• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:01
CEST 21:01
KST 04:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off6[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature4Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy9uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event18
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax2Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris30Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!13Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195
StarCraft 2
General
Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax What mix of new and old maps do you want in the next 1v1 ladder pool? (SC2) : 2v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Monday Nights Weeklies Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash On His 2010 "God" Form, Mind Games, vs JD [ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off BW General Discussion No Rain in ASL20?
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro24 Group D [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Ro24 Group B [ASL20] Ro24 Group C
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The year 2050 European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
High temperatures on bridge(s) Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment"
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Breaking the Meta: Non-Stand…
TrAiDoS
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3936 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1107

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
mcc
Profile Joined October 2010
Czech Republic4646 Posts
June 11 2014 23:17 GMT
#22121
On June 12 2014 08:06 coverpunch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2014 08:05 mcc wrote:
On June 12 2014 06:37 coverpunch wrote:
On June 12 2014 05:06 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
No wonder America is the laughing stock of the world and it's political priorities:


Because we still don't know the difference between its and it's?

IMO it was totally worth having the debate to question the exemptions given to religious groups and whether the government is encroaching on the freedom of belief when it forces people to abide by policies that may offend or violate their beliefs. This is currently a fundamental point of difference between the two parties, where Republicans are skeptical of a growing government and favor individual cooperation through social organizations and communities, while Democrats see such groups (especially Christianity) as a root cause of the outrages in the status quo and thus worth being pushed down and away from public life by a government seeking to end those outrages. In regards to Christianity, both sides insist the Bill of Rights protects something different - Republicans say the Bill of Rights should protect Christianity from having expressions of its faith taken away while Democrats say the Bill of Rights should protect other minority religions and groups from expressions of Christian beliefs.

Your video nitpicks a fairly stupid line of questioning while ignoring the essence and themes of the debate.

Criticizing others for voicing "opinions and not facts" while writing completely ideological (and false) paragraph is kind of ironical. The same goes for criticizing nitpicking while questioning a typo.

Uh, yeah, it is ironical. Almost like I tried to do it...

Well your post is completely indistinguishable from a serious one, so ...
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18830 Posts
June 11 2014 23:25 GMT
#22122
Clearly, coverpunch has merely been playing the role of a Fox News intellectual all along. He's simply trying to show us all just how inconsistent their views are. He's done an admirable job thus far, if the crowd's incredulity is any indication.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Mercy13
Profile Joined January 2011
United States718 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-06-11 23:40:54
June 11 2014 23:39 GMT
#22123
Anyone asserting the "secure the border before reform" position should read this article:

"Opponents of a new legalization program for unauthorized immigrants living and working in the United States frequently claim that we must try “enforcement first.” That is to say, we must adequately enforce the laws on the books before we can contemplate the formulation of more reasonable laws. This stance is nonsensical for two reasons. First of all, it ignores the fact that the unworkable nature of our immigration laws is itself facilitating unauthorized immigration; so it is illogical to hope that stronger enforcement of those unworkable laws will somehow lessen unauthorized immigration. Secondly, the “enforcement first” perspective conveniently overlooks the fact that the United States has been pursuing an “enforcement first” approach to immigration control for more than two-and-a-half decades—and it has yet to work."

Source

Attempts to "secure" the border will fail as long as there is no legal mechanism to supply the demand for migrant workers in this country.

Also, it should be noted that the bill that passed the Senate with bipartisan support includes several "triggers" related securing the boarder before any permanent path to citizenship becomes available, as well as huge increases in boarder security expenditures:

"The bill makes enormous investments in border security, including the following: deploying at least 38,405 full-time Border Patrol agents along the southern border (including an additional 19,200 more than currently in place); mandating an electronic exit system at all ports where Customs and Border Protection agents are deployed; constructing at least 700 miles of fencing, including double fencing; increasing mobile surveillance; deploying aircraft and radio communications; constructing additional Border Patrol stations and operating bases; hiring additional prosecutors, judges, and staff; providing additional training to border officers; and increasing prosecutions of illegal border crossings. The bill specifies mandatory area-specific technology and infrastructure that includes watch towers, camera systems, mobile surveillance systems, ground sensors, fiber-optic tank inspection scopes, portable contraband detectors, radiation isotope identification devices, mobile automated targeting systems, unmanned aircraft, radar systems, helicopters, and marine vessels, among other minimum requirements. The bill mandates 24-hour surveillance of the border region using mobile, video, and portable systems, as well as unmanned aircraft, and deploys 1,000 distress beacon stations in areas where migrant deaths occur. Interior enforcement against visa overstays is also increased. The Department of Homeland Security is required to initiate removal (deportation) proceedings, confirm that relief from removal is pending or granted, or otherwise close 90 percent of the cases of immigrants who have overstayed their visas by more than 180 days in the last 12 months. A pilot program is created to notify immigrants that their visas are about to expire."

