EPThttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review
If this crazy's work had any value he would publish it for peer review. He didn't because he knows he's full of crap.
Mathematical Breakthrough - Page 2
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
VIB
Brazil3567 Posts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review If this crazy's work had any value he would publish it for peer review. He didn't because he knows he's full of crap. | ||
|
lynx.oblige
Sierra Leone2268 Posts
| ||
|
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
 but you surely cannot take his word based on a handful of supporters. there are supporters for anything and everything, doesn't mean shit. opponents of global warming or even evolution can produce hundreds of credited and even well known scientists to sing for them...doesn't mean you should jump on their bandwagon. But in this case...Rodin is not even mentioned or even given a single thought because his ideas are just flat out wrong.edit: you should just stop trying to defend him or just erase this cuz it looks bad. | ||
|
Morteth
United States59 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:14 Probe1 wrote: TMCnet.com Technology Marketing Corporation. Please provide actual objective verification of anything he says in his video. You are yet to do anything but proport a load of amazing information with no actual reference. I'm just asking you to actually pay attention and watch a video or two or probably an hour or more of his information for an understanding... I can't understand the practical applications of Calculus without actually studying it. And most people who are un-educated in Calculus would likely consider the claims of Isaac Newton when he first created Calculus to be phony. I don't know man, sorry I guess? I gave you all the resources. You have to be un-biased and approach it all. There are countless educated individuals who are really interested in this. | ||
|
Caesarion
Australia8332 Posts
| ||
|
cynical
Canada589 Posts
| ||
|
Utkrossaren
Sweden39 Posts
| ||
|
Morteth
United States59 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:21 VIB wrote: Morteth look this up, it's really cool: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review If this crazy's work had any value he would publish it for peer review. He didn't because he knows he's full of crap. He's said it himself he won't patent anything, so it won't go into scientific review. Do you know what happened to Nicola Tesla? | ||
|
phyre112
United States3090 Posts
Someone off screen asks; "You can't really talk about it as linear, because that's referencing 3d" He answers: "It's your Z axis. You have your vertical axis, your horizontal axis, and then you have your Z axis, which is distinct from the surface topology of the logarithmic spiral." That's a transcription of about 45 seconds (maybe more maybe less, I wasn't really paying attention) of the video OP posted. Honestly, is this some kind of Joke? The man calls a number "energy" goes on to talk about how zero is a void, but is also the source of energy (for the name of god and the spin of the electron, no less) and then describes that same number as a "z-axis". Of something, I'm still not sure what. Honestly it looks like he fed a dictionary into a computer, used a randomizer to stick words together in a script, then recorded a youtube video with a picture of a funky spiral in the background to make it all look intelligent. This is ridiculous. I'd like to see your "largest military journal" that calls his system "revolutionary" | ||
|
zalz
Netherlands3704 Posts
But infinite energy would be the most revolutionairy concept in human history wich begs the question...if this guy was for real, why don't we have it yet? No peer reviews of his work pretty much makes him a fraud or atleast very likely to be one. People are eager to look past the overwhelming odds of him being a fraud because he promises something we want really badly. But if you stay realistic then you can't deny that this seems incredibly sketchy. | ||
|
Morteth
United States59 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:23 Utkrossaren wrote: Okay, this is a load of nonsense which doesn´t have any connection to real science whatsoever. Incredible. It's amazing how you can give someone all the resources to discover things on their own and they won't do it. But they'll criticize something to no end. Anyway, I just thought it was really interesting considering how many times we've heard of Obama saying "we need to get free energy" and blah blah blah, this all just coincided with what we as a civilization need. And the funny part is, it's all TRUE. His mathematics can't be disproven. | ||
|
dacthehork
United States2000 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:16 Hinanawi wrote: So Base 10 is a magical system with ties to the fabric of time and space, and not just something we decided on because we have 10 fingers? Yes we chose base 10 because it had magical properties determined by if the number ends in a 369 or 1245789 etc Ignore you can make a base anything greater than 2 system, luckily we picked the one that magically creates perpetual motion machines, that for some reason he hasn't been able to create in many years. OP see a shrink and get treated for schizophrenia / paranoia or whatever illness you have. | ||
|
Dagobert
Netherlands1858 Posts
| ||
|
VIB
Brazil3567 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:24 Morteth wrote: You didn't read it, plz read that link. It's really cool and can change your life:He's said it himself he won't patent anything, so it won't go into scientific review. Do you know what happened to Nicola Tesla? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review | ||
|
domovoi
United States1478 Posts
I'm just asking you to actually pay attention and watch a video or two or probably an hour or more of his information for an understanding... I can't understand the practical applications of Calculus without actually studying it. And most people who are un-educated in Calculus would likely consider the claims of Isaac Newton when he first created Calculus to be phony. Translation: Ignore the fact that he's spouting bullshit gibberish in his videos, you're much too dumb to understand his genius intellect. I don't know man, sorry I guess? I gave you all the resources. You have to be un-biased and approach it all. There are countless educated individuals who are really interested in this. Translation: There are so many people who have verified his work, I can't even link to any of them. | ||
|
Morteth
United States59 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:19 Probe1 wrote: Edit: I want the 10 minutes of my time and attention you wasted trying to convince you that this wasn't real; now realizing that you're a troll or you'd no less listen to reason than a person who will allow faith to be an unmovable final word on a subject. I want my time back. I'm not a troll. Fuck it's so difficult to get to people sometimes. The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want? | ||
|
hifriend
China7935 Posts
| ||
|
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:27 Morteth wrote: Incredible. It's amazing how you can give someone all the resources to discover things on their own and they won't do it. But they'll criticize something to no end. Anyway, I just thought it was really interesting considering how many times we've heard of Obama saying "we need to get free energy" and blah blah blah, this all just coincided with what we as a civilization need. And the funny part is, it's all TRUE. His mathematics can't be disproven. wait, you really believe in his theories? it even hurts me to say that his "ideas" are even theories, more like gibberish; but you honestly think that infinite energy is possible and his findings are a mathematical breakthrough? | ||
|
domovoi
United States1478 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:24 Morteth wrote: He's said it himself he won't patent anything, so it won't go into scientific review. Do you know what happened to Nicola Tesla? What the fuck does peer review have to do with patenting anything? You can't even patent mathematical concepts. | ||
|
dacthehork
United States2000 Posts
On June 08 2011 17:29 Morteth wrote: I'm not a troll. Fuck it's so difficult to get to people sometimes. The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want? An actual published paper ? | ||
| ||
