|
Frankly, I'm not sure whether this counts as NSFW or not, and if it's even really appropriate to post. That said, in my opinion, from what I know, this is a ridiculous violation of personal expression, as well as basic human rights. And that means it deserves discussion!
Essentially, some of the more zealous people in charge of ratings and censorship in Australia are refusing publication of mainstream pornography featuring women with A-cup breasts, on the grounds that it encourages child pornography. Legally, they have some basis for this (quoting a linked article):
The National Classification Code dictates that anything that describes or depicts a person who is, or appears to be, a child under 18 (whether the person is engaged in sexual activity or not) in a way that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult is Refused Classification.
This still feels completely wrong to me, and a vile application of a poorly worded law.
Links to articles (I can add better ones if anyone finds any, these are just where I heard about this):
http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/australia-bans-small-breasts/
[NSFW but a good blog on the topic] http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/27/now-australia-is-banning-small-boobs/
[NSFW] http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2010/01/28/australia-bans-small-breasts-as-child-pornography/
|
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
Anyways, people can just go anywhere on the internet and find this stuff, its not that hard, if you are watching porn online, this is no obstacle. As for those who get their porn from mags....why would you get porn from mags??
|
I didn't get past "Australian Sex Party" due to laughter.
|
On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
Thank you for your helpful contribution to the discussion!
|
rofl the policy is well-intentioned. I think this is just one of 'human's natural right to express their own free-will' thing that seems to occur every time government passes some kind of policy.
|
I can see the reasoning as to why they would do it but wouldn't banning it just cause everyone to go look at it more? I mean once it's banned theres more demand for it so aren't they under their own reasoning supporting child pornography?
|
On January 28 2010 07:51 haster27 wrote:
rofl the policy is well-intentioned. I think this is just one of 'human's natural right to express their own free-will' thing that seems to occur every time government passes some kind of policy.
Frankly, I think that while they might think they're doing good, they're too clouded by their own sense of justice to realize that what they're doing is massively detrimental to women's rights, and perception of them as a whole, which is rather ironic, frankly. Defend the children and make small boobs seem unnatural and obscene? What? That's hugely damaging to women who DO have small breasts and already might have self-confidence issues stemming from society's view that large breasts are better.
|
Aw shit now those bitches will have to work at mcdonalds
|
GOD I hate this country sometimes.
Now when a non-Aussie asks what to bring here when they come on a trip we have to say:
"Bring some internet, because ours is shit and costs a fuckload"
"Bring water if you're going to Adelaide because theirs is bad LOLZ"
And now: "Bring some porn if you aren't a fan of xbox huge tits"
Seriously, the left-wing morons in this country deserve to be drawn and quartered.
|
LOL AUSTRALIA
On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
no way!
|
United States4796 Posts
On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
Hey kona.
|
Australia has some problems with censorship, from everything I see. I guess I can see the point they have, to an extent, but if you're going to go that far, they need to ban pigtails and school girl uniforms in porn, because clearly that could possibly imply the girl is underage.
If this passes (or has it already), would that make it illegal for a small breasted, but 18+, woman to show herself in public (might be illegal in some cases anyway) or take a picture of herself nude?
The law is pretty damn retarded, tbh.
|
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA. OH MAN KONA IS GOING TO FREAAAAAAAAAAAAAK
On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
|
I thought there was something like this in the States before.. because one of the porn stars that was working with Max Hardcore claimed to be like 12 in the videos, even though they were legal aged. If I recall, the charges were dropped though.
|
On January 28 2010 07:57 So no fek wrote:
Australia has some problems with censorship, from everything I see. I guess I can see the point they have, to an extent, but if you're going to go that far, they need to ban pigtails and school girl uniforms in porn, because clearly that could possibly imply the girl is underage.
If this passes (or has it already), would that make it illegal for a small breasted, but 18+, woman to show herself in public (might be illegal in some cases anyway) or take a picture of herself nude?
The law is pretty damn retarded, tbh.
yeah its discrimination
|
On January 28 2010 07:56 DivinO wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags. Hey kona.
I doubt kona considers himself a fag. ;p
|
omg... this is more so funny than serious
but who wants porn with small breasts anyway.
australia makes a good choice imo
|
On January 28 2010 08:03 Grobyc wrote:
omg... this is more so funny than serious
but who wants porn with small breasts anyway.
australia makes a good choice imo
I thought we liked Asian girls here? :/
Soooo many Asian girls have rather small breasts.
I could even argue that they're being discriminated against.
|
On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
Anyways, people can just go anywhere on the internet and find this stuff, its not that hard, if you are watching porn online, this is no obstacle. As for those who get their porn from mags....why would you get porn from mags??
You may not be aware, the leftwing losers who put this in place are ALSO trying to make an internet filter so we can be as cool as China!
|
On January 28 2010 07:58 DreaM)XeRO wrote:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA. OH MAN KONA IS GOING TO FREAAAAAAAAAAAAAK Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
preemptively siding with kona here.
|
My gf has A-cups. If some Australian politician would tell her that she looks like a child because she has small breasts I'd rip his head off and shit down his neck.
|
On January 28 2010 08:07 Duckvillelol wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
Anyways, people can just go anywhere on the internet and find this stuff, its not that hard, if you are watching porn online, this is no obstacle. As for those who get their porn from mags....why would you get porn from mags?? You may not be aware, the leftwing losers who put this in place are ALSO trying to make an internet filter so we can be as cool as China!
Yeah, I read about that while going through these sources. It's completely ridiculous.
|
On January 28 2010 08:05 tirentu wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 08:03 Grobyc wrote:
omg... this is more so funny than serious
but who wants porn with small breasts anyway.
australia makes a good choice imo I thought we liked Asian girls here? :/ Soooo many Asian girls have rather small breasts. I could even argue that they're being discriminated against.
I still do like asian girls, I just like asian girls + big boobs more than asian girls w/o big boobs. Not by a massive amount, but if I had to choose...
You're probably right about the discrimination thing though, but there's nothing we can do so I just accept it.
|
WHAT?? Can't believe what I've just been reading... So they're basically telling small breasted women: "Hey, you won't be allowed to show off yourself because you look like a child when you're naked". WTF?
Like tirentu said, this is so massively detrimental to women's rights, I can't even begin to comprehend it.
And so fucking what if the models only appear to be under 18. Then the sexually deviant can get off without hurting anyone. As long as no models actually are under 18 we'll be fine.
|
Eh, I don't want to sound like a douche bag, everyone has their own opinions I guess.
|
fuck that :/ I love small boobs
rorikon however is super gay
|
thank god I don't live in australia
I get upset without my daily dose of flat chested beauty
|
United States42884 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:10 REDBLUEGREEN wrote:
My gf has A-cups. If some Australian politician would tell her that she looks like a child because she has small breasts I'd rip his head off and shit down his neck.
You don't understand. The problem isn't her, it's you. You only like her because she indulges your secret fantasy of raping an underage girl, who will obviously be underdeveloped, like your girlfriend. She's done nothing wrong but her very existence encourages your secret perversions to the point that it's inevitable you rape a child.
What surprises me is they go after boobs but not after waxing. Small boobs is clearly a sign of an underage girl (lol?!?!) but no pubic hair isn't.
|
On January 28 2010 08:08 Vivi57 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 07:58 DreaM)XeRO wrote:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA. OH MAN KONA IS GOING TO FREAAAAAAAAAAAAAK On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags. preemptively siding with kona here.