Source

House Republicans have refused to allow a vote on this bill, and have not proposed any amendments to it. Opposition to comprehensive immigration reform has nothing to do with a desire to have a secure boarder. It is all about obstruction for the sake of obstruction, because that is what people who vote in GOP primaries insist on these days.
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-06-12 00:00:13
June 11 2014 23:55 GMT
#22124
Dave Brat beat Cantor because he campaigned on a message against crony capitalism, lobbyists having too much influence in Washington, and that investment bankers responsible for the crash of 2008 should have gone to jail.

It wasn't immigration. Lindsay Graham voted for the immigration reform bill and he got 59 percent of the vote in his primary.

People of all political leanings are sick of big business being in bed with big government.


Dave Brat:
Eric Cantor doesn’t represent you, he represents large corporations seeking a never-ending supply of cheap foreign labor. He doesn’t care about how this will affect your livelihood, your schools, your tax bills or your kids’ chances of finding a job
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21722 Posts
June 12 2014 00:05 GMT
#22125
On June 12 2014 08:55 SnipedSoul wrote:
Dave Brat beat Cantor because he campaigned on a message against crony capitalism, lobbyists having too much influence in Washington, and that investment bankers responsible for the crash of 2008 should have gone to jail.

It wasn't immigration. Lindsay Graham voted for the immigration reform bill and he got 59 percent of the vote in his primary.

People of all political leanings are sick of big business being in bed with big government.

Show nested quote +

Dave Brat:
Eric Cantor doesn’t represent you, he represents large corporations seeking a never-ending supply of cheap foreign labor. He doesn’t care about how this will affect your livelihood, your schools, your tax bills or your kids’ chances of finding a job

When the choice is between a crony capitalist and someone who would rather see the country burn to satisfy his tantrum ill take the first one as a lesser of two evils thanks.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-06-12 00:08:57
June 12 2014 00:08 GMT
#22126
What makes you think Dave Brat wants to see America burn or that he's throwing a tantrum?
radscorpion9
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Canada2252 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-06-12 00:09:30
June 12 2014 00:08 GMT
#22127
On June 12 2014 08:25 farvacola wrote:
Farvacola likes writing all *sorts* of things!!


Hey farva do you think you could change the front page image of boehner and obama?? Just to freshen things up a bit. Its a really nice picture and all but it would be nice to see something else . Unfortunately I don't have any suggestions...hopefully someone gives you one
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21722 Posts
June 12 2014 00:14 GMT
#22128
On June 12 2014 09:08 SnipedSoul wrote:
What makes you think Dave Brat wants to see America burn or that he's throwing a tantrum?

The Tea Party has shows that repeatedly through their actions.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18830 Posts
June 12 2014 00:18 GMT
#22129
On June 12 2014 09:08 radscorpion9 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2014 08:25 farvacola wrote:
Farvacola likes writing all *sorts* of things!!


Hey farva do you think you could change the front page image of boehner and obama?? Just to freshen things up a bit. Its a really nice picture and all but it would be nice to see something else . Unfortunately I don't have any suggestions...hopefully someone gives you one

For some reason I've lost the ability to edit the OP but I'll replace the image as soon as I am able.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-06-12 00:21:04
June 12 2014 00:18 GMT
#22130
On June 12 2014 09:14 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2014 09:08 SnipedSoul wrote:
What makes you think Dave Brat wants to see America burn or that he's throwing a tantrum?

The Tea Party has shows that repeatedly through their actions.


Eric Cantor was a huge problem while he was in office. He was part of all those debt ceiling debacles, obstruction, and general idiocy in the house.

Seems to me like he was the one throwing tantrums and didn't care if America burned.

Oh yeah, he blamed his loss on Democrats pretending to be Republicans so they could vote against him in the primary.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21722 Posts
June 12 2014 00:20 GMT
#22131
On June 12 2014 09:18 SnipedSoul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2014 09:14 Gorsameth wrote:
On June 12 2014 09:08 SnipedSoul wrote:
What makes you think Dave Brat wants to see America burn or that he's throwing a tantrum?

The Tea Party has shows that repeatedly through their actions.


