EPTThis is by final word on this subject until peer review supports your/Rodins claims.
Actually this is my final word
FreeEnergylol
I can't stop. Please god close this topic I can't stop. I'm waiting for the GSL to come on and I'm bored.
Mathematical Breakthrough - Page 3
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
This is by final word on this subject until peer review supports your/Rodins claims. Actually this is my final word FreeEnergylol I can't stop. Please god close this topic I can't stop. I'm waiting for the GSL to come on and I'm bored. | ||
|
phyre112
United States3090 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:29 Morteth wrote: I'm not a troll. Fuck it's so difficult to get to people sometimes. The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want? How about actual proof that the government is interested in his work? | ||
|
rebuffering
Canada2436 Posts
| ||
|
Fontong
United States6454 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:29 Morteth wrote: I'm not a troll. Fuck it's so difficult to get to people sometimes. The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want? Proof that the government is interested in his work. | ||
|
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:29 Morteth wrote: I'm not a troll. Fuck it's so difficult to get to people sometimes. The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want? which government? soviet russia? | ||
|
VIB
Brazil3567 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:29 Morteth wrote: Yes, we want prove the government is interested in his work, other than you saying it is The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want?  Also, the government payed millions for a bomb detector that used dowsing for Iraq. So yea the government isn't really a good measure to compare to http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/8471187.stm | ||
|
Morteth
United States59 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:31 domovoi wrote: What the fuck does peer review have to do with patenting anything? You can't even patent mathematical concepts. He made a COIL that does NOT WASTE ENERGY. AKA whereas regular coils are INEFFICIENT, his coil is probably the most EFFICIENT coil on the planet. That is a device. Devices get patented. That same device is used by the U.S. Government to protect its borders. | ||
|
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:09 Morteth wrote: That's his technology. Have you seen that before? It's pretty rude to downplay something without investing time in it. It is also pretty stupid to believe every charlatan who just happens to be good at promising stuff and who has a few pretty pictures to back up his theory. He said in the video "that is the kind of electricity I am making" and referred that to frictionless transmission (which costs a lot of energy). But if he is already making that energy, why doesnt he show something that works and moves? Maybe because it doesnt do what he claims? Trying to scam some funds out of a government for some hoax research is always a good idea if you arent good at real research. The other incident with a big scientific breakthrough - the cold fusion of Pons and Fleischman from 1989 - didnt work out either, but they at least had tried to work within the scientific community to demonstrate an effect and have it replicated by others according to their specifications. The first step is always being able to demonstrate and repeat something revolutionary and since he hasnt done it there seems to be little point in discussing it ... | ||
|
Casta
Denmark234 Posts
Sometimes people invent or see connections between reality and mathematics because the beauty and simplicity of it looks divine, they become blinded and overly sure that their goal is correct because it is beautiful and keep trying in spite of data proving otherwise. | ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:33 Morteth wrote: He made a COIL that does NOT WASTE ENERGY. AKA whereas regular coils are INEFFICIENT, his coil is probably the most EFFICIENT coil on the planet. That is a device. Devices get patented. That same device is used by the U.S. Government to protect its borders. Lets see it. If he's not interested in patents, give us the specs and we'll all have infinite energy. Also, lets see any proof that ... uh... zero reduction energy coils are ... protecting United States borders. I'm sincerely ask you to stop making these threads until you have a shred of proof. Just a shred, not even an article published in Science. No, just one small way we can independently verify anything. | ||
|
Rayonnair
Singapore185 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:27 Morteth wrote: Incredible. It's amazing how you can give someone all the resources to discover things on their own and they won't do it. But they'll criticize something to no end. Anyway, I just thought it was really interesting considering how many times we've heard of Obama saying "we need to get free energy" and blah blah blah, this all just coincided with what we as a civilization need. And the funny part is, it's all TRUE. His mathematics can't be disproven. I don't know about the rest of the content on this guy because I haven't read it, so I can't comment. However, I can comment on "free energy". It's a myth. Conservation of energy does not allow for energy to be created or destroyed. | ||
|
Morteth
