The largest U.S. military journal calls Rodin’s work “the most revolutionary propulsion system ever created for outer space”;
Link of an introduction and foundation for his work.
Conventional science and mathematics seems to have looked past some of these ideas, although many are recognizable and there is some synergy. But the totality of it all has never been encompassed into one form of Mathematics, which supposedly can be applied to Biology (brain and DNA), physics (cosmology and sub quantum physics), electrical apparatuses (antennae, coils, conductors, and much more. From the words of
Supporters of his work include and are not limited to the following;
• Russell P. Blake, Top scientist and senior research engineer at Microsoft, Microsoft Corporation (10/1/88-1/3/96) Senior Researcher, Advanced Technology (9/93-1/96). • Prof. Scot C. Nelson University of Hawaii Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences • Dennis Watts, Senior Engineer of Communications for NASA and leading engineer for Boeing Aerospace; • Dr. Jonas Salk, offered to be Rodin’s personal physician and told him his work was so advanced he’d never complete it in his lifetime unless he cloned himself; • Dr, Hans Nieper, world renowned cancer doctor, German Society of Oncology and former physician to President Reagan, invited Rodin to submit a paper to the prestigious medical journal he is president of because he believed in Rodin’s work; • Christine Jackson, editor of “Explore More”, the most cutting edge medical journal in the U.S.; • Keith Watson, in charge of the Bikini Atoll nuclear testing research project for the U.S. government, believes in Rodin’s work and introduced Rodin before his presentation on power and propulsion systems at the Air Space America convention in 1988; • James Martin, the editor of Defense Science Magazine - the largest U.S. military journal calls Rodin’s work “the most revolutionary propulsion system ever created for outer space”; • Sal Rosenthal, inventor and patent holder of the tuberculosis test, regularly invited Rodin to participate in his California think tanks; • Tom Bearden, an alternative energy expert considered one of the world’s foremost experts in zero point energy says Rodin has “accomplished what he has been advocating for over 20 years and should continue his work”; • Oscar Hu, the astrophysicist at NASA who successfully recovered the Probe when it was lost going into the magnetic field of Neptune, has written papers on how Rodin Torus Coils can be used to create an artificial man-made black hole and an electrical wheatstone bridge that creates a gravity well on a laboratory bench top; • Jean Louis Naudin, the foremost international expert in vertical lift space and aircraft, uses Rodin’s work as proof that the B-Field Torsion Effect is real; • Maury King, author of “Zero Point Energy”; • Robert Emmerich, head of the Materials Testing Department at Hewlett Packard, tested the Rodin Torus Coil and concluded it had more than 60% greater output than anything presently existing or being used in antennas.
And all of his mathematics can be done by a 5th grader, according to him and proven time and time again once you actually peer into his works in detail.
The basis of his Mathematics is that the Base 10 system of numbers is actually two systems of numbers, 124578 are one system that are tethered and have an intricate relationship with electricity, while 3 6 and 9 are another system with separate traits to the other numbers, yet are tethered into the Base 10 system as well.
He also explains that 0 has no value, and is a void number. Essentially, he discovered that numbers aren't just arbitrary but are actually "alive" and serve their own distinct purpose, because each individual number from 1 to 9 have their own divisible set and other characteristics.
I'm probably HORRIBLY explaining this but it's extremely neat! o.O Dunno if this will ever prove to be useful, although his invention, the Rodin Coil has been proven to be the most efficient antenna by the military.
This is something I got from the website in regards to data compression, although I can't even grasp my mind around it, "Rodin enables the condensing of a trillion-fold calculation to only a few integer steps."
On June 08 2011 16:57 bartus88 wrote: So what exactly is the point of this thread? To discuss something that claims to be groundbreaking but doesn't have a lot of support yet?
I never heard of this guy before, but the video and his site seemed interesting. He makes an interesting statement on his site:
[Rodin] has discovered the underpinning geometry of the universe, the fabric of time itself.
That's a pretty big thing to say. I'm not buying it, if this guy is right, everyone would have known about him already.
I just found it and thought it was pretty interesting. I mean I've gone about 10 videos in on the first part which is only about 25 minutes and it's really tying in together. I mean I never thought all these connections existed... I have no clue why we haven't been taught this already. It's freakin' 2011.
