• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:44
CEST 09:44
KST 16:44
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week1[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation14$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 1 - Final Week Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 576 users

The Bane of Terran: Decision-Making - Page 2

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
AppleTart
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States1261 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-03 15:13:12
May 03 2010 15:03 GMT
#21
Umm, if you individually give add-ons rax, port, fact. Then you have to give chrono EVERY building that can upgrade and can build units.

In addition, the techlab, standalone, reactor is not very accurate.Its more like a decision of if you need to make marauders/higher tech or need to make more marines. Based on what race your opponent has, what units he makes etc, you decide if you need more tech labs or not. It's not rooted within the add-on itself, but rather what units/upgrades you want. I mean obviously you use techlab if you want to make higher tier units. That's saying the same thing as when zerg gets to lair they obviously get a hydra den if they want hydras as opposed to a spire for mutas.

Each race has to decide what units to make and must get the sufficient tech to build them. It just so happens that terran needs a tech building for each production building as opposed to how zerg just needs one tech building to produce out of all hatcheries. I wouldn't call it more "choices", maybe just more building in the literal sense. Zerg compensates for this by having to make a choice about building units/overlords for supply/drones.

I think the main flaw of the OP although I admit in itself is well written and reasoned which is why I'm even bothering to write this, is that is ignores the actual roots of decisions. If you want to timing push you get +1 upgrade. You don't split that into deciding do I get a forge? Do I get +1? The decision lies at the root cause of the initial decision to go +1 because of a timing attack. Your decision may change of course but that's on the level of gameplay and broader sense of the game than just simple techlab or reactor.
always tired -_-
Muhweli
Profile Joined September 2002
Finland5328 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-03 15:06:37
May 03 2010 15:06 GMT
#22
Didn't read the replies but it would appear you're trivializing zerg and protoss decision chains and in either case, picking the ones that are most convenient. Protoss tech "choices" end up at gateway -> warpgate, while choosing the right tech and unit combos after that are as dynamic as for terran or any other race for that matter. They just don't need to upgrade their gateways for it, that's true. And as far as terran goes, you can switch the reactors in and out between buildings too so it's not like you're bound to one strategy after building a tech lab to your starport.
River me timbers.
Muhweli
Profile Joined September 2002
Finland5328 Posts
May 03 2010 15:09 GMT
#23
Furthermore the whole idea is for the races to be different. For zerg, the macro dynamics are quite different than those of terran or protoss and knowing when to pop units and when to pop drones is really important or you'll get utterly desolated by some timing pushes, while for terran and protoss you can mostly pump scvs/probes almost constanly until the saturation point. Obviously this also trivializes the terran/toss macro since some strategies require stopping builder production, but you get the point.
River me timbers.
NihiLStarcraft
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Denmark1413 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-03 15:13:47
May 03 2010 15:12 GMT
#24
@Archerofaiur: Ah, that makes perfect sense then and I agree.

@DarkPlasmaBall: I would generally agree with what you say should be done with Terran OC energy however this is exactly what I meant. You need to let some energy go to MULEs, save some for emergency scans, maybe scan once right now though etc. If you run low on mineral patches and aren't at x/200 supply yet, calldown is a great option as its free minerals and MULEs would just make you go bankrupt in 3 minutes. That, to me, seems like a ton more work than it is to boost some obvious buildings with Protoss (as I said before, boost as many of your production buildings, most likely warp gates, as possible, if you research anything, give that a boost as well).