Who wouldn't, everybody loves kona..but loli is wierd man...
|
So if you're a porn star you have to wear silicons?
And what about girls with breasts too big? Won't it mean that maybe the women there are pregnant? That sounds like "food" for people with that kind of fetish!
|
T.T I actually like small breasts better than big. Also, this is discrimination towards A cup women who have built their career towards becoming a porn star.
|
This is just so goddamned hilarious. It's not even like it will stop small breasted porn from coming into australia, but i have to laugh at how fucking rediculous this is. Sucks to be in australia right now (like always though).
|
Yes, let's remove all legal options paedophiles have to get off, that's help reduce cases of rape of children.
|
Darn, I read the title as "Australia bans small breasts" at first. Free implants for everyone!
On January 28 2010 08:29 nevz wrote:
Yes, let's remove all legal options paedophiles have to get off, that's help reduce cases of rape of children.
I don't know what you're talking about sir. Catholic priests aren't allowed to look at porn, and they handle themselves just fine around children.
|
looooooool I should start selling illegal small boob pornography in alleyways to make some phat doe.
|
lol banning A cup girls, most girls who hit puberty has at least b cup size. Those ppl who imposed the rules must have watched too much loli to think all underage girls have a cup breast. haha
|
On January 28 2010 08:17 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 08:10 REDBLUEGREEN wrote:
My gf has A-cups. If some Australian politician would tell her that she looks like a child because she has small breasts I'd rip his head off and shit down his neck. You don't understand. The problem isn't her, it's you. You only like her because she indulges your secret fantasy of raping an underage girl, who will obviously be underdeveloped, like your girlfriend. She's done nothing wrong but her very existence encourages your secret perversions to the point that it's inevitable you rape a child. What surprises me is they go after boobs but not after waxing. Small boobs is clearly a sign of an underage girl (lol?!?!) but no pubic hair isn't.
wha lol
kwark really knows your fantasy's man
|
On January 28 2010 08:36 Roxen000 wrote:
looooooool I should start selling illegal small boob pornography in alleyways to make some phat doe.
Cut costs by taking existing porn and editting your chest onto the girls.
|
This count for abs?
If so I'm fucked bro.
But whateva. Shit like this happens on the shore all the time.
|
i think you guys dont have the context on this. the australian government is introducing an internet filter to block out what they deem to be harmful material to the kids of today. its not something that many australians support, in fact a lot of people are opposed to it.
however, the australian senate, right now, is such that neither of the major two parties have control. the two major parties are the coalition, and labor. to have a majority, labor needs all of its party votes, plus every non-coalition senator.
this means that the independent (i.e. not in a major party) senators have a lot of sway over the labor party.
so obviously theyre going to use that sway. steve fielding is the only member of the (small) family first party in the entire house of representatives/senate, and a lot of people dont like family first because they have relatively extreme views (i think with their name you can kind of guess what policies they support). the internet filter was his idea and he used his influence to push it when most people dont really care a whole lot.
so... i hope that explains to you guys why this filter is there 
|
And this is a bad thing how?.....??
|
On January 28 2010 08:52 BalliSLife wrote:
And this is a bad thing how?.....??
think about all the chicks with A cups trying to make a living man? how can you be so cruel
|
HAHA LOL
teeny boobs do not deserve this kind of attention. just let it go, aussies, else kona will be sad
|
I also feel bad for girls who like guys with tits. Discrimination against fat men as well.
|
this is just the start. remember these idiots will be in charge of what gets blacklisted in the internet filter.
|
On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
Anyways, people can just go anywhere on the internet and find this stuff, its not that hard, if you are watching porn online, this is no obstacle. As for those who get their porn from mags....why would you get porn from mags??
not for long if the government gets their way. this country is going backwards approaching warpspeed..
|
Australia is deciding what gets black listed on the internet? Where is this internet filter bro.. face tap that shit.
|
I guess this is ok if they ban all early developed girls from school and then they're ok for porn. wait that's wrong. yep, the law makes no sense.
|
On January 28 2010 08:40 new_construct wrote:
lol banning A cup girls, most girls who hit puberty has at least b cup size. Those ppl who imposed the rules must have watched too much loli to think all underage girls have a cup breast. haha
You realize true pedo's like toddlers right?
|
Tiny penises are also banned to reduce the amount of women pedo's around.
|
You guys are all idiots. Society needs to do whatever it can against pedos.
|
On January 28 2010 07:54 tirentu wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 07:51 haster27 wrote:
rofl the policy is well-intentioned. I think this is just one of 'human's natural right to express their own free-will' thing that seems to occur every time government passes some kind of policy. Frankly, I think that while they might think they're doing good, they're too clouded by their own sense of justice to realize that what they're doing is massively detrimental to women's rights, and perception of them as a whole, which is rather ironic, frankly. Defend the children and make small boobs seem unnatural and obscene? What? That's hugely damaging to women who DO have small breasts and already might have self-confidence issues stemming from society's view that large breasts are better.
A+++ post. I hadn't even though of this. I came into this thread with the idea that it was totally absurd, but you granted a view point I hadn't even considered. I commend you.
Also, if you can't tell, I agree with you very much.
Edit:
On January 28 2010 09:26 Catch]22 wrote:
You guys are all idiots. Society needs to do whatever it can against pedos.
Have you considered pedophilia probably isn't a choice? Much like being heterosexuel or homosexuel, no one can decide what turns them on. Personally, I find pedophiles very tragic, since I'd tend to believe that it's only the bottom % that would harm a child, and they're all cursed with a disease society hates them for. Also, consider that our definition of pedophilia is entirely based on our society's current culture and supposed "moral standards". Marriages between 12 year old's, and pregnancies in very young teens are the rule in most cultures history, and in the few indigenous populations that still remain independent.
I'm not saying you're wrong. Obviously anyone that harms a child sexually or profits off of their abuse deserves the full extent of their countries legal system thrust upon them. I just wanna present different ways to think about it.
|
On January 28 2010 09:26 Catch]22 wrote:
You guys are all idiots. Society needs to do whatever it can against pedos.
And also small breasted women.
|
Probably stated already but all this does is give women a 'determined' idea of what their body should look like. I think this is pretty shitty as a lot of the girls I know already have a hell of a lot of self-esteem issues. All this does I think is make the world a more superficial place :[. Horrible, horrible idiot lawmakers in Australia. For once in a long time I'm glad I'm an American . Even though our nation is superficial as hell too... Well fuck, I wish girls didn't care about how others see them so much. It bothers me so much! Women are beautiful whether they have A-cups or C-cups. Lol i'm off topic now but yeah...
|
This is why I love TL. Half of the posts in this thread belong in 4chan, while the rest are actually good posts.
|
On January 28 2010 09:27 wesleyq wrote:Probably stated already but all this does is give women a 'determined' idea of what their body should look like. I think this is pretty shitty as a lot of the girls I know already have a hell of a lot of self-esteem issues. All this does I think is make the world a more superficial place :[. Horrible, horrible idiot lawmakers in Australia. For once in a long time I'm glad I'm an American . Even though our nation is superficial as hell too... Well fuck, I wish girls didn't care about how others see them so much. It bothers me so much! Women are beautiful whether they have A-cups or C-cups. Lol i'm off topic now but yeah...
