EPTBW and SC2's Zerg Macro -a mechanics comparison - Page 4
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Korinai
Canada413 Posts
| ||
|
zefreak
United States2731 Posts
| ||
|
DrakeFZX3
United States925 Posts
| ||
|
dynwar7
1983 Posts
| ||
|
Shebuha
Canada1335 Posts
On September 21 2012 15:28 dynwar7 wrote: What the hell stop comparing these two games, when will people stop? wtf I completely agree, BW is much harder. EDIT: Just kidding. I think it's correct to continue comparing the games. They are similar in a lot of ways and a lot of good ideas can be (and obviously have) been taken from BW and applied to SCII. 99.9% of the time nothing happens as a result of a thread like this, but I think it's good to spark ideas and stuff. It's also interesting. | ||
|
Myrddraal
Australia937 Posts
On September 21 2012 15:01 zefreak wrote: Anyone who thinks that playing SC2 zerg at a high level is harder than playing BW zerg at a high level is dreaming, including jaedong. Maybe he forgets how hard BW is because he played it for so many years. Ask any of the current foreign zergs who are at the top of Europe and USA which they think is harder. There are SC2 zergs who can compete at an extremely high level while going to university full time like nerchio and Suppy. That would NOT happen in BW. I think if you read a bit deeper into what Jaedong said you would find that his opinion is actually quite valid, and for you to dismiss his opinion of what he finds harder is just blatantly arrogant. | ||
|
Norada
China482 Posts
| ||
| ||
