So instead of just being pointless it actually harmful as well.
By the way if you checked a list of all the possible things our species gets off on that wouldn't be the worse one, it wouldn't even be in the top 20.
Forum Index > Closed |
EvilSky
Czech Republic548 Posts
So instead of just being pointless it actually harmful as well. By the way if you checked a list of all the possible things our species gets off on that wouldn't be the worse one, it wouldn't even be in the top 20. | ||
PanN
United States2828 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:58 koreasilver wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2010 10:57 Foucault wrote: Btw I think this law is a pretty serious trespassing on the integrity of women and their bodies. No one would ever ban small dicks in porn. You fucking pedophile. Don't you call him a pedophile you fucking pedophile scum, you like adult women eh? Pedo. | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote: I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore. Is he not banworthy yet? -_- Like seriously, how can you not understand this...Not all women who have A cups feature in barely legal movies... God you are an idiot. It is banning by breast size, not age. | ||
Lexpar
1813 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:55 Catch]22 wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2010 10:52 Lexpar wrote: On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote: On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote: I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore. Personal attacks. They're usually a convenient route to take when your argument is a house built from tissues and cake. Right, you were the other guy who didn't know the difference between a comparison and an analogy, and then copypasted the same scentence half the pedos in this thread typed out already. Seems like it hit a nerve tho', I apologize and sincerely hope you find an alternative to almost-child-pornography. Ouch. That one whizzed dangerously close to my self worth. Honestly, everyone here disagrees with you, and you're starting to make a fool of yourself. This isn't a pedo forum; most of us share a common interest in a video game, and a lot of us are reasonable thinkers. If you don't like what people here think, you're perfectly welcome to leave. | ||
Catch]22
Sweden2683 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote: I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this. How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. | ||
Slow Motion
United States6960 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:59 Conquest101 wrote: ![]() Look at the size of her breasts. Get out you sick pedo. Sorry man I can't help myself. This is a sickness but I can't resist her hot young body. | ||
PanN
United States2828 Posts
On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote: I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this. How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. | ||
koreasilver
9109 Posts
| ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On January 28 2010 11:00 PanN wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2010 10:58 koreasilver wrote: On January 28 2010 10:57 Foucault wrote: Btw I think this law is a pretty serious trespassing on the integrity of women and their bodies. No one would ever ban small dicks in porn. You fucking pedophile. Don't you call him a pedophile you fucking pedophile scum, you like adult women eh? Pedo. He likes them grown up women with breasts B or better like a good Australian should! | ||
PanN
United States2828 Posts
On January 28 2010 11:02 koreasilver wrote: I like how catch is so set on this idea that all women with small breasts automatically look like prepubescent pedo candy. Yeah, its pretty sad when someone can't wrap their mind around such a simple concept. This whole law is just bs, pure insulting to people who were born a different way. | ||
Catch]22
Sweden2683 Posts
On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote: On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote: I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this. How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. | ||
koreasilver
9109 Posts
| ||
synapse
China13814 Posts
On January 28 2010 11:02 koreasilver wrote: I like how catch is so set on this idea that all women with small breasts automatically look like prepubescent pedo candy. THEY DONT? What has this world come to... | ||
Conquest101
United States1395 Posts
One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volunteer at some sort of clinic downtown for women suffering from eating disorders and self-image problems etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they thought they had to have >A cup breasts, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what Catch]22 will feel when they know men can't fap to anything but large-breasted girls. | ||
PanN
United States2828 Posts
On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote: On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote: On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote: I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this. How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, and you still don't see how this is wrong. Thanks for proving my point. | ||
koreasilver
9109 Posts
| ||
Saracen
United States5139 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:52 PanN wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote: On January 28 2010 10:48 Lexpar wrote: I believe the law prevents women with a breast size of A- from performing in pornography. That sounds like it discriminates against women to me. :S I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore. Women, of adult age, should be allowed to participate in pornography if they wish, no matter their breast size, or whatever. No women should be allowed to participate in such a immoral and debasing industry. Props to Australia for being morally conscious. etc. etc. | ||
Foucault
Sweden2826 Posts
On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote: I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this. How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. I stopped reading. Actually, I continued reading. How do abused women have anything to do with this law? Young girls who were sexually abused by pedophiles, were abused because they were young, dumbass. A pedophile doesn't like older girls/women, REGARDLESS of their breast size. | ||
Foucault
Sweden2826 Posts
On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote: On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote: On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote: I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this. How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law. | ||
PanN
United States2828 Posts
On January 28 2010 11:08 Foucault wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2010 11:04 Catch]22 wrote: On January 28 2010 11:02 PanN wrote: On January 28 2010 11:00 Catch]22 wrote: On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote: I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this. How about banning small dicks from porn? Its not that I'm uninterested in it, Its that its insignificant. One of my ex-girlfriends was a saint, she used to volounteer at some sort of shelter downtown for women who had been abused etc. And looking into the eyes of these girls, knowing the fact that their life might be ruined forever because they were the object of child pornography or abused for similar reasons, it was painful. The pain these girls feel, many of them are essentially dead already, they will never love, trust or be happy together with a man again because of this. This pain goes faaar beyond what a few small-breasted women will feel when they know men cant fap to girls-who-look-16-but-aint anymore. Ok, you didn't learn to read yet. This discriminates against women who are performing in adult cinematography, with themes that aren't designed to be "under aged". Ok? THIS DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WOMEN FOR HAVING SMALL BREAST. God damnit. No, women who look incredibly young, if you read the article about the law, you would know that it wouldnt stop women who look old but have small breast, only the ones whos age is questionable. Yes, but ALL women, regardless of age who have small breasts are obviously affected by this law, dumbass. Lol, hes actually serious about all this too, thats why this is funny. | ||
| ||
WardiTV Invitational
February Group A
SHIN vs CreatorLIVE!
SHIN vs Clem
SHIN vs ByuN
SHIN vs Gerald
[ Submit Event ] |
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Sea Dota 2![]() Hyuk ![]() TY ![]() Shuttle ![]() actioN ![]() Zeus ![]() Nal_rA ![]() Pusan ![]() Killer ![]() Dewaltoss ![]() [ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games Organizations Counter-Strike Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH173 StarCraft: Brood War• LUISG ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s Dota 2 League of Legends |
OSC
Big Brain Bouts
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Invitational
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
Clem vs Zoun
[ Show More ] Replay Cast
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
|
|