I'm starting to think this guy is like the next Tesla or something, and I really don't mean to blow his image up or something but just give his work about an hour and see how it all CONNECTS. To everything really. It's just exciting to me, that's all.
Please don't post in this thread. It is unverified, undocumented, non peer reviewed and no amount of your effort to repeat what has already been said in another prior thread and this one, will change the outcome. Save yourself time.
by Marko Rodin
Marko Rodin has come up with a revolutionary system of mathematics involving whole numbers, toroidal constructs and spirituality which proposes to explain life, the universe and everything
The highest search result that was not directly linked to Marko Rodin
How much of it would one have to watch before you'd want a comment. Because I couldn't get past the 2 minute mark before my first major eye-roll (to be honest I had several minor eye-rolling incidents before that) which made me hit the close window button.
Anytime anyone "proclaims" themselves as "revolutionary" and knowing something that nobody else knows then they're called a CRANK. This guy qualifies.
Can you please give some independent and unbias'd links instead of just listing a large polling of people, half of whom would have bias?
Edit: An in depth look through google resulted in: a handful of sites directly linked to Marko Rodin and all other relevant sites calling him a crackpot.
There are no news items on Marko Rodin. There is no wikipedia. The only scientists opinions that I've found call him a bad joke at best.
You are the only source of this information, aside from Marko Rodin himself.
Please provide objective evidence or edit your OP to disclose the highly subjective source of all of your information.
Marko Rodin has come up with a revolutionary system of mathematics involving whole numbers, toroidal constructs and spirituality which proposes to explain life, the universe and everything
The highest search result that was not directly linked to Marko Rodin
How much of it would one have to watch before you'd want a comment. Because I couldn't get past the 2 minute mark before my first major eye-roll (to be honest I had several minor eye-rolling incidents before that) which made me hit the close window button.
Anytime anyone "proclaims" themselves as "revolutionary" and knowing something that nobody else knows then they're called a CRANK. This guy qualifies.
Can you please give some independent and unbias'd links instead of just listing a large polling of people, half of whom would have bias?
Well why would millionaires and people from the highest positions in their careers totally diverge and invest the rest of their lives to have this Math proliferate? The best explanation would be to give it some time and watch it. Of course, you can't understand the depth of things with 2 minutes of time. Although I understand, I would of not believed in this prior to seeing some of this. And I STILL don't think all of it can be possible! It's just mind-boggling.
Marko Rodin has come up with a revolutionary system of mathematics involving whole numbers, toroidal constructs and spirituality which proposes to explain life, the universe and everything
The highest search result that was not directly linked to Marko Rodin
How much of it would one have to watch before you'd want a comment. Because I couldn't get past the 2 minute mark before my first major eye-roll (to be honest I had several minor eye-rolling incidents before that) which made me hit the close window button.
Anytime anyone "proclaims" themselves as "revolutionary" and knowing something that nobody else knows then they're called a CRANK. This guy qualifies.
Can you please give some independent and unbias'd links instead of just listing a large polling of people, half of whom would have bias?
Edit: An in depth look through google resulted in: a handful of sites directly linked to Marko Rodin and all other relevant sites calling him a crackpot.
There are no news items on Marko Rodin. There is no wikipedia. The only scientists opinions that I've found call him a bad joke at best.
You are the only source of this information, aside from Marko Rodin himself.
Please provide objective evidence or edit your OP to disclose the highly subjective source of all of your information.
Honestly, watching his videos just gets me confused. His biggest problem is that he explains things too complexly, like you have no choice to believe him because you don't know what the hell he's talking about.
I don't consider myself mathematically inept, I mean, I've taken up to Diff eq. and some discrete math stuff, and I'm familiar with a lot of the things he's talking about, but I really just can't put all of his work together to follow what he's talking about.
The first video especially was completely confusing.
I think he needs to explain things more clearly for me to be interested.
I felt like i read this thread already http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=230721#10 Oh wait, you did remake the thread, though you are not claiming free energy this time.... Why are you so obsessed with this op? There needs to be a MAJOR peer reviewed article over this. Then again, all this groundbreaking happened in what? Your video states 2008?
It's pretty rude to downplay something without investing time in it.
Uhh, yeah that's cool, but really not unexpected or anything. How is that a mathematical breakthrough?