Yeah, because a womans determined idea comes from semi-fetischy porn labeled "barely legal".
|
On January 28 2010 08:51 nebffa wrote:i think you guys dont have the context on this. the australian government is introducing an internet filter to block out what they deem to be harmful material to the kids of today. its not something that many australians support, in fact a lot of people are opposed to it. however, the australian senate, right now, is such that neither of the major two parties have control. the two major parties are the coalition, and labor. to have a majority, labor needs all of its party votes, plus every non-coalition senator. this means that the independent (i.e. not in a major party) senators have a lot of sway over the labor party. so obviously theyre going to use that sway. steve fielding is the only member of the (small) family first party in the entire house of representatives/senate, and a lot of people dont like family first because they have relatively extreme views (i think with their name you can kind of guess what policies they support). the internet filter was his idea and he used his influence to push it when most people dont really care a whole lot. so... i hope that explains to you guys why this filter is there
I guess that makes more sense. It brings up the question, what is a pedophile? We're so used to the legal definition, that we don't think about true pedophiles who are psychologically different and are attracted to children (not high school cheerleaders, but children).
It's a bad approach, but it's interesting to think about it developmentally as opposed to age.
Edit: ironically, most of the aussie actresses i've seen on tv (I googled australian actresses) are probably A cups
Dichen Lachman (dollhouse)+ Show Spoiler +
Stephanie Jacobsen (terminator series)+ Show Spoiler +
Anna Torv (fringe)+ Show Spoiler +
Rose Byrne (damages)+ Show Spoiler +
|
Sweden33719 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:51 nebffa wrote:i think you guys dont have the context on this. the australian government is introducing an internet filter to block out what they deem to be harmful material to the kids of today. its not something that many australians support, in fact a lot of people are opposed to it. however, the australian senate, right now, is such that neither of the major two parties have control. the two major parties are the coalition, and labor. to have a majority, labor needs all of its party votes, plus every non-coalition senator. this means that the independent (i.e. not in a major party) senators have a lot of sway over the labor party. so obviously theyre going to use that sway. steve fielding is the only member of the (small) family first party in the entire house of representatives/senate, and a lot of people dont like family first because they have relatively extreme views (i think with their name you can kind of guess what policies they support). the internet filter was his idea and he used his influence to push it when most people dont really care a whole lot. so... i hope that explains to you guys why this filter is there
.... Maybe take a cue from China and have the guy stabbed.
Okay maybe not, but wtf, politics makes me so sad =[
|
rise in australian porn site activity now?
|
On January 28 2010 09:35 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 09:27 wesleyq wrote:Probably stated already but all this does is give women a 'determined' idea of what their body should look like. I think this is pretty shitty as a lot of the girls I know already have a hell of a lot of self-esteem issues. All this does I think is make the world a more superficial place :[. Horrible, horrible idiot lawmakers in Australia. For once in a long time I'm glad I'm an American . Even though our nation is superficial as hell too... Well fuck, I wish girls didn't care about how others see them so much. It bothers me so much! Women are beautiful whether they have A-cups or C-cups. Lol i'm off topic now but yeah... Yeah, because a womans determined idea comes from semi-fetischy porn labeled "barely legal".
No but when lots of guys prefer larger breasts and then a government DECIDES that a particular group of women's breasts are similar to that of lower grade children, would you not find that insulting if you were a woman with small boobs? I sure as hell would.
|
Yeah man what the fuck.. if I were a woman with small breasts I'de be pissed!
|
On January 28 2010 10:07 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 09:35 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 09:27 wesleyq wrote:Probably stated already but all this does is give women a 'determined' idea of what their body should look like. I think this is pretty shitty as a lot of the girls I know already have a hell of a lot of self-esteem issues. All this does I think is make the world a more superficial place :[. Horrible, horrible idiot lawmakers in Australia. For once in a long time I'm glad I'm an American . Even though our nation is superficial as hell too... Well fuck, I wish girls didn't care about how others see them so much. It bothers me so much! Women are beautiful whether they have A-cups or C-cups. Lol i'm off topic now but yeah... Yeah, because a womans determined idea comes from semi-fetischy porn labeled "barely legal". No but when lots of guys prefer larger breasts and then a government DECIDES that a particular group of women's breasts are similar to that of lower grade children, would you not find that insulting if you were a woman with small boobs? I sure as hell would.
No but when alot of guys prefer to rape women and then a goverment DECIDES that a particular way of getting laid are similar to torture, would you not find that insulting if rape was your favorite past-time? I sure as hell would.
|
This is definitely insulting towards small breasted women. It's already hard enough as it is in a society that glorifies big breasts, now we even have governments basically telling women "lol ur a child". Then of course I can't see how this would stop child molesters at all. Might as well ban Japanese women from Australia due to their glorification of "cutesy" child-like women.
|
Banning female ejaculation is ridiculous. If their bodies sometimes do that when having an orgasm, then why the fuck would it be bannable. This relates strongly to gender roles I just wrote about; people just aren't comfortable with female sexuality. This is some bullshit, sounds like laws based on christianity to me.
And banning small-breasted women from porn is like implying that all men potentially like young girls. Also, why not track down male pedophiles harder instead of banning the female body.
|
On January 28 2010 10:13 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:07 ~OpZ~ wrote:On January 28 2010 09:35 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 09:27 wesleyq wrote:Probably stated already but all this does is give women a 'determined' idea of what their body should look like. I think this is pretty shitty as a lot of the girls I know already have a hell of a lot of self-esteem issues. All this does I think is make the world a more superficial place :[. Horrible, horrible idiot lawmakers in Australia. For once in a long time I'm glad I'm an American . Even though our nation is superficial as hell too... Well fuck, I wish girls didn't care about how others see them so much. It bothers me so much! Women are beautiful whether they have A-cups or C-cups. Lol i'm off topic now but yeah... Yeah, because a womans determined idea comes from semi-fetischy porn labeled "barely legal". No but when lots of guys prefer larger breasts and then a government DECIDES that a particular group of women's breasts are similar to that of lower grade children, would you not find that insulting if you were a woman with small boobs? I sure as hell would. No but when alot of guys prefer to rape women and then a goverment DECIDES that a particular way of getting laid are similar to torture, would you not find that insulting if rape was your favorite past-time? I sure as hell would.
Wtf is this argument?
Comparing naturally having small breasts with raping people? What.
Anyways, this is a slippery slope in my opinion. Not that Australia isn't ALREADY on one with the whole internet filter nonsense. I mean fuck, look at the list of crap that this might lead to.
You have a young looking face? Banned
You wax? Banned
You have underdeveloped musculature or are of short stature? Banned
Schoolgirl outfits? Banned
Bondage? Might lead to rape. Banned
Are you a midget? Banned
And Japan. OMG won't anyone think of Japan?
Etc. <.<
Not that I look at midget porn or anything.
|
Australia's political system seems intriguing. They seem to be increasingly liberal on social issues yet conservative on foreign policy. What I just said is probably a broad generalization, but I don't spend much time in my day thinking about the fate of the land down under.
|
On January 28 2010 10:13 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:07 ~OpZ~ wrote:On January 28 2010 09:35 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 09:27 wesleyq wrote:Probably stated already but all this does is give women a 'determined' idea of what their body should look like. I think this is pretty shitty as a lot of the girls I know already have a hell of a lot of self-esteem issues. All this does I think is make the world a more superficial place :[. Horrible, horrible idiot lawmakers in Australia. For once in a long time I'm glad I'm an American . Even though our nation is superficial as hell too... Well fuck, I wish girls didn't care about how others see them so much. It bothers me so much! Women are beautiful whether they have A-cups or C-cups. Lol i'm off topic now but yeah... Yeah, because a womans determined idea comes from semi-fetischy porn labeled "barely legal". No but when lots of guys prefer larger breasts and then a government DECIDES that a particular group of women's breasts are similar to that of lower grade children, would you not find that insulting if you were a woman with small boobs? I sure as hell would. No but when alot of guys prefer to rape women and then a goverment DECIDES that a particular way of getting laid are similar to torture, would you not find that insulting if rape was your favorite past-time? I sure as hell would.
