• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:31
CEST 00:31
KST 07:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202561RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time EWC 2025 details: $700k total prize; GSL, DH Dallas confirmed Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 704 users

Is the Gateway useless? - Page 2

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
JOJOsc2news
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
3000 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-05 15:47:28
January 05 2012 15:46 GMT
#21
On January 06 2012 00:39 discobaas wrote:
My opinion: it's ridiculous, it should only be possible with a warp prism or within a certain radius from a Nexus or something like that. Also it breaks late-game, especially, but not only, vs T, where the Protoss warps in 20 new units instantly after a battle while the opponent has to wait for ages. But yeah they're so used to this that they will most likely demand some silly buff in exchange, which I haven't thought of yet. I genuinely hope it gets fixed some time, because PvX matchups are awful to watch.


As I thought. This would turn into a thread of T and Z whining about warpgate.

As to the OP. The mechanic is not useless just because it is not used during the entire game. You could say a barracks without a tech lab or reactor is useless with that kind of logic. Or even better: The Command Center Should people get rewarded with faster SCV production for not choosing to get an orbital or pf? Come on. This is going nowhere!

The gateway is used to put on early pressure and is a way to reduce the production ability of protoss at the beginning. It is an essential step in balancing towards the metagame. Also, there are a lot of play styles and builds that use no or very late Warpgate (e.g. WhiteRa's stargate play)

This thread is going to turn ugly very soon and end in a loop of balance discussion by people who don't have the required expertise.
✉ Tweets @sc2channel ⌦ Blog: http://www.teamliquid.net/blog/JOJO ⌫ "Arbiterssss... build more arbiterssss." Click 'Profile' for awesome shiro art!
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
January 05 2012 15:46 GMT
#22
There was a point where you could actually increase your production rate by quite a bit if you could transform your gateways back and forth, but Blizzard decided to "fix" the bug, which was a terrible decision imo.
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25980 Posts
January 05 2012 15:46 GMT
#23
So here was my thought process:

- Everyone wants warpgates but you can't start with the technology since it's too good.
- Maybe once you've researched it, you should only be able to build warpgates?
      * But then they would build too quickly (no opening time) so that's stupid.
      * Maybe they should stay the same but automatically open so you have no choice.
            ~ But that's stupid too because there will be some cases where you need the units NOW and will favour chronoing a gateway unit instead of opening the warpgate - there's no reason to lose that choice.

So, in conclusion, the gateway / warpgate dynamic is stupid but it's the best solution I think.
Moderator
kingcoyote
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States546 Posts
January 05 2012 15:47 GMT
#24
On January 06 2012 00:44 Hoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2012 00:38 aderum wrote:
On January 06 2012 00:34 Hoon wrote:
On January 06 2012 00:29 JOJOsc2news wrote:
This looks like you have been facing a lot of warp in harrassment and now you want warpgate to be nerfed.
I think the mechanic is fine as it is, especially with mechanics like inject and reactors for the other races.

The problem is that there is a mechanic that is completely useless on the game (gateway).
The only use of a gateway is to morph it into a warpgate.
In game design, when there's something as 'useless' as the gateway, it means it is badly designed.
Maybe if they make build time with gateways faster, so the player has to choose between faster production or warp in anywhere...


But it isnt useless, its used in the early game in many different forms of expanding and putting pressure on. Just because its not used all game long doesnt make it worthless.

That's is the problem.
It is used only in the early game. No one thinks about going back to gateway later.

Blizzard noticed this problem in WoW. There were some spells there were used only at low levels, so they reworked then/removed them from the game.


Maybe the entire problem is that you have to manually switch to Warp Gate and you have the option to switch back. If the upgrade worked more like weapons/armor/shields, this issue wouldn't have even arisen. Upon completing Warp Gate research, all Gateways turn into Warp Gates as soon as possible, including newly constructed Gateways, with no option to revert. Afterall, you don't have to manually click upgrades on every single new unit, and you can't un-upgrade individual units. I think Warp Gate is meant to be more like that - a permanent, always on upgrade.
TiTanIum_
Profile Joined August 2011
Brazil1335 Posts
January 05 2012 15:48 GMT
#25
On January 06 2012 00:34 Hoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2012 00:29 JOJOsc2news wrote:
This looks like you have been facing a lot of warp in harrassment and now you want warpgate to be nerfed.
I think the mechanic is fine as it is, especially with mechanics like inject and reactors for the other races.

The problem is that there is a mechanic that is completely useless on the game (gateway).
The only use of a gateway is to morph it into a warpgate.
In game design, when there's something as 'useless' as the gateway, it means it is badly designed.
Maybe if they make build time with gateways faster, so the player has to choose between faster production or warp in anywhere...