I do agree that it's problematic to include the reactor/techlab/standalone distinction in this and I was honestly somewhat unsure. You can switch buildings, yes, but I haven't seen it yet in high-level games (after the 10 minute mark of course, in the beginning it can easily be a pre-established build order step or something) as it's somewhat micro intensive and generally annoying in a real game situation in mid- to late-game.
AssuredVacancy
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1167 Posts
May 03 2010 15:19 GMT
#25
This is a huge post filled with misinformation. Building reactors/tech labs at buildings isn't even difficult decision making, whereas chronoboosting takes far more decision making as you can chronoboost EVERY SINGLE research/unit protoss has.
You also seem to forget that zerg has something called larva. Zerg can't just constantly pump workers and constantly queue up a roach at every hatch. Zerg needs to decide when to power and when to build army. Considering zerg static d's take up a drone, the zerg also needs to know exactly when to put them down to minimize the economic damage.
Not every decision in the game is straight up layed out for you like 'choosing an add on', or 'choosing a spell to use'. Most of the time decision making is in the subtle differences like when to produce where and when to build what. These decisions far outweigh the simple "scan or mule" dilema.
We spend our youth attaining wealth, and our wealth attaining youth.
AppleTart
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States1261 Posts
May 03 2010 15:21 GMT
#26
On May 04 2010 00:19 AssuredVacancy wrote:
This is a huge post filled with misinformation. Building reactors/tech labs at buildings isn't even difficult decision making, whereas chronoboosting takes far more decision making as you can chronoboost EVERY SINGLE research/unit protoss has.
You also seem to forget that zerg has something called larva. Zerg can't just constantly pump workers and constantly queue up a roach at every hatch. Zerg needs to decide when to power and when to build army. Considering zerg static d's take up a drone, the zerg also needs to know exactly when to put them down to minimize the economic damage.
Not every decision in the game is straight up layed out for you like 'choosing an add on', or 'choosing a spell to use'. Most of the time decision making is in the subtle differences like when to produce where and when to build what. These decisions far outweigh the simple "scan or mule" dilema.


^completely agree with this (as stated in my post at the top of this page)
Terran has the most buildings, but that does not mean they make the most decisions. Its too much of an oversimplification by far. I could argue that building a bunker is an easier decision than making a spine crawler because you can just salvage the bunker later and it doesn't cost a worker's life permanently.
always tired -_-
Kuzmorgo
Profile Joined May 2009
Hungary1058 Posts
May 03 2010 15:24 GMT
#27
On May 03 2010 23:15 Archerofaiur wrote:

1) Decision making is not a bad thing.



With this agree i do.
Most of all the Terran race i like.
And that is because the most options (huge variety of units and unit combos) this race have.(IMO)
"No, whine not! Play, or play not! There is no whine."
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44222 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-03 15:26:58
May 03 2010 15:24 GMT
#28
dkh,

"@DarkPlasmaBall: I would generally agree with what you say should be done with Terran OC energy however this is exactly what I meant. You need to let some energy go to MULEs, save some for emergency scans, maybe scan once right now though etc. If you run low on mineral patches and aren't at x/200 supply yet, calldown is a great option as its free minerals and MULEs would just make you go bankrupt in 3 minutes. That, to me, seems like a ton more work than it is to boost some obvious buildings with Protoss (as I said before, boost as many of your production buildings, most likely warp gates, as possible, if you research anything, give that a boost as well)."

Why is it exactly a ton more work for Terran? We clearly understand the cases where we need to use MULEs, we need to do scans, and we need to get that extra free supply depot. When the situation presents itself, it should become quite easy when and how to use the energy. Are you talking about when we may need to do two at once (that would be when decision-making becomes difficult)?

Well, that happens with Protoss (and Zerg) as well. I can't Chrono Boost everything at the same time! Sometimes I have to choose: Should I boost +1 Weapons or my Probes or my Blink upgrade or my Immortal that's building, etc. All of those may seem like reasonable boosts at any one time, but I need to make the decision with limited energy. I really think you're reducing the decision-making process of Protoss to "Boost Anything" instead of the fact that Protoss users can't boost everything at the same time. We're bound by energy too :-)
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
LunarC
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States1186 Posts
May 03 2010 15:32 GMT
#29
I believe that the intent behind incorporating Macro Mechanics was to reward players with greater APM. Blizzard has already described why they will not make the Queen's Spawn Larvae ability autocast though there is very little decision-making involved, especially because Creep Tumors can self-propogate and Transfusion is not as useful for a race that relies on large numbers of units rather than a small number of powerful units. Given any other game besides Starcraft 2, there would be no reason not to make this ability auto-castable like Zealot Charge, but this ability was designed to meet peoples' complaints that Macro had been too simplified with MBS and Automine.