What the hell does this even mean. Are you trying to be funny? You sound retarded.
Rape is only a "funny" joke for a guy. And even then it's not funny at all, but rather gives away your low mental capacities.
|
Australia is truly run by morons *facepalm*
|
On January 28 2010 10:13 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:07 ~OpZ~ wrote:On January 28 2010 09:35 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 09:27 wesleyq wrote:Probably stated already but all this does is give women a 'determined' idea of what their body should look like. I think this is pretty shitty as a lot of the girls I know already have a hell of a lot of self-esteem issues. All this does I think is make the world a more superficial place :[. Horrible, horrible idiot lawmakers in Australia. For once in a long time I'm glad I'm an American . Even though our nation is superficial as hell too... Well fuck, I wish girls didn't care about how others see them so much. It bothers me so much! Women are beautiful whether they have A-cups or C-cups. Lol i'm off topic now but yeah... Yeah, because a womans determined idea comes from semi-fetischy porn labeled "barely legal". No but when lots of guys prefer larger breasts and then a government DECIDES that a particular group of women's breasts are similar to that of lower grade children, would you not find that insulting if you were a woman with small boobs? I sure as hell would. No but when alot of guys prefer to rape women and then a goverment DECIDES that a particular way of getting laid are similar to torture, would you not find that insulting if rape was your favorite past-time? I sure as hell would.
Lol if you're actually serious that's probably one of the worst analogies ever posted in an argument on TL.
|
On January 28 2010 10:13 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:07 ~OpZ~ wrote:On January 28 2010 09:35 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 09:27 wesleyq wrote:Probably stated already but all this does is give women a 'determined' idea of what their body should look like. I think this is pretty shitty as a lot of the girls I know already have a hell of a lot of self-esteem issues. All this does I think is make the world a more superficial place :[. Horrible, horrible idiot lawmakers in Australia. For once in a long time I'm glad I'm an American . Even though our nation is superficial as hell too... Well fuck, I wish girls didn't care about how others see them so much. It bothers me so much! Women are beautiful whether they have A-cups or C-cups. Lol i'm off topic now but yeah... Yeah, because a womans determined idea comes from semi-fetischy porn labeled "barely legal". No but when lots of guys prefer larger breasts and then a government DECIDES that a particular group of women's breasts are similar to that of lower grade children, would you not find that insulting if you were a woman with small boobs? I sure as hell would. No but when alot of guys prefer to rape women and then a goverment DECIDES that a particular way of getting laid are similar to torture, would you not find that insulting if rape was your favorite past-time? I sure as hell would.
I understand that this is the internet, and being that you are anonymous you may have had some sexual abuse somewhere in your past (not necessarily directed towards you). This sort of thing could potentially make you more prone to getting upset and emotional over this type of discussion, which is probably very normal. Regardless, think about your argument. Really think about it.
|
I think he tries to sneak in his own opinions on how he thinks rape is not a big deal, into his argument.
|
On January 28 2010 10:13 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:07 ~OpZ~ wrote:On January 28 2010 09:35 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 09:27 wesleyq wrote:Probably stated already but all this does is give women a 'determined' idea of what their body should look like. I think this is pretty shitty as a lot of the girls I know already have a hell of a lot of self-esteem issues. All this does I think is make the world a more superficial place :[. Horrible, horrible idiot lawmakers in Australia. For once in a long time I'm glad I'm an American . Even though our nation is superficial as hell too... Well fuck, I wish girls didn't care about how others see them so much. It bothers me so much! Women are beautiful whether they have A-cups or C-cups. Lol i'm off topic now but yeah... Yeah, because a womans determined idea comes from semi-fetischy porn labeled "barely legal". No but when lots of guys prefer larger breasts and then a government DECIDES that a particular group of women's breasts are similar to that of lower grade children, would you not find that insulting if you were a woman with small boobs? I sure as hell would. No but when alot of guys prefer to rape women and then a goverment DECIDES that a particular way of getting laid are similar to torture, would you not find that insulting if rape was your favorite past-time? I sure as hell would.
Your body developing small breasts =\= raping people
How can you even compare the two? The government is telling ADULT women who have A cups that they are the equivalent to CHILDREN. Are all men who date women with small breasts pedophiles? You have shitty argument skills, and that produced no lulz.
|
Guess I'm a pedophile according to the Australian government.
|
On January 28 2010 07:58 DreaM)XeRO wrote:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA. OH MAN KONA IS GOING TO FREAAAAAAAAAAAAAK Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
what is loli?
|
On January 28 2010 10:37 Jugan wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 07:58 DreaM)XeRO wrote:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA. OH MAN KONA IS GOING TO FREAAAAAAAAAAAAAK On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags. what is loli?
cute little girls
sometimes sexualized, sometimes not
|
On January 28 2010 10:37 koreasilver wrote:
Guess I'm a pedophile according to the Australian government.
I guess my gf is a child according to the Australian government...
|
On January 28 2010 10:38 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:37 Jugan wrote:On January 28 2010 07:58 DreaM)XeRO wrote:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA. OH MAN KONA IS GOING TO FREAAAAAAAAAAAAAK On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags. what is loli? cute little girls sometimes sexualized, sometimes not
Ah I see... thanks :O
|
On January 28 2010 10:37 Jugan wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 07:58 DreaM)XeRO wrote:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA. OH MAN KONA IS GOING TO FREAAAAAAAAAAAAAK On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags. what is loli?
It's sexual drawings in an anime style of children.
Edit: Way to totally change your tone Doc :p
|
if this keeps up im gona gg australia and move.
anyone need a roommate? preferrably with a fibre connection.
|
On January 28 2010 10:37 Jugan wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 07:58 DreaM)XeRO wrote:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA. OH MAN KONA IS GOING TO FREAAAAAAAAAAAAAK On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags. what is loli?
Sup.
I just typed four letters into the google machine of awesome. The letters were:
"l"
"o"
"l"
"i"
What do you know? To my surprise I got a hit right away.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon
|
I always loved australia, I thought some of the laws were stupid (regarding video game censorship) but damn, this is a new level of stupidity, this doesn't help anyone, it just insults women.
What kind of idiot..... I'm so raged right now
|
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11".
And OpZ, why take things so personal? Perhaps reading this page would make it more clearer that I'm not suggesting that people who have small breast are vile like people who rape: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analogy
|
On January 28 2010 10:39 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:37 koreasilver wrote:
Guess I'm a pedophile according to the Australian government. I guess my gf is a child according to the Australian government...
Relish the taboo.
|
HAha holy shit what.
Almost every girl I've ever done that wasn't fat was flat chested. Guess I'm a no good pervert. Jesus, this is dumb.
|
On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11".
lol
|
On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11".
