EPTthere needs to be a BM handbook or something because if drawing a pylon heart is bad mannered you girls need to grow some thicker skin
[SGL] RooT vs NrG. (Drama) - Page 4
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
ekaj
United States174 Posts
there needs to be a BM handbook or something because if drawing a pylon heart is bad mannered you girls need to grow some thicker skin | ||
|
NrG.Bamboo
United States2756 Posts
ballsssssssss | ||
|
TheAntZ
Israel6248 Posts
| ||
|
Kmickelow
Canada106 Posts
| ||
|
Neoattitude
Guam172 Posts
Ahhboxxah = bm Catz's reply = really bad bm Officials banning NRG and not Root = favoritisim and really really bad BM. | ||
|
Fraud
Canada108 Posts
The 3 season ban seems a bit harsh, I think for a first non-warning offense, it should be a disqualification. Jumping to a ban is rather extreme... | ||
|
sMi.EternaL
United States162 Posts
Team NrG's SGL Penalty Points: 0.0 NrG Team Info on SGL Site Assuming there were any prior issues there ("should") would be points here. At the very least you'd think the admin team would deduct penalty point(s) and make a statement. An outright removal of a team over something so incredibly petty is absolutely horrible administrating and definitely does not bode well for the future of this league within the community. Also, personally, none of these players were "bm." Trash talking is part of the game and has been for the past 10years of SC/War3 and countless years of gaming before that. If you don't like it (as a league/admin) then just prohibit speaking to your opponent beyond "gg/gl/hf." Pretty simple. | ||
|
Karliath
United States2214 Posts
On September 07 2010 13:04 tyCe wrote: I think any chat that isn't gg or pp shouldn't be allowed in tournament matches. Telling your opponent that you're going one build or another really screws with your opponent's mind and gives yourself an unfair advantage. On the other hand, to explicitly swear at your opponent is almost as bad - it is rude, but at least it does not give you an unfair advantage in the game. I think CatZ should have been DQ'd immediately once he said he's going 7pool. Why can't you say what build you are going, true or not? The opponent could have easily replied, "I'm doing a 2 gate rush." It's not like CatZ gains an unfair advantage here. | ||
|
shynee
Canada180 Posts
| ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9107 Posts
Banning team NrG completely? Completely ridiculous. Teams with hackers in them get a lesser punishment... (using sc1 as a precedent) | ||
|
Darpa
Canada4413 Posts
| ||
|
Tachion
Canada8573 Posts
00:20:13 - AhhBoxxah to ALL: who youre talking to Who was he talking to!? | ||
|
ekaj
United States174 Posts
| ||
|
ploy
United States416 Posts
| ||
|
dRaW
Canada5744 Posts
*edit* the reply from catz is bm  | ||
|
NrG.NeverExpo
Canada2114 Posts
On September 07 2010 13:55 ploy wrote: Any league admin who supports a decision of his with "because it's my league" just sucks. A lot. SGL]GnR says: yes i give you one chacne its qualifiers there are no second chances SGL]GnR says: i dont need records SGL]GnR says: its my league and what i say goes It's kinda like the whole "Because i'm your mom and i say so" bit. Quite hilarious how he backs himself up | ||
|
reza
Canada213 Posts
| ||
|
jackalope
Taiwan120 Posts
| ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
On September 07 2010 13:26 Plexa wrote: Whatever, it's not the issue. If you're going to disallow it fine, but make sure it's well known in advance etc. The rules don't stipulate that you need to be quiet all game so what Catz did is fine. Yeah I know it's not the issue but I was just refuting talking during game like that is a legitimate part of "SC2 mindgame." He shouldn't receive some harsh punishment or something for it, but it's not exactly "fine." It's not fine. Forget the rules, it's common sense and common courtesy. | ||
|
jackalope
Taiwan120 Posts
| ||
| ||