Marko Rodin claims infinite free energy, so he might as well be screaming "I'm a fraud."
I mean I don't know, it's not every day military magazines and doctors around the world appreciate someone's work so highly. This explains why his "free energy" devices work.
This is a video of someone levitating a Rodin Coil, although it's not much he is using household resources for this.
KwarK, the mighty watchman who will free us from stupidity, said,
Closing this in the name of physics. Bring me peer reviewed articles in scientific journals, not youtube videos.
Edit: I want the 10 minutes of my time and attention you wasted trying to convince you that this wasn't real; now realizing that you're a troll or you'd no less listen to reason than a person who will allow faith to be an unmovable final word on a subject.
All I see is an unverified list of people who may or may not think this guy is smart, none of whom I have heard of or have any reason to believe. And then a bunch of bullshit about revolutionizing math and finding that numbers are alive.
How about instead of linking to his videos, you explain his breakthrough, since apparently a 5th grader can easily understand it.
im sorry but you do realize that rodin is a running joke? sorry his stuff is misinformation. i mean it's cool that SOME people support him but you surely cannot take his word based on a handful of supporters. there are supporters for anything and everything, doesn't mean shit. opponents of global warming or even evolution can produce hundreds of credited and even well known scientists to sing for them...doesn't mean you should jump on their bandwagon. But in this case...Rodin is not even mentioned or even given a single thought because his ideas are just flat out wrong.
edit: you should just stop trying to defend him or just erase this cuz it looks bad.
On June 08 2011 17:14 Probe1 wrote: TMCnet.com Technology Marketing Corporation. Please provide actual objective verification of anything he says in his video.
You are yet to do anything but proport a load of amazing information with no actual reference.
I'm just asking you to actually pay attention and watch a video or two or probably an hour or more of his information for an understanding... I can't understand the practical applications of Calculus without actually studying it. And most people who are un-educated in Calculus would likely consider the claims of Isaac Newton when he first created Calculus to be phony. I don't know man, sorry I guess? I gave you all the resources. You have to be un-biased and approach it all. There are countless educated individuals who are really interested in this.
"The whole topic today is about the number 9. Now number nine is a but a big mystique in everything we know; cloud 9, love potion #9, umm, the most great name of God equals number nine - in bahai scriptures baha is the equation for it, 2151; we'll come to that. to answer your question specifically about this energy, this energy is the only thing that comes from the hole - from Zero, the vortex. It goes linearly in all directions, nothing can resist it, nothing can resist it. It penetrates everything, it penetrates everything and leaves it's reticulation pattern. It leaves a grain. It animates everything. It is the source of the non-decaying spin of the electron. You take this energy away, and the universe will become a destitute void."
Someone off screen asks; "You can't really talk about it as linear, because that's referencing 3d"
He answers: "It's your Z axis. You have your vertical axis, your horizontal axis, and then you have your Z axis, which is distinct from the surface topology of the logarithmic spiral."
That's a transcription of about 45 seconds (maybe more maybe less, I wasn't really paying attention) of the video OP posted. Honestly, is this some kind of Joke? The man calls a number "energy" goes on to talk about how zero is a void, but is also the source of energy (for the name of god and the spin of the electron, no less) and then describes that same number as a "z-axis". Of something, I'm still not sure what. Honestly it looks like he fed a dictionary into a computer, used a randomizer to stick words together in a script, then recorded a youtube video with a picture of a funky spiral in the background to make it all look intelligent. This is ridiculous.
I'd like to see your "largest military journal" that calls his system "revolutionary"
Not exactly my field wich makes it somewhat hard to poke through his words and judge wether it makes any sense or is just gibberish made to sound plausible.
But infinite energy would be the most revolutionairy concept in human history wich begs the question...if this guy was for real, why don't we have it yet?
No peer reviews of his work pretty much makes him a fraud or atleast very likely to be one. People are eager to look past the overwhelming odds of him being a fraud because he promises something we want really badly. But if you stay realistic then you can't deny that this seems incredibly sketchy.
On June 08 2011 17:23 Utkrossaren wrote: Okay, this is a load of nonsense which doesn´t have any connection to real science whatsoever.
Incredible. It's amazing how you can give someone all the resources to discover things on their own and they won't do it. But they'll criticize something to no end.
