US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3435

On March 23 2016 15:35 kwizach wrote:
Utah called for Cruz! Clinton looking to be ahead of her targets for the night

On March 23 2016 15:38 kwizach wrote:
Rolling Stones is apparently endorsing Clinton for president in their next issue:

+ Show Spoiler +

On March 23 2016 15:36 GreenHorizons wrote:


Only if you ignore that they are totally misreporting the results of Arizona and have been all night.

On March 23 2016 15:47 Slaughter wrote:


So you think the final vote will be closer in Arizona?

On March 23 2016 15:56 Kipsate wrote:
4 delegates win for Bernie, thats not really a win

how much is Utah worth?

On March 23 2016 15:56 Kipsate wrote:
4 delegates win for Bernie, thats not really a win

how much is Utah worth?

On March 23 2016 15:58 ZigguratOfUr wrote:


33. So 10 still undecided.

On March 23 2016 16:35 On_Slaught wrote:
Even if Hillary loses a few in the delegate lead, she increases her popular vote lead, which will be just as important come convention.

On March 23 2016 15:38 kwizach wrote:
Rolling Stones is apparently endorsing Clinton for president in their next issue:

On March 23 2016 16:38 GreenHorizons wrote:


It looks like there's pretty clear it wasn't just rolls not being updated but election fraud.

https://vid.me/KKWP

You can see the signature is identical on 2 different documents. I'm sure someone will call it some conspiracy, but it's beyond obvious at this point.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Bernie is coming back to Seattle to embarrass Hillary's pep rally at that high school up north. He's coming to Safeco Field (capacity 54,000+)

Ded campaign is ded.

On March 23 2016 17:26 On_Slaught wrote:


Not sure what you want us to say. If there is obvious evidence of electoral fraud then Sanders has legal recourse.

On March 23 2016 17:30 Kipsate wrote:
That people have to wait in line so long is stupid but also exists on both sides, has been a problem not just in Arizona. Thats not electoral fraud thats incompetence in general, if real ground for electroral fraud exists then something will be done about it.

Bernie's campaign is dead insofar of getting the democratic nomination, insofar as spreading his message it most certainly is not. With a bit of luck this will influence people when Congress is up for rellection but I somehow doubt it.

Are we still just chalking all these repeated problems up to coincidence incompetence and such?

On March 23 2016 17:41 Kipsate wrote:
For the record I find the whole primary system to be odd and the incompetence of voting machines, processing, registering to vote if not locked out etc to be ridicilous but unfortunately that won't change this election. The higher turnout has esp been a problem among independents and Republicans from what I know, too many people want to vote but not enough stations etc are ready for it. Granted America has a much higher population and geographical divide then Europe but the "bastion" of democracy shouldn't have these problems to this degree, it makes you wonder how much influence it has.

On March 23 2016 17:30 Kipsate wrote:
That people have to wait in line so long is stupid but also exists on both sides, has been a problem not just in Arizona. Thats not electoral fraud thats incompetence in general, if real ground for electroral fraud exists then something will be done about it.

Bernie's campaign is dead insofar of getting the democratic nomination, insofar as spreading his message it most certainly is not. With a bit of luck this will influence people when Congress is up for rellection but I somehow doubt it.

On March 23 2016 17:44 GreenHorizons wrote:


How many people you think saw a 4-5 hour line on their local news and thought to themselves "I should go wait in that!"? Especially after a long day at work...? Possibly an early day again tomorrow?

I don't think I can take anyone seriously who suggests that doesn't have a significant impact.

Yes it's happening on both sides and there's reasons for overlap but some significant differences as well.

In a surprise announcement, Jeb Bush will endorse Ted Cruz on Wednesday as an antidote to the “divisiveness and vulgarity” of Donald Trump, providing a badly needed boost to the Texas senator – but it’s one that comes dangerously late in a game that Trump is dominating.

Cruz, in New York City on Wednesday, planned to celebrate with a victory lap of three network morning shows. The endorsement comes 32 days after a beaten Bush dropped out of the GOP presidential race, and eight days since Sen. Marco Rubio abandoned his own quest after being rebuffed by Bush, his fellow Floridian and one-time mentor.

Bush says in a statement to be released by the Cruz campaign: “Ted is a consistent, principled conservative who has demonstrated the ability to appeal to voters and win primary contests.”

“For the sake of our party and country, we must move to overcome the divisiveness and vulgarity Donald Trump has brought into the political arena, or we will certainly lose our chance to defeat the Democratic nominee and reverse President Obama’s failed policies,” the statement continues.