Imagine the power of the proxy 2 gate...
BEARDiaguz
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Australia2362 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-05 15:53:10
January 05 2012 15:48 GMT
#26
I think a better way of looking at it is that Blizzard would prefer it if the Protoss could build straight warpgates instead of dithering with gateways at all. But obviously that would be crazy imbalanced so they put in this delay in the game before you can get warpgates.

Much like how you don't start with an Orbital Command or Pfort but you'd obviously want them instead of CC.
ProgamerAustralian alcohol user follow @iaguzSC2
ApBuLLet
Profile Joined September 2010
United States604 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-05 15:53:14
January 05 2012 15:49 GMT
#27
On January 06 2012 00:28 darkness wrote:
Protoss isn't in a great state to be nerfed even one bit. Be careful with your suggestions. ^_^


It's not about balance really, it is about game design, and I definitely agree with the OP. I actually made a thread long ago (back in beta) about this, but it got shot down at the time because back then there was a whole lot of balance bitching and stuff =(

Like I said though, it really has nothing to do with balance as much as it does with game design and actual game play. For example, imagine how much bearable PvP would be if the 4gate never existed? Or if it did, it would be a much riskier build then it was and much easier to defend. The reason I say this is because if warpgate wasn't the primary means of creating units for Protoss, that means it would have to be limited in some way, maybe warpgates need energy perhaps (this is hypothetical so just go with it ), once the energy runs out the 4gate is done. Since time is an extremely critical factor of the success of a 4gate in this scenario, then the defending player would simply have to stall with sentries while building up an army of zealots/immortals or something. Doesn't this make a ton more sense then all of the 4gate vs 4gate shenanigans that we saw for months, that was fixed by making weird artificial changes to the game like changing ramp vision, pylon range, etc?

Also, it is just kinda bad to have an UPGRADE that is required literally every single game, is researched at the same exact time (90% of the time it is right when your core finishes, some stargate openings are the other 10%), no matter the matchup or the strategy. The only other one I can think of is the Orbital Command, but that is Terran's macro mechanic so that makes much more sense. I just think that having an upgrade that is that necessary really restricts the player from doing a variety of strategies. For example, if regular gateways were Protoss' primary means of producing units, would a fast +1 air attack strategy be viable? Maybe in some situations it would be, but we will never know because if the Protoss player does that they will probably die.

As a final note, doesn't it piss people off that Protoss seems to be so revolvent around timing attacks? As a Zerg player, it definitely pisses me off . The reason for this is because of warpgate and the fact that it significantly hinders an opponents defensive advantage, seeing as you can just warp in directly outside of their base. I think the game would be much better off if these attacks were harder to sustain (i.e. less effective if your opponent is prepared, but still viable), and macro Protoss was more viable and less passive.

Anyway, that is my thoughts on it all, hopefully this will be changed someday, ideally HotS, but that's pretty unrealistic. Maybe in the next expansion or something.

Edit:
On January 06 2012 00:37 zedi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2012 00:34 Hoon wrote:
On January 06 2012 00:29 JOJOsc2news wrote:
This looks like you have been facing a lot of warp in harrassment and now you want warpgate to be nerfed.
I think the mechanic is fine as it is, especially with mechanics like inject and reactors for the other races.

The problem is that there is a mechanic that is completely useless on the game (gateway).
The only use of a gateway is to morph it into a warpgate.
In game design, when there's something as 'useless' as the gateway, it means it is badly designed.
Maybe if they make build time with gateways faster, so the player has to choose between faster production or warp in anywhere...


The point is that it's an early game mechanic. It should become useless after.


How does this make sense? Name another "early game mechanic" that becomes useless later in the game? I can't think of a single one.
JOJOsc2news
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
3000 Posts
January 05 2012 15:50 GMT
#28
On January 06 2012 00:48 iaguz wrote:
I think a better way of looking at it is that Blizzard would prefer it if the Protoss could build straight warpgates instead of dithering with warpgates at all. But obviously that would be crazy imbalanced so they put in this delay in the game before you can get warpgates.

Much like how you don't start with an Orbital Command or Pfort but you'd obviously want them instead of CC.