You don't get it. It's not about age, it's about women who have small breasts.
|
On January 28 2010 10:40 Lexpar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:37 Jugan wrote:On January 28 2010 07:58 DreaM)XeRO wrote:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA. OH MAN KONA IS GOING TO FREAAAAAAAAAAAAAK On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags. what is loli? It's sexual drawings in an anime style of children. Edit: Way to totally change your tone Doc :p
:p
|
On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11".
My girlfriend is 19, but she isn't particularly well-endowed. Does that make my relationship with her "almost illegal"?
|
On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11".
The argument YOU created is indeed shitty. Comparing attraction to genetically small breasted women as a direct equivalent to rape is shitty.
|
On January 28 2010 10:35 Foucault wrote:
I think he tries to sneak in his own opinions on how he thinks rape is not a big deal, into his argument.
Touchè
|
On January 28 2010 08:03 Grobyc wrote:
omg... this is more so funny than serious
but who wants porn with small breasts anyway.
australia makes a good choice imo
No more Jenna Haze.
|
On January 28 2010 10:42 Foucault wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11". You don't get it. It's not about age, it's about women who have small breasts.
No, it most certainly is NOT. This law is in no way discriminating to small breasted women, only to men who cant get off to anyting but women who look like children, which honestly are down right pathetic.
|
On January 28 2010 10:43 koreasilver wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11". My girlfriend is 19, but she isn't particularly well-endowed. Does that make my relationship with her "almost illegal"?
You dont fuck your girlfriend because she has small breasts, people look at "barely-legal porn" because of the acting and dialogue. Either that or the fact that they managed to find women who look 16, but are really 18.
There's a huge difference in your intents.
|
On January 28 2010 10:41 koreasilver wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:39 ~OpZ~ wrote:On January 28 2010 10:37 koreasilver wrote:
Guess I'm a pedophile according to the Australian government. I guess my gf is a child according to the Australian government... Relish the taboo.
Oh, I will. I will.
|
If watching porn with A-cup women is bad, isn't having a relationship/marrying them even worse? They might as well say no sex or marriage with A-cup women.
Whatever this doesn't affect me; I only watch pornos with D-cups or bigger.
|
I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S
|
On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument. This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help. I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11". And OpZ, why take things so personal? Perhaps reading this page would make it more clearer that I'm not suggesting that people who have small breast are vile like people who rape: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analogy
Lol...Take a minute...and stop...think about it...Keep thinking....Are you still thinking?
Stop generalizing everyone that disagrees with a law that can cause millions of women to feel inadequate and feel as though they appear as children just because they're breasts aren't large.
|
On January 28 2010 10:45 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:42 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11". You don't get it. It's not about age, it's about women who have small breasts. No, it most certainly is NOT. This law is in no way discriminating to small breasted women, only to men who cant get off to anyting but women who look like children, which honestly are down right pathetic.
Look. What you just said was the ridiculous intention of the law, but what everyone else is arguing in this thread is that it in fact IS discriminating towards small breasted women, since they're not children and don't look like children. The only supposed similarity they have with children is their small breasts.
I have no idea how you can't see why small breasted women would feel discriminated by this?
|
We also just banned female ejaculation videos from recieving classification, because our fucktard ministers apparently consider it to be urination. Bitches should go take a biology or anatomy course before banning everything they dont understand.
|
On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote:
I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S
I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore.
|
|
|
Catch]22's posts are so lol.
|
On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote:
I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore.
Women, of adult age, should be allowed to participate in pornography if they wish, no matter their breast size, or whatever.
|
On January 28 2010 10:49 dethrawr wrote:
We also just banned female ejaculation videos from recieving classification, because our fucktard ministers apparently consider it to be urination. Bitches should go take a biology or anatomy course before banning everything they dont understand.
lol that's ridiculous
who's to say you can't urinate on someone during sex? It's not like the majority of the people thinks it's hot but who the hell is the government to decide this for people.
|
On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote:
I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore.
Personal attacks. They're usually a convenient route to take when your argument is a house built from tissues and cake.
|
On January 28 2010 10:52 Lexpar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote:
I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore. Personal attacks. They're usually a convenient route to take when your argument is a house built from tissues and cake.
I don't think anyone here is taking him seriously, hes being more crazy than the law its self.
|
On January 28 2010 10:45 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:42 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11". You don't get it. It's not about age, it's about women who have small breasts. No, it most certainly is NOT. This law is in no way discriminating to small breasted women, only to men who cant get off to anyting but women who look like children, which honestly are down right pathetic.
idiots like u are runing our country into the ground!!!
|
On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote:
I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore.
Hahahahaha.
What don't you understand man.
It doesn't MATTER if they look like they are 14 or 40. If they have A-cup breasts, they ARE BANNED FROM PORN.
It's literally not about how old they look but the SIZE OF THEIR BREASTS.
Jesus christ.
|
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn?
|
On January 28 2010 10:46 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:43 koreasilver wrote:On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11". My girlfriend is 19, but she isn't particularly well-endowed. Does that make my relationship with her "almost illegal"? You dont fuck your girlfriend because she has small breasts, people look at "barely-legal porn" because of the acting and dialogue. Either that or the fact that they managed to find women who look 16, but are really 18. There's a huge difference in your intents.
No I bet people will fuck their flat breasted girlfriend because, go fucking figure, women with small breasts can not only be attractive but downright sexy.
It's already illegal to do child pornography, and that's because of the exploitation of children. You can't fucking illegalize thought despite how sick it may be.
|
On January 28 2010 10:49 dethrawr wrote:
We also just banned female ejaculation videos from recieving classification, because our fucktard ministers apparently consider it to be urination. Bitches should go take a biology or anatomy course before banning everything they dont understand.
srsly? wtf.
On January 28 2010 09:26 Catch]22 wrote:
You guys are all idiots. Society needs to do whatever it can against pedos.
Lmao in what supposed way is this ban supposed to contribute to stopping pedos? Not all men drawn toward young women go out and rape kiddies you know.
|
On January 28 2010 10:53 Khul Sadukar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:45 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:42 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11". You don't get it. It's not about age, it's about women who have small breasts. No, it most certainly is NOT. This law is in no way discriminating to small breasted women, only to men who cant get off to anyting but women who look like children, which honestly are down right pathetic. idiots like u are runing our country into the ground!!!
if anything, he's running our country into the ground if given a chance.
|
On January 28 2010 10:52 Lexpar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote:
I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore. Personal attacks. They're usually a convenient route to take when your argument is a house built from tissues and cake.
Right, you were the other guy who didn't know the difference between a comparison and an analogy, and then copypasted the same scentence half the pedos in this thread typed out already.
Seems like it hit a nerve tho', I apologize and sincerely hope you find an alternative to almost-child-pornography.
|
|
|
On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn?
I think it would help immensely in curbing child pornography amirite.
|
Lol, catch thinks banning small breasted girls from porn will stop pedophiles.
Sorry, thats the dumbest thing I've heard this year, and I work with two guys who are ex-convicts and are obsessed with lil wayne (one of them has a lil wayne tattoo).
I'm laughing way to hard right now. thanks hifriend, I missed that bit, hahahahahahaa
|
Btw I think this law is a pretty serious trespassing on the integrity of women and their bodies.
No one would ever ban small dicks in porn.
|
On January 28 2010 10:56 koreasilver wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? I think it would help immensely in curbing child pornography amirite.
You are right.
|
On January 28 2010 10:57 Foucault wrote:
Btw I think this law is a pretty serious trespassing on the integrity of women and their bodies.
