|
Canada1257 Posts
Frankly, I'm not sure whether this counts as NSFW or not, and if it's even really appropriate to post. That said, in my opinion, from what I know, this is a ridiculous violation of personal expression, as well as basic human rights. And that means it deserves discussion!
Essentially, some of the more zealous people in charge of ratings and censorship in Australia are refusing publication of mainstream pornography featuring women with A-cup breasts, on the grounds that it encourages child pornography. Legally, they have some basis for this (quoting a linked article):
The National Classification Code dictates that anything that describes or depicts a person who is, or appears to be, a child under 18 (whether the person is engaged in sexual activity or not) in a way that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult is Refused Classification.
This still feels completely wrong to me, and a vile application of a poorly worded law.
Links to articles (I can add better ones if anyone finds any, these are just where I heard about this):
http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/australia-bans-small-breasts/
[NSFW but a good blog on the topic] http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/27/now-australia-is-banning-small-boobs/
[NSFW] http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2010/01/28/australia-bans-small-breasts-as-child-pornography/
|
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
Anyways, people can just go anywhere on the internet and find this stuff, its not that hard, if you are watching porn online, this is no obstacle. As for those who get their porn from mags....why would you get porn from mags??
|
I didn't get past "Australian Sex Party" due to laughter.
|
Canada1257 Posts
On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
Thank you for your helpful contribution to the discussion!
|
rofl the policy is well-intentioned. I think this is just one of 'human's natural right to express their own free-will' thing that seems to occur every time government passes some kind of policy.
|
I can see the reasoning as to why they would do it but wouldn't banning it just cause everyone to go look at it more? I mean once it's banned theres more demand for it so aren't they under their own reasoning supporting child pornography?
|
Canada1257 Posts
On January 28 2010 07:51 haster27 wrote:
rofl the policy is well-intentioned. I think this is just one of 'human's natural right to express their own free-will' thing that seems to occur every time government passes some kind of policy.
Frankly, I think that while they might think they're doing good, they're too clouded by their own sense of justice to realize that what they're doing is massively detrimental to women's rights, and perception of them as a whole, which is rather ironic, frankly. Defend the children and make small boobs seem unnatural and obscene? What? That's hugely damaging to women who DO have small breasts and already might have self-confidence issues stemming from society's view that large breasts are better.
|
Aw shit now those bitches will have to work at mcdonalds
|
GOD I hate this country sometimes.
Now when a non-Aussie asks what to bring here when they come on a trip we have to say:
"Bring some internet, because ours is shit and costs a fuckload"
"Bring water if you're going to Adelaide because theirs is bad LOLZ"
And now: "Bring some porn if you aren't a fan of xbox huge tits"
Seriously, the left-wing morons in this country deserve to be drawn and quartered.
|
LOL AUSTRALIA
On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
no way!
|
United States4796 Posts
On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
Hey kona.
|
Australia has some problems with censorship, from everything I see. I guess I can see the point they have, to an extent, but if you're going to go that far, they need to ban pigtails and school girl uniforms in porn, because clearly that could possibly imply the girl is underage.
If this passes (or has it already), would that make it illegal for a small breasted, but 18+, woman to show herself in public (might be illegal in some cases anyway) or take a picture of herself nude?
The law is pretty damn retarded, tbh.
|
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA. OH MAN KONA IS GOING TO FREAAAAAAAAAAAAAK
On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
|
I thought there was something like this in the States before.. because one of the porn stars that was working with Max Hardcore claimed to be like 12 in the videos, even though they were legal aged. If I recall, the charges were dropped though.
|
On January 28 2010 07:57 So no fek wrote:
Australia has some problems with censorship, from everything I see. I guess I can see the point they have, to an extent, but if you're going to go that far, they need to ban pigtails and school girl uniforms in porn, because clearly that could possibly imply the girl is underage.
If this passes (or has it already), would that make it illegal for a small breasted, but 18+, woman to show herself in public (might be illegal in some cases anyway) or take a picture of herself nude?
The law is pretty damn retarded, tbh.
yeah its discrimination
|
On January 28 2010 07:56 DivinO wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags. Hey kona.
I doubt kona considers himself a fag. ;p
|
omg... this is more so funny than serious
but who wants porn with small breasts anyway.
australia makes a good choice imo
|
Canada1257 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:03 Grobyc wrote:
omg... this is more so funny than serious
but who wants porn with small breasts anyway.
australia makes a good choice imo
I thought we liked Asian girls here? :/
Soooo many Asian girls have rather small breasts.
I could even argue that they're being discriminated against.
|
On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
Anyways, people can just go anywhere on the internet and find this stuff, its not that hard, if you are watching porn online, this is no obstacle. As for those who get their porn from mags....why would you get porn from mags??
You may not be aware, the leftwing losers who put this in place are ALSO trying to make an internet filter so we can be as cool as China!
|
On January 28 2010 07:58 DreaM)XeRO wrote:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA. OH MAN KONA IS GOING TO FREAAAAAAAAAAAAAK Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote:
Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags.
preemptively siding with kona here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
