|
I'm just glad I don't live in Australia. I'd hate to miss it when Kiera Knightly comes out with her porno.
|
On January 28 2010 11:07 koreasilver wrote:
brb deleting all pictures of my girlfriend from my hard drive so I won't be mistaken for a pedophile.
Fuck...I better delete the family photos off the desk top too or they'll get me child porn/incest.
|
On January 28 2010 11:09 PanN wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law, dumbass. Lol, hes actually serious about all this too, thats why this is funny.
I know lol
At first I was sure he was trolling but lo and behold he is a real life moron
|
A pedophile's mind in Catch]22's universe.
"Look at that sweet little girl waiting at the bus stop. Oh wait, what the fuck? Those have got to be C- minimum. Fuck that, tits are too big."
|
On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law.
Read the article about the law, please.
|
On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please.
Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read.
|
I honestly like pretty girls (ie: face) more than their breast size. Maybe it's because most Asian girls have smaller breasts because of their smaller bodies. However, big breasts are definitely a bonus.
The rule is pretty stupid imo. I don't see how small breasts increases child pornography.
|
On January 28 2010 11:10 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:07 koreasilver wrote:
brb deleting all pictures of my girlfriend from my hard drive so I won't be mistaken for a pedophile. Fuck...I better delete the family photos off the desk top too or they'll get me child porn/incest.
The purest form of love.
|
On January 28 2010 11:10 Slow Motion wrote:
I'm just glad I don't live in Australia. I'd hate to miss it when Kiera Knightly comes out with her porno.
Preach it brother.
|
On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read.
Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they.
|
On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they.
Your tone changed rather quickly once someone mentioned the B word.
|
On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they.
Finally changed his tone huh?
|
On January 28 2010 10:55 Foucault wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 10:53 Khul Sadukar wrote:On January 28 2010 10:45 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:42 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 10:40 Catch]22 wrote:
Well Helvetica, it takes a shitty analogy to respond to a shitty argument.
This entire thread is nothing but people who will always see what "The Man" does as wrong. If you think your life is ruined because you have to stop looking at porn that is ALMOST illegal, then maybe you might just need some help.
I'm sure all you loli-lovers disagree: "No, she only looks 12 years old, but in reality she is 18, I swearz. Its just this particular artists representation!!11". You don't get it. It's not about age, it's about women who have small breasts. No, it most certainly is NOT. This law is in no way discriminating to small breasted women, only to men who cant get off to anyting but women who look like children, which honestly are down right pathetic. idiots like u are runing our country into the ground!!! if anything, he's running our country into the ground if given a chance.
our censorship board has the same mentality as this guy (even though hes probably just trolling) we have ppl in charge that actually think like this and its infuriating. this government is fing up telecommunications since they were elected (nbn tender anyone?) and now its getting way out of hand!
see you fellow aussies in march at the protest rallies!
|
On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they.
Except, none of the articles said anything like this. Now you're just being a retard.
|
On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they.
ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding.
“We are starting to see depictions of women in their late 20s being banned because they have an A cup size”
K
|
On January 28 2010 11:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they. Finally changed his tone huh?
Terrific timing there.
|
|
|
On January 28 2010 11:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they. Finally changed his tone huh?
Maybe it was foolish of me to assume you actually READ the law before discussing it.
|
On January 28 2010 11:19 Catch]22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2010 11:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:On January 28 2010 11:15 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:11 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote:On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote:On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote:On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote:
I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this.
How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. Read the article about the law, please. Read what everyone is saying about you please, maybe you can understand if you actually read. Well, people have been arguing this whole time about something entirely different than what the law does. The law prevents the type of movie that is specifically designed to emulate sex with underage girls. If the point of the video is not this, its not touched. 24 year old girls with small breasts who just want to do regular porn are not at all affected, and neither should they. Finally changed his tone huh? Maybe it was foolish of me to assume you actually READ the law before discussing it.
This is funny becau-
|
On January 28 2010 07:49 tirentu wrote:
Essentially, some of the more zealous people in charge of ratings and censorship in Australia are refusing publication of mainstream pornography featuring women with A-cup breasts, on the grounds that it encourages child pornography. Legally, they have some basis for this (quoting a linked article):
The National Classification Code dictates that anything that describes or depicts a person who is, or appears to be, a child under 18 (whether the person is engaged in sexual activity or not) in a way that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult is Refused Classification.
They are basing a NEW REGULATION on an EXISTING clause in the National Classification Code. They will now ban porn based on BREAST SIZE.
A quote from one of the articles:
“We are starting to see depictions of women in their late 20s being banned because they have an A cup size”, Fiona said. “It may be an unintended consequence of the Senator’s actions but they are largely responsible for the sharp increase in breast size in Australian adult magazines of late”.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