United States59 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:33 Rabiator wrote: It is also pretty stupid to believe every charlatan who just happens to be good at promising stuff and who has a few pretty pictures to back up his theory. He said in the video "that is the kind of electricity I am making" and referred that to frictionless transmission (which costs a lot of energy). But if he is already making that energy, why doesnt he show something that works and moves? Maybe because it doesnt do what he claims? Trying to scam some funds out of a government for some hoax research is always a good idea if you arent good at real research. The other incident with a big scientific breakthrough - the cold fusion of Pons and Fleischman from 1989 - didnt work out either, but they at least had tried to work within the scientific community to demonstrate an effect and have it replicated by others according to their specifications. The first step is always being able to demonstrate and repeat something revolutionary and since he hasnt done it there seems to be little point in discussing it ... Except I don't believe every charlatan. I actually believe his work can do good. That's the only reason why I brought it up.. it made sense to me. And it's sad that instead of taking this information with a grain of salt, or just plain watching the stuff for a long time to grasp most of it, instead it's being ridiculed. A rudimentary Rodin coil ripping apart magnets, why does it rip them apart? Cause it creates a REAL STRONG MAGNETIC FIELD. Lol... some people can be so thick. | ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
Proof or gtfo to use the pejorative of our times. Edit: I watched both videos you posted. Please stop using the argument that we're not watching. I took your OP with a grain of salt. Then I reviewed the material myself. If I claimed Napoleon was alive and dressed up a short person up and shot a video in my garage then put it on youtube then refused to let others see it, exactly what would you think? | ||
|
domovoi
United States1478 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:33 Morteth wrote: He made a COIL that does NOT WASTE ENERGY. AKA whereas regular coils are INEFFICIENT, his coil is probably the most EFFICIENT coil on the planet. That is a device. Devices get patented. I'm talking about his bullshit Vortex mathematics. But anyway, peer review still has nothing to do with patenting. What the fuck are you talking about. In fact, if he publicly disclosed the instructions to build such a coil to peer review, that would guarantee he wouldn't be able to patent it. So you've got it completely backwards. That same device is used by the U.S. Government to protect its borders. lolwut | ||
|
Morteth
United States59 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:31 Probe1 wrote: Proof that the government is actually interested. You know, like documents and stuff. Peer review has nothing to do with patents. You have nothing to do with physics. I, and the physics community would be insulted if only we cared. This is by final word on this subject until peer review supports your/Rodins claims. Actually this is my final word FreeEnergylol I can't stop. Please god close this topic I can't stop. I'm waiting for the GSL to come on and I'm bored. His work at "extraordinary technologies convention". | ||
|
Abductedonut
United States324 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:29 Morteth wrote: I'm not a troll. Fuck it's so difficult to get to people sometimes. The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want? Bro, take it easy, it's not your fault his work is poorly presented and nobody knows what the hell he's talking about. I watched half his videos and I still don't get what he's even remotely trying to get at. Sorry if this seems rude, but what's background in mathematics? Your "calculus" example wasn't very convincing because the idea of calculus isn't very difficult to understand. It's rates of change and areas under curves. | ||
|
darmousseh
United States3437 Posts
This is definitely not thread worthy. PS: Got a degree in mathematics. | ||
|
Morteth
United States59 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:31 Probe1 wrote: Proof that the government is actually interested. You know, like documents and stuff. Peer review has nothing to do with patents. You have nothing to do with physics. I, and the physics community would be insulted if only we cared. This is by final word on this subject until peer review supports your/Rodins claims. Actually this is my final word FreeEnergylol I can't stop. Please god close this topic I can't stop. I'm waiting for the GSL to come on and I'm bored. Yeah cause the government readily puts out all the information on their most advanced technology. Riiiight... | ||
|
Grend
1600 Posts
Listen to his claims, they are quite incredible, he claims that through something only he has been able to invent he can basically solve every problem in the world. Does not that sound kind of strange? That implies he is the smartest man alive, by far. Now combine that with the fact that he has previously claimed to have invented a perpetuum mobile machine, does that make sense? (This is not evidence to disprove his theory I know, but it is an argument for why you should be skeptical about his claims) Everyone would love if his theory was correct, and would start utilizing it if it was true and worked. He could probably become the richest man alive if this was true. So why does he not publish his findings in good journals? Why does he have to make Youtube videos to make his theory known? It does not make sense. Unless you believe in some kind of worldwide conspirancy of people not wanting free energy, instant teleportation and some more things he claims to be able to do. His mathemathics cannot be disproven? How can you claim something like that with no evidence to back it up? How can you be absolutely certain something cannot be disproven? | ||
|
Spidinko
Slovakia1174 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:33 Morteth wrote: He made a COIL that does NOT WASTE ENERGY. AKA whereas regular coils are INEFFICIENT, his coil is probably the most EFFICIENT coil on the planet. That is a device. Devices get patented. That same device is used by the U.S. Government to protect its borders. So he doesn't want to have it patented and that's why he doesn't release his research so other (more legitimate) scientists could study it and check if he's not full of crap? I mean I've just read through this thread and it smells like BS. When you want to read about things like that, try reading scientific journals. They may be harder to read sometimes or contain fewer promisis (free energy) but at least you know that someone's checked their work. | ||
| ||
