tied in another Rasmussen poll in which each won 38 percent. In that survey, voters were also allowed to answer that they would stay home and not vote for either candidate.

According to the latest Rasmussen poll, 15 percent of respondents would prefer some other candidate and 5 percent were undecided.

The recent poll also found that Trump does twice as well among Democrats as Clinton does among Republicans in a matchup between the two candidates.

Trump takes 15 percent support of Democrats in a general election matchup between Trump and Clinton, but Clinton takes just 8 percent of GOP voters.

Trump has 73 percent support of Republicans, and Clinton has 77 percent support of Democrats in a matchup.

The survey was conducted from April 27 to 28 among 1,000 likely voters. The margin of error is 3 percentage points.


Source


I'm not a fan of big fan of Hillary but that's a Rasmussen poll. We also have 6 more months of Trump being Trump.

Edit: Yeah just as I expected, Rasmussen one way, everyone else the other: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-02 17:40:52
May 02 2016 17:39 GMT
#74298
On May 03 2016 02:30 ZeaL. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2016 01:52 GreenHorizons wrote:
And it starts...

Donald Trump leads Hillary Clinton by 2 points in a head-to-head matchup, according to a new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey.

Trump gets 41 percent to Clinton's 39 percent in the new poll.

This poll differs from recent polling, which all show Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, holding a lead over her Republican counterpart. According to the RealClearPolitics average of polls, Clinton has a 7.3 point lead over Trump, 47.4 to 40.1 percent.

Just last week, Clinton and Trump tied in another Rasmussen poll in which each won 38 percent. In that survey, voters were also allowed to answer that they would stay home and not vote for either candidate.

According to the latest Rasmussen poll, 15 percent of respondents would prefer some other candidate and 5 percent were undecided.

The recent poll also found that Trump does twice as well among Democrats as Clinton does among Republicans in a matchup between the two candidates.

Trump takes 15 percent support of Democrats in a general election matchup between Trump and Clinton, but Clinton takes just 8 percent of GOP voters.

Trump has 73 percent support of Republicans, and Clinton has 77 percent support of Democrats in a matchup.

The survey was conducted from April 27 to 28 among 1,000 likely voters. The margin of error is 3 percentage points.


Source


I'm not a fan of big fan of Hillary but that's a Rasmussen poll. We also have 6 more months of Trump being Trump.

Edit: Yeah just as I expected, Rasmussen one way, everyone else the other: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html


They do all show her lead shrinking though (she peaked at 50.4%). I think it's reasonable to imagine they'll be statistically tied by the end of the Republican convention (provided it's not a crime scene).
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
May 02 2016 17:39 GMT
#74299
Rasmussen has been feeding into the GOP distortion field for a long time now.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-02 17:42:34
May 02 2016 17:41 GMT
#74300
On May 03 2016 01:55 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2016 23:16 kwizach wrote:
On May 02 2016 11:01 oBlade wrote:
On May 02 2016 10:20 kwizach wrote:
On May 02 2016 10:12 oBlade wrote:
This is apparently your discovery of hindsight. It's "unmistakably" the Nazi salute because it happened in the past and we now have the photo's context. And you're not listening. I'm asking you what you expect me to say to you right now. As in what was your goal here?

...except everyone but you recognized it for what it was before she confirmed it was the Nazi salute and before we had context, because it looks like the Nazi salute and not like anything else -- no need for hindsight. I'm not expecting you to say anything. You're the one who started replying to me for no reason except to say "nuh-uh!", and you've declined repeatedly my invitations to either stop replying or take it to PM. What are you trying to achieve here?

I'm having a discussion - don't you share that goal? Surely you didn't copy/paste to me a dozen times just to restate that you thought it was 100% certain that the woman was doing a Nazi salute? Did you think I wasn't aware of your opinion?

What's so different about the picture of the man I showed you, besides the angle of the shot, that makes the gesture totally different than the woman's?

What discussion are you having? You didn't seem to be aware of my point given you kept ignoring it and going on tangents instead. Perhaps if you stopped attributing to me positions you imagined in your head, it'd be easier to have an actual discussion. You're the one asking me what you should be responding to me, so you don't even seem to know what point you want to argue -- again, you're the one who replied to me.

The gestures are not "totally different", since both obviously have their arms up and extended, but they're sufficiently different to know for sure that the woman was doing the Nazi salute looking at how she deliberately kept her hand straight, while the guy could be doing any kind of of salute given his hand muscles are relaxed and not keeping the hand straight. Again, this was obvious to everyone in the thread, without context of hindsight (contrary to what you falsely claimed).

So this is why it's going nowhere as usual: You think questions are strawmen and your idea of a discussion is repeating the same thing ad nauseam. Your opinion has been read, really. Even Rubio only repeats himself 3 times. People down in the Mafia forum now know what you think. We've all got it.

Ah, yet another post where you ramble on without making any point related to the actual topic being discussed -- thanks for proving my point Your questions were you imagining a possible position for me that I never defended, and then asking me about that position (me being personally bothered by your skepticism, or me calling Trump guilty by association). That's a very productive way of conducting a conversation!
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
Prev 1 3713 3714 3715 3716 3717 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Master Swan Open #94
CranKy Ducklings89
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech62
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 23812
Barracks 3006
Horang2 1346
Bisu 1192
Shuttle 704
Flash 657
Jaedong 590
ToSsGirL 392
Larva 377
EffOrt 319
[ Show more ]
firebathero 317
Soulkey 288
BeSt 240
Last 159
Hyun 151
ggaemo 60
ZerO 55
Rush 53
Free 36
sSak 22
Shinee 22
Movie 19
zelot 18
Sea.KH 14
JulyZerg 13
IntoTheRainbow 6
Dota 2
XcaliburYe788
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor234
Other Games
singsing2108
B2W.Neo1086
Beastyqt753
crisheroes321
Fuzer 307
ZerO(Twitch)19
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
CasterMuse 19
lovetv 8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH269
• StrangeGG 55
• Adnapsc2 19
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2241
League of Legends
• Jankos1532
Upcoming Events
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2h 32m
CSO Cup
4h 32m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6h 32m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
21h 32m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 2h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 6h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL Team Wars
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.