Anyway, I just thought it was really interesting considering how many times we've heard of Obama saying "we need to get free energy" and blah blah blah, this all just coincided with what we as a civilization need. And the funny part is, it's all TRUE. His mathematics can't be disproven.
On June 08 2011 17:16 Hinanawi wrote: So Base 10 is a magical system with ties to the fabric of time and space, and not just something we decided on because we have 10 fingers?
Yes we chose base 10 because it had magical properties determined by if the number ends in a 369 or 1245789 etc
Ignore you can make a base anything greater than 2 system, luckily we picked the one that magically creates perpetual motion machines, that for some reason he hasn't been able to create in many years.
OP see a shrink and get treated for schizophrenia / paranoia or whatever illness you have.
I'm just asking you to actually pay attention and watch a video or two or probably an hour or more of his information for an understanding... I can't understand the practical applications of Calculus without actually studying it. And most people who are un-educated in Calculus would likely consider the claims of Isaac Newton when he first created Calculus to be phony.
Translation: Ignore the fact that he's spouting bullshit gibberish in his videos, you're much too dumb to understand his genius intellect.
I don't know man, sorry I guess? I gave you all the resources. You have to be un-biased and approach it all. There are countless educated individuals who are really interested in this.
Translation: There are so many people who have verified his work, I can't even link to any of them.
KwarK, the mighty watchman who will free us from stupidity, said,
Closing this in the name of physics. Bring me peer reviewed articles in scientific journals, not youtube videos.
Edit: I want the 10 minutes of my time and attention you wasted trying to convince you that this wasn't real; now realizing that you're a troll or you'd no less listen to reason than a person who will allow faith to be an unmovable final word on a subject.
I want my time back.
I'm not a troll. Fuck it's so difficult to get to people sometimes.
The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want?
On June 08 2011 17:23 Utkrossaren wrote: Okay, this is a load of nonsense which doesn´t have any connection to real science whatsoever.
Incredible. It's amazing how you can give someone all the resources to discover things on their own and they won't do it. But they'll criticize something to no end.
Anyway, I just thought it was really interesting considering how many times we've heard of Obama saying "we need to get free energy" and blah blah blah, this all just coincided with what we as a civilization need. And the funny part is, it's all TRUE. His mathematics can't be disproven.
wait, you really believe in his theories? it even hurts me to say that his "ideas" are even theories, more like gibberish; but you honestly think that infinite energy is possible and his findings are a mathematical breakthrough?
KwarK, the mighty watchman who will free us from stupidity, said,
Closing this in the name of physics. Bring me peer reviewed articles in scientific journals, not youtube videos.
Edit: I want the 10 minutes of my time and attention you wasted trying to convince you that this wasn't real; now realizing that you're a troll or you'd no less listen to reason than a person who will allow faith to be an unmovable final word on a subject.
I want my time back.
I'm not a troll. Fuck it's so difficult to get to people sometimes.
The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want?
Proof that the government is actually interested. You know, like documents and stuff. Peer review has nothing to do with patents. You have nothing to do with physics. I, and the physics community would be insulted if only we cared.
This is by final word on this subject until peer review supports your/Rodins claims.
Actually this is my final word
FreeEnergylol
I can't stop. Please god close this topic I can't stop. I'm waiting for the GSL to come on and I'm bored.
KwarK, the mighty watchman who will free us from stupidity, said,
Closing this in the name of physics. Bring me peer reviewed articles in scientific journals, not youtube videos.
Edit: I want the 10 minutes of my time and attention you wasted trying to convince you that this wasn't real; now realizing that you're a troll or you'd no less listen to reason than a person who will allow faith to be an unmovable final word on a subject.
I want my time back.
I'm not a troll. Fuck it's so difficult to get to people sometimes.
The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want?
How about actual proof that the government is interested in his work?
so funny how the smart people get called crackpots. i am very interested now, thanks for bringing this up, unlike some, i have an open mind, and will give this some looking over.
KwarK, the mighty watchman who will free us from stupidity, said,
Closing this in the name of physics. Bring me peer reviewed articles in scientific journals, not youtube videos.
Edit: I want the 10 minutes of my time and attention you wasted trying to convince you that this wasn't real; now realizing that you're a troll or you'd no less listen to reason than a person who will allow faith to be an unmovable final word on a subject.