Eric Cantor was a huge problem while he was in office. He was part of all those debt ceiling debacles, obstruction, and general idiocy in the house.

Seems to me like he was the one throwing tantrums and didn't care if America burned.

your right I forgot he was the person keeping the budget from being able to go on a vote because of some changed rules, my apologies.

It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25514 Posts
June 12 2014 00:20 GMT
#22132
While I can't disagree with that, I don't see any 'Tea Party' candidate being less intransigent
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-06-12 00:25:11
June 12 2014 00:23 GMT
#22133
First, we'll have to see if he wins the seat.

I'm really just happy that Cantor is gone. I can't imagine anyone being worse, with the possible exception of Ted Cruz.

Edit: I just remembered that Ted Cruz officially renounced his Canadian Citizenship and it was confirmed this week.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25514 Posts
June 12 2014 00:26 GMT
#22134
Well in fairness I am quite interested to see how legitimate libertarians might influence the legislature, just from what I can see so many of them are just Conservative ideologies masquerading as anti-big government candidates.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
screamingpalm
Profile Joined October 2011
United States1527 Posts
June 12 2014 00:31 GMT
#22135
Heh Virginia politics always entertaining. Can't say that I saw this coming though. Wasn't Bob McDonald just recently in the news for adultery or some scandal?
MMT University is coming! http://www.mmtuniversity.org/
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18830 Posts
June 12 2014 00:48 GMT
#22136
Replaced the OP's image with something more appropriate :D
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4786 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-06-12 00:56:52
June 12 2014 00:54 GMT
#22137
On June 12 2014 05:37 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
I think conservatives would support a "comprehensive" bill if they thought that it actually secure the border first. The problem is, none of the proposed bills do, nor do we trust Obama to care about following them. So they can be a part of the same bill (in principle), but the securing of the border must occur first.


You do realize how contradictory that garble is right?

What would the proposal need to say to do that to your satisfaction?

Sounds like nothing can pass while Obama is president because conservatives think he is a lawless brigand, and sounds like some conservatives here think the supreme court will just grant citizenship no matter what the law says.

So sounds like conservatives wont do anything until they run at least 2 branches, probably all three, so basically they don't plan on ever doing anything.

Newsflash for conservatives: keeping people from voting, trying to break up families by deporting hard working people, pushing for policies like stop and frisk, talking about women's vagina's and rape, opposition to gay marriage, etc... is only making your constituency older, whiter, more homophobic, and too small to ever win a presidential election.

What I think conservatives tend to not understand is that their privilege is being checked. For a long time all they had to do was whatever they convinced ignorant white people they wanted. Now you can't win a national election by only getting ignorant white votes. Conservatives have to appeal to non-whites if they want to have a chance (pushing to restrict non-conservative voters or trying to secure more of the white vote can only take you so far).

Conservatives need to come up with policies non-whites actually appreciate not just try to convince them how conservative policies are actually good for them (they aren't falling for conservative BS). Also refusing to acknowledge the racist practices of stop and frisk just further undermines the idea of 'reaching out'. Conservative opposition to immigration reform is the same thing. Nothing conservatives have suggested is going to get them any closer to a winning coalition.

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

What party veterans are trying to tell the Conservatives blocking immigration reform is all about that number next to Hispanic and non-Hispanic black. Blocking immigration reform means you lose most of those non-white independents.

Republicans are not going to get any significant number more white voters, and people are outraged at their attempts at voter suppression so it's looking really bad for them (Presidentially).

Conservatives are basically just giving democrats a 10 point bump by blocking reasonable immigration reform.

Oh well, on the bright side at least we'll have Ted Cruz to laugh at this presidential cycle.


The numbers are barely changing, and Romney won independents.

Your evidence that what I am saying is wrong is your own personal opinion, which has been demonstrated time and time again to be wildly off-base with respect to the right. I am glad that you went from yesterday asking questions and seemingly being ignorant of conservative rationale on immigration to here giving us an essay on what you think.

I personally don't trust Obama to enforce the laws (including the stupid "triggers" from the bill last year). It's a separate topic, but imo this president has shown his willingness to use more "executive authority" than almost anyone. So no, I don't trust him.

As to only needing whites... so? I'm so glad we have you (and the whole media) as Republican campaign managers. I don't give two figs for the party. There is no point in winning as Democrat-lite. If we lose, we lose. There are certainly compromises to me made, as in any republic, but I refuse to fall for the same BS twice. Amnesty first means security WILL NOT happen. The Democrats won't even acknowledge a problem on the border. With Washington the way it is, I need to see the legislation as clear and unambiguous as possible.

