EPTPlease clap.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3436
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
Please clap. | ||
|
Soularion
Canada2764 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
Edit: LOL at GH calling someone out for being partisan. That's like Trump levels of lack of self-reflection. | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
The fact is that more democratic primary voters prefer clinton to sanders. | ||
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On March 23 2016 19:50 Soularion wrote: Hmm. Well. Across the entire week - therefor including Democrats Abroad - Sanders actually holds onto about a ~55% delegate lead as of right now. That's not quite what he wanted, but if he were to significantly overperform in Washington to the degree that he did in Idaho/Utah then this race is going to New York quite evenly. If he would've won Arizona, it would've been a /huge/ night for him. Assuming delegate distribution stays proportional, the final results will probably be something like: Arizona: Clinton 45 Sanders 30 Utah: Sanders 26 Clinton 7 Idaho: Sanders 17 Clinton 6 Democrats abroad: Sanders 9 Clinton 4 That's about 57%? Edit: fixed a number | ||
|
Soularion
Canada2764 Posts
On March 23 2016 21:46 The_Templar wrote: Assuming delegate distribution stays proportional, the final results will probably be something like: Arizona: Clinton 44 Sanders 31 Utah: Sanders 26 Clinton 7 Idaho: Sanders 17 Clinton 6 Democrats abroad: Sanders 9 Clinton 4 That's about 57.6%? Where do you get the Arizona stat from? NYtimes has it at Clinton 41 Sanders 22 at the moment. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
WhiteDog
France8650 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On March 23 2016 22:22 WhiteDog wrote: Imo the Bernie platform should about the future (not that the election is dead). Clinton is a brand, Bernie is an old man with ideas, but what will stay of those ideas in five years if he is not able to present himself again ? ten years ? Is there anyone that could take his political legacy and built it has an institutional current within the democrat party ? On the other hand, there will always be another Clinton. bernie doesnt even want to be a democrat and you expect him to build party institution? guy is only surviving for so long because vermont | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On March 23 2016 22:42 oneofthem wrote: bernie doesnt even want to be a democrat and you expect him to build party institution? guy is only surviving for so long because vermont He may not be much of a democrat himself, but his message is inspiring a lot of democrats. It's hard to ignore the fact that a significant portion of our party supports a lot of his ideas. A lot of people aren't focusing on feasibility and instead making it clear they want the country to head a different direction. I think it's a fair point to make. I definitely think Sanders will continue to have a lasting impact. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22452 Posts
On March 23 2016 21:46 The_Templar wrote: Assuming delegate distribution stays proportional, the final results will probably be something like: Arizona: Clinton 45 Sanders 30 Utah: Sanders 26 Clinton 7 Idaho: Sanders 17 Clinton 6 Democrats abroad: Sanders 9 Clinton 4 That's about 57%? Edit: fixed a number So he did the bare minimum needed, not a good night but a 'good enough'. (assuming the 58-42 split required to win the majority) | ||
|
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
i'm just kidding or am I. | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
only positive influence may be to talk hillary out of starting some land wars but id hope RAND is already doing that domestically i see some pure tax and spend from bernie. this is also not good enough and is out of the 1950's in tax policy. if he wants to accomplish some lasting change for the long term push for transparency related issues in international tax and accounting | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
Liberal internationalism | ||
|
Soularion
Canada2764 Posts
On March 23 2016 22:53 Gorsameth wrote: So he did the bare minimum needed, not a good night but a 'good enough'. (assuming the 58-42 split required to win the majority) which is fine considering how bad Arizona looked for him. Tonight should be enough to push him towards New York, where he needs to win (or at least come close) which is the big test for him. Well, first big test  | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On March 23 2016 23:02 ticklishmusic wrote: I doubt Hillary is going to go out and start a land war for shits and giggles. Liberal internationalism 4+4 years is a long time. she would have intervened in a couple places already, although probably not bad decisions in hindsight. | ||
|
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
On March 23 2016 23:10 Soularion wrote: which is fine considering how bad Arizona looked for him. Tonight should be enough to push him towards New York, where he needs to win (or at least come close) which is the big test for him. Well, first big test Not sure how the polls look(or whether they should be trusted) but Clinton is a two-time New York Senator and NY has a significant minority, would be a HUGE upset if she doesn't win this (if any she might win this by a landslide). | ||
|
RvB
Netherlands6289 Posts
On March 23 2016 21:52 Mohdoo wrote: Bush endorsing Cruz is hilarious. That essentially signals that Kasich is out of the race and does not have establishment support going into the convention, right? Was he actually ever in the race? He should've dropped out way earlier. That might have given Rubio a chance to challenge Trump/Cruz as well. | ||
| ||