No one would ever ban small dicks in porn.
You fucking pedophile.
|
Look at the size of her breasts. Get out you sick pedo.
|
People are such fucking idiots, so instead of some pedo getting off on small breast porn in the privacy of his own basement you want them to take charge and give the old candy truck a go eh?
So instead of just being pointless it actually harmful as well.
By the way if you checked a list of all the possible things our species gets off on that wouldn't be the worse one, it wouldn't even be in the top 20.
|
On January 28 2010 10:58 koreasilver wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:57 Foucault wrote:
Btw I think this law is a pretty serious trespassing on the integrity of women and their bodies.
No one would ever ban small dicks in porn. You fucking pedophile.
Don't you call him a pedophile you fucking pedophile scum, you like adult women eh? Pedo.
|
On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote:
I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore.
Is he not banworthy yet?
-_-
Like seriously, how can you not understand this...Not all women who have A cups feature in barely legal movies...
God you are an idiot. It is banning by breast size, not age.
|
On January 28 2010 10:55 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:52 Lexpar wrote:On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote:
I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore. Personal attacks. They're usually a convenient route to take when your argument is a house built from tissues and cake. Right, you were the other guy who didn't know the difference between a comparison and an analogy, and then copypasted the same scentence half the pedos in this thread typed out already. Seems like it hit a nerve tho', I apologize and sincerely hope you find an alternative to almost-child-pornography.
Ouch. That one whizzed dangerously close to my self worth.
Honestly, everyone here disagrees with you, and you're starting to make a fool of yourself. This isn't a pedo forum; most of us share a common interest in a video game, and a lot of us are reasonable thinkers. If you don't like what people here think, you're perfectly welcome to leave.
|
On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn?
Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful.
The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore.
|
On January 28 2010 10:59 Conquest101 wrote:Look at the size of her breasts. Get out you sick pedo.
Sorry man I can't help myself. This is a sickness but I can't resist her hot young body.
|
On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore.
Ok, you didn't learn to read yet.
This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok?
THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST.
God damnit.
|
I like how catch is so set on this idea that all women with small breasts automatically look like prepubescent pedo candy.
|
On January 28 2010 11:00 PanN wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:58 koreasilver wrote:On January 28 2010 10:57 Foucault wrote:
Btw I think this law is a pretty serious trespassing on the integrity of women and their bodies.
No one would ever ban small dicks in porn. You fucking pedophile. Don't you call him a pedophile you fucking pedophile scum, you like adult women eh? Pedo.
He likes them grown up women with breasts B or better like a good Australian should!
|
On January 28 2010 11:02 koreasilver wrote:
I like how catch is so set on this idea that all women with small breasts automatically look like prepubescent pedo candy.
Yeah, its pretty sad when someone can't wrap their mind around such a simple concept.
This whole law is just bs, pure insulting to people who were born a different way.
|
On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit.
No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable.
|
If a woman is over 18 and she wants to be on porn, why should it matter at all?
|
On January 28 2010 11:02 koreasilver wrote:
I like how catch is so set on this idea that all women with small breasts automatically look like prepubescent pedo candy.
THEY DONT? What has this world come to...
|
Are you serious.
One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volunteer at some sort of clinic downtown for women suffering from eating disorders and self-image problems etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they thought they had to have >A cup breasts, it was painful.
The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what Catch]22 will feel when they know men can't fap to anything but large-breasted girls.
|
On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable.
Yes, and you still don't see how this is wrong.
Thanks for proving my point.
|
brb deleting all pictures of my girlfriend from my hard drive so I won't be mistaken for a pedophile.
|
On January 28 2010 10:52 PanN wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote:
I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore. Women, of adult age, should be allowed to participate in pornography if they wish, no matter their breast size, or whatever.
No women should be allowed to participate in such a immoral and debasing industry. Props to Australia for being morally conscious.
etc. etc.
|
On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore.
I stopped reading.
Actually, I continued reading. How do abused women have anything to do with this law? Young girls who were sexually abused by pedophiles, were abused because they were young, dumbass.
A pedophile doesn't like older girls/women, REGARDLESS of their breast size.
|
On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable.
Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law.
|
On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law, dumbass.
Lol, hes actually serious about all this too, thats why this is funny.
|
I'm just glad I don't live in Australia. I'd hate to miss it when Kiera Knightly comes out with her porno.
|
On January 28 2010 11:07 koreasilver wrote:
brb deleting all pictures of my girlfriend from my hard drive so I won't be mistaken for a pedophile.
Fuck...I better delete the family photos off the desk top too or they'll get me child porn/incest.
|
On January 28 2010 11:09 PanN wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law, dumbass. Lol, hes actually serious about all this too, thats why this is funny.
I know lol
At first I was sure he was trolling but lo and behold he is a real life moron
|
A pedophile's mind in Catch]22's universe.
"Look at that sweet little girl waiting at the bus stop. Oh wait, what the fuck? Those have got to be C- minimum. Fuck that, tits are too big."
|
On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law.
Read the article about the law, please.
|
On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please.
Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read.
|
I honestly like pretty girls (ie: face) more than their breast size. Maybe it's because most Asian girls have smaller breasts because of their smaller bodies. However, big breasts are definitely a bonus.
The rule is pretty stupid imo. I don't see how small breasts increases child pornography.
|
On January 28 2010 11:10 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:07 koreasilver wrote:
brb deleting all pictures of my girlfriend from my hard drive so I won't be mistaken for a pedophile. Fuck...I better delete the family photos off the desk top too or they'll get me child porn/incest.
The purest form of love.
|
On January 28 2010 11:10 Slow Motion wrote:
I'm just glad I don't live in Australia. I'd hate to miss it when Kiera Knightly comes out with her porno.
Preach it brother.
|
On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read.
Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they.
|
On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they.
Your tone changed rather quickly once someone mentioned the B word.
|
On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they.
Finally changed his tone huh?
|
On January 28 2010 10:55 Foucault wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:53 Khul Sadukar wrote:On January 28 2010 10:45 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:42 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11". You don't get it. It's not about age, it's about women who have small breasts. No, it most certainly is NOT. This law is in no way discriminating to small breasted women, only to men who cant get off to anyting but women who look like children, which honestly are down right pathetic. idiots like u are runing our country into the ground!!! if anything, he's running our country into the ground if given a chance.
our censorship board has the same mentality as this guy (even though hes probably just trolling) we have ppl in charge that actually think like this and its infuriating. this government is fing up telecommunications since they were elected (nbn tender anyone?) and now its getting way out of hand!
see you fellow aussies in march at the protest rallies!
|
On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they.
Except, none of the articles said anything like this. Now you're just being a retard.
|
On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they.
ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding.
“We are starting to see depictions of women in their late 20s being banned because they have an A cup size”
K
|
On January 28 2010 11:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they. Finally changed his tone huh?
Terrific timing there.
|
|
|
On January 28 2010 11:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they. Finally changed his tone huh?
Maybe it was foolish of me to assume you actually READ the law before discussing it.
|
On January 28 2010 11:19 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they. Finally changed his tone huh? Maybe it was foolish of me to assume you actually READ the law before discussing it.
This is funny becau-
|
On January 28 2010 07:49 tirentu wrote:
Essentially, some of the more zealous people in charge of ratings and censorship in Australia are refusing publication of mainstream pornography featuring women with A-cup breasts, on the grounds that it encourages child pornography. Legally, they have some basis for this (quoting a linked article):
The National Classification Code dictates that anything that describes or depicts a person who is, or appears to be, a child under 18 (whether the person is engaged in sexual activity or not) in a way that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult is Refused Classification.