Exactly my point!
Very well put!
✉ Tweets @sc2channel ⌦ Blog: http://www.teamliquid.net/blog/JOJO ⌫ "Arbiterssss... build more arbiterssss." Click 'Profile' for awesome shiro art!
AvAri
Profile Joined August 2011
Austria135 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-05 15:56:52
January 05 2012 15:54 GMT
#29
On January 06 2012 00:42 MetalSlug wrote:
I agree that Gateway units should produce faster than Warpgated units.
its just stupid that gateways dont have any purpose as soon as warpgates are avaible



the same can be said for "naked" rax there is no point in having those if a addon is available

if warpgate available from second 1 wouldnt be extremly op then i'm sure gateways wouldn't even be in the game. the research is just a way to delay it's availability and it's a way to further differentiate the races

and the argument "they cant buff gateway units because of warpgate" is only partially true in reallity its"...because of the rest of the race" gateway units would need to be buffed a lot to be able to deal effectivly with all kind of early aggression, drops,.... and buffed gateway units would mean every t3 would be way op the hole race would need to be changed

and actually i like that every race focuses on a different army approach
with terran units of equal power, protoss "meat" units and very strong key tech units and zerg masses of units
buffed gateway units would in my eyes make protoss more similar to terran


edit
I think a better way of looking at it is that Blizzard would prefer it if the Protoss could build straight warpgates instead of dithering with gateways at all. But obviously that would be crazy imbalanced so they put in this delay in the game before you can get warpgates.

Much like how you don't start with an Orbital Command or Pfort but you'd obviously want them instead of CC.


exactly this

pf or orbital from the start would be op
the same for stim and a lot of other key upgrades that are meant to be researched
the research is just a way to control the timing
DawN883
Profile Joined November 2011
Sweden558 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-05 15:55:05
January 05 2012 15:54 GMT
#30
I really don't see the problem with warpgates. They are just fine as they are now

On January 06 2012 00:48 iaguz wrote:
I think a better way of looking at it is that Blizzard would prefer it if the Protoss could build straight warpgates instead of dithering with warpgates at all. But obviously that would be crazy imbalanced so they put in this delay in the game before you can get warpgates.

Much like how you don't start with an Orbital Command or Pfort but you'd obviously want them instead of CC.


This probably summarizes it
If the dead are not raised, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die
L3gendary
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada1470 Posts
January 05 2012 15:55 GMT
#31
On January 06 2012 00:46 Chill wrote:
So here was my thought process:

- Everyone wants warpgates but you can't start with the technology since it's too good.
- Maybe once you've researched it, you should only be able to build warpgates?
      * But then they would build too quickly (no opening time) so that's stupid.
      * Maybe they should stay the same but automatically open so you have no choice.
            ~ But that's stupid too because there will be some cases where you need the units NOW and will favour chronoing a gateway unit instead of opening the warpgate - there's no reason to lose that choice.

So, in conclusion, the gateway / warpgate dynamic is stupid but it's the best solution I think.


tbh I dont know why anyone would want warpgates its a fundamentally flawed mechanic (removes defenders advantage etc). ofc if they removed it toss gateway units would have to be rebalanced.
Watching Jaedong play purifies my eyes. -Coach Ju Hoon
Kovaz
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada233 Posts
January 05 2012 15:55 GMT
#32
The problem with warpgates is that Protoss is balanced around having them, so any change in how they function would likely require drastic rebalancing, but we're too late in the development of Wing of Liberty for it to really be an option. Still, I think that PvP is proof enough that warpgates cause a lot of problems.

I'm not sure if I like the idea of making them produce more slowly, since that will just make people go for a 5-warpgate instead of a 4-warpgate and get the same production. Instead, what I'd like to see is something along the lines of an extra 25 mineral cost for units out of a warpgate. That way, it becomes a choice between cheap, delayed reinforcements, or expensive, immediate reinforcements. Also, this could be coupled with a slight buff to gateway units, which would make protoss feel more robust throughout the game, and that would facilitate nerfing/redesigning units like the colossus.
Akinokaze
Profile Joined March 2011
Australia326 Posts
January 05 2012 15:55 GMT
#33
Rather then giving a straight buff to gateways or nerfing warpgates, why not give warpgate research the extra perk of reducing the build times of normal gateways?
In the Emperor we trust
Erik.TheRed
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1655 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-05 15:57:38
January 05 2012 15:57 GMT
#34
I think Chill just about summed it up for you, warpgates are balanced to enter at a certain point in the game, and they are intentionally meant to replace gateways once you finish WG research. The only reason there is a gateway at all is because it would be OP if protoss could warp in from the start. Is it a dynamic and well-designed solution? in my opinion, not really... but it does work.
"See you space cowboy"
Tobberoth
Profile Joined August 2010
Sweden6375 Posts
January 05 2012 15:57 GMT
#35
On January 06 2012 00:46 Chill wrote:
            ~ But that's stupid too because there will be some cases where you need the units NOW and will favour chronoing a gateway unit instead of opening the warpgate - there's no reason to lose that choice.