I want my time back.
I'm not a troll. Fuck it's so difficult to get to people sometimes.
The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want?
Proof that the government is interested in his work.
KwarK, the mighty watchman who will free us from stupidity, said,
Closing this in the name of physics. Bring me peer reviewed articles in scientific journals, not youtube videos.
Edit: I want the 10 minutes of my time and attention you wasted trying to convince you that this wasn't real; now realizing that you're a troll or you'd no less listen to reason than a person who will allow faith to be an unmovable final word on a subject.
I want my time back.
I'm not a troll. Fuck it's so difficult to get to people sometimes.
The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want?
KwarK, the mighty watchman who will free us from stupidity, said,
Closing this in the name of physics. Bring me peer reviewed articles in scientific journals, not youtube videos.
Edit: I want the 10 minutes of my time and attention you wasted trying to convince you that this wasn't real; now realizing that you're a troll or you'd no less listen to reason than a person who will allow faith to be an unmovable final word on a subject.
I want my time back.
The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want?
Yes, we want prove the government is interested in his work, other than you saying it is
If this crazy's work had any value he would publish it for peer review. He didn't because he knows he's full of crap.
He's said it himself he won't patent anything, so it won't go into scientific review. Do you know what happened to Nicola Tesla?
What the fuck does peer review have to do with patenting anything? You can't even patent mathematical concepts.
He made a COIL that does NOT WASTE ENERGY. AKA whereas regular coils are INEFFICIENT, his coil is probably the most EFFICIENT coil on the planet. That is a device. Devices get patented.
That same device is used by the U.S. Government to protect its borders.
It's pretty rude to downplay something without investing time in it.
It is also pretty stupid to believe every charlatan who just happens to be good at promising stuff and who has a few pretty pictures to back up his theory. He said in the video "that is the kind of electricity I am making" and referred that to frictionless transmission (which costs a lot of energy). But if he is already making that energy, why doesnt he show something that works and moves? Maybe because it doesnt do what he claims? Trying to scam some funds out of a government for some hoax research is always a good idea if you arent good at real research.
The other incident with a big scientific breakthrough - the cold fusion of Pons and Fleischman from 1989 - didnt work out either, but they at least had tried to work within the scientific community to demonstrate an effect and have it replicated by others according to their specifications.
The first step is always being able to demonstrate and repeat something revolutionary and since he hasnt done it there seems to be little point in discussing it ...
This is pretty hard to take seriously, he has some pretty big claims with very little actual proof.
Sometimes people invent or see connections between reality and mathematics because the beauty and simplicity of it looks divine, they become blinded and overly sure that their goal is correct because it is beautiful and keep trying in spite of data proving otherwise.
On June 08 2011 17:33 Morteth wrote: He made a COIL that does NOT WASTE ENERGY. AKA whereas regular coils are INEFFICIENT, his coil is probably the most EFFICIENT coil on the planet. That is a device. Devices get patented.
That same device is used by the U.S. Government to protect its borders.
Lets see it. If he's not interested in patents, give us the specs and we'll all have infinite energy.
Also, lets see any proof that ... uh... zero reduction energy coils are ... protecting United States borders.
I'm sincerely ask you to stop making these threads until you have a shred of proof. Just a shred, not even an article published in Science. No, just one small way we can independently verify anything.
On June 08 2011 17:23 Utkrossaren wrote: Okay, this is a load of nonsense which doesn´t have any connection to real science whatsoever.
Incredible. It's amazing how you can give someone all the resources to discover things on their own and they won't do it. But they'll criticize something to no end.
Anyway, I just thought it was really interesting considering how many times we've heard of Obama saying "we need to get free energy" and blah blah blah, this all just coincided with what we as a civilization need. And the funny part is, it's all TRUE. His mathematics can't be disproven.
I don't know about the rest of the content on this guy because I haven't read it, so I can't comment. However, I can comment on "free energy". It's a myth. Conservation of energy does not allow for energy to be created or destroyed.
It's pretty rude to downplay something without investing time in it.
It is also pretty stupid to believe every charlatan who just happens to be good at promising stuff and who has a few pretty pictures to back up his theory. He said in the video "that is the kind of electricity I am making" and referred that to frictionless transmission (which costs a lot of energy). But if he is already making that energy, why doesnt he show something that works and moves? Maybe because it doesnt do what he claims? Trying to scam some funds out of a government for some hoax research is always a good idea if you arent good at real research.
