EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 2159
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
| ||
|
Yoav
United States1874 Posts
On August 07 2015 07:49 KwarK wrote: You're assuming there is no oral history predating the Bible. Given that the Bible goes back all the way to the foundation of the earth 7000 years ago that's a little silly. There had to be oral history predating the written Bible and it had to go all the way back through the stone age because otherwise how would the bronze age people have known about the creation of the earth? We know they lived for hundreds of years but even so none of them lived long enough to remember about creation. I'm assuming no such thing. Just saying that you can't dismiss Hebrew ideas as "stone age" because that's a gross oversimplification of the history. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22597 Posts
On August 07 2015 10:14 Yoav wrote: I'm assuming no such thing. Just saying that you can't dismiss Hebrew ideas as "stone age" because that's a gross oversimplification of the history. Either the bible is real or its not. If its not real then its no more a guide for morality then the Ikea catalog. If it is real then God surely told people how to live before the bronze age. And God being all knowing he is unlikely to change his world views on a regular basis, therefor making it a reasonable assumption that they are indeed 'Stone Age' idea's. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On August 07 2015 10:13 ticklishmusic wrote: Trump with the best answer by far to the first q Is this a joke? Sure it's entertaining, but when you really look at what he's saying, it's disgraceful. Sure, it's possible to be too politically correct, but what about a little bit of civility? This isn't about not being politically correct. It's about being a bully. Also, isn't Huckabee a creationist? Citing DNA and empirical evidence is pretty ironic. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On August 07 2015 10:21 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Good answer from Paul on ISIS. Kasich very good answer on his choice to expand Medicaid. Meh, it was factually incorrect. Kasich I mean | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18445 Posts
Are there any other streams? | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42416 Posts
Not the greatest quality, but i can manage. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24354 Posts
On August 07 2015 10:26 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: It seems Fox is desperate to deflate Trump, doesn't seem to be working. How they didn't see that coming I don't know. Having people to boo him in the crowd won't be enough. If he makes it out without calling Kelly a 'dumb slut" or something I predict a 5 point bump. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On August 07 2015 10:26 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: It seems Fox is desperate to deflate Trump, doesn't seem to be working. Can't really blame them considering he is basically blackmailing the Republican party at this point. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18445 Posts
On August 07 2015 10:27 Grettin wrote: I'm watching here due to georestrictions. http://zunox.hk/zunox4.html Not the greatest quality, but i can manage. Thanks. That works. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24354 Posts
On August 07 2015 10:32 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Is it safe to say that John Kasich is the Huntsman of 2016? that pretty much nails it. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On August 07 2015 10:32 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Is it safe to say that John Kasich is the Huntsman of 2016? A non shitty guy with real accomplishments and the ability to execute a reasonable agenda who will never be elected? | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
| ||