Isn't it way faster to switch it to warpgate and warp than to build a unit, even if you chrono boost it? It switches SO fast.
Jurassic
Profile Joined July 2010
Hungary79 Posts
January 05 2012 16:01 GMT
#36
On January 06 2012 00:48 TiTanIum_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2012 00:34 Hoon wrote:
On January 06 2012 00:29 JOJOsc2news wrote:
This looks like you have been facing a lot of warp in harrassment and now you want warpgate to be nerfed.
I think the mechanic is fine as it is, especially with mechanics like inject and reactors for the other races.

The problem is that there is a mechanic that is completely useless on the game (gateway).
The only use of a gateway is to morph it into a warpgate.
In game design, when there's something as 'useless' as the gateway, it means it is badly designed.
Maybe if they make build time with gateways faster, so the player has to choose between faster production or warp in anywhere...


Imagine the power of the proxy 2 gate...


Then just buff gateways only when warpgate tech is reserched. But there is still the problem that 2base turtling into deathball would be even more rewarding... which is bad.
Hassybaby
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United Kingdom10823 Posts
January 05 2012 16:01 GMT
#37
On January 06 2012 00:55 midnight.tokyo wrote:
Rather then giving a straight buff to gateways or nerfing warpgates, why not give warpgate research the extra perk of reducing the build times of normal gateways?


I was thinking this. What if after you have warp gate research, standard gateway build-times go down as well? So you can reinforce quicker by getting units out of a gateway, or have the warp-in-anywhere mechanic of the warp gate?

Theorycrafting here. It would be HELL to balance, and the concept would probably be a bitch to implement. But possibly something to consider?
"These guys are mindfucking me into a sex coma" | "Mayonnaise is a must-have lubricant when performing necrophilia"
NtroP
Profile Joined July 2010
United States174 Posts
January 05 2012 16:01 GMT
#38
On January 06 2012 00:50 JOJOsc2news wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2012 00:48 iaguz wrote:
I think a better way of looking at it is that Blizzard would prefer it if the Protoss could build straight warpgates instead of dithering with warpgates at all. But obviously that would be crazy imbalanced so they put in this delay in the game before you can get warpgates.

Much like how you don't start with an Orbital Command or Pfort but you'd obviously want them instead of CC.


Exactly my point!
Very well put!


Except that there is a choice available in choosing orbital command or planetary fortress. With warpgates, you choose, warpgates, and in some strange situations, warpgates.

There is a big difference. One is interesting and useful, the other simply just busywork.
HaXXspetten
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Sweden15718 Posts
January 05 2012 16:03 GMT
#39
What about adding a lategame nexus research, let's say it requires templar archives or something, that decreases the production time by 5 seconds for all gateway units, but not the respective cooldown for warpgates. That way, with or without chronoboost, gateways would always have a slightly shorter production time and at least be an option. Still think that even so, warpgates would be superior in almost all scenarios, but it would be nice to give toss an option to use gateways in at least some sort of situation, because now they're totally useless after warpgate is researched, no matter what the circumstances are.
leandroqm
Profile Joined June 2008
Netherlands874 Posts
January 05 2012 16:03 GMT
#40
On January 06 2012 00:55 Kovaz wrote:
The problem with warpgates is that Protoss is balanced around having them, so any change in how they function would likely require drastic rebalancing, but we're too late in the development of Wing of Liberty for it to really be an option. Still, I think that PvP is proof enough that warpgates cause a lot of problems.

I'm not sure if I like the idea of making them produce more slowly, since that will just make people go for a 5-warpgate instead of a 4-warpgate and get the same production. Instead, what I'd like to see is something along the lines of an extra 25 mineral cost for units out of a warpgate. That way, it becomes a choice between cheap, delayed reinforcements, or expensive, immediate reinforcements. Also, this could be coupled with a slight buff to gateway units, which would make protoss feel more robust throughout the game, and that would facilitate nerfing/redesigning units like the colossus.


Then the problem would be the death ball being too strong
What are you tinkering about?
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 29m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 192
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 483
Dota 2
monkeys_forever386
capcasts170
League of Legends
Grubby4575
Counter-Strike
Fnx 2379
Stewie2K659
taco 421
flusha354
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King118
AZ_Axe84
Liquid`Ken31
Other Games
tarik_tv17683
summit1g10224
gofns8107
FrodaN1833
C9.Mang0175
ViBE64
Sick45
PPMD28
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 61
• musti20045 48
• poizon28 47
• davetesta19
• RyuSc2 14
• Adnapsc2 6
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 34
• FirePhoenix5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22488
League of Legends
• Doublelift3914
Other Games
• imaqtpie1141
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
11h 29m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
15h 29m
CSO Cup
17h 29m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
19h 29m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 10h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 15h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 19h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.