Even if you had some rule to make them re-do statements, I wouldn't be surprised if you could get out of that by just saying "yeah but there IS a tiny fraction of scientists that do believe that the earth is only a couple thousand years old! So can you really say it's demonstrably false?" or something along those lines.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 2682
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
Even if you had some rule to make them re-do statements, I wouldn't be surprised if you could get out of that by just saying "yeah but there IS a tiny fraction of scientists that do believe that the earth is only a couple thousand years old! So can you really say it's demonstrably false?" or something along those lines. | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On December 19 2015 10:49 TheTenthDoc wrote: You most certainly have that right. Any agency or citizens council endowed with criminal or civil power extra-judiciary would be abused with allegations all day long, just as politicians today accuse each other of lying for political gain. The best you can hope for is a civically engaged population ready to hold politicians' feet to the fire. We're talking elections, pressure for impeachment, state representatives & article 5, and other means in state constitutions like the initiative process. The fact that the American public is so underinformed makes the constant statement of falsities on both side of the aisle even more toxic than it already was and means we need to hold politicians more accountable than ever before (and no, clickbait articles that can always be dismissed as partisan/establishment opposition are not accountability). Too bad there's a negative incentive for the government to actually do that in any meaningful fashion. If a drug company makes an ad that includes too many positive images, they have to remake the ad entirely and state everything wrong with the first ad in it. If a politician says something demonstrably false...they go on with their day. And no, this is not infringing on the right to free speech. You do not have the right to lie to the American public. I would argue you actually have the responsibility to keep them informed. Unless you're the CIA or NSA I guess. Politician says something demonstrably false? You'd hardly find unanimous agreement in this very forum much less the population in general. This all reads way too much like disenfranchising the dumb by revolutionary act in the name of a representative republic. It's incredibly utopian considering the divergence in political ideologies. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
wptlzkwjd
Canada1240 Posts
On December 19 2015 12:35 Plansix wrote: But remember, no matter what Trump says, he wants to bang his daughter. I do too ![]() Edit: His daughter I mean, not mine. I don't even have a child. | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On December 19 2015 11:00 Toadesstern wrote: you would have to prove that they knew they were lying at the moment they made the statement and did it deliberately if you want to go after them I'd guess. Even if you had some rule to make them re-do statements, I wouldn't be surprised if you could get out of that by just saying "yeah but there IS a tiny fraction of scientists that do believe that the earth is only a couple thousand years old! So can you really say it's demonstrably false?" or something along those lines. Even if they did not know they were lying, they should still have to publicly state that what they said was incorrect. They obviously shouldn't say they were lying in that case-they should say "I was incorrect and had misremembered X." For all that I dislike Carson, I respect him for actually admitting he's wrong when he's shown to be wrong, or attributing it to false memory. On December 19 2015 11:43 Danglars wrote: You most certainly have that right. Any agency or citizens council endowed with criminal or civil power extra-judiciary would be abused with allegations all day long, just as politicians today accuse each other of lying for political gain. The best you can hope for is a civically engaged population ready to hold politicians' feet to the fire. We're talking elections, pressure for impeachment, state representatives & article 5, and other means in state constitutions like the initiative process. Politician says something demonstrably false? You'd hardly find unanimous agreement in this very forum much less the population in general. This all reads way too much like disenfranchising the dumb by revolutionary act in the name of a representative republic. It's incredibly utopian considering the divergence in political ideologies. If a politician says that a general was fired because of telling Barack Obama things he didn't want to hear...and that general retired before Barack Obama was ever running for President...that is false. They should have to tell the public that they said something false. Over and over again you say that people aren't making demonstrably false statements, Danglars, and that in a certain light what they say can be true, but that is not reality. No amount of reality distortion field on the right or left will make 1 plus 1 equal 3. When the press has become two wings of the parties, and any criticism by the press is dismissed as partisanship, what can we possibly hope for the media to accomplish? Edit: Also, you can't impeach people running political campaigns. That's part of the problem-there are mechanisms in place once they take office, including the ones you list (with fewer at the federal level) but accountability in the election process is a lot less substantive with a lot less enforcement power (see: CARLY for America). And the bulk of America only pays attention during the election process, not in the interim. Edit2: I guess I just don't understand how false advertising in politics is somehow a different issue than false advertising in, well, ads. Expecting the electorate to sort it out is increasingly like expecting the market to sort it out-it just doesn't work. | ||
|
killa_robot
Canada1884 Posts
On December 19 2015 13:20 wptlzkwjd wrote: I do too ![]() Edit: His daughter I mean, not mine. I don't even have a child. So you're saying if you had a daughter you think she'd be so ugly that you wouldn't want to bang her? You're a dick. | ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8703 Posts