They are basing a NEW REGULATION on an EXISTING clause in the National Classification Code. They will now ban porn based on BREAST SIZE.
A quote from one of the articles:
“We are starting to see depictions of women in their late 20s being banned because they have an A cup size”, Fiona said. “It may be an unintended consequence of the Senator’s actions but they are largely responsible for the sharp increase in breast size in Australian adult magazines of late”.
|
On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they.
Then this law is coming dangerously close to banning thoughts. When a pedo views a porno with a 15 year old, there is an actual child being harmed. When a pedo views a porno with an 18 year old depicting a 15 year old, there is no actual harm to a child. The pedo is using his imagination (imagining what would be a crime).
We don't punish people for what's in their minds, but for doing actual harm to others. You think a pedo, who realizes his or her problem, and never hurts a child should be punished? That's completely pointless and ridiculous.
|
On January 28 2010 11:19 Lexpar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they. Finally changed his tone huh? Terrific timing there.
I saw that too, but I didn't wanna double post...Forgot about editing though.
Lmao. The whole presentation of his argument changed. =\
|
Catch]22 trying to clean up his mess.
|
On January 28 2010 11:20 Slow Motion wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they. Then this law is coming dangerously close to banning thoughts. When a pedo views a porno with a 15 year old, there is an actual child being harmed. When a pedo views a porno with an 18 year old depicting a 15 year old, there is no actual harm to a child. The pedo is using his imagination (imagining what would be a crime). We don't punish people for what's in their minds, but for doing actual harm to others. You think a pedo, who realizes his or her problem, and never hurts a child should be punished? That's completely pointless and ridiculous.
Thats not true, we don't just punish people for actually performing crimes, in many cases it's also a criminal offense to be believed of planning such crime, however we can't punish thoughts, partly because we can't prove them to begin with, also it would be ridiculous.
|
On January 28 2010 11:23 koreasilver wrote:
Catch]22 trying to clean up his mess.
I forgive him.
His hatred for pedophilia has prevented him from thinking rationally.
|
On January 28 2010 11:20 Conquest101 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 07:49 tirentu wrote:
Essentially, some of the more zealous people in charge of ratings and censorship in Australia are refusing publication of mainstream pornography featuring women with A-cup breasts, on the grounds that it encourages child pornography. Legally, they have some basis for this (quoting a linked article):
The National Classification Code dictates that anything that describes or depicts a person who is, or appears to be, a child under 18 (whether the person is engaged in sexual activity or not) in a way that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult is Refused Classification. They are basing a NEW REGULATION on an EXISTING clause in the National Classification Code. They will now ban porn based on BREAST SIZE. A quote from one of the articles: “We are starting to see depictions of women in their late 20s being banned because they have an A cup size”, Fiona said. “It may be an unintended consequence of the Senator’s actions but they are largely responsible for the sharp increase in breast size in Australian adult magazines of late”.
Wait...they can ban the image of someone acting as a child in any movie if a reasonable adult finds it offensive? Oh god, don't let catch22 decide what's reasonable!
|
On January 28 2010 11:24 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:20 Slow Motion wrote:On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they. Then this law is coming dangerously close to banning thoughts. When a pedo views a porno with a 15 year old, there is an actual child being harmed. When a pedo views a porno with an 18 year old depicting a 15 year old, there is no actual harm to a child. The pedo is using his imagination (imagining what would be a crime). We don't punish people for what's in their minds, but for doing actual harm to others. You think a pedo, who realizes his or her problem, and never hurts a child should be punished? That's completely pointless and ridiculous. Thats not true, we don't just punish people for actually performing crimes, in many cases it's also a criminal offense to be believed of planning such crime, however we can't punish thoughts, partly because we can't prove them to begin with, also it would be ridiculous.
Wow. Way to reverse 180 there?
|
On January 28 2010 11:21 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:19 Lexpar wrote:On January 28 2010 11:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:
[quote]
Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful.
The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they. Finally changed his tone huh? Terrific timing there. I saw that too, but I didn't wanna double post...Forgot about editing though. Lmao. The whole presentation of his argument changed. =\
My tone changed when I realized I believed I was arguing with people, not trolls linking pictures of 90 year old women and claiming they might be near-child pornography too.
|
Then this law is coming dangerously close to banning thoughts. When a pedo views a porno with a 15 year old, there is an actual child being harmed. When a pedo views a porno with an 18 year old depicting a 15 year old, there is no actual harm to a child. The pedo is using his imagination (imagining what would be a crime).
We don't punish people for what's in their minds, but for doing actual harm to others. You think a pedo, who realizes his or her problem, and never hurts a child should be punished? That's completely pointless and ridiculous.
You summed it up pretty well there.
It's ridiculous to try to control people's fantasies or sexual preferences. If there are people out there who wants to watch porn with an 18 year old in diapers pretending to be an infant I say go for it.
|
How are your flip flops coming along?
Good? That's good.
|
On January 28 2010 11:24 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:20 Slow Motion wrote:On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they. Then this law is coming dangerously close to banning thoughts. When a pedo views a porno with a 15 year old, there is an actual child being harmed. When a pedo views a porno with an 18 year old depicting a 15 year old, there is no actual harm to a child. The pedo is using his imagination (imagining what would be a crime). We don't punish people for what's in their minds, but for doing actual harm to others. You think a pedo, who realizes his or her problem, and never hurts a child should be punished? That's completely pointless and ridiculous. Thats not true, we don't just punish people for actually performing crimes, in many cases it's also a criminal offense to be believed of planning such crime, however we can't punish thoughts, partly because we can't prove them to begin with, also it would be ridiculous.
No, the planning of a crime is called attempt. There is a whole set of criminal law doctrines set around the subject of attempt. A major issue in attempt is where to draw the line between action and thought. If a planned illegal action is too close to mere thought, then the law tries to avoid punishing.
The whole point of attempt is to not allow people who are close to actually robbing a bank get away merely because the authorities caught them in time. Again, legal doctrines around attempt try very hard to draw lines that distinguish between action and thought.
|
On January 28 2010 11:26 nevz wrote:Show nested quote +
Then this law is coming dangerously close to banning thoughts. When a pedo views a porno with a 15 year old, there is an actual child being harmed. When a pedo views a porno with an 18 year old depicting a 15 year old, there is no actual harm to a child. The pedo is using his imagination (imagining what would be a crime).
We don't punish people for what's in their minds, but for doing actual harm to others. You think a pedo, who realizes his or her problem, and never hurts a child should be punished? That's completely pointless and ridiculous.
You summed it up pretty well there. It's ridiculous to try to control people's fantasies or sexual preferences. If there are people out there who wants to watch porn with an 18 year old in diapers pretending to be an infant I say go for it.
Untrue, I could imagine there would be far less interested in abusing children if there weren't actually any child pornography to get their imagination started.
|
On January 28 2010 11:28 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:26 nevz wrote:
Then this law is coming dangerously close to banning thoughts. When a pedo views a porno with a 15 year old, there is an actual child being harmed. When a pedo views a porno with an 18 year old depicting a 15 year old, there is no actual harm to a child. The pedo is using his imagination (imagining what would be a crime).