But in practice, Macro Mechanics seem to be more useful as things that allow a player to recover from a period of bad macro by casting the abilities multiple times all at once. I think to completely fulfill the intent of the Macro Mechanics, they should be limited in how many times they can be cast at the same time. In other words, the Queen should only have 75 energy, the Nexus should only have 50 energy, and the Orbital Command should only have 75 energy. Also, Spawn Larvae could use some adjusting, but to be honest I don't think it can be satisfactorily tweaked. Maybe making the act of building a Queen more of a significant decision.
REEBUH!!!
NihiLStarcraft
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Denmark1413 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-03 15:37:40
May 03 2010 15:33 GMT
#30
On May 04 2010 00:19 AssuredVacancy wrote:
Building reactors/tech labs at buildings isn't even difficult decision making, whereas chronoboosting takes far more decision making as you can chronoboost EVERY SINGLE research/unit protoss has.


True, on the other hand chrono boosting or not makes a difference of a few seconds which - as I said before - doesn't matter as much as building a techlab or a reactor in the later stages of the game. Not to mention what a few scans or MULEs can do and not do for you (ie. win or lose you the game).

On May 04 2010 00:19 AssuredVacancy wrote:
You also seem to forget that zerg has something called larva. Zerg can't just constantly pump workers and constantly queue up a roach at every hatch. Zerg needs to decide when to power and when to build army. Considering zerg static d's take up a drone, the zerg also needs to know exactly when to put them down to minimize the economic damage.


If you would bother to read the thread you would find information on this issue. I have left that aspect of Zerg decision making out as my write-up is mostly concerned with the new macro mechanics and their impact.

On May 04 2010 00:19 AssuredVacancy wrote:
Not every decision in the game is straight up layed out for you like 'choosing an add on', or 'choosing a spell to use'. Most of the time decision making is in the subtle differences like when to produce where and when to build what. These decisions far outweigh the simple "scan or mule" dilema.


I agree 100% but this topic is not about the subtle decisions, it's just about the big ones. The original post makes that very clear. Also I wouldn't call "scan or mule" a simple dilemma by all means but I guess that's subjective.
baskerville
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
541 Posts
May 03 2010 15:34 GMT
#31
nice post
i for one think the real differences in the 3 races is the real sell point of sc1 and probably sc2
in xtrashort
zerg with a central hub and cheap expand
the terran with its harass repertoire and flying buildings
and protoss with usually the coolest units and micro galore

the terran is the most destructive with quite a good mobility, and you pay it with involvement in zesomany apm tribute payed to it
(in short a successful emp takes some attention)
http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/smilies/random-big.gif
Railz
Profile Joined July 2008
United States1449 Posts
May 03 2010 15:36 GMT
#32
A lot of this could be solved by giving Terran a mechanic to allow quick swap of tech buildings, rather then just flying 2 or more buildings from place to place. Perhaps when one building is lifted up and is set to land on another building, the other one swaps up automatically and switches.
Did the whole world just get a lot smaller and go whooosh?_-` Number 0ne By.Fantasy Fanatic!
AppleTart
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States1261 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-03 15:39:43
May 03 2010 15:38 GMT
#33
I would like to say if this thread is about the "big decisions," then you completely missed the target because choosing to make an add-on isn't the big decision, its choosing to make marauders vs marines that's the big decision. If you want one or the other you get tech lab or no tech lab. As for other races, do you want immortals or templar? Depending on what you want you may go robo first or twilight council first. Please read my post at the top of the page.