Washington (CNN)A major breach at computer network company Juniper Networks has U.S. officials worried that hackers working for a foreign government were able to spy on the encrypted communications of the U.S. government and private companies for the past three years. The FBI is investigating the breach, which involved hackers installing a back door on computer equipment, U.S. officials told CNN. Juniper disclosed the issue Thursday along with an emergency security patch that it urged customers to use to update their systems "with the highest priority." The concern, U.S. officials said, is that sophisticated hackers who compromised the equipment could use their access to get into any company or government agency that used it. One U.S. official described it as akin to "stealing a master key to get into any government building." CNN and you think hillary's e-mails were bad? think again. even the snowden leaks appear like a tiny problem in comparison if this turns out to be true. // also I am so damn pleased this happened amidst this idiotic discussion about encryption and what menace it is. basically the government wants to have backdoors into everything - because terrorism. and looky what happaned here. don't get me wrong, that this happened sucks and could have consequences beyond anyone's grasp. it just shows the dead end this discussion and politician's simple ideas lead into - looking at you Cameron et al. Juniper Networks' security fix is intended to seal a back door that hackers created in order to remotely log into commonly used VPN networks to spy on communications that were supposed to be among the most secure. Juniper said that someone managed to get into its systems and write "unauthorized code" that "could allow a knowledgeable attacker to gain administrative access." Such access would allow the hacker to monitor encrypted traffic on the computer network and decrypt communications. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23617 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Deaths from drug overdoses have surged across the US to record levels, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nationwide, overdose deaths last year exceeded 47,000, more than the number of people killed in car accidents and up 7% from the previous year. The CDC said 61% of the deaths involved some type of opioid pain relievers and heroin. The count also included deaths involving powerful sedatives, cocaine and other legal and illicit drugs. CDC director Tom Frieden said the rise in overdoses related to opioid use, up 14% from 2014, was particularly concerning. “The increasing number of deaths from opioid overdose is alarming,” he said. “The opioid epidemic is devastating American families and communities.” Overdose deaths are up in both men and women, in non-Hispanic whites and blacks, and in adults of nearly all ages, the report said. West Virginia, New Mexico, New Hampshire, Kentucky and Ohio had the highest overdose death rates. In West Virginia, the overdose rate was 35.5 per 100,000; the national rate was about 15 per 100,000. State rates are calculated to provide a more balanced comparison between states given the differences in population size. In sheer numbers, California — the most populous state — had the most overdose deaths last year, with more than 4,500. Ohio was second, with more than 2,700. The numbers are based on death certificates. Nearly half a million Americans died from drug overdoses from 2000 through 2014, the CDC says. Source | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32113 Posts
but it all starts in dr offices because we prescribe heavy duty pain killers for every minor thing. People get their wisdom teeth out and they get a fat script with refill for heavy duty pills that are extremely easy to get hooked on to. you have lots of people who don't fit what your eyes think is druggie turning into ones because they hurt their back, got pills, got hooked, and went to the hood for smack when their doctor cut them off. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18846 Posts
On December 20 2015 01:50 QuanticHawk wrote: I think over the next decade the situation with heroin is going to really climax. It has been building steam for way too long, and in a lot of suburb areas it is beginning to get to pot/booze levels of availability. If you buy pot, you almost certainly can get opioid based pills too, and somewhere in that chain is a heroin dealer. but it all starts in dr offices because we prescribe heavy duty pain killers for every minor thing. People get their wisdom teeth out and they get a fat script with refill for heavy duty pills that are extremely easy to get hooked on to. you have lots of people who don't fit what your eyes think is druggie turning into ones because they hurt their back, got pills, got hooked, and went to the hood for smack when their doctor cut them off. On a related note, there is hope in the form of liberalized drug policies. Many people who use medical marijuana do so to alleviate chronic pain associated with various ailments. So a few smart folks set out to find the answer to the logical question: Is legal marijuana acting as an alternative for people who might otherwise use and abuse painkillers? Those smart folks — better known as researchers from the University of California, Irvine, and the RAND Corporation — analyzed U.S. states that permit medical marijuana to see if they could find some answers. And answers they did find: "Our findings suggest that providing broader access to medical marijuana may have the potential benefit of reducing abuse of highly addictive painkillers." To reach their conclusion, the researchers looked at two different measures: 1. How many people had been admitted to addiction facilities for painkiller abuse, and 2. How many people died from painkiller overdoses. States with medical marijuana legalization and pot dispensaries saw reductions in both admissions and deaths compared to states without medical marijuana. The accessibility of the weed played a role, too: Researchers didn't find decreases in states that allow medical marijuana but don't allow medical marijuana dispensaries. A new study found the unintended way legalized marijuana is likely preventing overdose deaths. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32113 Posts
I think the scary thing about opioids is that addiction can be so strong that it catches people who don't touch drugs otherwise and aren't trying to abuse them to get stoned. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23617 Posts
On December 20 2015 02:10 farvacola wrote: On a related note, there is hope in the form of liberalized drug policies. A new study found the unintended way legalized marijuana is likely preventing overdose deaths. Veterans have been talking about this for well over a decade. Our politicians like to claim they care about the veterans but they'll start another war and get their kids through rehab long before they actually take care of them. Oh Kasich... | ||
|
Deathstar
9150 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
HONOLULU (AP) — President Barack Obama has vetoed two bills that would have blocked steps that his administration is taking to address climate change. One bill would have nullified carbon pollution standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency. The second bill would have voided a set of national standards designed to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas pollution from existing power plants. In a letter notifying Congress of his decision, Obama says climate change is a "profound threat" that must be addressed. Some Republican lawmakers and presidential candidates scoff at the climate science. Obama has made addressing climate change a priority. He recently praised a new international climate agreement reached at a Paris conference and credited his administration as being a driving force behind the deal. Source | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23617 Posts
http://abcnews.go.com/Live?stream=1 | ||
|
scudst0rm
Canada1149 Posts
On December 20 2015 10:06 GreenHorizons wrote: 3rd Democratic Debate stream http://abcnews.go.com/Live?stream=1 Is the stream skipping for anyone else? | ||
|
wptlzkwjd
Canada1240 Posts
On December 20 2015 10:19 scudst0rm wrote: Is the stream skipping for anyone else? I'm watching on Yahoo and it doesn't seem to be skipping on my end on HD settings. | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
"Bernie apologizes," Trump is going to have a field day. | ||
| ||
