On June 08 2011 17:06 BluzMan wrote: Geez, now these charlatans have come to TL. Kill it with fire!
That's his technology. Have you seen that before?
It's pretty rude to downplay something without investing time in it.
It is also pretty stupid to believe every charlatan who just happens to be good at promising stuff and who has a few pretty pictures to back up his theory. He said in the video "that is the kind of electricity I am making" and referred that to frictionless transmission (which costs a lot of energy). But if he is already making that energy, why doesnt he show something that works and moves? Maybe because it doesnt do what he claims? Trying to scam some funds out of a government for some hoax research is always a good idea if you arent good at real research.
The other incident with a big scientific breakthrough - the cold fusion of Pons and Fleischman from 1989 - didnt work out either, but they at least had tried to work within the scientific community to demonstrate an effect and have it replicated by others according to their specifications.
The first step is always being able to demonstrate and repeat something revolutionary and since he hasnt done it there seems to be little point in discussing it ...
Except I don't believe every charlatan. I actually believe his work can do good. That's the only reason why I brought it up.. it made sense to me. And it's sad that instead of taking this information with a grain of salt, or just plain watching the stuff for a long time to grasp most of it, instead it's being ridiculed.
A rudimentary Rodin coil ripping apart magnets, why does it rip them apart? Cause it creates a REAL STRONG MAGNETIC FIELD. Lol... some people can be so thick.
On June 08 2011 17:40 darmousseh wrote: Everything he says is rudimentary and not interesting. All he notices, like any young arithmatician is that there are repeating patterns in base 10.You could do the exact same thing with base 2. Also, I haven't seen a single mathematical statement. Seriously, how hard is it to find 1 PROOF or even 1 equation. The decimal system is a convenient system based on the # of digits we have on our 2 hands. You know he is a fake when he brings up things like "Ying Yang". The reason you can't DISPROVE anything he says is because he isn't saying anything controversial. Most of his findings are true, what's not true is his conclusion. Here's a trick. In base 2, all powers of 2 end in a 0!!!! I must have discovered the underpinnings of the universe!!!
This is definitely not thread worthy.
PS: Got a degree in mathematics.
If this is so obvious why aren't you working with millionaires and starting a new operating system / medical devices / etc?
By the way binary code isn't real. You are using 2/3rds of a trinary code. He goes into that too. That's why with binary code it's impossible to get TRUE A.I. Supposedly, it makes sense but that's too far in the deep end for me to understand.
On June 08 2011 17:39 Morteth wrote:some people can be so thick.
Yes. They can. And it's sad everytime I see it happen. You, along with all other gullible people, have my pity. Can someone close this please? It's bullshit. Next thing you know the believers will open homeopathy and dowsing threads.
On June 08 2011 17:31 Probe1 wrote: Proof that the government is actually interested. You know, like documents and stuff. Peer review has nothing to do with patents. You have nothing to do with physics. I, and the physics community would be insulted if only we cared.
This is by final word on this subject until peer review supports your/Rodins claims.
Actually this is my final word
FreeEnergylol
I can't stop. Please god close this topic I can't stop. I'm waiting for the GSL to come on and I'm bored.
You could just stay out of the thread, as trying to convince OP that this is worthless is a complete waste of time. It's fairly evident that he has a will that will not be broken by anything. Reminds me of that guy who got banned from moving his super-incoherent megaramble back after it was moved out of the blog section.
It's pretty rude to downplay something without investing time in it.
It is also pretty stupid to believe every charlatan who just happens to be good at promising stuff and who has a few pretty pictures to back up his theory. He said in the video "that is the kind of electricity I am making" and referred that to frictionless transmission (which costs a lot of energy). But if he is already making that energy, why doesnt he show something that works and moves? Maybe because it doesnt do what he claims? Trying to scam some funds out of a government for some hoax research is always a good idea if you arent good at real research.
The other incident with a big scientific breakthrough - the cold fusion of Pons and Fleischman from 1989 - didnt work out either, but they at least had tried to work within the scientific community to demonstrate an effect and have it replicated by others according to their specifications.
The first step is always being able to demonstrate and repeat something revolutionary and since he hasnt done it there seems to be little point in discussing it ...
Except I don't believe every charlatan. I actually believe his work can do good. That's the only reason why I brought it up.. it made sense to me. And it's sad that instead of taking this information with a grain of salt, or just plain watching the stuff for a long time to grasp most of it, instead it's being ridiculed.
A rudimentary Rodin coil ripping apart magnets, why does it rip them apart? Cause it creates a REAL STRONG MAGNETIC FIELD. Lol... some people can be so thick.
You say that it makes sense to you, but then you said earlier that you don't have the education necessary to understand it, but then you said in your first post that a 5th grader could understand it. Which is it?
Can I shield myself from these magic Base 10 time-space phenomenon by surrounding myself with electronics that run on a Base 2 number system? Or is the number 'zero' still a source of mystical energy in Base 2? What about hexadecimal?
On June 08 2011 17:40 darmousseh wrote: Everything he says is rudimentary and not interesting. All he notices, like any young arithmatician is that there are repeating patterns in base 10.You could do the exact same thing with base 2. Also, I haven't seen a single mathematical statement. Seriously, how hard is it to find 1 PROOF or even 1 equation. The decimal system is a convenient system based on the # of digits we have on our 2 hands. You know he is a fake when he brings up things like "Ying Yang". The reason you can't DISPROVE anything he says is because he isn't saying anything controversial. Most of his findings are true, what's not true is his conclusion. Here's a trick. In base 2, all powers of 2 end in a 0!!!! I must have discovered the underpinnings of the universe!!!
This is definitely not thread worthy.
PS: Got a degree in mathematics.
If this is so obvious why aren't you working with millionaires and starting a new operating system / medical devices / etc?
By the way binary code isn't real. You are using 2/3rds of a trinary code. He goes into that too. That's why with binary code it's impossible to get TRUE A.I. Supposedly, it makes sense but that's too far in the deep end for me to understand.
Oh my god you can't be serious. Do you even remotely understand how computers work?
EPT
![[image loading]](http://tesladownunder.com/TeslaRedAlert2Full1000.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.ppmsite.com/forum/files/tesla_coil_187.png)
![[image loading]](http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/einstein_hair.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y215/turky_ii/ii/top_15_08.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.d.com.com/i/dl/media/dlimage/62/05/6205_large.jpeg)
![[image loading]](http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/~kskeldon/PubSci/images/tesla1.gif)
![[image loading]](http://www.forceforgood.co.uk/screenshots/reda4.gif)