Big decisions lay at a gameplay level as opposed to trivial things like making a tech lab. If anything the choice zerg makes to make drones or lings early game right when the pool finishes is bigger than the choice to mule or scan right when your first orbital finishes.
always tired -_-
AssuredVacancy
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1167 Posts
May 03 2010 15:40 GMT
#34
On May 04 2010 00:33 dkh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 04 2010 00:19 AssuredVacancy wrote:
Building reactors/tech labs at buildings isn't even difficult decision making, whereas chronoboosting takes far more decision making as you can chronoboost EVERY SINGLE research/unit protoss has.


True, on the other hand chrono boosting or not makes a difference of a few seconds which - as I said before - doesn't matter as much as building a techlab or a reactor in the later stages of the game.

Show nested quote +
On May 04 2010 00:19 AssuredVacancy wrote:
You also seem to forget that zerg has something called larva. Zerg can't just constantly pump workers and constantly queue up a roach at every hatch. Zerg needs to decide when to power and when to build army. Considering zerg static d's take up a drone, the zerg also needs to know exactly when to put them down to minimize the economic damage.


If you would bother to read the thread you would find information on this issue. I have left that aspect of Zerg decision making out as my write-up is mostly concerned with the new macro mechanics and their impact.

Show nested quote +
On May 04 2010 00:19 AssuredVacancy wrote:
Not every decision in the game is straight up layed out for you like 'choosing an add on', or 'choosing a spell to use'. Most of the time decision making is in the subtle differences like when to produce where and when to build what. These decisions far outweigh the simple "scan or mule" dilema.


I agree 100% but this topic is not about the subtle decisions, it's just about the big ones. The original post makes that very clear. Also I wouldn't call "scan or mule" a simple dilemma by all means but I guess that's subjective.


Lol if you think chronoboosting a research for a timing attack is not as significant as building a tech lab/reactor then I think you should actually play the game.
Leaving out the aspects which require decision making in other races while saying terran takes the most decision making seems a bit stupid, no? That's like saying "This is the best thing ever, if you don't count the ones that are better than it".
In the end I'm guessing either you are new at the game or you aren't very good at it, esp if you think the big decisions aren't the ones where you decide when to build what.
We spend our youth attaining wealth, and our wealth attaining youth.
NihiLStarcraft
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Denmark1413 Posts
May 03 2010 15:42 GMT
#35
Man, this is really going to quickly to properly answer/discuss everything... :D

On May 04 2010 00:24 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Why is it exactly a ton more work for Terran? We clearly understand the cases where we need to use MULEs, we need to do scans, and we need to get that extra free supply depot. When the situation presents itself, it should become quite easy when and how to use the energy. Are you talking about when we may need to do two at once (that would be when decision-making becomes difficult)?

Well, that happens with Protoss (and Zerg) as well. I can't Chrono Boost everything at the same time! Sometimes I have to choose: Should I boost +1 Weapons or my Probes or my Blink upgrade or my Immortal that's building, etc. All of those may seem like reasonable boosts at any one time, but I need to make the decision with limited energy. I really think you're reducing the decision-making process of Protoss to "Boost Anything" instead of the fact that Protoss users can't boost everything at the same time. We're bound by energy too :-)


That's absolutely right of course, it's just my personal feeling that it seems much easier with Protoss to decide. Let's take your example: if I'm afraid of, say, a Marauder or a Roach push (because of intel), I would boost the Immortal as that is of course my priority. If I'm pretty sure my enemy is teching up and not pushing, I would just speed up that +1 upgrade so my push gets out quicker (I assume I'm preparing one). If I have left over energy, I give that to my probes or my gates, if they need it although I feel, unless we're talking very top-level play, that isn't really so incredibly important (SC2 doesn't need as many workers as SC1 and warp gates are really very quick to cool down already (talking about the later game stages again of course).
NihiLStarcraft
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Denmark1413 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-03 15:44:55
May 03 2010 15:44 GMT
#36
On May 04 2010 00:40 AssuredVacancy wrote:
Lol if you think chronoboosting a research for a timing attack is not as significant as building a tech lab/reactor then I think you should actually play the game.
Leaving out the aspects which require decision making in other races while saying terran takes the most decision making seems a bit stupid, no? That's like saying "This is the best thing ever, if you don't count the ones that are better than it".
In the end I'm guessing either you are new at the game or you aren't very good at it, esp if you think the big decisions aren't the ones where you decide when to build what.