I simply don't see that what has been put before Congress has sufficient assurances of security.
"It is therefore only at the birth of a society that one can be completely logical in the laws. When you see a people enjoying this advantage, do not hasten to conclude that it is wise; think rather that it is young." -Alexis de Tocqueville
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
June 12 2014 00:56 GMT
#22138
On June 12 2014 09:26 Wombat_NI wrote:
Well in fairness I am quite interested to see how legitimate libertarians might influence the legislature, just from what I can see so many of them are just Conservative ideologies masquerading as anti-big government candidates.


"Legitimate libertarians" meaning what?
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25514 Posts
June 12 2014 01:20 GMT
#22139
People who actually buy into that particularly political philosophy wholesale rather than those who pay lip service to it, but who subsequently use whatever public support they have to pursue particular ideological agendas via governmental mechanisms.

Say what you want about the guy, I don't agree with a lot of his platform but I view a Ron Paul differently from social conservatives masquerading as something that they are not. I have a lot of time for people who hold an actual libertarian position on a wide range of issues as part of a divergent political landscape, I can't stand those who jump on the small government bandwagon when what they really mean is 'cut the programmes I don't personally agree with' , if that makes sense. The 'Tea Party' movement has plenty of figures in both camps .
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
June 12 2014 01:35 GMT
#22140
On June 12 2014 10:20 Wombat_NI wrote:
People who actually buy into that particularly political philosophy wholesale rather than those who pay lip service to it, but who subsequently use whatever public support they have to pursue particular ideological agendas via governmental mechanisms.

Say what you want about the guy, I don't agree with a lot of his platform but I view a Ron Paul differently from social conservatives masquerading as something that they are not. I have a lot of time for people who hold an actual libertarian position on a wide range of issues as part of a divergent political landscape, I can't stand those who jump on the small government bandwagon when what they really mean is 'cut the programmes I don't personally agree with' , if that makes sense. The 'Tea Party' movement has plenty of figures in both camps .


The problem is that most people don't understand that the "crony" in crony capitalism is a feature not a bug. Monopoly, state subsidies, pro-business policies, lobbying, and even corruption are simply adaptations of capital seeking to reproduce itself. They are the result of capital going over or around natural and artificial barriers to reproduction.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
Prev 1 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RotterdaM Event
15:00
Rotti's All Random Finals
RotterdaM1375
IndyStarCraft 257
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1375
Reynor 280
IndyStarCraft 257
mouzHeroMarine 222
Hui .114
BRAT_OK 105
ProTech103
UpATreeSC 95
MindelVK 29
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 493
Larva 383
Dewaltoss 136
firebathero 121
Aegong 45
scan(afreeca) 30
HiyA 12
IntoTheRainbow 10
Beast 2
Dota 2
XaKoH 373
Pyrionflax101
Counter-Strike
fl0m1666
Stewie2K243
kRYSTAL_73
PGG 16
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu189
Other Games
Grubby2125
FrodaN1414
C9.Mang0159
KnowMe130
Trikslyr67
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 51
• LUISG 8
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 14
• Pr0nogo 5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22114
• WagamamaTV792
League of Legends
• Jankos1503
• TFBlade937
Counter-Strike
• imaqtpie852
Other Games
• Shiphtur164
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 59m
Afreeca Starleague
14h 59m
Rush vs TBD
TBD vs Mong
WardiTV Summer Champion…
15h 59m
Cure vs Classic
ByuN vs TBD
herO vs TBD
TBD vs NightMare
TBD vs MaxPax
OSC
16h 59m
PiGosaur Monday
1d 4h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 14h
herO vs TBD
Royal vs Barracks
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
LiuLi Cup
3 days
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs herO
Cure vs Rogue
Classic vs HeRoMaRinE
Cosmonarchy
3 days
OyAji vs Sziky
Sziky vs WolFix
WolFix vs OyAji
BSL Team Wars
3 days
Team Hawk vs Team Dewalt
BSL Team Wars
3 days
Team Hawk vs Team Bonyth
SC Evo League
4 days
TaeJa vs Cure
Rogue vs threepoint
ByuN vs Creator
MaNa vs Classic
Maestros of the Game
4 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
4 days
SC Evo League
5 days
Maestros of the Game
5 days
BSL Team Wars
5 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Sziky
BSL Team Wars
5 days
Team Dewalt vs Team Sziky
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLAN 3
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
Acropolis #4 - TS1
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

CSL Season 18: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
EC S1
Sisters' Call Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.