We don't punish people for what's in their minds, but for doing actual harm to others. You think a pedo, who realizes his or her problem, and never hurts a child should be punished? That's completely pointless and ridiculous.
You summed it up pretty well there. It's ridiculous to try to control people's fantasies or sexual preferences. If there are people out there who wants to watch porn with an 18 year old in diapers pretending to be an infant I say go for it. Untrue, I could imagine there would be far less interested in abusing children if there weren't actually any child pornography to get their imagination started.
"could imagine"
I could imagine you not posting and all pedophiles would spontaneously combust at once.
|
And another note on attempt, the law deals with attempts to commit an actual crime. What you are concerned with here is porn with underage women or a pedo who will actually hurt children.
Watching pornos with adult women who portray children is not an attempt to watch porn with actual children, or an attempt to hurt children. In fact, you could argue that watching these pornos are a way for pedos to manage their problems, and keep their perversion in the realm of imagination.
And if you really are concerned about these pornos inciting pedos to hurt children, you must also be in favor of banning films and movies that portray violence, which desensitizes people.
|
On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they.
and u misunderstand how these kind of laws are interpreted and enforced in australia. seriously quit the bs! this is more about a government censoring whatever they like with no oversight or accountability. hell they dont even have to tell us what they will be filtering its a secret.
i"d make better posts but on the mobile atm. u get the idea, prob not.
|
|
|
I like how catch started to understand the problem here, and then he went back to not understanding it, like a car almost making it up a hill.
|
On January 28 2010 11:07 Saracen wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:52 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote:
I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore. Women, of adult age, should be allowed to participate in pornography if they wish, no matter their breast size, or whatever. No women should be allowed to participate in such a immoral and debasing industry. Props to Australia for being morally conscious. etc. etc.
ppl with this viewpoint are the reason why we are getting a filter with a very possible negative impact on internet speed on our already slow connections. go be moral elsewhere without punishing the rest of us!
|
On January 28 2010 11:41 Khul Sadukar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:07 Saracen wrote:On January 28 2010 10:52 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote:
I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore. Women, of adult age, should be allowed to participate in pornography if they wish, no matter their breast size, or whatever. No women should be allowed to participate in such a immoral and debasing industry. Props to Australia for being morally conscious. etc. etc. ppl with this viewpoint are the reason why we are getting a filter with a very possible negative impact on internet speed on our already slow connections. go be moral elsewhere without punishing the rest of us!
I don't know if you are serious or not, but he certainly wasn't.
|
On January 28 2010 11:39 PanN wrote:
I like how catch started to understand the problem here, and then he went back to not understanding it, like a car almost making it up a hill.
You can tell how messed up this guy is. He actually thinks that the only reason we don't punish people for having thoughts about taking illegal actions is because you can't prove they had those thoughts, when the real reason is that non-oppressive governments specifically try hard not to punish mere thoughts.
|
On January 28 2010 11:34 Slow Motion wrote:
And another note on attempt, the law deals with attempts to commit an actual crime. What you are concerned with here is porn with underage women or a pedo who will actually hurt children.
Watching pornos with adult women who portray is not an attempt to watch porn with actual children, or an attempt to hurt children. In fact, you could argue that watching these pornos are a way for pedos to manage their problems, and keep their perversion in the realm of imagination.
And if you really are concerned about these pornos inciting pedos to hurt children, you must also be in favor of banning films and movies that portray violence, which desensitizes people.
Yeah, It might be a way for them to handle their problems, and it might be a gateway, we don't know.
As for movies, the general idea in the scientific community is that sex and violence, while linked often, are processed in different ways by the brain, there for those two don't nessecarily correlate.
|
On January 28 2010 11:10 Slow Motion wrote:
I'm just glad I don't live in Australia. I'd hate to miss it when Kiera Knightly comes out with her porno.
oh shit our hottest export miranda kerr has small tits! lucky i saved these photos when i did!
|
On January 28 2010 11:42 Slow Motion wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:39 PanN wrote:
I like how catch started to understand the problem here, and then he went back to not understanding it, like a car almost making it up a hill. You can tell how messed up this guy is. He actually thinks that the only reason we don't punish people for having thoughts about taking illegal actions is because you can't prove they had those thoughts, when the real reason is that non-oppressive governments specifically try hard not to punish mere thoughts.
LOL you are completely right, I didn't think about it that way, thanks slow motion for proving catch is crazier than I thought he was.
|
I bet he loved Minority Report
|
On January 28 2010 11:42 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:34 Slow Motion wrote:
And another note on attempt, the law deals with attempts to commit an actual crime. What you are concerned with here is porn with underage women or a pedo who will actually hurt children.
Watching pornos with adult women who portray is not an attempt to watch porn with actual children, or an attempt to hurt children. In fact, you could argue that watching these pornos are a way for pedos to manage their problems, and keep their perversion in the realm of imagination.
And if you really are concerned about these pornos inciting pedos to hurt children, you must also be in favor of banning films and movies that portray violence, which desensitizes people. Yeah, It might be a way for them to handle their problems, and it might be a gateway, we don't know. As for movies, the general idea in the scientific community is that sex and violence, while linked often, are processed in different ways by the brain, there for those two don't nessecarily correlate.
It might be a way for them to rape innocent victims, or a way for them to rape innocent victims. We don't know. We don't have the technology.
As for movies, the general idea in the scientific community is that sex and violence, while exactly the same thing, are processed at the same time, in the same area of the brain, leading to increased rape.
This is fun. I can see why you do it now.
|
User was warned for this post.
|
On January 28 2010 11:52 Lexpar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:42 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:34 Slow Motion wrote:
And another note on attempt, the law deals with attempts to commit an actual crime. What you are concerned with here is porn with underage women or a pedo who will actually hurt children.
Watching pornos with adult women who portray is not an attempt to watch porn with actual children, or an attempt to hurt children. In fact, you could argue that watching these pornos are a way for pedos to manage their problems, and keep their perversion in the realm of imagination.
And if you really are concerned about these pornos inciting pedos to hurt children, you must also be in favor of banning films and movies that portray violence, which desensitizes people. Yeah, It might be a way for them to handle their problems, and it might be a gateway, we don't know. As for movies, the general idea in the scientific community is that sex and violence, while linked often, are processed in different ways by the brain, there for those two don't nessecarily correlate. It might be a way for them to rape innocent victims, or a way for them to rape innocent victims. We don't know. We don't have the technology. As for movies, the general idea in the scientific community is that sex and violence, while exactly the same thing, are processed at the same time, in the same area of the brain, leading to increased rape. This is fun. I can see why you do it now.
I love you.
Lol.
|
Sweden33719 Posts
Folks, as fun as this topic is, I feel it has strayed a bit far into a personal merry-go-round of insults.
Feel free to re-create the thread, minus the aforementioned merry-go-round, or wait until some other admin can clean it up and unlock it.
Eitherway, closed for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://www.101lifestyle.com/images/celebs/dichen_lachman/DCELEB-dichen%20lachman%20pics%20002.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://image.wetpaint.com/image/1/SSC0FxfHHDKC75TjsVrr0Q18306/GW297H222)
![[image loading]](http://blogs.coventrytelegraph.net/passtheremote/torv.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.contactmusic.com/pics/la/katsu_ya_celebs_240908/rose_byrne_2091616.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/34/95_year_old_woman.JPG)
![[image loading]](http://www.blavish.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/Flip%20Flop%20Mop.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/5152/0002cn.png)