The other incident with a big scientific breakthrough - the cold fusion of Pons and Fleischman from 1989 - didnt work out either, but they at least had tried to work within the scientific community to demonstrate an effect and have it replicated by others according to their specifications.
The first step is always being able to demonstrate and repeat something revolutionary and since he hasnt done it there seems to be little point in discussing it ...
Except I don't believe every charlatan. I actually believe his work can do good. That's the only reason why I brought it up.. it made sense to me. And it's sad that instead of taking this information with a grain of salt, or just plain watching the stuff for a long time to grasp most of it, instead it's being ridiculed.
A rudimentary Rodin coil ripping apart magnets, why does it rip them apart? Cause it creates a REAL STRONG MAGNETIC FIELD. Lol... some people can be so thick.
This is the thing. We did watch the videos, or at least I did and the people in your last thread and the other forum threads and a quick google search results in. No, we didn't watch all 10 hours. We did however commit time and interest and found it to be merely unverified claims and in so many words, bunk.
Proof or gtfo to use the pejorative of our times.
Edit: I watched both videos you posted. Please stop using the argument that we're not watching. I took your OP with a grain of salt. Then I reviewed the material myself. If I claimed Napoleon was alive and dressed up a short person up and shot a video in my garage then put it on youtube then refused to let others see it, exactly what would you think?
On June 08 2011 17:33 Morteth wrote: He made a COIL that does NOT WASTE ENERGY. AKA whereas regular coils are INEFFICIENT, his coil is probably the most EFFICIENT coil on the planet. That is a device. Devices get patented.
I'm talking about his bullshit Vortex mathematics.
But anyway, peer review still has nothing to do with patenting. What the fuck are you talking about. In fact, if he publicly disclosed the instructions to build such a coil to peer review, that would guarantee he wouldn't be able to patent it. So you've got it completely backwards.
That same device is used by the U.S. Government to protect its borders.
On June 08 2011 17:31 Probe1 wrote: Proof that the government is actually interested. You know, like documents and stuff. Peer review has nothing to do with patents. You have nothing to do with physics. I, and the physics community would be insulted if only we cared.
This is by final word on this subject until peer review supports your/Rodins claims.
Actually this is my final word
FreeEnergylol
I can't stop. Please god close this topic I can't stop. I'm waiting for the GSL to come on and I'm bored.
His work at "extraordinary technologies convention".
I'm not a troll. Fuck it's so difficult to get to people sometimes.
The government is INTERESTED in his WORK. What more proof do you want?
Bro, take it easy, it's not your fault his work is poorly presented and nobody knows what the hell he's talking about.
I watched half his videos and I still don't get what he's even remotely trying to get at.
Sorry if this seems rude, but what's background in mathematics? Your "calculus" example wasn't very convincing because the idea of calculus isn't very difficult to understand. It's rates of change and areas under curves.
Everything he says is rudimentary and not interesting. All he notices, like any young arithmatician is that there are repeating patterns in base 10.You could do the exact same thing with base 2. Also, I haven't seen a single mathematical statement. Seriously, how hard is it to find 1 PROOF or even 1 equation. The decimal system is a convenient system based on the # of digits we have on our 2 hands. You know he is a fake when he brings up things like "Ying Yang". The reason you can't DISPROVE anything he says is because he isn't saying anything controversial. Most of his findings are true, what's not true is his conclusion. Here's a trick. In base 2, all powers of 2 end in a 0!!!! I must have discovered the underpinnings of the universe!!!
On June 08 2011 17:31 Probe1 wrote: Proof that the government is actually interested. You know, like documents and stuff. Peer review has nothing to do with patents. You have nothing to do with physics. I, and the physics community would be insulted if only we cared.
This is by final word on this subject until peer review supports your/Rodins claims.
Actually this is my final word
FreeEnergylol
I can't stop. Please god close this topic I can't stop. I'm waiting for the GSL to come on and I'm bored.
Yeah cause the government readily puts out all the information on their most advanced technology. Riiiight...
Show me the actual military journal, show me the actual quotes from known and respected phycisists within this field, show me that his work has been published in a peer reviewed journal. A youtube video claiming something does not replace the scientific method or actual evidence.
