EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 2110
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain17972 Posts
| ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
whatisthisasheep
624 Posts
http://news.yahoo.com/chattanooga-active-shooter-officer-down-live-coverage-154953657.html Will Biden hurt Hillary or Sanders once he enters the Presidential race? | ||
|
Introvert
United States4741 Posts
| ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
On July 17 2015 06:06 Introvert wrote: That would be a safe guess. For the most part, long posts are useless here, as you won't make any progress. Better to use short posts and only respond to specific things when the opportunity presents itself. I think that would be equally pointless. | ||
|
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
On July 17 2015 06:04 whatisthisasheep wrote: PLEASE don't let the guy who shot those 5 marines dead in Tennessee turn out to be a illegal immigrant. That would be a disaster. http://news.yahoo.com/chattanooga-active-shooter-officer-down-live-coverage-154953657.html Will Biden hurt Hillary or Sanders once he enters the Presidential race? It's some fuck head with a muslim name. ISIS took credit during the shootings. | ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10687 Posts
On July 17 2015 06:04 whatisthisasheep wrote: Will Biden hurt Hillary or Sanders once he enters the Presidential race? I doubt he will hurt Sanders (not known before presidential race, so he is running on message), but he could hurt Hillary (running on name and now there is a second big name). | ||
|
killa_robot
Canada1884 Posts
On July 16 2015 13:00 KwarK wrote: I don't see why diagnostics can't work somewhat like Akinator (the 20 questions bot) where it learns from the answers to constantly improve its accuracy. The more human experience it gets the better it is at identifying patterns that lead it to the correct conclusion. Yes, humans don't always immediately tell you the right symptoms to diagnose something but a computer program doesn't distinguish saying "I heard a loud crack and now I can see my shin bone" from "I was hesitant to come in because it's probably nothing". It's not incapable of intuition because it doesn't have a base level of communication which excludes things it would intuit, if that makes sense. Everything is valid for diagnostics and with a decent sample size it ought to be able to draw conclusions mimicking intuition. If anything it ought to outperform doctors, it can't miss cues and it has every other case it has ever seen (orders of magnitude more than any doctor) to compare against with perfect recall. You'd need human assistance, especially at first while you teach it, but that kind of pattern recognition and database comparison is exactly what computers beat humans at. Pretty much. Diagnosing an issue against a database of information is one of the easiest things to program. What's more is these machines (or one central machine) would get more accurate as time goes by if machine learning is put into place (which no doubt would be done). Personally I think it's the diagnostic equipment that would take the longest to create. Humans lie/are wrong about things all the time, so having equipment to preform the tests would be the deciding factor in how well this works. If equipment could not be made to be human-less, physicians would likely just be replaced by technicians with little knowledge of health, but that can work the machines and walk people through the steps required to diagnose them. | ||
|
Chewbacca.
United States3634 Posts
On July 16 2015 10:38 Belisarius wrote: Just on that, here's a fun little toy that predicts how likely a given job is to be automated. The full document/paper is here. Top 20 least likely to be automated: + Show Spoiler + 1. Recreational therapists 2. First-line supervisors of mechanics, installers and repairers 3. Emergency management directors 4. Mental health and substance abuse social workers 5. Audiologists 6. Occupational therapists 7. Orthotists and prosthetists 8. Healthcare social workers 9. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons 10. First-line supervisors of fire-fighting and prevention workers 11. Dietiticians and nutritionists 12. Lodging managers 13. Choreographers 14. Sales engineers 15. Physicians and surgeons 16. Instructional coordinators 17. Psychologists 18. First-line supervisors of police and detectives 19. Dentists (general) 20. Elementary school teachers (except special education) Top 20 most likely to be automated: + Show Spoiler + 1. Telemarketers 2. Title examiners, abstracters, and searchers 3. Hand sewers 4. Mathematical technicians 5. Insurance underwriters 6. Watch repairers 7. Cargo and freight agents 8. Tax preparers 9. Photographic process workers and processing machine operators 10. New accounts clerks 11. Library technicians 12. Data entry keyers 13. Timing device assemblers and adjusters 14. Insurance claims processing and policy clerks 15. Brokerage clerks 16. Order clerks 17. Loan officers 18. Insurance appraisers, auto damage 19. Umpires, referees and other sports officials 20. Tellers The little gadget thing lets you stick any job in and see how it rates. Of course it's just a bunch of researchers' guesses but the results are pretty interesting. Fun site, I have a 1.7% chance of being automated.  | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44222 Posts
On July 17 2015 06:04 whatisthisasheep wrote: PLEASE don't let the guy who shot those 5 marines dead in Tennessee turn out to be a illegal immigrant. That would be a disaster. http://news.yahoo.com/chattanooga-active-shooter-officer-down-live-coverage-154953657.html Will Biden hurt Hillary or Sanders once he enters the Presidential race? Definitely hurt Hillary more than Sanders imo, as his image and interests align more closely with Hillary's than with Sanders's. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18825 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44222 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States42558 Posts
| ||
|
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On July 17 2015 07:16 Jerubaal wrote: As an English teacher, the biggest problem with technology is that kids can't focus on anything for more than 15 seconds. As a person who once passed English class, they don't pay attention to the teacher either. | ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10687 Posts
On July 17 2015 08:23 cLutZ wrote: As a person who once passed English class, they don't pay attention to the teacher either. Which is exactly what he said? | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44222 Posts
He didn't notice though. Wasn't paying attention. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
Then how is a teacher superior? | ||
|
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
For people who have to put in effort to pass an English class? Vastly. I don't see computers flat out replacing teachers anytime soon unless they are closer to true artificial intelligence then I think. | ||
| ||
