EPTAustralia bans small-breasted pornography? - Page 3
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
BalliSLife
1339 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:52 BalliSLife wrote: And this is a bad thing how?.....?? think about all the chicks with A cups trying to make a living man? how can you be so cruel | ||
|
seRapH
United States9805 Posts
teeny boobs do not deserve this kind of attention. just let it go, aussies, else kona will be sad | ||
|
Mori600
Japan311 Posts
| ||
|
Khul Sadukar
Australia1735 Posts
| ||
|
Khul Sadukar
Australia1735 Posts
On January 28 2010 07:50 Megalisk wrote: Porn with small boobs are lame, and loli is for fags. Anyways, people can just go anywhere on the internet and find this stuff, its not that hard, if you are watching porn online, this is no obstacle. As for those who get their porn from mags....why would you get porn from mags?? not for long if the government gets their way. this country is going backwards approaching warpspeed.. | ||
|
TheSituation
United States32 Posts
| ||
|
betaben
681 Posts
| ||
|
..Slick...
United States202 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:40 new_construct wrote: lol banning A cup girls, most girls who hit puberty has at least b cup size. Those ppl who imposed the rules must have watched too much loli to think all underage girls have a cup breast. haha You realize true pedo's like toddlers right? | ||
|
Chrispy
Canada5878 Posts
| ||
|
Catch]22
Sweden2683 Posts
| ||
|
Lexpar
1813 Posts
On January 28 2010 07:54 tirentu wrote: Frankly, I think that while they might think they're doing good, they're too clouded by their own sense of justice to realize that what they're doing is massively detrimental to women's rights, and perception of them as a whole, which is rather ironic, frankly. Defend the children and make small boobs seem unnatural and obscene? What? That's hugely damaging to women who DO have small breasts and already might have self-confidence issues stemming from society's view that large breasts are better. A+++ post. I hadn't even though of this. I came into this thread with the idea that it was totally absurd, but you granted a view point I hadn't even considered. I commend you. Also, if you can't tell, I agree with you very much. Edit: On January 28 2010 09:26 Catch]22 wrote: You guys are all idiots. Society needs to do whatever it can against pedos. Have you considered pedophilia probably isn't a choice? Much like being heterosexuel or homosexuel, no one can decide what turns them on. Personally, I find pedophiles very tragic, since I'd tend to believe that it's only the bottom % that would harm a child, and they're all cursed with a disease society hates them for. Also, consider that our definition of pedophilia is entirely based on our society's current culture and supposed "moral standards". Marriages between 12 year old's, and pregnancies in very young teens are the rule in most cultures history, and in the few indigenous populations that still remain independent. I'm not saying you're wrong. Obviously anyone that harms a child sexually or profits off of their abuse deserves the full extent of their countries legal system thrust upon them. I just wanna present different ways to think about it. | ||
|
Ecrilon
501 Posts
On January 28 2010 09:26 Catch]22 wrote: You guys are all idiots. Society needs to do whatever it can against pedos. And also small breasted women. | ||
|
wussleeQ
United States3130 Posts
 . Even though our nation is superficial as hell too... Well fuck, I wish girls didn't care about how others see them so much. It bothers me so much! Women are beautiful whether they have A-cups or C-cups. Lol i'm off topic now but yeah... | ||
|
tirentu
Canada1257 Posts
| ||
|
Catch]22
Sweden2683 Posts
On January 28 2010 09:27 wesleyq wrote: Probably stated already but all this does is give women a 'determined' idea of what their body should look like. I think this is pretty shitty as a lot of the girls I know already have a hell of a lot of self-esteem issues. All this does I think is make the world a more superficial place :[. Horrible, horrible idiot lawmakers in Australia. For once in a long time I'm glad I'm an American . Even though our nation is superficial as hell too... Well fuck, I wish girls didn't care about how others see them so much. It bothers me so much! Women are beautiful whether they have A-cups or C-cups. Lol i'm off topic now but yeah...Yeah, because a womans determined idea comes from semi-fetischy porn labeled "barely legal". | ||
|
igotmyown
United States4291 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:51 nebffa wrote: i think you guys dont have the context on this. the australian government is introducing an internet filter to block out what they deem to be harmful material to the kids of today. its not something that many australians support, in fact a lot of people are opposed to it. however, the australian senate, right now, is such that neither of the major two parties have control. the two major parties are the coalition, and labor. to have a majority, labor needs all of its party votes, plus every non-coalition senator. this means that the independent (i.e. not in a major party) senators have a lot of sway over the labor party. so obviously theyre going to use that sway. steve fielding is the only member of the (small) family first party in the entire house of representatives/senate, and a lot of people dont like family first because they have relatively extreme views (i think with their name you can kind of guess what policies they support). the internet filter was his idea and he used his influence to push it when most people dont really care a whole lot. so... i hope that explains to you guys why this filter is there I guess that makes more sense. It brings up the question, what is a pedophile? We're so used to the legal definition, that we don't think about true pedophiles who are psychologically different and are attracted to children (not high school cheerleaders, but children). It's a bad approach, but it's interesting to think about it developmentally as opposed to age. Edit: ironically, most of the aussie actresses i've seen on tv (I googled australian actresses) are probably A cups Dichen Lachman (dollhouse)+ Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://www.101lifestyle.com/images/celebs/dichen_lachman/DCELEB-dichen%20lachman%20pics%20002.jpg) Stephanie Jacobsen (terminator series)+ Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://image.wetpaint.com/image/1/SSC0FxfHHDKC75TjsVrr0Q18306/GW297H222) Anna Torv (fringe)+ Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://blogs.coventrytelegraph.net/passtheremote/torv.jpg) Rose Byrne (damages)+ Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://www.contactmusic.com/pics/la/katsu_ya_celebs_240908/rose_byrne_2091616.jpg) | ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:51 nebffa wrote: i think you guys dont have the context on this. the australian government is introducing an internet filter to block out what they deem to be harmful material to the kids of today. its not something that many australians support, in fact a lot of people are opposed to it. however, the australian senate, right now, is such that neither of the major two parties have control. the two major parties are the coalition, and labor. to have a majority, labor needs all of its party votes, plus every non-coalition senator. this means that the independent (i.e. not in a major party) senators have a lot of sway over the labor party. so obviously theyre going to use that sway. steve fielding is the only member of the (small) family first party in the entire house of representatives/senate, and a lot of people dont like family first because they have relatively extreme views (i think with their name you can kind of guess what policies they support). the internet filter was his idea and he used his influence to push it when most people dont really care a whole lot. so... i hope that explains to you guys why this filter is there .... Maybe take a cue from China and have the guy stabbed. Okay maybe not, but wtf, politics makes me so sad =[ | ||
|
synapse
China13814 Posts
| ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On January 28 2010 09:35 Catch]22 wrote: Yeah, because a womans determined idea comes from semi-fetischy porn labeled "barely legal". No but when lots of guys prefer larger breasts and then a government DECIDES that a particular group of women's breasts are similar to that of lower grade children, would you not find that insulting if you were a woman with small boobs? I sure as hell would. | ||
| ||
