EPTCasey Anthony not guilty - Page 2
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
mewbert
United States291 Posts
| ||
|
Dimagus
United States1004 Posts
On July 06 2011 03:25 Eddog wrote: I can not BELIEVE that she got off on EVERY single murder and manslaughter charge. I am actually shocked. This is worse then OJ In what way is killing 1 person worse than killing 2 | ||
|
Zhou
United States832 Posts
| ||
|
Phenny
Australia1435 Posts
On July 06 2011 03:26 Mikilatov wrote: Not a very good OP, but I personally followed this trial WAYYYY closer than I should have... I watched about 80% of it, and I actually agree with the verdict. While she obviously knows something, and may have even done it, I don't feel there was sufficient evidence to prove she actually killed her kid, despite the fact that she's a lying bish. Exactly this, I'm not sure people understand how it's required to be proven beyond reasonable doubt. | ||
|
sanya
482 Posts
On July 06 2011 03:26 Modeath wrote: WAY DIFF oj killed his cheating skank of a wife. This woman Held a 3yo's head underwater, or Sufficated her till she drowned then dumped the body. both did it and got away with it , no ? not much difference then | ||
|
Eddog
United States142 Posts
On July 06 2011 03:27 Dimagus wrote: In what way is killing 1 person worse than killing 2 You missed my point | ||
|
Megakenny
Canada829 Posts
On a side note Nancy Grace is absolutely terrible. | ||
|
MozzarellaL
United States822 Posts
On July 06 2011 03:28 sanya wrote: both did it and got away with it , no ? not much difference then So in your ideal criminal court system, guilty until proven guilty eh? | ||
|
scur2d2
Canada104 Posts
On July 06 2011 03:26 Modeath wrote: WAY DIFF oj killed his cheating skank of a wife. This woman Held a 3yo's head underwater, or Sufficated her till she drowned then dumped the body. Apparently she did not do any of it. | ||
|
Gamegene
United States8308 Posts
This is not one of those times. | ||
|
Cush
United States646 Posts
| ||
|
Mikilatov
United States3897 Posts
On July 06 2011 03:27 Phenny wrote: Exactly this, I'm not sure people understand how it's required to be proven beyond reasonable doubt. Yeah, I'm not saying she didn't do it, but as far as the trial's actual content, there's definitely quite a lot of reasonable doubt that surfaced... But I wouldn't have found it too crazy if she got some other type of manslaughter charge, but definitely not murder 1 based upon the trial's content. | ||
|
Niton
United States2395 Posts
On July 06 2011 03:26 Mikilatov wrote: Not a very good OP, but I personally followed this trial WAYYYY closer than I should have... I watched about 80% of it, and I actually agree with the no Murder 1 verdict. I throught she'd get charged with something more though. While she obviously knows something, and may have even done it, I don't feel there was sufficient evidence to prove she actually intentionally killed her kid, despite the fact that she's a lying bish. This pretty much sums up my feelings as well. When I watched the closing statements, I heard the prosecutor say something to the effect of "Casey Anthony is a very good liar". If the prosecution's best evidence is that they think she's lying, you can't convict. If you're going to try someone on capital murder charges, "We think this is what happened, so that's why she's guilty" is not good enough. | ||
|
Dance.
United States389 Posts
| ||
|
Judicator
United States7270 Posts
On July 06 2011 03:23 Shiragaku wrote: No more content is needed. The fact that she is not guilty is enough to disgust you and laugh at. Johnnie Cochran has a new rival. JC is dead. Welcome to 2005. | ||
|
sanya
482 Posts
On July 06 2011 03:29 MozzarellaL wrote: So in your ideal criminal court system, guilty until proven guilty eh? guilty until proven guilty .... mind=blown | ||
|
EnWara
United States55 Posts
| ||
|
Zirith
Canada403 Posts
| ||
|
Killerkrack
664 Posts
| ||
|
mewbert
United States291 Posts
| ||
| ||