Listen to his claims, they are quite incredible, he claims that through something only he has been able to invent he can basically solve every problem in the world. Does not that sound kind of strange? That implies he is the smartest man alive, by far. Now combine that with the fact that he has previously claimed to have invented a perpetuum mobile machine, does that make sense? (This is not evidence to disprove his theory I know, but it is an argument for why you should be skeptical about his claims)
Everyone would love if his theory was correct, and would start utilizing it if it was true and worked. He could probably become the richest man alive if this was true. So why does he not publish his findings in good journals? Why does he have to make Youtube videos to make his theory known? It does not make sense. Unless you believe in some kind of worldwide conspirancy of people not wanting free energy, instant teleportation and some more things he claims to be able to do.
His mathemathics cannot be disproven? How can you claim something like that with no evidence to back it up? How can you be absolutely certain something cannot be disproven?
If this crazy's work had any value he would publish it for peer review. He didn't because he knows he's full of crap.
He's said it himself he won't patent anything, so it won't go into scientific review. Do you know what happened to Nicola Tesla?
What the fuck does peer review have to do with patenting anything? You can't even patent mathematical concepts.
He made a COIL that does NOT WASTE ENERGY. AKA whereas regular coils are INEFFICIENT, his coil is probably the most EFFICIENT coil on the planet. That is a device. Devices get patented.
That same device is used by the U.S. Government to protect its borders.
So he doesn't want to have it patented and that's why he doesn't release his research so other (more legitimate) scientists could study it and check if he's not full of crap? I mean I've just read through this thread and it smells like BS. When you want to read about things like that, try reading scientific journals. They may be harder to read sometimes or contain fewer promisis (free energy) but at least you know that someone's checked their work.
It's pretty rude to downplay something without investing time in it.
It is also pretty stupid to believe every charlatan who just happens to be good at promising stuff and who has a few pretty pictures to back up his theory. He said in the video "that is the kind of electricity I am making" and referred that to frictionless transmission (which costs a lot of energy). But if he is already making that energy, why doesnt he show something that works and moves? Maybe because it doesnt do what he claims? Trying to scam some funds out of a government for some hoax research is always a good idea if you arent good at real research.
The other incident with a big scientific breakthrough - the cold fusion of Pons and Fleischman from 1989 - didnt work out either, but they at least had tried to work within the scientific community to demonstrate an effect and have it replicated by others according to their specifications.
The first step is always being able to demonstrate and repeat something revolutionary and since he hasnt done it there seems to be little point in discussing it ...
Except I don't believe every charlatan. I actually believe his work can do good. That's the only reason why I brought it up.. it made sense to me. And it's sad that instead of taking this information with a grain of salt, or just plain watching the stuff for a long time to grasp most of it, instead it's being ridiculed.
A rudimentary Rodin coil ripping apart magnets, why does it rip them apart? Cause it creates a REAL STRONG MAGNETIC FIELD. Lol... some people can be so thick.
On June 08 2011 17:40 darmousseh wrote: Everything he says is rudimentary and not interesting. All he notices, like any young arithmatician is that there are repeating patterns in base 10.You could do the exact same thing with base 2. Also, I haven't seen a single mathematical statement. Seriously, how hard is it to find 1 PROOF or even 1 equation. The decimal system is a convenient system based on the # of digits we have on our 2 hands. You know he is a fake when he brings up things like "Ying Yang". The reason you can't DISPROVE anything he says is because he isn't saying anything controversial. Most of his findings are true, what's not true is his conclusion. Here's a trick. In base 2, all powers of 2 end in a 0!!!! I must have discovered the underpinnings of the universe!!!
This is definitely not thread worthy.
PS: Got a degree in mathematics.
If this is so obvious why aren't you working with millionaires and starting a new operating system / medical devices / etc?
By the way binary code isn't real. You are using 2/3rds of a trinary code. He goes into that too. That's why with binary code it's impossible to get TRUE A.I. Supposedly, it makes sense but that's too far in the deep end for me to understand.
On June 08 2011 17:39 Morteth wrote:some people can be so thick.
Yes. They can. And it's sad everytime I see it happen. You, along with all other gullible people, have my pity. Can someone close this please? It's bullshit. Next thing you know the believers will open homeopathy and dowsing threads.