You have been coming into this thread with offensive replies beginning with your first post. I have chosen to ignore that attitude in your first post and answered in a way that I feel was purely on topic. I have nothing to say to the post above as it does not include any relevant argument. If you want to troll, go somewhere else, if you want to discuss and argue well-mannered, I'm here and reading.

atarianimo
Profile Joined June 2007
United States82 Posts
May 03 2010 15:44 GMT
#37
On May 03 2010 23:29 Archerofaiur wrote:

Show nested quote +
On May 03 2010 23:25 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Chrono: What unit/ upgrade queue do I boost?

Yes
Show nested quote +

Orbital: What ability do I use?

Yes
Show nested quote +

Queen: What ability do I use?

No. You want Spawn Larva. 99% of the time.




I think the decision with Zerg is what you do with the extra larva the queen gives you. Do you power drones or make combat units? It's basically the same as deciding what to Chrono Boost.
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
May 03 2010 15:46 GMT
#38
On May 04 2010 00:44 atarianimo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2010 23:29 Archerofaiur wrote:

On May 03 2010 23:25 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Chrono: What unit/ upgrade queue do I boost?

Yes

Orbital: What ability do I use?

Yes

Queen: What ability do I use?

No. You want Spawn Larva. 99% of the time.




I think the decision with Zerg is what you do with the extra larva the queen gives you.

It doesnt matter that there is decision making in another part of the game. The fact of the matter is that there is not decision making in when/how to use spawn larva. Its just


Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
Spawn Larva
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44222 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-03 15:48:50
May 03 2010 15:46 GMT
#39
"That's absolutely right of course, it's just my personal feeling that it seems much easier with Protoss to decide. Let's take your example: [et al]"

I agree, dkh. Based on the situation, you know what to do. Just like with the Terran. If you're going against cloaked units, you'll want energy for scan. If you need money quickly, then you go MULEs. If you get supply blocked, then you get the instant supply. Easy decisions :-)

Terran: What do I use OC energy on?
Protoss: What do I use Nexus energy on?

There really isn't that much of a difference. You look at the scenario you're in, and act accordingly.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
AppleTart
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States1261 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-03 15:49:59
May 03 2010 15:46 GMT
#40
Terrans have 3 options but each of their option does one thing and one thing only... Mule mines minerals and that's all it can do, scan scans and reveals..., and call down makes supply and thats pretty much it.... But chrono and spawn larve may seem simpler because its just one option that costs energy, but deciding what and when to do with each afterward and during is something terran lacks.

Imagine if they made the OC only have one skill, to make a mule. But that mule itself could either build a depot for free or scan somewhere. Then the OC would only have one skill as well but it wouldn't be as simple as just 3 skills vs 1 skill
always tired -_-
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 16m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 563
actioN 176
Noble 87
JulyZerg 34
Sharp 30
Bale 19
yabsab 14
Sacsri 14
Dota 2
ODPixel261
XcaliburYe196
League of Legends
JimRising 642
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss411
chrisJcsgo49
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor147
Other Games
summit1g9117
shahzam937
Stewie2K624
monkeys_forever321
Liquid`RaSZi75
SortOf73
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick19583
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH383
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• tankgirl 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2161
League of Legends
• Lourlo1322
• Stunt594
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
2h 16m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
5h 16m
Replay Cast
16h 16m
RSL Revival
1d 2h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 8h
OSC
1d 12h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.