On June 08 2011 17:31 Probe1 wrote: Proof that the government is actually interested. You know, like documents and stuff. Peer review has nothing to do with patents. You have nothing to do with physics. I, and the physics community would be insulted if only we cared.
This is by final word on this subject until peer review supports your/Rodins claims.
Actually this is my final word
FreeEnergylol
I can't stop. Please god close this topic I can't stop. I'm waiting for the GSL to come on and I'm bored.
You could just stay out of the thread, as trying to convince OP that this is worthless is a complete waste of time. It's fairly evident that he has a will that will not be broken by anything. Reminds me of that guy who got banned from moving his super-incoherent megaramble back after it was moved out of the blog section.
It's pretty rude to downplay something without investing time in it.
It is also pretty stupid to believe every charlatan who just happens to be good at promising stuff and who has a few pretty pictures to back up his theory. He said in the video "that is the kind of electricity I am making" and referred that to frictionless transmission (which costs a lot of energy). But if he is already making that energy, why doesnt he show something that works and moves? Maybe because it doesnt do what he claims? Trying to scam some funds out of a government for some hoax research is always a good idea if you arent good at real research.
The other incident with a big scientific breakthrough - the cold fusion of Pons and Fleischman from 1989 - didnt work out either, but they at least had tried to work within the scientific community to demonstrate an effect and have it replicated by others according to their specifications.
The first step is always being able to demonstrate and repeat something revolutionary and since he hasnt done it there seems to be little point in discussing it ...
Except I don't believe every charlatan. I actually believe his work can do good. That's the only reason why I brought it up.. it made sense to me. And it's sad that instead of taking this information with a grain of salt, or just plain watching the stuff for a long time to grasp most of it, instead it's being ridiculed.
A rudimentary Rodin coil ripping apart magnets, why does it rip them apart? Cause it creates a REAL STRONG MAGNETIC FIELD. Lol... some people can be so thick.
You say that it makes sense to you, but then you said earlier that you don't have the education necessary to understand it, but then you said in your first post that a 5th grader could understand it. Which is it?
Can I shield myself from these magic Base 10 time-space phenomenon by surrounding myself with electronics that run on a Base 2 number system? Or is the number 'zero' still a source of mystical energy in Base 2? What about hexadecimal?
On June 08 2011 17:40 darmousseh wrote: Everything he says is rudimentary and not interesting. All he notices, like any young arithmatician is that there are repeating patterns in base 10.You could do the exact same thing with base 2. Also, I haven't seen a single mathematical statement. Seriously, how hard is it to find 1 PROOF or even 1 equation. The decimal system is a convenient system based on the # of digits we have on our 2 hands. You know he is a fake when he brings up things like "Ying Yang". The reason you can't DISPROVE anything he says is because he isn't saying anything controversial. Most of his findings are true, what's not true is his conclusion. Here's a trick. In base 2, all powers of 2 end in a 0!!!! I must have discovered the underpinnings of the universe!!!
This is definitely not thread worthy.
PS: Got a degree in mathematics.
If this is so obvious why aren't you working with millionaires and starting a new operating system / medical devices / etc?
By the way binary code isn't real. You are using 2/3rds of a trinary code. He goes into that too. That's why with binary code it's impossible to get TRUE A.I. Supposedly, it makes sense but that's too far in the deep end for me to understand.
Oh my god you can't be serious. Do you even remotely understand how computers work?
EPT
but you surely cannot take his word based on a handful of supporters. there are supporters for anything and everything, doesn't mean shit. opponents of global warming or even evolution can produce hundreds of credited and even well known scientists to sing for them...doesn't mean you should jump on their bandwagon. But in this case...Rodin is not even mentioned or even given a single thought because his ideas are just flat out wrong.
![[image loading]](http://tesladownunder.com/TeslaRedAlert2Full1000.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.ppmsite.com/forum/files/tesla_coil_187.png)
![[image loading]](http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/einstein_hair.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y215/turky_ii/ii/top_15_08.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.d.com.com/i/dl/media/dlimage/62/05/6205_large.jpeg)
![[image loading]](http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/~kskeldon/PubSci/images/tesla1.gif)
![[image loading]](http://www.forceforgood.co.uk/screenshots/reda4.gif)
